Will We Get Action From the Back Section?
For my first real "Numbers Nerd" post, I thought I'd take a look at the Avs blueliners and their performance on the powerplay. Because someone still has to fire those pucks for Ryan Smyth to deflect into the net.
In 2006-2007, the Avalanche powerplay from a defenseman standpoint pretty much started and stopped with John-Michael Liles and Brett Clark. Jordan Leopold was injured (just 15 GP). Ken Klee was ineffective (0, yes zero, PP points). And Patrice Brisebois was both (5 PP points in 33 games). None of the other defensemen played enough to score even a single point. And now you know why Joe Sakic pulled so many double shifts on the powerplay.
Clark and Liles accounted for 632 of the 908 powerplay minutes logged by Avalanche defensemen. That's a whopping 70% of the workload. Not surprisingly, the pair scored 42 of the 48 PP points scored by our D.
Liles led the way with 28 points - 8 goals, 20 assists. While it still seems like he could/should be contributing more, that number is nothing to sneeze at. It matches his PP point total of 05-06 (in 11 fewer games). Even more impressive: the last Colorado defenseman to top 28 points? Ray Bourque in 2001. At 5:02 of PP ice time per game, Liles was our clear #1 QB - a role he'll likely resume this fall.
Clark started off slowly. With the departure of Rob Blake, Clark was thrust into a more prominent PP role, and seemed to struggle with it a bit. He didn't look comfortable in the early going and had difficulty receiving crossing passes as well as keeping the puck in the zone. His 4 PP points in the first 41 games seemed to be an accurate barometer of his comfort level. As the season wore on, though, he appeared to gain confidence. In the 11 games Liles missed due to injury, Clark scored 4 times and then added 5 more points over the final 30 games. Not exactly Paul Coffey-like numbers, but 14 PP points is acceptable for the 2nd PP defenseman.
Jordan Leopold should take some of Clark's PP minutes next year. Obviously, he didn't spend much time on the ice doing anything last season, but he has played on the powerplay before. In 2005-06, Leopold average 3:14 of PP TOI per game with Calgary, and scored a respectable 13 points (2g,11a). In 2003-2004 - before Dion Phaneuf and Roman Hamrlik joined the Flames - Leopold had 6 PP goals. TSN's scouting report lists Leopold as having "untapped offensive potential". If there was ever a team to help a guy find his offensive game, this seems to be the one.
New arrival Scott Hannan didn't get much PP ice last year with the Sharks - just 1:30 per game - and his production (5 PP points) reflects that. In 2005-06, though, Hannan averaged 3:03 of PP TOI, and scored 10 points (2g, 8a). Barring injury, I don't think he'll get 3 minutes of PP ice a game here - he's going to be used more at even strength and on the kill.
I imagine Liles and Leopold will get the biggest chunk of powerplay time starting out, with Clark and Hannan used more sparingly to save them for the PK and EV situations. After those four, only Kyle Cumiskey - a long shot to make the roster - would seem to be viable powerplay options.
0 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
Re: Back section action
Interesting stats. Everybody has grown comfortable with the idea that Liles is an "offensive defenseman" but how offensive he really is never seems to get reported. Obviously the guy has some PP talent.
I'm worried that Liles will get hurt and the Avs then have to rely on somebody like Hannan to pull the weight on the PP. Leopold and Clark would be decent but still unproven together---and like you said, Clark is no Liles.
Let's just hope the injury bug is finished screwing with the Avalanche blueline for a while.
Clark
I'm with you there, Mystery Poster.
I rated Clark the highest of all the Avs defensemen last year, but a lot of people look at him as a spare part. If it wasn't for the presence Kurt Sauer, Clark would easily be the most underrated D on the team.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Jul 24, 2007 11:39 AM MDT reply actions
Re: Clark
I totally agree. In my earlier comment, I said "Clark is no Liles", but I didn't mean that in a bad way. He's a different kind of defenseman than Liles, and extremely valuable to the Avalanche. The addition of Hannan will take a lot of the pressure off Clark and let him truly play his style of D---which you described perfectly.
Now quit posting anonymously and become a member already!!
Disagree
I think I'm the only one who isn't sold on Clark. He gambles and scores points, but I always felt that some of his gambles really hurt the Avs. He also seemed to have turnovers at the wrong time. I am not sold on him yet, even though I will admit I started coming around on him towards the end of the season.
by Jibblescribbits on Jul 24, 2007 12:57 PM MDT up reply actions
Re: Disagree
well, I can't say much more than I have except that I have not noticed his "gambling" so far. Even if he does, it's certainly not like the reckless abandon of Ozo or DeVries. He's not even nearly as risky as Liles in the offensive zone. I'll watch that this year more, I guess.
I'd like to see Clark and Sauer form a rock solid 2nd pairing at even strength, with Hannan and Leopold on the top pairing, and Liles + Skratch on a 3rd pairing that sees minimal ice time at even strength. That would free Liles to be on the ice as much as possible for the PP, where's he's easily at his best, and Skrastins to focus on the PK, where he's at his own best.
Smooth
I don't know about that. Clark carried our D last year in that quite on the ice manner (a page from Sakic?). Everyone on that team knows it too, he was the man. The guy is good at the things you don't notice. With the puck that means creating space for himself and being patient with his moves allowing him to make the right play. Without the puck he is always in the right place and stays in the right place as the puck moves. More talented players don't 'get around' Clark.
As far as the gamble, he only does it when the team needs that goal or if the chance is there with a forward ready to backcheck.
Most well rounded D man on the block, Clark gets my nod.
I still would probably put Hannan and Leopold together on the 1st pairing as they compliment each other well, but would put Clark with Hannan if things don't go great.
by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Jul 24, 2007 2:56 PM MDT up reply actions
Why don't we all agree...
that Clark is better than most give him credit for. I'd go as far as to say that he is a poor man's Adam Foote (pre-Columbus, of course).

by 



























