After 5 Games...
These are the things I like about the Colorado Avalanche:
- Being competitive in every game
- Having a point shot on the powerplay
- An effective penalty kill
- Scott Hannan being a +3
- Craig Anderson
- Kyle Quincey
- Darcy Tucker
- That Duchene kid
- Having a very real chance of being ahead of the Wings in the standings when we play them on Saturday
- The sun shining on my face
These are the things that I don't like about the Colorado Avalanche:
- Being outshot in every third period so far
- Faceoffs
- Liking Darcy Tucker
- Chris Stewart
- Liles' inability to clear the puck
- Matt Hendricks in the shootout
- An ineffective 2nd line
- The sun shining on my face
On the whole, the pros outweigh the cons, don't you think?
105 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Another like
Coaching staff actually, ummmm, doing stuff. Benching Wolski for a period. Benching Stewart today. Benching Hensuck most of the year so far. Think Arny would have played most of last season with Sacco around?
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
+/-
+ Wolski coming into form
+Duchene/OReilly playing ability
-Duchene/OReilly scoring ability (assists not withstanding)
+Less goon’s, more ‘gamers’ (tucker turning it around, stewart not being there just to fight)
-Budaj has clearly lost his spot (only a negative cause I always wanted him to succeed)
+Hejduk reveling in his gotta score every game role.
+THE POWER PLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAay
I wouldn’t mind a little more goon from those who can do it though
just thinking about that reminds me. Remember when Hendricks was called up last year and was an undisciplined madman? Sacco seems to have these guys on a real short leash.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 12, 2009 3:19 PM MDT up reply actions
Yep
Still gotta take care of your own, especially your goalie. I’m not liking all of the unretributed (is that a word?) contact Andy’s been getting.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 12, 2009 3:21 PM MDT up reply actions
Signing Koci seems like it was a totally useless move, IMO. He is taking up a spot on the roster for ummm, O’Reilly maybe. If you take enforcement out of the picture, O’Reilly>Koci.
Colorado Avalanche: Please excuse the mess while we are under construction.
Too True…unless Koci and/or Mcleod start dropping the gloves to protect their teammates, Koci doesn’t have a reason to be on this team.
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 12, 2009 5:24 PM MDT up reply actions
Koci does give the Avs some size, even with enforcement out of the picture. His role is to be an enforcer though. Every team seems to have a guy like this, and i don’t think Koci has played bad. I basically see him as a replacement for what Parker was for the team the past couple of years
Sports don't build character, they reveal it
Except so far, Koci sucks.
=(
I thought you knew that algebra was all razzamatazz. A Globetrotter always saves the good algebra for the final minutes.
by A.J. Haefele on Oct 13, 2009 2:29 AM MDT up reply actions
Svatos had better score more if he’s going to be -5 after 5 games. That second line will take shape when they figure out who to put on the left side. It’s got to be someone good defensively and tough…that eliminates a bunch of guys. I’d try Hendricks there and see if anything happens.
This team will make the playoffs and upset the Sharks in the first round...it's our turn.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Oct 12, 2009 3:29 PM MDT reply actions
funny
During the post game interview on the Boston radio station Svatos was commenting on how the team is committed to Sacco’s defensive system.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 12, 2009 3:36 PM MDT up reply actions
I think he’s playing better defensively, but he is still on pace for -82. not that that’s the best means of measurement but he’s got to tighten up more.
This team will make the playoffs and upset the Sharks in the first round...it's our turn.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Oct 12, 2009 4:29 PM MDT up reply actions
After today's game... I wouldn't mind these lines.
Wolski – Stastny – Hejduk (of course)
Galiardi – Duchene – Jones OR could be Jones- Duchene – Svatos ?
Tucker – O’Reilly – Svatos
Mcleod – Hendricks – Stewart
Koci, and Hensick play as needed – if another player is benched at the time or need more. Also, Koci only averages 2-4 minutes per game. So he really isn’t needed, at all.
by toothandnailer777 on Oct 12, 2009 3:34 PM MDT reply actions
Oh.
what about switching Cumiskey for Jones on the powerplay for the point… he has a nice slap shot.
