Changing The Narrative

photo courtesy of the Denver Post
The Colorado Avalanche used to be a franchise the hockey media couldn't get enough of. With rosters comprised almost entirely of all stars (or it seemed that way), hockey writers and ESPN had no trouble coming up with Av-related stuff to talk about from 1996 until 2003 or so.
Then the Lockout and the salary cap came, and guys like Forsberg, Foote, Blake and Roy were all gone (if not already). The Avs went from perennial division champs to also-rans.
The signing of Ryan Smyth and Scott Hannan in the off-season helped to stem this a bit, but by mid-season it was the same old story. Nobody talked about the Avalanche. While teams like Pittsburgh, Washington, Toronto, Ottawa, Detroit and Anaheim got tons of press (for obvious reasons), Colorado just kind of fell off everyone's radar.
And if the Avs weren't being ignored, they were being underestimated. As just one example, ESPN's weekly power rankings consistently placed Colorado far below teams with worse records and weaker lineups. In Week 14, the Avs, with a record of 25-18-3 and just coming off of a 3-1-0 tour of the Southeastern Division, were ranked 18th overall, three spots below the Rangers (21-20-5) who had lost six of their previous seven games. Also ranked higher: the 22-18-5 Islanders. The word "power" should never be associated with the Islanders, ever.
In general, the Avs were old news, and not worth talking about.
Until the trade deadline two weeks ago, of course. With the acquisition of Peter Forsberg, Adam Foote and Ruslan Salei, not to mention a five-game winning streak that includes a shutout of the Anaheim Ducks, the Avs are once again media darlings. In this week's power rankings, the Avs are up three spots to number 11. This morning, Colorado was featured on ESPN's hockey front page, for the third time in five days.
It's clear that the Avalanche is a buzz-worthy team again. Unfortunately they had to "turn back the clock" to regain the attention, but it worked and it's putting butts in seats---the ultimate goal of any franchise. Are things looking up in a market that was considered to be on the decline for at least two seasons? A playoff appearance, let alone a deep run, would go a long way to returning Colorado to the national spotlight, but the process has already begun.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Media Smarts
The Power Rankers looked at our PP% and Q. I agree with many of the rankings the team got. Playerwise the team should be higher.
by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Mar 7, 2008 10:10 AM MST reply actions
RE: Media Smarts
Isn't that an oxymoron? "media smarts"?
I agree that the power play ranking and effectiveness (or lack there of) has hurt our rankings, but the Avs have been ranked too low at many times and seem to get little respect. We were a good team (not a great team) before the Christmas break and the following injury debacle started, but we still got ranked behind a number of teams who had no business being in front of us.
by Americanario on Mar 7, 2008 10:26 AM MST up reply actions
two thoughts
- Forsberg's hair looks, to be kind, ridiculous. and this is coming from a guy who has crappy hair. Is that an upside down mullet?
- When Dater linked to that pic the other day, I commented that it was too bad they had to be reunited in those awful uniforms. That explosively derogatory comment (or something) seems to have been too hot for the Post and was deleted.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 7, 2008 11:14 AM MST reply actions
Re: two thoughts
The vast majority of my comments to Post articles and All Things Avs posts are deleted. It must be a conspiracy.
Speaking of the media
I think we have confirmation that AD has been drinking:
http://blogs.denverpost.com/avs/2008...
If that is so, keep on drinking AD!
Radio sports updates
The Fan sports updates would crack you guys up right now. They recount how Theo got the shutout and Wolski got the game winner. Then they end the update with this, "The Avs are 5-0 since signing Peter Forsberg at the trading deadline". As if the very act of signing Forsberg leads to wins. It doesn't even matter if he's played. I don't know why but this has been killing me all day.
btw, an explanation of Avs not selling out
I saw that some of you were wondering yesterday why the Avs didn't sell out Foppa's return. It's simple really. They sold out the Kings game where people knew Foote would play, but they didn't sell out the Canucks game because no one knew whether Forsberg would play or not. Think about it, tickets are expensive, it's a big gamble to buy tickets to see Forsberg, then go to the game and realize that he decided to rest one more game. That would really suck, it's why I didn't go, instead I wen to the Ducks game. Which is what most people did because the Ducks game was sold out.
by Mike the Avs Fan on Mar 7, 2008 1:31 PM MST reply actions
ESPN
ESPN's power rankings seem to have consistently overranked the Rangers all season. Fox Sports seems to rank completely on win%, which begs the question of the purpose of the rankings. Why not just look at the standings?
Re: ESPN
Yep, the Rangers have been waaaay overestimated. That doesn't help dissuade anyone from the idea that the Four Letter is biased toward the Boston/New York teams.



















