Game 18: Flames 1, Avalanche 0
Photo by David Zalubowski (AP)
Let's start with the good news: The Colorado Avalanche won't see the Flames again until January 18th.
That's it. Thanks for checking in, folks.
Okay, that's not really the only good news, although it may seem like it today. Peter Budaj continues his torrid streak, allowing just one goal against the Flames. Unfortunately, that's one less than our anemic offense could muster and so, for the 4th time in 4 tries, the Flames won.
At the risk of getting fired from my new gig here on the first day, I have to admit that I felt the Avalanche defense wasn't all that bad on Tuesday (you know, the 50 shot game). Although the Avs had all sorts of clearing issues in that game (I'm looking at you Brett "Backhand" Clark), I felt they were generally steady overall. The biggest issue was fatigue - our forwards never had the puck in the Calgary zone. As they game wore on, our defense just wore out.
Last night, our defense was even better. The Avalanche forwards were noticeably diligent in their efforts to get back and help (Tuesday, not so much) and the defensemen seemed to take that extra second to make sure their clearing attempt would actually, you know, clear. Peter Budaj faced 33 shots, but other than a couple of excellent chances for Curtis Glencross in the 3rd, didn't have to make too many difficult saves. The Avs continue to block a ton of shots (21 last night, 25 on Tuesday). The bottom line is that after a shaky start to the season, defense and goaltending is not the issue.
It's the offense, stupid. Or it's the stupid offense - take your pick. The Avalanche mustered 18 shots on Mikka Kiprusoff and he didn't have to break a sweat until late in the game. The Avs had very little sustained pressure on Calgary in the two games - every time they entered the zone, it would be cleared out quickly or Kipper would swallow up the one shot on the net. The Avs lack of team speed is painfully obvious. There's almost no chemistry anywhere (how many times did we see an Avalanche fighting for a loose puck...with another Avalanche?). At the start of the season, the Avs were putting on a passing clinic - a forward under pressure would drop the puck to a specific spot just as his teammate was getting to that area. Not any more - passes are sloppy and to the wrong spot and the few shots the team is getting on net are easily stopped. What happened? Did we stop doing the passing drills? How come Paul Stastny knew Ryan Smyth was going to dump the puck behind the net in game 1, but not game 18?
After the disaster in Calgary on Tuesday, every line and pairing other than Foote and Hannan was changed. John-Michael Liles paired with Ruslan Salei (Salei has been playing very well lately) while Brett Clark and Jordan Leopold were paired together to perhaps make it easier to showcase the pair for potential trades.
Up front, it was
- Wolski, Stastny and Hejduk
- Smyth, Arnason, Svatos
- Tucker, Hensick, Jones
- McLeod, McCormick, Laperriere
Marek Svatos was injured in the game and missed the 3rd period. If he, Ben Guite or Joe Sakic is unable to go on Saturday, the Avs will need to place one of them on IR and call up someone from Lake Erie.
- Same old story in the faceoff circle, with the Avs winning just 31% of the draws. Craig Conroy won 9 of 12 to continue his dominance of the Avs this year.
- I missed this on Tuesday, but Scott Hannan has worn the A for the last two games. He, Smyth and Milan Hejduk have all had turns with the A in Joe Sakic's absence
- Cody McLeod (4) and Wojtek Wolski (3) led the Avs in hits.
- Reported attendance was just 14,536
- Calgary has outscored Colorado 8-1 in the 3rd period this year and 13-4 overall.
The Avs play in LA on Saturday and Anaheim on Monday. They have a very busy schedule next week with 5 games in 8 days. I'll be covering this a little more later on today.
Comments
I really like your recap format.
Shame about the game, though.
Let's go Pens!
by JDunman on
Nov 21, 2008 8:23 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
What game? That barely qualified as one.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Nov 21, 2008 8:23 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
thanks! in honor of me joining MHH by complete coincidence, SBN has rolled out some great hockey widgets.
Hi, I'm new here
by David Driscoll-Carignan on
Nov 21, 2008 9:08 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Marek Svatos was injured in the game and missed the 3rd period
On a blatantly obvious Dion Phadouche trip that wasn’t called because he was going for a big hit, and we don’t want to have him called when he’s doing it or he might stop. God forbid we call the most overrated player in the league for anything even when the trip is so obvious a pee-wee league player could have made the call.
not that I’m bitter
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on
Nov 21, 2008 8:26 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Yeah, but would we be able to handle a season that didn’t include a Marek Svatos injury? The fact that Jordan Leopold is still on the ice is already too much for me to comprehend.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Nov 21, 2008 8:47 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
The Avs
Are trying to trade him before he breaks
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on
Nov 21, 2008 8:58 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Phadouche, lol. That’s terrific.
The artist formerly known as ClaudeLemieux
by JonHaven on
Nov 21, 2008 9:01 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You must be new here.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Nov 21, 2008 9:45 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Your call-out on this is so right on!
It is completely outrageous how sportscasters like Melrose gush over this completely overrated player. He is NOT talented!!!! UGH!
Has anyone else heard any rumors of steroid use by Dion?
by Pookie on
Nov 21, 2008 10:15 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I can't believe there was no call
Phadouche easily stuck his arm out to throw Svatos an elbow to the ribs and that just so happens to be where Svatts is injured. Lappy should have came out and broken Phadouche’s face after that but Phadouche is probably scared of him after him after getting his clock cleaned two years ago. Stupid pansy cheat-shot artist of douchbaggery!
InYoFace Phadouche! InYoFace
by InYoFace on
Nov 21, 2008 10:22 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
They showed the replay last night. Second in slow mo. Dion tried to blindside/take out Svatos’ head, and when Svats dodged that, Dion still tried to go after him/finish with a high elbow. The replay froze at the end with his elbow above his own frickin’ head.
Complete SCUM.
The Avs should get that reviewed in Toronto, just to call attention to his dirty playing style, but then again, that’ll probably just make those morons in the NHL front office drool even more over his over-rated ass.
by Pookie on
Nov 21, 2008 10:49 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Not to mention that Svatos didn’t have the puck….
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on
Nov 21, 2008 12:16 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You know it's bad....
…when Arny is second line centre.
When’s Foppa coming back?
by pingu on
Nov 21, 2008 9:02 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
With the way the Avs are playing now, if Foppa comes back to the NHL, it won’t be with them.
The artist formerly known as ClaudeLemieux
by JonHaven on
Nov 21, 2008 9:03 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Agree
No way Forsberg signs with a team that (as of now) will be a lottery team. I’d expect him in Philly unless the Avs turn it around.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on
Nov 21, 2008 9:15 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
You’re both right, of course, but a man can dream.
by pingu on
Nov 21, 2008 10:01 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I found last night to be even more troubling than Tuesday for the following reason. Tuesday night guys didn’t show up. Last night, they did, and still looked like hell. Basic fundamentals are somehow now missing. They look hesitant with the puck, lost, and pretty much like they don’t have a fricken clue offensively what they should be doing out there. I’m really starting to think that this is just a very poorly coached hockey team. Not that I believe they have all of the talent in the world, either, but their talent isn’t this bad. Is it?
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on
Nov 21, 2008 9:18 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
I’m really starting to think that this is just a very poorly coached hockey team
My principles say that it’s very difficult to evaluate a coaches work until a full season is over, but I’m beginning to get tempted to agree with you. Everything just looks…chaotic (especially on the offensive end).
The exception to my principles is that there’s times when it’s so bad that it’s obvious and in those cases the 1-year period can be dropped. I’m starting to get to that point.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on
Nov 21, 2008 9:28 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Nobody seems to know their assignments. They seem to be playing a variant of pond hockey’s classic “Follow the puck” strategy.
It works well when playing against 10-year old kids. Not so much in the NHL.
by ShaneG on
Nov 21, 2008 10:00 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I really thought with Q and Theo gone, we had no where to go but up. But with Granato behind the bench, well, the Avs are the worst I have ever seen them. It’s not right. He should be the first to go before any player.
Red Wings Suck
by texacogirl on
Nov 21, 2008 11:34 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I think what bugged me the most last night is that the few times that the Avs were actually on a rush or even in the offensive zone, almost everybody seemed determined to make yet another pass, or another deke, and almost nobody seemed to want to actually shoot. The exceptions to this: Svatos and Leopold (I haven’t looked at the actual shot stats…but I’m not so much talking about succesful shots on net anyway, just a willingness to TRY and shoot).