And not having Duchene in front of the net during the powerplay. have a more behind the net kind of style powerplay on the right side… point shot when needed?
by toothandnailer777 on Oct 12, 2009 3:35 PM MDT up reply actions
Don't understand Duchene in front of net either
He isn’t exactly a big body forward, is he? You’d think they would try to get Wolski, Jones and Stewart to fill that role. This is definitely where they miss guys like Bruno and Smyth. Man those guys are great in front of the net.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 12, 2009 3:38 PM MDT up reply actions
I think the idea has little to do with the position and everything to do with getting him some ice time with SOS and Hejduk
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 12, 2009 3:53 PM MDT up reply actions
Good point. And with SoS’s luck with intercepting pucks, maybe it is better to have Duchene stand in there?
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 12, 2009 3:55 PM MDT up reply actions
Duchene has been pretty good at setting screens – he’s already created two goals off of point shots by doing so if I’m remembering right.
yeah but,
I still like his abilaty to move the puck over his ability to stand in front of the net, I don’t get it…
by From the Point on Oct 12, 2009 5:02 PM MDT up reply actions
either way, he must be a better speeler than me!
by From the Point on Oct 12, 2009 5:03 PM MDT up reply actions
yes!
McLeod looks better in that company than on that second line
by From the Point on Oct 12, 2009 5:37 PM MDT up reply actions
I completely agree. I loved that line tonight.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 12, 2009 7:51 PM MDT up reply actions
but i do think he would be more effective in behind the net play or trying to do more of a passing powerplay—getting ppl out of position and then shooting. Kind of like Hejduk’s powerplay goal the other night. Plus, I feel like Stastny is more effective in front of the net.
by toothandnailer777 on Oct 12, 2009 4:06 PM MDT reply actions
Some "after five games" stuff with regards to the current standings:
At 3-1-1 for 7 points, the Avs are tied with the Flyers for the same record and fifth most points in the league.
Only Pittsburgh, New York Rangers, Los Angeles, and Calgary have more than that with 8 points. Albeit that may change tonight as half of the teams in the league have only played 4 games while a hand full have still only played 3.
The Avs are currently second in the North West division standings to Calgary. Again, that may change tonight. If Edmonton beats Nashville, they will be tied with the Avs for the same record and number of points.
by c0nquistad0rian on Oct 12, 2009 4:22 PM MDT reply actions
Just got back from the game...
My thoughts after being there:
1. I go to every home bruins game, give or take, and the Avalanche are the only team that the Bruins’ fans respect. It is no mystery that the fans still remember what we did for Bourque.
2. Coach Sacco really is on top of his game with changes. He had a preset plan to prevent the Royalty line from playing against Chara and Morris. Without fail they would take dump the puck and put the 3rd line out. They had some shorter shifts but it worked because Stastny seemed to get more room when not against Chara. Surprise surprise. I like this intelligent, proactive, planned coaching.
3. Quincey played so well as to have the other team’s fan yelling at Savard not to take the puck down Quincey’s side.
4. In person, Radar is even better than I thought. He plays nothing like a rookie. Duchene was just as impressive as on tv.
5. I was amazed that the shot total for the 3rd was 12-3 for the Bruins. Even though the shots were lop-sided, the period didn’t seem THAT titled. We had way too many passes go through the crease or slot that should be shots on net. If those passes turn into shots we’ll be putting 30 shots on net a game.
by c6hor8 on Oct 12, 2009 5:26 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
good to hear that Sacco was watching the matchups. He got smoked in that part of the game by Nashville. thanks for the info!
Wait, coaches can actually have a game plan? Who’d have thunk it.
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 12, 2009 5:30 PM MDT up reply actions
+1 on the Royalty Line nickname.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
Does this make Stastny, Prince Stastny (with his dad obviously the king?)
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 13, 2009 9:08 AM MDT up reply actions
I like to think of it more along the lines of the “Son of Stastny” being like the old Nordic names. Think along the lines of “Thor, son of Odin”. And yes, his dad is royalty.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
That works for me!
I was think over the summer of a royal flush line or something, but outside of poker, that doesn’t sound very frightening.
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 13, 2009 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions
I am also liking Sacco a lot. I’m beginning to think the Avs brass brought him in as coach cuz he already knew the talent. How many of our current guys has he already worked with??
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 11:59 AM MDT up reply actions
HUGE PLUS YOU FORGOT: Ryan O’Reilly. I love that kid and if he gets sent down, I’ll be shocked. He’s the best face off guy we have and his tenacity is just amazing. I would not be surprised if he gets his first goal before Duchene given he has less pressure on him and is simply rocking it.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 12, 2009 7:54 PM MDT reply actions
You just don’t want him to get sent back to Erie because then you’ll have to travel further to give him his occasional “reward”.
