31-10-7 Just Isn't Good Enough When You're Peter Budaj

I've probably added four or five inches to my biceps carrying all this water for Avalanche goaltender Peter Budaj. But even if I don't convince anyone but myself, I'll stick to my guns and defend him as long as he keeps playing well.
Why this worn-out topic again? Because of Terry Frei, of course.
In an otherwise unremarkable piece about the direction the Avalanche franchise might have gone if Joe Sakic hadn't come back, Frei sneaks in this little gem:
In the net, can the Avs get the Andrew Raycroft who won the Calder Trophy with Boston or the Raycroft who was awful at Toronto? Or can Peter Budaj, who hasn't been able to solidify his hold on the No. 1 job despite flashes in the past three seasons, finally pull that off and perhaps even join the league's upper tier?
The italics are mine.
The contention that Budaj is at fault for being relegated to backup last season seems a little strange. For one, Jose Theodore got hot last year. But before that, Budaj wasn't really given a chance to be the number one goalie anyway. Even when Theodore was still sucking something awful, Budaj was being relegated to backup---or at least suffering through that horrible goalie carousel.
While it was obvious that Joel Quenneville's juggling of his goaltenders was a horrible strategy, some continue to blame the goalies (namely Budaj) for that major coaching screw up. As if Quenneville had no choice but to play each goalie only a game or two at a time.
But let's look at some of Budaj's "flashes" and see if they warranted his continued relegation.
Budaj's first real chance to prove himself was between March 9th and April 9th of 2006. David Aebischer had been traded and replacement Jose Theodore was still recovering from injury, so Budaj (23 and a rookie at the time), was leaned on to fill the gap. How did he do? He went 7-4-2 including 2 shutouts and a save percentage of .907. Not a stellar showing, sure, but solid considering his lack of experience and the shakiness of the defense in front of him. And remember, he wasn't replaced by Theodore because of poor performance. The Avalanche front office specifically traded starter Aebischer for starter Theodore. Budaj was only the interim starter because the team assumed Theodore would be cut out for the role of number one as soon as he recovered from his foot injury.
Theodore went 1-2-1 to finish the season, played well in the conference quarterfinals then completely tanked against the Ducks in the second round.
In 2006-07, Joel Quenneville couldn't figure out what the hell to do with Budaj or Theodore, and alternated them back and forth for the first half of the season. Neither goalie played more than three games straight until Quenneville had had enough of Theodore and benched him on December 29th. Budaj then played twelve consecutive games, going 6-4-2. Again, not amazing, but he did have a save percentage better than .930 in five of those games, and better than .900 in nine.
The carousel got going again on January 28th and lasted until February 25th. Then, Budaj took over. And by took over, I mean he spanked the entire Northwest Division for more than a month. From February 27th until April 8th---the last game of the season---Budaj went 13-1-2, interrupted only three times by Jose Theodore, who went 2-1-0 during that time period. Budaj had a five-game winning streak and two four-game winning streaks as well. If that wasn't an indication of his ability when given consistent starts, what was?
Budaj finished the year with an excellent record of 31-16, a respectable goals against average of 2.58 and a save percentage of .905. Considering Jose Theodore's consistent crapping of the bed that year, it was assumed that Budaj would wrest the starting job away for good.
But that was not in the cards. Whether it was Budaj's "shaky" training camp (it wasn't that shaky, just not lights-out), or the Avalanche front office's insistence on getting their money's worth out of Jose Theodore, Coach Q continued the infuriating goalie carousel at the start of the 2007-08 season. Again, neither goalie played more than three games straight until December 13th. On that date, Budaj was given the chance to play consistently, and he rewarded the team with a 5-1-1 record in the next seven consecutive games. Jose Theodore then played one game, conceivably just to give Budaj a rest. Unfortunately, Budaj's next two games, on December 31st and January 2nd, were losses, and from that time on Jose Theodore was the starting goalie. Luckily Theodore played well, but there was no indication at all that Budaj would not have done the same had he been given the opportunity to do so.
So, in Peter Budaj's mere four chances to actually prove himself by consistently starting in net, his record was 31-10-7. That's pretty damn good. Budaj seems to suffer and play inconsistently when he starts inconsistently. The more regular his appearances, the more regular his wins. Unfortunately, under Coach Q, no amount of consistency or solid play was good enough when the team was still trying to save Jose Theodore's all-but-over career in net. Budaj's supposed inability to tie down the number one spot was far more the fault of the Save Theodore order and the coaching staff than his own shortcomings.
Assuming Tony Granato doesn't waste time trying to save the career of Andrew Raycroft, Peter Budaj will finally get the opportunity to prove himself---again. He will either do very well or he won't. He will lose some games, like any goalie will. I'm perfectly comfortable with the possibility that he could collapse under the pressure and suck horribly all season, leaving the Avalanche no choice but to lean on Raycroft or trade somebody good for another goalie. That's not impossible. But I also know that Budaj has indeed proven himself, and that the only problem seems to be that nobody ever paid attention. I trust he'll do just fine. Hopefully he doesn't make me look like an ass...
0 recs |
23 comments
|
Comments
It appears that nobody outside of some of us at this site think Budaj is fit to carry Theo’s jockstrap, much less be the regular starter for this team. No matter how his numbers are compared to Theo’s over the same time span, he comes out the same or better yet everybody is willing to toss him aside while Theo gets a ridiculous amount of doubt benefits from the US and Canadian governments. The fact that people use arguments like the desperation of the team was the reason they went on The Streak or Theo has a better resume to discredit even the possibility of Boots assuming the starting role pisses me off. One: if the team plays great in front of Boots and they get the W, it’s all due to the team, while if they play like ass, and Budaj gets an L hung on him, it’s all Budaj’s fault. Conversely, if Theo sucked goat balls in net, the team let him down because he’s obviously a talented goalie with a pedigree who is more trustworthy and when the team plays well and gets a W even in a shaky appearance by Theodore, all of a sudden Three-or-four “did enough to win.” The double standards and flip-floppery are rampant and tired. Two: Theo’s pedigree was pre-lockout, Eastern Conference inflation. He went downhill fast. Did he deserve a second chance? Sure. Did he show flashes of brilliance? Sure. Does it AUTO-FUCKING-MATICALLY mean he’s a hands-down, lights-out, every-which-way-but-loose, better goaltender. Not remotely.
I have to go lie down now and do my breathing exercises till my meds kick in…on account of my rage…
by Mike @ MHH on Sep 9, 2008 8:23 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
That same rage is what drives this post. Seriously, I’m starting to think that anything less than a Vezina and a Stanley Cup this season will mean the end of poor Boots.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe Dunman on Sep 9, 2008 8:53 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
With some people I don’t even think that will be enough.
Boods will have won those due to a great defense core and a lights out scoring offense.
Remember Theo was the second coming of St Patrick…..(I almost threw up typing that).
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on Sep 9, 2008 1:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arguments
One of my favorite arguments, to show how unfairly Budaj was treated, is this:
Last season, Budaj was the starter, for good reason (the streak was the year before). He started 4 of the first 5 games for the Avs, and 6 of the first 9. His stats in his first 4 starts were:
3-1, 2.68 GAA, .907Sv%.
Not bad, and certainly not bad enough to lose the starting job (especially considering his performance at the end of the previous season). Then he played two more games, and he played so poorly that he his stats after 6 regular season games were:
4-2, 2.62GAA, .910Sv%
Neither of those lines are great, but neither are all that bad. Included in that is one aberration game where the entire team played awful, not just Budaj. This was the 4-0 loss to Nashville the second game of the season (Joe knows this one well). If you exclude that game Budaj’s stats from those 5 games were:
4-1, 2.21GAA, .924Sv%…. in other words, in all but one game as the clear starter, Budaj was lights out!
Granted that’s cherrypicking stats just a bit, but there is no possible way to look at those stats (and his play) and see any reason to open up a goalie controversy that would define the first half of the season. Oh and just for shit’s and giggles Theo’s stats over the same time (the first 9 games) were:
3 GP, 1-2, 3.90 GAA, .857Sv%
There is absolutely no way that goalie competition should have ever been opened up. It is completely inexcusable and is probably the main reason we were calling for Q’s head and now he is unemployed. After the first 9 games (and based on the previous season) there i no way any sane person could have argued that Budaj shouldn’t have been the starter, yet he wasn’t.
I hope he plays well next season but there’s no reason to believe he won’t. The only cause for concern would be to see how he’s going to be over the course of an entire season.
"A witty saying proves nothing."
- Voltaire (1694-1778)
by Jibblescribbits on Sep 9, 2008 1:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Break out the thesaurus too
Who the hell uses the word “vacillating” in a sports article? I mean, sometimes I pull out some odd words but good grief, that one is simply not a cromulent word to use.
by ShaneG on Sep 9, 2008 9:58 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Clearly, the intellect of Frei is far beyond what your mortal mind can comprehend.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe Dunman on Sep 9, 2008 10:30 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Budaj
l look forward to seeing Boots give his doubters the boot. No one seems to remember that he came into the Detroit series and gave us a chance to win in a couple of games after The Theo gave up goal after goal. Sure he didn’t look so good in the last game with Detroit when we had many of our starters sitting or playing injured but no one else looked too good either. I find the crowd around our seats supportive of Budaj. Let’s hope we can give him that support again.
by eve on Sep 9, 2008 9:59 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
And he even grew a beard!
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe Dunman on Sep 9, 2008 10:31 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Theo gives up 3-4 a game vs detroit and Budaj gives up 1. Damn that Budaj.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on Sep 9, 2008 1:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Boots is the man
and his talking to the goalposts will be brought back into the forefront this year. I missed watching him last year and when Raycroft inevitably bombs, the job should be pretty much sewn up.
I wish I got to this thread earlier so people wouldn’t have taken what I wanted to say already (namely Mike’s rage post). I always show up late (baaaaw).
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Sep 9, 2008 2:23 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Talking to the goalposts? Maybe that the Avs secret weapon, Roy did and he was beyond great, Boots does it and he’s great too. Maybe i should try that, It seems easier than getting into the right position and watching the puck.
"To have arrived on this Earth as a product of a biological accident, only to depart through human arrogance, would be the ultimate irony"
R. Leakey, Origins; 1977
"Two roads divurged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
by Savage33 on Sep 10, 2008 4:27 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
…It seems easier than getting into the right position and watching the puck.
Yeah, that technique shit if for losers!!
by Mike @ MHH on Sep 10, 2008 10:24 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
More Budaj defense
I posted this at Hfboards not too long ago, being one of the afformentioned water carriers. Feel free to add it to the ongoing Budaj defense manifesto.
Budaj is a guy who has every excuse in the entire world to lack confidence. He’s a guy who should have his nerves frayed and his whole psyc completely screwed up. In my estimation he’s been stepped on over and over throughout his long tenure with the Avalanche.
This all started when Phillip Sauve was ordained the successor to Roy. Sauve had his own connection to the Avalanche and Lacroix. Despite Budaj’s tremendous success Toronto in the OHL and his pick in the second round. He got bridesmaid duties to Sauve. Despite never been the official starter in Hershey he did extremely well and the old Bears faithful will quickly confirm that he was the better of the goaltenders. But despite those things it was Sauve that got the nods from the Avalanche brass. It seemed like no matter what he did, it was never good enough. Then comes the Avalanche call up after they finally got rid of Sauve. Budaj comes in to back up Abby. What do the Avs do going in to the playoffs? They deal for Salo who really never plays at all. Still Budaj hangs tough, so much so in the end that the Avs lean on him to carry the team to the playoffs after the Abby trade so Theo can rest his knee. The following year Theo sucks just about as much as you can suck and Budaj almost pulls off the miracle run at the end of the season. EVERYONE is thinking Budaj is the clear starter going in to the next year. Hell, there’s serious talk of just buy Theo out. But not only does Theo stay on board but Q has the balls to say there is no clear starter going in to training camp! Seriously, how bad do you have to be with goalies to even make such a statement when a guy just put the team on his shoulders for you last year? So, Budaj goes through camp with this crap and he starts out the year pretty well.
http://sports.espn.go.com/nhl/teams/…=col&year=2008
Budaj beats Dallas, loses with 0 goal support in a horrid game in Nashville, wins the 3rd game San Jo-Fricken early favorite to win the cup-se. Then he doesn’t get the start in game 4?! Holy Hells, that’s perfect Coach Q for you. That is the chance at starting goalie? That’s what it looks like? That’s how you lose your starting job, by winning? What did it take for Budaj to win the job anyway? 6-0 with a 1.5 GAA?
Here’s my view on Budaj and the Avs going in to ‘08. We are no worse off than going in to ’07 in reference to goalie confidence from the fans. Except now we have a coach that’s actually pretty good with goaltenders. Then again, compared with Q anyone outside of Mike Keane would be better. Now, Budaj is finally the clear starter. No more wishy, washy garbage, he is the starter. Budaj hasn’t been the clear starter for his hockey team since eight years ago with the Toronto Major’s. Where, incidentally he was clearly the best goaltender of the entire league. His other chance at starter would be for Slovakia in the 2006 Olympics. Where he beat Bryzgalov (Russia) and DiPietro (USA). Just as a bonus to all the Theo lovers from the last playoffs, he also beat Backstrom (Finland) in the 2008 IIHF World Championships recently.
He’s done nothing in his career but win. The Avs have invested a ton of time in his development and he’s paid his dues. In my mind he’s never been named the clear starter of the Avs except after the Abby trade and “the streak” when Theo finally found Q’s doghouse for good. His other performances as a #1 in the OHL and International play have been very successful.
by Dario on Sep 9, 2008 8:24 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I wonder how we’ll all react at the end of September when Granato announces that Andrew Raycroft will be the starting goalie.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe Dunman on Sep 9, 2008 8:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I predict Granato will show up missing an ear on opening day.
by Dario on Sep 9, 2008 10:37 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I was hoping the Avs would show up missing a Granato on opening day.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Sep 10, 2008 11:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
As long as it’s Tony. I’ve got no problem with Cammie.
by Mike @ MHH on Sep 10, 2008 11:48 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Glad to see I'm not alone
Living out in the desert in California, we don’t get a lot of hockey news (surprise) and the few times that I get to see the Avalanche is either when they’re playing the Kings or Ducks.
Toward the end of last season, my son and I were always confused as to why Theo was in instead of Boots. Of the few games we get to see (and even rarer when Budaj was in) he always seemed like a wall whereas Josie looked like a sieve!
Hopefully, Boots will get the chance to show what he can do based on his skills, not on his contract! This sounds similar to an argument at the Mile High Report about replacing Dre’ Bly with one of the other “cheaper” corner backs. It won’t happen because we’re paying Bly too much!
"It's all over Fat Man" - Tom Jackson to John Madden 1977 AFC Championship Game
"I love your analysis of our team. Its kinda like watching a spider monkey trying to figure out a jar of peanuts.. you know whats going on.. you know whats in there, but to actually figure it out, is just a bit beyond your mental skills..."
- Bronco Dano
by DesertBroncoFan on Sep 10, 2008 2:29 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the money was definitely the reason why Theo kept getting chances to play. He just got lucky to finally regain some of his skill at the end of last season.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe Dunman on Sep 10, 2008 2:47 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So that huge contract actually HELPED Theo in his carreer? That’s good marketing
26 Card Jet
by Tommelot on Sep 11, 2008 3:57 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
A lot of coaches
In a lot of sports tend to keep this tired philosophy of starting who ever makes more money. “Winning be damned, lets force our money’s worth out of him.”
InYoFace Hasek! InYoFace
by InYoFace on Sep 10, 2008 2:54 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Excellent
I was browsing SI.com, of course in search of more articles about Golden Boy’s “devastating” knee injury and how the sports mecca Boston is stunned and heartbroken, when I came across this in-depth blurb about how the Avalanche will have the second-worst goaltending tandem in the West, beating only the Kings. It then went on to mention how that male model we had last year experienced a “career resurgence” in Colorado and even said we “lost” him in free agency.
Yeah. Right. Lose an overpaid backup-caliber playboy, gain a hard-working, underappreciated, starting-caliber and motivated Boots. How can we sustain such a loss?
P.S. Is my overly sarcastic tone a little too over the top?
by SlamDunkTheFunk on Sep 10, 2008 6:22 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
No, your overly sarcastic tone is music to my eyes.
I always find it so amazing the ire that bloggers receive when the amount of research many of us do (even easy stuff like Budaj’s past performances) is twice as much (or more) than what is done by so-called journalistic experts. It took me literally thirty minutes to determine Budaj’s 31-10-7 record in consistent starts. Why has nobody in the press taken that time?
Hopefully Boots makes us all look like geniuses for trusting his past performances.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe Dunman on Sep 10, 2008 6:50 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs





























