Mile High Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:



Sports blogs for fans, by fans.
Around SBN: Steve McNair Dead - Former NFL QB Shot and Killed


Your Middle Of The Week Thread

Hoo boy, it's been a while since I was in school.  Seven years, in fact, since I graduated with my BA in 2001.  And here I am again, sitting in class, raising my hand, pouring over books and handouts and desperately trying to study whenever I get a free second.  It's going to be a long three and a half years.

Now, as for the hockey world, the Avalanche front office continues to be quiet, and there has been no news about Joe Sakic or Mats Sundin or any of the other at-least-somewhat-notable free agents out there floating around. Not much else is going on, either.  Well, Puck Daddy is playing host to a battle royale between Ross McKeon and Ted Leonsis that's humorous if only because Yahoo! commentators seem to be the most negative, contrary people on the planet.

Oh, and there's a new study that suggests face width has something to do with aggressive behavior in men. 

Canadian scientists investigated photos of pro and varsity hockey players, measuring how wide and long their faces were. They found the wider that faces looked, the more aggressive players were, as measured by the number of penalty minutes they accrued, which are handed out for aggressive behavior.

I'm not sure how many of you have experience setting up scientific experiments or have knowledge of the concepts of correlation and causation, but if you can find a more asinine waste of grant money, please let me know.  Good god.

0 recs | Comment 57 comments

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Don’t count out such research. I heard that if your hand is bigger than your face, you have cancer. SMACK!

I'm sorry, Mr. Hossa, but I'm afraid we can't be friends anymore. Why? Because I hate you.

by JDunman on Aug 20, 2008 8:26 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Really?!!

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 8:48 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Joe must not have an older brother…

by StructuralPoke on Aug 20, 2008 10:50 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nope, you’re right. I am the older brother.

As a matter of fact, JDunman is my younger brother, and he knows all too well the “cancer hand” trick. Although I don’t think I tried that one on him that often.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 11:01 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Our family is reknowned for the lameness of our jokes.

I'm sorry, Mr. Hossa, but I'm afraid we can't be friends anymore. Why? Because I hate you.

by JDunman on Aug 22, 2008 10:03 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

As well as for our lack of grammar. There is no ‘k’ in renowned.

I'm sorry, Mr. Hossa, but I'm afraid we can't be friends anymore. Why? Because I hate you.

by JDunman on Aug 22, 2008 10:04 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Dude whatever.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 22, 2008 10:14 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Don’t make me break you two up!

by Mike @ MHH on Aug 22, 2008 3:38 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Mommy, he’s correcting me!

Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-

by Americanario on Aug 22, 2008 6:27 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’m not sure how many of you have experience setting up scientific experiments or have knowledge of the concepts of correlation and causation, but if you can find a more asinine waste of grant money, please let me know.

Headline yesterday: Church Attendance Boosts Student GPAs

Really? Kids who are taught self-discipline to go somewhere once a week are more likely to be better at school which is really a measure of…self-discipline?

Shocking.

"A witty saying proves nothing."
- Voltaire (1694-1778)

by Jibblescribbits on Aug 20, 2008 8:49 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

i love how no one in media gets correlation vs. causation. :p

by thedoctor on Aug 20, 2008 9:15 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fixed

I love how no one in the scientific community gets correlation vs. causation.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 9:19 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fixed

love how no one in the social scientific community gets correlation vs. causation.

/real scientist, not “social scientist”.

But most of the time the study is presented properly and the media distorts it…

"A witty saying proves nothing."
- Voltaire (1694-1778)

by Jibblescribbits on Aug 20, 2008 9:57 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, I thought about adding “social” myself, but then I’d have to admit that my BA in sociology is pretty much worthless. No fault of my own, of course.

I also agree that reporters have a pretty horrendous time describing the actual findings and methodology of studies. They’re so busy trying to come up with a catchy headline and a fifth grade description that they miss the point entirely.

This one, though, I’m not so sure. Looking at pictures is a pretty lousy methodology no matter what you’re studying.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 10:07 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Exercise is good for you

There was a study done here at the U of S a couple years back and the result was, I kid you not, “Exercise is good for you”

I think they were going to tackle the mystery of whether food is good for us or not.

by ShaneG on Aug 20, 2008 9:15 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This just in: high calorie diets and sedentary life styles may lead to weight gain!

SHOCKING

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 9:21 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Pill makes women pick bad mates

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/26180187/

There’s so much that can be done with this one. I’m not even going to point out that I was on the pill when Mike and I started dating. Oops…

by Mrs @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 9:30 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, but were you on it when you met me?

Side note: the correct title of that article should be “Pill makes women bat shit crazy, like food, air”

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 9:39 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Nope. So I guess that means we’re meant to be, huh?

by Mrs @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 9:58 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Should we tell Mike?

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 10:07 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh, nothing. Don’t worry about it.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:01 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Fixed

Not to use an old lazy joke but:

Pill makes women bat shit crazy, like food, air

Fixed

"A witty saying proves nothing."
- Voltaire (1694-1778)

by Jibblescribbits on Aug 20, 2008 10:09 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

How is air crazy? Or are we just talking about Beijing air now?

by Mike @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 11:49 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Reading it wrong

Women are batshit crazy.. they like food and air.

"A witty saying proves nothing."
- Voltaire (1694-1778)

by Jibblescribbits on Aug 20, 2008 12:12 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Doesn’t everybody like food and air?

by Mrs @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:25 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think he meant “women are batshit crazy AND they like food and air” not because.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:45 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Oh, well that makes complete sense. :-)

by Mrs @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:48 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Yeah, mine was better.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:52 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Modern Anthropology

This being an open thread and all (and me being on my lunch break), I’ll offer an additional topic of discussion: undergraduate apparel choices on American college campuses.

Undergrad classes start on Monday here, and many fresh-faced young pups have already arrived. On my way to get some food at the student center today, I noticed a trend in feminine fashion this season. That trend is tiny white thongs under tiny white shorts and skirts.

How did I notice this, you ask? Well, any man who works under a dress code and has a reasonable sense of style knows that you don’t wear a white t-shirt under a white dress shirt. Why? Because white is extremely visible through white. It makes no sense, but you can clearly see it. Instead, a modern man of style chooses a gray t-shirt, which is almost invisible under a white shirt. If you’ve not seen this yourself, give it a try. Other than maybe the hemmed edges of the sleeves, you can’t see a gray t-shirt through a white dress shirt.

Apparently, many young ladies today are unaware of this fact. It’s really unfortunate. Really.

/dirty old man

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 10:42 AM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Or

They do know the white under white rule and they are only continuing the disturbing “if you want to meet guys, dress like a hooker” trend.

InYoFace Hasek! InYoFace

by InYoFace on Aug 20, 2008 11:05 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If by “disturbing” you actually mean “perfectly acceptable and encouraged.”

But not encouraged by me, of course. The media! Blame the media!

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 11:06 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I have no problem with it visually. Its the attitudes some of these women tend to have. I know I am generalizing, but the ones that dress that way and then are irritated that people are looking at them, I worry about their understanding of society. Somewhere the train of logic is missing some key parts.

InYoFace Hasek! InYoFace

by InYoFace on Aug 20, 2008 11:11 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Well, considering I’ve never had the courage to actually speak to a woman who dresses like that, I honestly don’t know if they get irritated or not. One would think that dressing for attention would make subsequent attention acceptable, but like you said, the logic train never made it out of the station.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 11:20 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I never have either, but I have observed others. Its usually not pretty because the “hookers” are better than you.

InYoFace Hasek! InYoFace

by InYoFace on Aug 20, 2008 11:24 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The basic rule of thumb in those instances is that if you’re the kind of guy that is attracted to a the kind of girl that is dressed like that, then you are IN FACT not good enough for that woman.

Kinda like the old saying: I’d never want to be part of a club that would have me as a member.

Ohh, and 99.9% of those girls entering college are sloots. It’s called the american high school system.

by Mike @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 11:52 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

So wait, these girls are “sloots” but I’m not good enough for them because they’re attractive to me? How does anyone find love anymore?

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:04 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Internet dating, be who ever!

For example, I am the architect that designed the birds nest in Beijing.

InYoFace Hasek! InYoFace

by InYoFace on Aug 20, 2008 12:17 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I am George Clooney.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:52 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Officially Confused

I don’t exactly understand the complaint. A white skirt with a hot pink thong would for sure be showing through. Today, I am wearing white pants and a white thong underneath. I can assure you, I would not leave the house if I saw any semblance of skin showing through my pants. Is this the issue? (Note: these pants are actually made of fabric and by that I mean they are much thicker than see-through.)

Additionally, when I wear white dress shirts, I wear a white tank top underneath which covers the skin from showing through as that fabric is not thick enough to hide the skin, bra, ect. Sometimes I wear a different color for contrast and leave a button or two open.

These dressing habits hardly make me a “sloot”.

Don't Go, Joe!

by texacogirl on Aug 20, 2008 8:12 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If your pants are not see-through, then no, they are not the issue. We’re specifically referring to any white clothing you can clearly see through, especially when white undergarments are worn.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 8:55 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Makes Sense

But if a girl is going for the “wow” factor, why not through on the hot pink thong?

Just sayin’

Some chicks truly are clueless.

Don't Go, Joe!

by texacogirl on Aug 20, 2008 9:21 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

The hot pink thong would say “I’m a sloot, and I know it” the white under white at least leaves some doubt.

Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-

by Americanario on Aug 20, 2008 10:36 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

as in, “I’m a dumb sloot.”

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 21, 2008 5:04 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

"Scientific" study

This WAS the biggest waste of time and money and I’ll tell you why.

Ian Brown.

Not only has me seeing him live last weekend rekindled my love for anything remotely connected to him or John Squier (they’re more worth than the sum of their parts), he also has a very thin face. He also politely offered to chop off the hands of a flight stewardess with plastic cutlery.

And of course you can say that “they only reviewed Hockey players, and not people in general”. But Hockey players aren’t genetically born as hockey players.

Tom
Pointing out the fairly obvious since 1987

26 Card Jet

by Tommelot on Aug 20, 2008 12:19 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Also, since when do all penalty minutes represent aggressive behavior?

I would assume that aggressive in this regard means “trying to cause bodily harm to another person.” Most obstruction calls (holding, tripping, hooking, etc.) are committed in an effort merely to break up a play or slow down the opposition, not to break the dude’s face.

Maybe the study only looked at aggressive penalties like roughing, high-sticking, elbowing and fighting and it just wasn’t conveyed in the article about the study.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:50 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Back to face size for a sec

From everything I’ve read, most enforcers are a) the nicest guys on the team, and b) only got to the enforcer role because they realized that they weren’t going to make it on skill, but really wanted to play in the nhl, thus the fist work. How that correlates to face size I’ll never figure, but maybe a wide face means you can’t play hockey worth jack. (I’m going to measure mine right now!)

by TheRed on Aug 20, 2008 12:19 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I’d assume larger people have larger faces, and fighters in the NHL tend to be larger than other players. Not always, but usually. Size matters when you’re pummeling the hell out of the guy next to you.

But yeah, fighting in the NHL is not an outlet for an intrinsic character trait, but a job description. It’s a role. The guys most equipped to play that role effectively are the guys with bigger bodies, and therefore, bigger faces. This is not rocket science. It’s not even social science!

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:48 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I think it’s funny that in Baby @ MHH’s book “Z is for Zamboni” the guy drawn in to represent the “P is for Penalty” page is drawn as a big guy with a wide mean face. Just sayin’.

by Mrs @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:50 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

If it’s in a children’s book, it must be true!

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 12:53 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I disagree. Green eggs and ham taste like shit.

by Mike @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 3:07 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

This reminds me of an email I saw many years ago with “Rejected Dr. Suess Children’s Books.” One that I remember was “Horton Hires a Ho.” Another was “The Grinch’s Ten Inches.”

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Aug 20, 2008 3:19 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Those sound like bestsellers to me.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 7:44 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

My buddy has a tshirt with the “horton hires a ho” on it. Priceless graphic, too.

by TheRed on Aug 20, 2008 11:33 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

I bet it’s very classy.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 21, 2008 5:04 AM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Back To Skool

I hear you Joe. I don’t know how you have managed to still write for the blog at all. I have updated my websites once since I started grad school in June. Shoot, I barely even keep up with reading about the Avs. Color me impressed with your multitaskness. Where are you studying? The undergrads are just showing up here but they don’t seem to be rocking the thongs as hard.

Never trust the lunch lady.

by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Aug 20, 2008 4:46 PM MDT reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Louisville. The Big East is white thong country.

It helps that both my job and my school are in the same place so I don’t have to travel much. That gives me a little bit of extra time.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe @ MHH on Aug 20, 2008 7:43 PM MDT to parent up reply reply actions actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.
Start posting about the Avalanche »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

4786_695297176842_12128056_41106654_7868483_n_small
Joe Sakic's future.
180px-don-music_small
Smyth Dealt To LA For Quincy, Preissing, 5th Rounder
Small
This is kinda crappy... Way to promote hockey, and all sports in general
Usf_small
Sakic Listed on Canada's Olympic camp roster!
Rockies_small
Lines?
Razor_small
Not Bad...So Far
Small
Huet to Avs?
Usf_small
Bouwmeester signs 5 year deal with the Flames
Usf_small
Paul Stastny included in USA Olympic camp roster
Usf_small
Cody McCormick not given qualifying offer by Avs; to become a UFA

Post_icon New FanPost All FanPosts Carrot-mini


Play-by-Play

Icon_small Joe @ MHH

New_profile_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Color Commentary

Profilepic2_small Mike @ MHH

Boone_small Angélique C. Murray

Official Partner of Yahoo! Sports