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 12, 2009 9:07 PM MDT up reply actions
there is that…
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 12, 2009 10:07 PM MDT up reply actions
If the Avs legitimately think they can make the playoffs, keep O’Reilly . If not, i don’t think it would be a horrible idea to let him play one more year in juniors. He will get first line ice time there, and could develop his game to an even higher level. I worry a bit that playing in a 3rd line role with the Avs will stunt his growth as a player. The kid already has NHL game obviously and does all the little stuff right, but he could fine tune some offensive skills in Erie. Either way this kid has a high ceiling, and I am excited to see how good he can be.
Sports don't build character, they reveal it
I would disagree a little with you. O’Reilly is a responsible, hard working smart player and is perfect as a 3rd line center. With Duchene and Stastny ahead of him on the first and second line, he pretty much is in the same spot he would be in if he went back to Juniors. I think that learning the role you will have in the NHL is better then having a different role in Juniors. The “he is only 18” comment applies here as well, and I think he is exactly where he needs to be.
GO AVS!!!
by slapshotr2007 on Oct 13, 2009 10:14 AM MDT up reply actions
I totally agree. Watching him, I honestly don’t think he will be a 1st or 2nd line center. He’ll be a wicked 3rd, tho, that causes the other team trouble with who to match up with whom when the 1-2 punch now has a deadly right hook coming right behind.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 10:44 AM MDT up reply actions
I see O’Reilly developing into the same role on the Avs that Jordan Staal plays for the Pens. 3rd line center, but used a lot on special teams and in crunch time so he still sees plenty of ice time.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 13, 2009 11:08 AM MDT up reply actions
give him some ba intangibles, and...
We’ve got another Sakic Foppa Drury center setup. I thought that worked out ok last time around.
09
by wflan on Oct 13, 2009 11:56 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions
i sure wouldn’t complain.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 11:57 AM MDT up reply actions
yup, that’s exactly what i was thinking.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 11:57 AM MDT up reply actions
heck yeah, strong down the middle for MANY years to come sounds sweeeeet…..
GO AVS!!!
by slapshotr2007 on Oct 13, 2009 12:26 PM MDT up reply actions
couldn’t agree more. very entertaining hockey so far, these guys are all effort. And even more exciting is that guys NOT putting in the effort seem to get into Sacco’s doghouse very very quickly (see Wolski and Stewart), which I love. If he can keep them playing with this kind of energy, it’ll be a fun season no matter what happens.
I don’t know about savant, after Joey Q’s revolutionary “3 Dudes Behind the Goalline” system and Granato’s “I Don’t Have a Fucking Clue What to Do Here!” system, anybody would look like a genius. It’s all who you follow.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
line combos
Injuries are going to come so it is kind of mute right now. But given that Stewie will not suck forever, the guy who just doesn’t fit in well anywhere is Svatos. He screws up the second line because of lack of size and defensive inabilities and adds little to a grinder 3rd line. And how can you justify a “scorer” on the 4th? His only real contribution to the team is the second power play unit. I would trade him now for something. Sit down and play with line combos on paper…he doesn’t fit anywhere.
I could get on board with this. I also think that he’d benefit from a change of scene. Seems like he’s never quite gotten off the ground with the Avs. Maybe we can move him with a D man come the deadline…
hijacking from another thread, what do ya’ll think we could realistically get if we packaged svats and hensick?
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 10:59 AM MDT up reply actions
If they could package those two with an expiring D-man contract (Salei or Clark) for a top two line winger to help out boy wonder I’d be happy. I would imagine the top two line winger would also need to have an expiring contract in order for this to work.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 11:18 AM MDT up reply actions
Is mike Milbury still running things somewhere? How about Doug McLain?
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 13, 2009 12:10 PM MDT up reply actions
I actually was chatting with some Ranger fans about this on HF, they seemed receptive to a Liles + Clark + Hensick for Drury + Girardi offer. I’d do it, I think. Drury would be a perfect wing for Stastny or Duchene.
It’s also pretty well established on there that Svatos is worth a low 2nd to a high 3rd at the deadline, and the Penguins would be a pretty perfect destination for him.