This seems to fly in the face of the standard plan for getting out of a scoring slump: Shoot and drive the net hoping for a rebound.
by exredcoat on
Nov 21, 2008 9:36 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Leopold led the team with three shots.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Nov 21, 2008 9:46 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
4 if you count the one on Budaj
Hi, I'm new here
by David Driscoll-Carignan on
Nov 21, 2008 9:53 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I’ve been silently complaining about this style of “too-stylish-for-your-own-good” offense for at least a year. Yes it’s good to pass or deke occasionally to throw the defense off but when you do it EVERY TIME, it’s predictable.
It’s almost like the Avalanche are determined to play some bizzare “gentleman’s hockey”. I can almost hear the following in my head during an RPM play:
Statsny: Why it would be too selfish of mine self to take a shot. Here, good Fellow, Hejduk.
Heduk: Why thank you, fair fellow! Oops, it appeared I fanned it. Perhaps Gentleman Smyth can rebound it.
Smyth: Sorry dear Sirs, I was out of position!
Statsny: No worries fellows! We’ll give it a try during the next shift!
by Cheesus on
Nov 21, 2008 3:31 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
What is almost the worst is that nobody on the team or front office is coming out and saying that the play is unacceptable. A few of the players have said that they should be working harder, but come on! I know that the Avs’ MO is to keep it in house, but this is one of those times where you need to rally the fans up too.
Where is the voice of the team right now? They feel lost…
GO AVS
by slapshotr2007 on
Nov 21, 2008 11:51 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
They look lost, too. Sakic was out for a while last season and the whole team didn’t fall apart. They actually won a fair amount of games without him. I can’t figure out how they went from super coordinated and high scoring at the start of the year and now are completely incapable of putting together a decent offensive attack.
Welcome aboard, by the way!
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe @ MHH on
Nov 21, 2008 11:54 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
But to be fair
Calgary has been shutting down everyone lately ….
Tue Nov 4, 2008 Coyotes Flames 4 – 2 L
Thu Nov 6, 2008 Predators Flames 6 – 7 W
Sat Nov 8, 2008 Flames Blue Jackets 1 – 3 L
Sun Nov 9, 2008 Flames Blackhawks 1 – 6 L
Tue Nov 11, 2008 Maple Leafs Flames 3 – 4 W
Thu Nov 13, 2008 Flames Sharks 1 – 6 L
Tue Nov 18, 2008 Avalanche Flames 1 – 4 W
Thu Nov 20, 2008 Flames Avalanche 1 – 0 W
errrrr, I mean “lately” as in their recent two games against the Avs. 28 goals allowed during their previous 6 games, 1 goal total in the last two versus the Avnemics. Great job TG!
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on
Nov 21, 2008 12:16 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
In Webster’s dictionary
Colorado Avalanche = 1) The cure all for your struggling teams ailments (unless of course you are the Avalanche)
2) The team to play when your looking to score your first NHL goal.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on
Nov 21, 2008 12:23 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
At the beginning of a game whenever McNab comments that the opposition is on a losing streak or just came off a tough game, my wife and I will look at each other and say, “We’re going to lose tonight!” About 90% of the time it’s true.
by Cheesus on
Nov 21, 2008 3:42 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Quote of the year by Lappy
It’s been a while since I’ve seen a team beat our team four times in one year,"
It is hard to remember back to last year and the Dead Wings 4-0 regular season sweep, although in his defense they did also sweep us in the playoffs so it was more of an 8-0 season loss for the Avs.
"To have arrived on this Earth as a product of a biological accident, only to depart through human arrogance, would be the ultimate irony"
R. Leakey, Origins; 1977
"Two roads divurged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
by Savage33 on
Nov 21, 2008 3:41 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Lappy, like many of us, has probably tried to completely seer the existence of the evil winged wheel from his mind. meaning that 0-8 stretch last season didn’t actually exist
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on
Nov 21, 2008 6:16 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs













