Game 32: Avalanche 2, Lightning 1 (SO)
Photo by Doug Benc (Getty)
Rule 26.4 Infractions – During the Course of a Penalty Shot - A goal will be awarded when a goalkeeper attempts to stop a penalty shot by throwing his stick or any other object at the player taking the shot or by deliberately dislodging the goal.
Let's get this out of the way first: I think it was a bad call.
In case you missed it, the Avalanche won in the shootout last night, largely thanks to a controversial call by the refs. On the Avs' 2nd shootout attempt, Milan Hejduk's shot was stopped by Tampa Bay's Mike Smith. But Smith lost control of his stick in the process, and after a ridiculously long conference, the refs - including Tim Peel, who earlier had announced a penalty to "Edmonton's Ryan Smyth" - decided that Smith had thrown his stick and Hejduk was awarded a goal. The Lightning bench erupted into unchartable levels of tizziness and the fans began throwing debris onto the ice. A few seconds later, Andrew Raycroft made an excellent glove save on Martin St Louis to seal the victory (and bringing on a fresh new round of Tampa protests - Ryan Malone and Mike Smith were both given 10 minute misconducts for abuse of officials). To be honest, the Avalanche benefited from the officiating all night long - there were several Colorado infractions that didn't get called in the game, although the only one I can pull from the deep recesses of my brain right now is the Scott Hannan elbow on St Louis.
They shouldn't have needed the help.
Once again, the Avalanche burst out of the starting blocks ready to play. The game had few whistles - especially early on - and the Avs were controlling the play for much of it. The Avs were intercepting passes and keeping the puck from leaving the Tampa zone with tenacity. For the 2nd straight game, Paul Stastny opened the scoring at the 3:46 mark, banging home a Ryan Smyth rebound in the crease.
Exactly 7 minutes into the 2nd period, I had a thought. The Avalanche were up 1-0. The were playing very well and each of the 4 lines had at least one excellent shift by that point. The problem was, they really should have been up 2-0 or even 3-0...and that doesn't even count David Jones fanning on the puck in front of a wide open net. They just weren't able to turn all the puck control, all the takeaways, all the time spent in the Lightning zone into great scoring chances...or even average scoring chances. It's very odd to say that even though the Avalanche had 35 shots and Mike Smith was given the 1st star for his strong play. I really felt that Colorado should have had more to show for it - if not goals, than at least shots. By a similar token, I don't know where Tampa got 38 shots from. It's like I was watching the wrong game.
Anyway, after making the mental note above, I knew what was going to happen and it didn't take long; Jeff Halpern scored just 35 seconds later. Of course it would be Halpern - he always seems to play well against Colorado and he was playing in his first game of the year.
And that was it for the scoring. The puck didn't get past either Raycroft or Smith the rest of the way. Of course, both goalies played very well. The much maligned (at the M Double-H, anyway) Raycroft started off a little shaky and then gathered steam as the game wore on (he was absolutely money in the shootout). He also sometimes looked more lucky than good when making his saves. Both of those attributes reminded me very much of Jose Theodore. I just wrote that sentence, and I'm still trying to decide if that's a compliment or a criticism. I guess I'll have to reserve judgment for now - I have a feeling we'll be seeing more from Mr Raycroft in the near future.
Ben Guite and Darcy Tucker made their return to the lineup. Philippe Dupuis was sent down after the last game, and Cody McCormick was the healthy scratch. Curiously, TJ Hensick was not scratched but was demoted to the 4th line - a line McCormick would probably have been better suited for. Despite getting the Brad Richardson treatment, I thought Hensick played well.
- Smyth, Stastny, Hejduk
- Wolski, Arnason, Jones
- Tucker, Laperriere, Stewart
- McLeod, Guite, Hensick
On D, Ruslan Salei returned after being scratched for Tjarmin. He played with Jordan Leopold, but the bulk of the ice time went to the other 4 D.
- Stastny now has 11 points in 10 games wearing the A
- Wojtek Wolski was stopped in the shootout for the first time all season
- The Lightning had more blocks (19) than the Avs (12) - it's not often that the Avs are on the losing end of those battles.
The Avs are in Miami on Sunday to take on the Panthers. There are a couple of ex-Avs on the roster - Brett McLean, Karlis Skrastins and Keith Ballard (who only sort-of counts - but the real side story will be the chance to see the Stewart brothers play against each other for the first time in the NHL.
I think it was a bad call, that Smith just dropped his stick after making a kinda-sorta save on Hedgie’s initial attempt. That was what seemed to tick a steamed Smith off the most after the game - that Hejduk was wrongly rewarded after he made the first stop on the shootout attempt. - Adrian Dater, All Things Avs
"There was a strong feeling that this stick was thrown," said Mike Murphy, NHL senior vice president of operations, to a pool reporter. "And when it's thrown on a penalty shot, a goal is awarded.'' - Aaron J Lopez, Rocky Mountain News
And for the Tampa announcers, the stick was most definitely out of Smith's hand before the save was made. Saying it wasn't out of his hands over and over again doesn't make it so. - Shane Giroux, Avs Talk (I watched the same feed and this was, indeed, hilarious)
The problem wasn't the call, however, it was the fact that the officials couldn't review the play. Seen from the ice in real time, I'm sure it did look like he threw the stick. If the officials could've seen even just the exact same view a second time, they probably wouldn't have made that call. However, it's like the umpire during a baseball game - they're apparently not supposed to have the benefit of instant replay for the shoot out and get stuck with making a judgment call on something they've seen just once. - Cassie, Bolts Blog
If the officials are going to make that call, they have to be sure. I don’t think they were sure. Of course, nobody had the opportunity to ask them if they were sure because the league would not make any of them available to speak to a pool reporter after the game - Erik Erlendsson, Bolts Report
By rule, the only reviewable aspect of the play is if the puck was in the net. - Damian Cristodero, St Petersburg Times
And why can't officials speak to reporters after a game? They basically gave one team the game over another and then they can't defend themselves? Tell me what you were thinking. Tell me why you ruled a certain way. Murphy said he didn't want the refs to be "trapped" by a "hot environment." Please. Dealing with the pressure is part of the job. If you can't face a bunch of reporters who would have asked simple questions, really, how can you handle the pressure of what's going on on the ice? - Damian Cristodero, Lightning Strikes
Tocchet called the decision "a tough one to swallow. My phone's been blowing up by NHL people that are friends of mine who said that's a terrible call," Tocchet said. Colorado coach Tony Granato said the referees' call was "gutsy" and "right." "If the goalie throws his stick in an attempt to stop a penalty shot or shootout opportunity, it's an automatic goal," Granato said. - AP
After Jussi Jokinen and Vinny Lecavalier missed on Tampa Bay's first two shootout opportunities, Marty St. Louis had a chance to extend the shootout but was stopped by Andrew Raycroft, who finished with 37 saves. - Erik Erlendsson, Tampa Bay Online
As the Avs filed off the ice in jubilation, they had to dodge plastic water bottles and other debris being tossed from the angry fans at the St. Pete Times Forum. - Adrian Dater, Denver Post
Forwards Ben Guite and Darcy Tucker returned to the Avalanche lineup after extended absences. Tucker missed 11 games because of a sprained left knee, while Guite sat out 17games recovering from a rib-cage injury. - Aaron J Lopez, Rocky Mountain News
"I am truly excited to be joining the Canucks (now that they don't suck)," said Sundin. "Once I made the decision to return to play a few weeks ago, the Vancouver opportunity was simply the best overall fit most money. I want to thank Mike Gillis and the entire Canucks organization for their professionalism throughout this entire process while I sat on my fat ass for half the year." - Mats Sundin. [OOPS, How'd that get in there?]
73 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
WTF
When did we pass the Wild?
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Dec 19, 2008 9:20 AM MST reply actions
last night, apparently.
if it helps, I didn’t know we’d past Edmonton…and I was looking at the standings yesterday for the Christmas story.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 19, 2008 9:22 AM MST up reply actions
“passed” even.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 19, 2008 9:23 AM MST up reply actions
We’ve been up on Edmonton about a week now, but they still have 2 games in hand, as does Minny who we did pass last night. So in all reality in Minny wins one of those games and Edmonton wins both, we are back to the bottom.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on Dec 19, 2008 10:25 AM MST up reply actions
LOL
That was my exact same reaction about 5 seconds before I saw this post.
Hahahahahahahahahahha.
They call me Bubblegum.
by A.J. Haefele on Dec 19, 2008 10:49 AM MST up reply actions
WOW
I gotta say, I’m shocked… I thought that was an error or something. But NHL.com says the same thing. Damn.
Go Avs!
by Mike, (Avs Fan) on Dec 19, 2008 1:34 PM MST up reply actions
Theo
He also sometimes looked more lucky than good when making his saves. Both of those attributes reminded me very much of Jose Theodore.
That’s pretty much what I’ve been saying since the start of the season. Where Budaj is very sound positionally, Theo and Rayzor need the reflexes and agility to shine. It’s not a bad thing, it just looks a bit shaky/wonky/wobbly.
26 Card Jet
It sure was nice to see Darcy Tucker back out there again! Skating around, doing little aside from be a douche.
by JonHaven on Dec 19, 2008 9:46 AM MST reply actions
Well
At least they kept Stewart in. I would have liked to see him scratched, but had he been inserted for Stewart (who I like) I would have worded a strongly written blog post.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Dec 19, 2008 9:52 AM MST up reply actions
Even*
written a strongly worded
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Dec 19, 2008 9:53 AM MST reply actions
Does the preview button not work for readers in Cali? I think ‘wording a strongly written blog post’ sounds more old-englishy…
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
Woslki didn’t so much as get stopped on his shoot out attempt as he seemed to lose the puck…
Hejduk’s shot? Smith did drop his stick and according to the rule the right call was made. Now, do I think dropping his stick made a difference? NO. I think Smith should have stopped Hejduk’s shot regardless, Avs won on a technicality, but then again. Raycroft stopped all three of their shooters, and the Avs still would have had another shot, who can say what would have happened?
They Avs have gotten the shaft on Technicalities before, it about time one goes in their direction.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
WoslkiWolski didn’t so much as get stopped on his shoot out attempt as he seemed to lose the puck…
That’s what I thought also, but nonetheless, the streak is broken.
Smith put himself in a horrible position trying to poke check The Duke on that play. Smith played in the West, he HAS to know how good of hands Hejduk has! He put himself in a hole, and made a great recovery, but in real time, I can see how that looked like a thrown stick to the ref.
As for the Tampa Bay camp saying the refs should be available for questioning after a game, that’s dumb. They’re paid to officiate games, not placate media and fans.
And Raycroft’s post save semi-taunting with the brief statue of liberty followed by knocking the puck into the stands was pretty money, and I bet he doesn’t even know it.
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
Thanks for putting the highlights in the recap – saves me a trip to nhl.com.
The call is kind of a weird one…it’s clear that he drops his stick prior to making the save with his blocker. But it sounded like Smith was pissed because he thought Hejduk put in the rebound, which is b.s…he was clearly going backhand the whole way and Smith missed on the initial poke check.
Whatever, a win’s a win.
any other thoughts on the video highlights? anyone running into technical problems (slower load times?) with having them in there?
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 19, 2008 11:10 AM MST up reply actions
Since I sadly missed the game...
Can I get the overall people had of Raycroft’s play. Call me a pessimist but a coach is going to have a hard time not starting a guy who is 6-1. So I fear he’ll be playing more. Did he look stable?
And the highlights and recap don’t do the game justice, but did we drastically out-play Tampa and did Smith keep them in it or was it an even game?
Well, Raycroft is 5-1, not 6-1, and it’s not as simple as just starting the goalie with the best record. It’s starting the best goalie. Raycroft, regardless of his record, is not a better goalie than Budaj.
I can’t believe this argument is still being had.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
No kidding.
I’m blown away that the team keeps winning for Raycroft =[
They call me Bubblegum.
by A.J. Haefele on Dec 19, 2008 10:51 AM MST up reply actions
I’m very happy about it, because a win is a win and the more the better.
I just wish everybody would keep this crap in perspective. How about a hypothetical? Can you imagine what would have happened a few years back if Roy had started the season 12-15-2 (for example) and Aebischer had gone 5-2-1? Would anyone have started calling for Roy to be benched, or would they have chalked it up to quality of opponents, defensive contributions and/or dumb luck? Has anyone even actually watched Andrew Raycroft play? It’s terrifying.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
To your last point
about it being terrifying, it truly is. I missed this game live, but watched the replay of it and you can see just from the highlights that he was beaten several times and saved by a missed net or a post.
What gets me is this team has played much better defensively in some of his starts and given up low quality, high quantity shots on goal, making his straight stats look better. Look at the last two games in which Raycroft did enough to win (he has to get SOME credit) and had 30+ saves, but many of which wore out his logo or hit his glove without him really having to move it much. On the flip side, you get Budaj against the Flyers, who are on fire, and he’s helpless on at least three of those goals.
I do love winning, though. Also, going back to your point about Roy/Aebischer, if you were to go back and check out some of Abby’s stats, they wouldn’t look too bad at this point. Yet, I don’t know if anybody misses him at all. Stats can be so misleading, especially as a goalie in hockey. It’s like using fielding percentage as an accurate indicator of a how well a baseball player plays defense. Sure, the stats exist, but if you watch the games, you’ll see how tremendously misleading they are.
This whole thing makes me want to light myself on fire.
They call me Bubblegum.
by A.J. Haefele on Dec 19, 2008 11:04 AM MST up reply actions
Also
The team has played better in front of Raycroft, because they have played these teams while he is in net:
• Tampa Bay (x2) 30th in the NHL, 15th Eastern Conference
• Dallas: 24th in NHL, 14th in Western Conference
• Columbus: 22nd in the NHL, 12th in the West
• Detroit: 3rd NHL, 2nd West
• Philly: 6th in NHL, 4th in East
For the most part he has played weak teams, minus Philly and Detroit. Budaj gets a steady diet of Calgary, Minnesota, Vancouver, Anaheim, Chicago, Nashville etc while also getting San Jose, Philly, Boston etc. Yes he also gets some Edmonton and Dallas, but for the most part the Avs have played higher quality competition with Budaj in net. Of course his win-loss record will be worse.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m extremely happy Raycroft has played well and has been able to play well enough to get some wins. And I would love nothing more if Raycroft were the goalie we could turn to against weaker teams and give Budaj the night off. I’m also happy Raycroft is 5-1, because the Avs need all the points they can get this season. But the lack of context when comparing Budaj to Raycroft this season is mind-numbingly absurd.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Dec 19, 2008 11:49 AM MST up reply actions
Right
I think we’re arguing for the same side here.
I’m just gonna light myself on fire.
They call me Bubblegum.
by A.J. Haefele on Dec 19, 2008 11:53 AM MST up reply actions
Oh we are
But i don’t think it can be said enough.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Dec 19, 2008 12:14 PM MST up reply actions
Philly is not the same team now as they were when Raycroft played them. The night Raycroft faced them they were a team struggling mightily and (like us at the time) had not won a game.
Outside of that your saying almost the same things I am.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on Dec 19, 2008 12:37 PM MST up reply actions
Raycroft played a good game but in no way was solid. He was often out of position and flailing,he often got bailed out by good play from the defense (there were almost always twoor three Avs guys in front of him lifting sticks, and clearing pucks), or his posts, or the puck bounced wide. Despite the high number of shots he faced, few were very dangerous, again the defense did a good job of keeping things to the outside and cutting down Tampa’s shot quality.
Raycroft was really bailed out in the OT, when St. Louis backhanded a rebound off the post with Raycroft laying on the ice.
In the Shoot out, Raycroft was solid.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on Dec 19, 2008 11:07 AM MST up reply actions
I have a really hard time seeing how anyone thinks that's a bad call
the puck CLEARLY hits the butt of Smith stick before he makes contact with his closer and AFTER he lost control of the stick (see: the slowmo behind the net http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gTwSKbRA7UU ). The verbage of the rule is a little weird with that deliberately phrase, but goalies spend their entire lives with stick in hand — how could he NOT have meant to discard it even Hejduk didn’t touch it? And since it hit the stick, how can you argue it didn’t affect the play?
bottom line, Smith needed to hang onto the stick.
HOT DANG
You’re right! Check the 2:22 mark and notice the puck bouncing of the stick’s butt!
26 Card Jet
how could he NOT have meant to discard it even Hejduk didn’t touch it?
to that effect, I missed the Dallas game. Didn’t Smith’s former mentor have an issue holding on to his stick in that shootout too?
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 19, 2008 11:49 AM MST up reply actions
Yeah and the Altidudes mentioned the same thing last night. Furthermore, I am real surprised the refs even huddled over this Smith play as the refs in Dallas would not even consider for a minute Turco had thrown his stick during the shootout last game. It was much more obvious in that game Turco had thrown his stick than in this game.
Red Wings Suck
Wooow
Great angles.
How about those announcers and fans, huh? The announcer who is complaining about the PA guy “yapping about throwing stuff on the ice” sounded pretty butthurt. The fans throwing things out onto the ice are ridiculous. I hate that people have somehow decided that it’s perfectly okay to throw things onto the field of play. Great role models they must be for their kids, huh?
They call me Bubblegum.
by A.J. Haefele on Dec 19, 2008 11:51 AM MST up reply actions
I liked the Tampa announcers a lot, but as Shane pointed out in his recap, color guy Bobby Taylor kept saying over and over that Smith didn’t lose the stick until after the initial save all while we were watching the exact opposite in the replay. “see, look, he still has the stick in his hand”…me looks at TV to see stick on the ice
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 19, 2008 12:14 PM MST up reply actions
I’m not sure how you drop a stick unless it gets caught under someone or ou get run over. I’ve never had that problem. His excuse was something along the lines of my stick would have been in the air had i not dropped it. Deal with it.
The Savage - Game Thread Leader and King Of The World
"Two roads divurged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
I’ve had mine pop out when it get’s real scrambly. It’s funny, you think “I need to jetison this thing, cuz it keeps getting caught up in stuff” but as soon as you let go of the stick you’re all “OH NOZ, I lost my stick!”
Truly goalies are insane.
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
Yeah, Ive had it get caught between players skates or under someone and lost the stick and the first reaction is Where the hell’s my stick. It’s a weird position.
The Savage - Game Thread Leader and King Of The World
"Two roads divurged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
DD the puck hit the stick after it left Smith’s hands, making it the right call. Your recap just gives fuel to the fire right now. You should change “Let’s get this out of the way first: I think it was a bad call.” ;)
Never trust the lunch lady.
by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Dec 19, 2008 11:55 AM MST reply actions
I wish I could see it, but now I’m at work
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 19, 2008 11:59 AM MST up reply actions
nope. even if it did, the rule is “throwing his stick”. I’m still not convinced that he did.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 19, 2008 12:11 PM MST up reply actions
That’s to bad, I had a creative way of editing that one all lined up…
Now you’re robbing the world of joy at your expense. Selfish much?
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
for goodness sake, I’ve been sleeping on my couch for a WEEK so that my in-laws have a bed to sleep in until they get power restored. I am the EPITOME of selflessness. or something.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 19, 2008 12:38 PM MST up reply actions
Or you know the Mrs. will kick you to the curb if you don’t, and you’re just trying to stay in her good graces.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on Dec 19, 2008 12:52 PM MST up reply actions
the rule is "throwing his stick".
That’s exactly my problem with the call. I don’t think Smith threw his stick. It looked to me like he dropped it. I’m glad to have the two points but this was a crappy win thanks to the refs. I would have liked to see Hejduk get another chance to shoot instead of getting the goal awarded.
Red Wings Suck
what’s the difference between “dropping while arm and hand are moving” vs. throwing? seems silly to me, the goalie has to keep his stick under control, same as a player.
I agree. The goalie should keep his stick in control at all times. My issue, I guess, is more the wording of the rule than anything else. I think it should read the goalie shall keep control of the stick rather than saying the goalie can’t throw the stick. So, the issue here is, if you hold this play to the letter of the rule, it was a bad call because he didn’t throw the stick.
Red Wings Suck
I know from experience how difficult it can be to keep one’s stick under control…ladies.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
…and gentlemen.
Never trust the lunch lady.
by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Dec 19, 2008 2:44 PM MST up reply actions
I think the call they made is open to interpretation, but only because the rule is badly worded.
It should say that the goalie can’t throw his stick and interfere with the shot – if you bunt your stick over the back of the net and make a save stickless, is that illegal?
So as the rule stands – you can’t throw your stick defending a shootout attempt at all – it’s the right call if the refs felt Smith threw his stick (I’ll leave the definition of “throwing” to the human movement experts – it’s a clear judgement call anyway) then they have to award the goal.
But what they should have been deciding was if throwing his stick unfairly gave him an advantage in making the save. And I’m not sure it did.
Either way, they should have been allowed to look at the video – the shootout is an abortive tragic betrayal of hockey anyway, allowing a bit of technology in isn’t going to make it any more of a farce.
IMO throwing your stick away will ALWAYS give you an advantage, it allows you to catch the puck or knock it away with the blocker and allows greater movement of the blocker and stick hand.
The Savage - Game Thread Leader and King Of The World
"Two roads divurged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
If that's true...
Then there’s nothing wrong with the rule or the call. He clearly drops his stick before making the save.
I have to admit I’m not enough of a goaltending expert to judge the niceties of such things.
by eltharion_doa on Dec 20, 2008 6:14 AM MST up reply actions
Thats just my opinion, I don’t know what other goalies think. But I hate any goalie who has to drop his stick to make tha save cough Hasek cough. It’s part of the equipment just like a players, they can’t drop their stick and throw the puck with their hand. Goalies should have to keep their stick in control at all times unless it’s pulled out of their hand.
The Savage - Game Thread Leader and King Of The World
"Two roads divurged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
for the record
I just watched the video and I’m still of the opinion that the puck hit the blocker. I’m not sure that that really matters – if they think he threw his stick, then it is what it is. still not a fan of the call overall…but I’m sure Smith will have a better grip the next time.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 20, 2008 7:14 AM MST reply actions
Yeah, the puck did hit the blocker, after it deflected off the knob of the stick. Its hard to see in the low resolution videos.
Never trust the lunch lady.
by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Dec 20, 2008 9:00 AM MST up reply actions

by 


















