Game 4 Recap: Blackhawks 4 - Avalanche 3 (Shootout)
Don't give us none of your aggravation
We had it with your discipline
Saturday night's alright for fighting
Get a little action in
-Elton John
Sadly, there wasn't much fighting last night, although there certainly should have been. There was some crazy action, however, as the Avalanche lost to the Blackhawks 4-3 in the shootout. Once again, we're reminded that these are not the same old-Avs. Even though we ultimately had to settle for the loser point, the Avalanche were fun to watch. Again, that's something we haven't been able to say for a while, save for that too-brief comeback by Peter Forsberg.
It didn't start out crazy. The only scoring in the first period was a Cam Barker goal late in the first facilited by Tomas Kopecky mugging Chris Anderson deep in the paint. Kopecky pulled this stunt all night long and was never called for it. Strangely and conspicuously, no one from the Avalanche stepped up to put a stop to that nonesense. Coming after Thursday's game where no one made Patric Hornqvist pay for his blatant steamrolling of Anderson, I have to say I'm scratching my head a little. A lot, actually. Ditto for the Niklas Hjalmarsson crosscheck to the face of Darcy Tucker. While this was a terrible non-call (the officiating from Ian Walsh and Chris Rooney was horrendous, and this happened in clear view of one of them), it's really something that should have been, uh, handled internally. Cody McLeod did get a hard check on Hjalmarsson late in the 3rd, but that was just an incidental hockey hit. I don't know if it's Sacco keeping everyone on a tight leash or something else, but isn't this exactly why David Koci is dressed?
Okay, back to the game. While there was just the one first period goal, the 2nd period became wide open. I guess it shouldn't be that much of a surprise, as 8 of the Avs 13 goals have been scored in the 2nd frame. Matt Hendricks got things started 2:35 when his hard hit in the corner pressured a Blackhawk to make a bad pass that was intercepted by TJ Galiardi coming in from the bench. Galiardi's shot was stopped, but Hendricks was right there to backhand a rebound over Cristobal Huet's pads. It knotted the game up at 1 and was Hendricks first NHL goal. The Blackhawks appeared to take the lead a couple minutes later when Anderson made a frantic goal line save on a wraparound attempt that was incorrectly called a goal (by a ref who was clearly screened from the puck). Thankfully, the goal was overturned on review. Just a few minutes after that, Wojtek Wolski beautifully redirected Scott Hannan's pass from the point to give the Avalanche their first lead of the game. The celebration was shortlived, as Andrew Ladd took advantaged of some defensive scrambling by the Avs to knot the game up at 2.
One of the bright spots early on this year has been the penalty kill. The Avalanche did allow one PP goal tonight (the Barker goal that should have been waved off), but killed off 4 others including a critical 5 on 3 midway through the 2nd period. Joe Sacco has been using the youngsters on the kill - Galiardi, O'Reilly, McLeod and Duchene are the top 4 forwards in SH ice time - and their aggressive puck pursuit has been paying off so far. And, not long after killing off the 5 on 3, Colorado got a 5 on 3 of their own and converted with Milan Hejduk's first goal of the season. Unfortunately, a big defensive breakdown (and a huge overcommittment by Anderson) allowed the Hawks to tie the game again with a shorthanded goal soon after. After a wild 2nd period, the score was 3-3.
And that was it for the scoring. Both teams tightened up considerably in the 3rd period. There were some chances by both clubs, including a heart-stopping moment as time was running out when Paul Stastny calmly deflected the puck away from a wide open player, but no goals. Both teams then skated through a scoreless OT before going to the shootout.
I could probably fill a recap with just the shootout summary, but I'll keep to the bullet points. Anderson looked shaky early on, but then shook it off. Wolski missed. Svatos fooled Huet so badly with his shot that Huet raised his stick in celebration...only to look behind to see the puck in the net. And Joe Sacco went with Darcy Tucker (who scored) and Matt Hendricks (who didn't come close) instead of Galiardi. I think that covers it.
It's only 4 games, but I am pleased with the Avalanche so far. They are 2-1-1 and have been competitive in every game. It's not all roses, but there's a lot of unexpected bright spots (special teams, Anderson, Quincey, Hannan and Tucker to name a few) that are basking us with little rays of hope. I hope it lasts.
TJ Hensick was a healthy scratch despite what I thought was a good performance on Thursday. David Koci skated for 7 completely invisible shifts in his place. On defense, Ruslan Salei missed the game and has apparently been placed on the IR. For all the improvements the Avalanche organization has made in the area of public relations, they still have a lot of work to do. Note to Avalanche brass: it would be cool to hear about stuff like that before the games, not during the games.
- Wolski - Stastny - Hejduk
- McLeod - Duchene - Svatos
- Tucker - O'Reilly - Stewart
- Koci - Galiardi - Hendricks
- Liles - Foote
- Quincey - Hannan
- Cumiskey - Clark
Many have commented in the game thread behemoth and the post-game reaction that a new line of McLeod - O'Reilly - Galiardi emerged last night and looked pretty good. Another odd one out there at one point was Tucker - Hendricks - Stewart. This was right after Chicago's first goal and I believe they were out there for a reason...but nothing came of it.
- 5 of the 6 goals scored tonight were the first of the season for the goal scorer.
- The Avs have been outshot 51-24 in 3rd periods this year.
- 9 of the Avs' 19 shots were from the defensemen. Kyle Quincey had 4, tops on the team
- Remember that big hit by Wolski on Patrick Kane a few minutes into the game? The scorekeeper didn't; Wolski officially had 0 hits.
The Avalanche have a wake and skate on Monday in Boston. Gametime is 1pm eastern, 11 am in Denver.
The Avalanche played its second game of a seven-game road trip, the team's longest since moving to Denver from Quebec City in 1995. Chicago played its first game at the United Center after opening the season with two contests against Florida in Helsinki, followed by a game in Detroit. - AP
"T.J. Galiardi made the great play, picking off a centering pass there, and I just went to the net and got a rebound goal," Hendricks said. "It was kind of a dirty, ugly one, and I'm glad it's over with. It's kind of a dream come true in a sense; you wait your whole life for that." - Terry Frei, Denver Post
Bottom two lines were very good tonight. Darcy Tucker? What the hell man? This is the energy guy I thought we were getting last year. O'Reilly? Killer game. Great play on the 5 on 3. The Avs need more games like this from their bottom lines. Now only if they had a true 2nd line. - InYouFace, MHH
"I certainly thought [Wolski] played much better tonight," Sacco said. "He had more urgency in his game. He was making better decisions with the puck. He's a good, skilled player, but we want him to compete every shift, every game." - Terry Frei, Denver Post
It’s that simple for the Avs: Paul Stastny needs to average a point a game, period, if this team is going anywhere this season. Tonight in Chicago, when the game was there for the taking, a Stastny goal was what was in order. But it didn’t happen. - Adrian Dater, All Things Avs
here were moments where the Hawks looked like they were dominating the game (including most of the third period) but giving up 3 goals in the second period certainly doesn't make you feel great. I guess it's good that none of the three were high glove side (I don't think they were anyway?) - Matthew Dirt, Second City Hockey
Huet played a solid game and really only let in 1 soft goal , the first Colorado goal was off a rebound. In regulation/OT, Christobal only faced 19 shots. Surprisingly, Huet shined in the shutout, making 6 stops and kept the Hawks in it. - Blackhawks Buzz
It wasn't always pretty, but the Blackhawks gained two important home ice points. The Avs, playing their second of a season-long seven game road trip, proved a little mightier than the preseason predictions of a last place finish in the Western Conference. Behind the strong goaltending of Park Ridge native Craig Anderson, the young Avalanche played a grind-it-out hockey game that was able to keep the Blackhawks off-balance most of the night. - Mark Kiley, Blackhawks Confidential
"That was the deepest I've ever been," Hawks coach Joel Quenneville said [obviously forgetting this game]. "Certainly we like the result. We had many times a chance to win it and then Kopecky came up big to sustain it and Ladd finished it. (Huet) made several key saves and gave us a chance to sustain it and we finally won. He looked good there." - Chris Kuc, Chicago Tribune
Sharp is still on the power play point. I don’t see that ending well. - Blackhawkbob, Fifth Feather (we've been there, Bob, and feel your pain).
The Hawks' power play. Once again, the Hawks went on a 5-on-3 power play and the other team had them right where they wanted them. They had a full minute with a 2-man advantage, and managed only one shot. That's unacceptable. - Hockeynight.com (see above)
0 recs |
35 comments
|
Comments
I disagree with the assessment that Anderson overplayed the SH goal. Was he
1) magically supposed to know that the three forwards and one defenseman were taking the shooter out of stupidity and not because he was the only threat,
2) supposed to realize that Hot Pocket had bought a ticket on the backside instead of playing his man,
3) and play the pass instead of the shooter (something you’re never supposed to do)?
You can bitch that he shouldn’t have reacted by butterflying on the pass, and I’ll agree, but lay that goal at his feet after two horrendous plays by Clark followed by a defensive zone fail of epic proportions by the PP unit isn’t a very genuine analysis.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
by Mike @ MHH on Oct 11, 2009 9:55 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
oh, the defense gets blame for sure. he just looked like he was WAY out of the net to me. I know you aren’t supposed to play the pass, and I guess it wouldn’t have been an issue of Liles wasn’t busy checking himself out in a mirror (or whatever), but it still seemed he could take some blame there.
in a related question, on that big blast by Burish late in the game, how come Anderson was on the ice before the shot was taken? and by “on the ice” I don’t mean in a butterfly. I mean, laying on the ice. Bufyglien was in front – did he take him down?
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 11, 2009 11:02 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Chicago p-b-p guy insinuated that there was some contact but Anderson embellished to try and draw a call. Of course they thought the not-incidental contact on the first goal was just good positioning “in front of the crease”, so in all likelihood it was blatant goaltender interference that wasn’t called.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
by Mike @ MHH on Oct 11, 2009 1:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
(a) the officiating was the worst i’ve ever seen
(b) the chicago p-b-p guys are effing IDIOTS and bigger homers than i’ve ever seen in no small part due to the fact that they thought the officiating was spot on. they even claimed quincey was faking it when he went down, despite the fact he looked completely lost afterward, shaking his head and clearly unsure of where he even was.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 11, 2009 2:05 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed.
All I was able to see was the NHL.COM highlights and couldn’t agree more. How in gods name can you call that a goal when your 12 feet away behind 3 players? For the first time in my life, I’m going to defend Darcy Tucker, how do you miss that call? Doesn’t the NHL watch the games for missed calls like that for possible fine or suspension?
The 2009-2010 Avs: Proof that god hates me.
by i2strange97 on Oct 11, 2009 2:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i would have found it humorous (if i wasn’t so pissed already) that the chicago commentators defended the non-call on tucker because, as they said, the official’s sightline was blocked by the CROSSBAR. yeah, it’s impossible to see a guy swing his fucking stick like he’s in the world series because you’re on the other side of the goal.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 11, 2009 2:31 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Dearest Koci
You are paid to be an Enforcer. If you aren’t going to take out punks who molest your teammates, exactly what purpose are you serving being on the ice?
Loves and Kisses,
hockeymom
Colorado Avalanche: Please excuse the mess while we are under construction.
by hockeymom on Oct 11, 2009 5:34 PM MDT up reply actions 4 recs
Didn't see the game
But was Chris Stewart invisible last night? Since about his 3rd or 4th week up last year, I’ve been disappointed. The guy has excellent size, speed, and puck skills, but to me he just seems to be lost out there. He seems to be gliding. I think a PP of Hejduk/Stastny/Stewart/Duchene/Quincey could be sick with Stewart wreaking havoc in front of the net rather than Duchene, but Stewart just doesn’t seem to realize how big and fast he is. If he’d use his body, the guy could be a top-line forward playing 18-20 minutes every night. He just seems to be content with playing on the 3rd line, though. That’s very disappointing to me, especially when a guy like Cody McLeod with far lesser skills works his tail off and plays top-6 minutes.
"You were born to be a player. You were meant to be here. This moment is yours." -- Coach Herb Brooks' pregame speech prior to the Miracle on Ice
by wtnelson on Oct 11, 2009 10:55 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
other than some post-whistle stuff (mostly consisting of getting taunted by Dustin Byfuglien, I believe), he didn’t have much of an impact.
the reason is clear: I picked him to have a breakout year this year. Who did I pick last year? Hensick. Clearly, I need to stop doing that.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 11, 2009 10:59 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You should have seen his penalty shot. It was… not good.
by Dario on Oct 11, 2009 11:46 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
speaking of penalty shots…Duchene and Radar both attempted a shootout shot even though they have yet to score an NHL goal. that can’t be something that’s happened very often
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 11, 2009 11:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I liked the call to put those guys in the shootout. Speaking from my own experience, netting a shootout goal has helped boost my confidence and put an end to a couple nasty cold streaks. I’m not saying that either Duchene or O’Reilley are in a “cold streak” but I think it would have done wonders for their confidence if they could have buried one.
by centreice on Oct 11, 2009 1:26 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was a quality night of hockey for the Avs. A point on the road against a max cap team for their home opener is no small accomplishment.
Last years Avs team would have gone the wrong direction after the home team got the generous whistle. This years Avs team fought through some homer officiating and made a game of it. I will watch a team with that personality every time.
After a poor performance in Nashville I thought O’Reily was a beast last night. If he keeps that up he’s going to make it very hard to send him down to the OHL because whoever takes his position simply won’t be as good on the PK. You could put Wolski out there on the PK because he’s good at it but he’s the kind of hockey player that needs his legs and the PK seems to hurt other parts of his game. O’Reily as a 3rd line guy isn’t going to command a huge contract when his rookie deal is up so the cost of losing a year on his UFA eligability might not be so high.
Clark may have been bad but he was still way better than Salei. Cumiskey is a heart attack waiting to happen. He’s got to know that jumping up in the play when you just got the lead isn’t good timing. He jumped in to the rush, a turn over happened in the neutral zone and it lead a goal. It’s not his fault there was a turn over in the neutral zone but he’s got to pick his spots and it’s not when you got a lead on the road in the 3rd period.
Foote, Quincey and especially Hannan were outstanding last night. I thought Duchene looked like he lost some of his legs last night.
by Dario on Oct 11, 2009 11:57 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Duchene did look a little lost last night… I have been playing him up to my friends, and when they came over last night to watch the game, he did very little. No big mistakes, but nothing flashy either that I could point at and say “look! the future is near!”
Thanks Joe...
by mfured20 on Oct 11, 2009 12:07 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
haha I was joking about that actually. When regulation ended, I threw up my arms and yelled “Duchene didn’t do a SINGLE incredible move all night!” I mean really, that was unacceptable
by centreice on Oct 11, 2009 1:27 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
He was well contained all night until late in the 3rd when he still had some jump and the Chicago defenders were letting him skate.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
by Mike @ MHH on Oct 11, 2009 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed. If anything, I viewed tonight’s game as the league taking notice of our Matty D
by centreice on Oct 11, 2009 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
and...
i suspect the league is taking notice of the avs as a whole. this is certainly not the team the pundits predicted. should be interesting to see how they respond to not being viewed as an easy 2 pts anymore
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 11, 2009 2:08 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Foote looked good when he was doing Footer-esque things like taking Toews to the corner and playing man-to-man, but when he needed to do some “new” NHL stuff like clear screens in front of his goalie, he failed miserably. It seems to be rubbing off on Liles too. Neither one of them is controlling the area in front of the goalie. Everytime a gigantic screen was set in front of Anderson, it seemed like #’s 4 and 52 where standing IN FRONT of the screeners.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
by Mike @ MHH on Oct 11, 2009 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i didn’t like the footer-liles pairing. i think it lessened both of their games. i also noticed truly how slow foote is. he’s never been a speed demon, but age is definitely a huge factor for him.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 11, 2009 2:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Speaking of defensemen
Cumiskey seems to be getting more confident. He has some room to grow but I do think Sacco has confidence in him which is carrying over to his play. There were 3-4 plays last night in our zone where I expected a mistake by him but he played solid defense instead. When Preissing returns i hope Clark goes instead of Cumiskey.
by c6hor8 on Oct 11, 2009 6:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
he does. Sacco even put him out on the PK for a shift…with the faceoff in the Avalanche zone
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 11, 2009 6:43 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
how much do you think the wolski benching has to do with that? you’d have to believe players are realizing that with sacco, no one is a sure-bet for the line up.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 11, 2009 6:49 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
it sure shook me up! had to do something similar to his players
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 11, 2009 7:20 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Being at the game, let me share a few things.
- Foote has legs of cement, he is SLOOOOOOOOW, and looks really out of place. Even though he had a decent game, his best plays seemed to come as a reaction to being beat
- Anderson is nuts…he tried several times to make saves with his head, just to redirect thing.
- Duchene is clearly holding his stick a bit too much, and I think Huet knew it. On his SO shot, he waited too long…again…and Huet poked it before he even had a chance.
- I was very happy that the Avs were able to get a point from a game where they were outplayed, and outmatched by a club that is really superior to them (at least on paper).
I proudly was displayed (as was my wife) in Avs colors (one of only 4 people in Avs stuff in the 4 nearest sections)…and took some good natured ribbing, but had a blast. I know a lot of people aren’t fans of the shootout, but 9 round ones are GOOD fun.
I put a Fanshot up of my pics from the game. They aren’t edited yet….they are direct from the camera. I’ll make em better later
by chiavsfan on Oct 12, 2009 6:01 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Were you in Sec. 314?
We had 3 or 4 people in Avs sweaters a few rows down, and we also had next season’s cast of “Tool Academy” right in front of us, just cursing the Avs fans out.
I apologize on behalf of Hawks fans everywhere.
HOCKEENIGHT.COM...home of FRIDAY NIGHT FIGHTS and the HOCKEENIGHT PUCKCAST!!!
by Forklift14 on Oct 12, 2009 8:57 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
331…we had some hecklers, but they were more heckling Huet and Campbell, and yelling about Detroit (they said Detroit Sucks works better than Colorado Sucks). In fact, a few of the more voacl ones were in amazement of Duchene, and wished he had scored. So all was well from our end
by chiavsfan on Oct 12, 2009 9:12 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
(they said Detroit Sucks works better than Colorado Sucks)
This has nothing to do with Cadence or # of Syllables.
The 2009-10 Colorado Avalanche: Aiming for the Charity Point
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 12, 2009 9:49 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Actually it was a little bit of both. We talked about our shared hatred of the Red Wings… and after an entertaining game, all was well
by chiavsfan on Oct 12, 2009 9:58 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Shootout
Anyone have a link for the entire shootout, I wanna see the Svatos goal…
by Avalanche318 on Oct 12, 2009 9:53 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
So does Huet…
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
by Mike @ MHH on Oct 13, 2009 9:32 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
zing!!
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 14, 2009 10:45 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Lack of team toughness
Is really bugging the heck out of me. Since the refs weren’t going to do a damn thing about it, someone needed to slam Kopecky’s goalie molesting ass to the ice. Absolutely ridiculous that he was never called for goaltender interference, especially on that first goal. And to let a guy skate free after a blatant cheap shot like the one to Tucker?
I don’t know what it is about this team that makes them so passive when their teammates are getting mugged? I know you don’t want to start taking dumb penalties, but to just pretend that nothing is going on out there? It was bad last season, and even with their improved play, it is an area that still puzzles me.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 12, 2009 9:57 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 




























