Pre-Season Game 5: Blackhawks 7, Avalanche 4
Well, that didn't go so well. Despite superb performances by Paul Stastny and newly-minted scoring ace David Jones, the Colorado Avalanche couldn't hold back the goal-scoring onslaught of the Chicago Blackhawks, who won the game 7-4.
The Avs fell behind early, giving up two goals in the first period. Going into the second period down 2-1, it took Stastny just 38 seconds to score on a power play and tie up the game. Two minutes later, Jones would score his second goal of the night and move the Avs into the lead, but that advantage was short-lived. The 'Hawks would score five more goals on the night, and only Stastny would help stem the tide in the third period with another power play tally.
Son of Stastny finished with two goals and an assist, Jones with two goals. Marek Svatos and Wojtek Wolski both got on the board, each earning an assist. Brett Clark, John-Michael Liles and Darcy Tucker also had helpers.
I'm not going to harp on this, because it's something we already knew, but Andrew Raycroft is not going to be giving Peter Budaj any challenge whatsoever for the starting role. Raycroft gave up six goals on 23 shots, including a horrendous second period in which he faced just six shots but allowed two goals and the Blackhawks to reclaim the lead for good. For what it's worth, Cristobal Huet wasn't much better for the Indian, stopping only sixteen of twenty shots at his end.
Worth noting were the absences of Ryan Smyth, Joe Sakic, Milan Hejduk and Adam Foote. They all sat out. All the forwards fighting for a roster spot, with the exception of Tyler Arnason, were in the game. At this point it's looking pretty good for David Jones, obviously, but nobody among Brian Willsie, TJ Hensick, Per Ledin, Chris Stewart* or Cody McCormick had a particularly good showing. McCormick got into a fight in the first period and a shoving match in the third, so there's that.
The Avs get a rematch against the 'Hawks on Sunday.
*Chris Stewart is off to Lake Erie, as of today.
Comments
About Hensick
He had to leave the game early due to a scratched cornea.
by Angélique C. Murray on
Oct 4, 2008 8:35 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Indeed. I saw in the box score that he took a high stick.
The Avs site says he’ll be okay, and that he was able to play after the injury but didn’t play in the second or third periods, I assume as a precaution. Depending on the severity, he should be able to play because recovery tends to be pretty fast.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Oct 4, 2008 8:41 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
He has been playing pretty decent, I just don’t see two of these youngsters making the starting squad (barring injuries). Jones has been lights out in his two games (3 if you include the Burgandy/Blue), and I feel he’ll be the guy to stay up, pushing guys like Willsie, Ledin, and one or both of the Cody’s out of Denver on a flight to Eire.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on
Oct 4, 2008 4:23 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good for Budaj!
I mean, like everyone else, im not fond of the avs losing pre-season games, especially when you see teams like the canucks (i cant stand Kesler by the way) undefeated. However, there is a silver lining to this story. IMHO, i believe Budaj is at his best, when he knows hes the best. (sounds awkward) I think Budaj is the type of goalie who thrives knowing hes the go-to guy. This year, he wont have to worry about letting in a bad goal and worrying it may be his last game for a while. He can concentrate on hockey and not on whos creeping up behind him. Raycroft is still a work in project…lets not all turn our backs on him so soon…we wouldnt want to be leafs fans.
by EddieAVS on
Oct 4, 2008 8:47 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, I wanted to illustrate that there will be no question who the starting goalie is this year, not that I hate Raycroft or think he can’t be good at times.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Oct 4, 2008 11:44 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
McCormick
one punched the guy he fought, then kept beating on him while the linesmen tried to break it up. That was nice. For what its worth I didn’t think raycroft had much of a chance on the two pp goals. The D was a little sloppy out there. Of course defending against kane and toews can’t be easy, those guys most definitely do not suck.
by TheRed on
Oct 4, 2008 10:00 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Hey, giving up power play goals is a common thing for every goalie. That’s why it’s called a power play for the opposing team after all—-they’re at a distinct advantage. Raycroft, like all goalies, is going to give up goals. But it’s the volume of those goals that worries me, naturally. And even without the two pp goals, the Avs still would have lost 5-4.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Oct 4, 2008 11:44 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
exactly. I was just pointing out that at least the pp goals weren’t soft, unlike two of the other ones that he had a clear look at and should have stopped. I wish I hadn’t gotten in late and missed the first two goals against, I might have a better idea of his performance. At least its still preseason. PS w/o the two pp goals, or even with those and w/o the two soft goals, it would have been tied much longer and given the avs a shot. the last chi goal was an empty netter.
by TheRed on
Oct 4, 2008 12:43 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Ah yes, the empty-netter. You’re right that the game would have been very different had Raycroft not allowed the two PPs because it would have been 4-4 in the third period, therefore the Avs would not have pulled him and there would have been no empty-netter.
But, then again, had an individual butterfly not died in Panama one hundred years ago, the impending effect of its flapping wings on the world’s wind patterns would have made Hurricane Ike even worse.
What I’m trying to say is, Raycroft should stop more shots.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Oct 4, 2008 1:06 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
hey, no argument there. We’ll see how budaj does on sunday…..
by TheRed on
Oct 4, 2008 2:54 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Friday night's misplaced defense
The defense we have all been bragging about was disimal last night. As for Hensick he got hurt driving to the net very early in the game. The team could not produce on the 4 minute power play they received as a result of his injury. Wolski what to say about Wolski… He still is not showing his talent but the lines were pretty messed up last night. Why any coach would keep the Sheriff and send down both Cody’s is beyond me. Has Arnie ever driven to the net with energy and force like Hensick and Svatos are willing to do?
by eve on
Oct 4, 2008 5:53 PM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Has Arnie ever driven to the net with energy and force like Hensick and Svatos are willing to do?
Only against edmonton
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on
Oct 4, 2008 6:31 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
It’s probably no coincidence that the defense was a mess and Adam Foote wasn’t playing.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Oct 4, 2008 9:46 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
That’s a pretty grim outlook! I’d like to think that Hannan should also be able to lead a D
26 Card Jet
by Tommelot on
Oct 5, 2008 10:47 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Did you miss most of last season? Hannan proved then that he’s no natural leader. The defense didn’t really tighten up until Foote got there, sadly.
The good news is Foote didn’t miss the game because of injury. Granato just sat him to give Cumiskey some playing time.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Oct 5, 2008 11:35 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I noticed Hannan looking bleak out there before the deadline, but I reckoned it was because it was his first year coming over and needed to re-adjust to the new system/teammates and get the hierarchy sorted.
Was this wishful thinking?
26 Card Jet
by Tommelot on
Oct 6, 2008 6:39 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I don’t know, maybe. I’m sure some of Hannan’s trouble last year was a combination of poor coaching, adjustment to a new team, and constant injuries to pairing partners. But some players, if they’re good enough, rise above those problems and excel anyway. I don’t think he did that. But that’s okay, because the Avs don’t need him to be the leader. That’s why Foote is back.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Oct 6, 2008 8:04 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But that’s okay, because the Avs don’t need him to be the leader.
Until Footer goes down for a month or two when he shatters a hip…
by Mike @ MHH on
Oct 6, 2008 8:49 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nonsense. Foote cannot be broken.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Oct 7, 2008 11:32 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs











