Clough Still Doesn't Get It
Listening to Sandy Clough this morning, I was treated to more of his wildly generalized criticism of what he considers to be the faults of bloggers. They're not accountable. They're free to just say whatever they want without the threat of being fired for it. They're uncritical of thoughts that coincide with whatever world view they may espouse. They're just a collection of nodding heads. They're not bound by the rigorous standards of journalism.
Call me crazy, but those sound like stereotypes of talk radio to me. Mega dittos, Sandy.
I've now listened to The Sports Guys for two days in a row. Yesterday, I was very impressed with the program, with Clough's presentation and with his temperance. I didn't agree with everything he said, but he didn't come across as a pompous prick---like he did in the email exchange with thedoctor the other day.
Today, with his co-host back, the show sounded more like that which Clough complains about. Two people sharing unchallenged opinions that misrepresent their topic and serve only to reinforce their own world view. No one called in with an alternative opinion. In fact, no calls were taken at all. Just two people, speaking from a position of authority, shaking their heads in disapproval at something they clearly don't fully understand. He mentioned Mile High Hockey in only vague terms---not by name---and didn't, in any way, address any of the concerns I have brought up both here in posts and in a brief (and civil) email exchange with him yesterday.
For his listeners that aren't blog savvy, they have no idea that an alternative opinion (not to mention contradictory facts) to Clough's exists. All they know is that "blogs aren't accountable" and bloggers just agree with each other and don't engage in arguments or check their facts. If I made a post that said, "Sandy Clough and all other talk radio hosts just bloviate to the nodding masses and never acknowledge differing opinions," I'd have 50 comments coming to his defense and attacking my assertion. And that would be good, because my wild generalizations shouldn't be allowed to stand unchallenged.
Which form of media is superior in that regard?
As far as I'm concerned, this issue is done. If Clough wants to continue to paint bloggers as morons with such a broad brush, that's fine. But he should be aware that his words---meant to reinforce negative stereotypes about blogging---only serve to reinforce all those negative stereotypes about talk radio.
Sandy, if you want to discuss anything further, you have my email address. And I hope you keep reading Mile High Hockey. In fact, you should register for a free membership and start posting comments (and diary entries!) of your own. I'd love to have you on board.
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Proud to be a Chucklehead
The fact that Clough allowed his private email ramblings to be posted here shows how either oblivious he is to his condescending, snobbish and insulting manner or he doesn't care. I suspect he's proud of it. It's his schtick. Maybe it's all he has to offer. Personally, I would be embarrassed to behave like he has.
He can call it whatever he wants, but to me he comes off as someone who is clearly threatened by the big, ever advancing world outside his old-school radio mind. Too bad really, he will never be able to offer his listeners the full value of his "30+ yrs experience" with such a inability to take criticism, refusal to debate opposing opinion and closed mind he wears like a badge of honor. Whenever I'm confronted with someone who acts like Clough, I can't help but wonder what inadequacy they're trying to make up for.
Credit to you Joe (Doc n' others) who dealt with him in a civilized, respectful manner. Clough on the other hand, could give a shit about presenting himself as more than the angy, curmudgeonly poop that he is.
I meant to include...
I would love for Clough to join MHH, join a debate where he could experience the blogspere's own type of "accountability". Joe, you would rock as it's moderator. Unfortunately, it'll never happen.
i haven't posted them
but he's continued to drop an email or 2 my way that've been nice and very normal, even as he continues to bash blogs on the radio. I would suspect his behavior is a shtick (and one that's working -- I know I'm watching post-game comments and listening in the mornings much more now).
It's really irritating he won't come off his high horse and have some legit debate about these issues too, but what can you do.
I still like him ...
face it, as a big hockey and Av fan in this town, he is all we have on the radio. KOA? Are you kidding me? Irv and Joe? They would rather talk little league baseball than NHL hockey. The national guys? Riiiiiiight. All you have to do is listen to any of them for 5 minutes to figure out how far hockey and the NHL are off of the national radar.
So, love him or hate him (which I do believe is part of his shtick, btw) he is all we have as hockey fans. And he is pretty knowledgeable about the sport and the Avs.
by Bob in Boulder on Feb 29, 2008 3:30 PM MST up reply actions
In Sandy's defense
In his defense, Sandy is known to still not have a mobile phone. So while he's mastered email (I've corresponded on email with him several times) I suspect the process of registering for a blog and posting comments is foreign enough that he wouldn't bother.
Also, while a lot of journalists read blogs I think they are discouraged from commenting on them by their employers. Understandably the energies of paid journalists should drive traffic to the people that pay their bills. I think that's one reason Dater has his own blog but I know he's very good about making the rounds to various blogs and message boards.



