Hensick is probably only worth another overhyped/underperforming prospect at this point, maybe a low pick. He’s better to keep imo.
they can keep on being receptive to liles, but i will go kathy bates ala misery on them before i let it happen.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 1:06 PM MDT up reply actions
Who’s broadcasting the game today? Avs site says “RIS” ?!
by Dario on Oct 13, 2009 9:48 AM MDT via mobile reply actions
Yeah, doesn’t look like anything I’ll be able to pick up. Lame!
by Rather Dashing on Oct 13, 2009 10:18 AM MDT up reply actions
Not on locally
Which is lame. However, if you’re getting the free DirecTV preview you should be able to get the Canadian feed. It is listed on channel 771 on DirecTV.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 10:30 AM MDT up reply actions
PS
In addition to the horrible new radio deal (I still do not get 1510 at all in Boulder), Kroenke further screwed the locals here by no longer having any games on local, over the air, TV. Several years ago about 10 games per season were on a local over the air channel (channel 20, I believe). I used to call my grandma and tell her when games were on that she could watch. It is pretty ignorant to lock out a large chunk of your fan base with outrageous ticket prices and no free TV at all.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 10:33 AM MDT up reply actions
wow. that’s just bad marketing no matter how you look at it. pretty idiotic if you ask me. you won’t get folks in the seats if they’ve no idea how fun these guys are to watch. even non-cable folks deserve some of the lovin.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 10:47 AM MDT up reply actions
Yep
The Avs poor showing on the ice, especially last season, isn’t the only reason for the decline in attendance. Kroenke has been pooping the bed all over the place, imo, in marketing and exposing this team. Especially right now when there seems to be something to be excited about. Those Avalanche Experience ads are brutal as well.
Where will you be on October 1st, 2009 at 6:45 PM Mountain Time?
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 13, 2009 11:20 AM MDT up reply actions
FYI
Avs local TV ratings were top-10 in US last season, and they have been top-10 for Winter Classic every year as well.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 13, 2009 12:11 PM MDT up reply actions
Toronto coverage
It’s on Leafs TV here in Toronto, which means more Toronto homerism than anyone should be subjected to.
by UnFinished Business on Oct 13, 2009 12:16 PM MDT up reply actions
So, no Radio or TV tonight?????
WTF
GO AVS!!!
by slapshotr2007 on Oct 13, 2009 12:29 PM MDT up reply actions
All it takes is one big win and then it’s “Let’s plan the parade”
by UnFinished Business on Oct 13, 2009 12:38 PM MDT up reply actions
Hey hey hey. Be careful. We’ll be getting trolls tonight from PPP.
To the Avalanche: Please stop messing with my head.
I read PPP. As Leafs fans go, his stuff is some of the more honest and reasonable material out there
by UnFinished Business on Oct 13, 2009 12:48 PM MDT up reply actions
Some of the PPP guys are pretty good…
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 13, 2009 12:48 PM MDT up reply actions
I’d say most. They have a lot of fans, so there are some trolls to be sure, but all the guys who write it, and many of the commentors are good.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 13, 2009 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions
hell, MHH has its Avs trolls too…not naming any names or anything
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 1:07 PM MDT up reply actions
Hey!
I just look like a troll. Doesn’t mean that I am one!
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - "Hey Brother, can you spare a Left Winger?"
Simple Request...
I want to hear “pooping the bed all over the place” used much more often in our analysis of games.
by centreice on Oct 13, 2009 12:34 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m honestly surprised to not see “Uniprons” somewhere on that second list…
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
It’s too horrible to even mention….maybe we’ll get lucky and the upcoming jersey will morph into the dominate jersey (first they just need to fix a few things and make a white version for home)
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 13, 2009 12:50 PM MDT up reply actions
Have we heard anything about who will be a healthy scratch tonight?
To the Avalanche: Please stop messing with my head.
I think Stewie will get the opportunity to bounce back.
Koci needs to be in to counter the truculence (If he doesn’t play tonight, why the hell do we even have him).
My guess: Hensick and Hendricks.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 13, 2009 2:05 PM MDT up reply actions
hendricks didn’t do too well last night so my money is on him and hensick. go figure that the coach who would’ve benched tucker doesn’t need to bench tucker. god, please help me wrap my head around this new sham wow situation.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 3:14 PM MDT up reply actions
I thought Hendricks had a decent game against Boston. No worse than Svatos.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
he just seemed a little out of position at times, had a couple of turnovers. maybe it just looked lacking when put in comparison to how he’s been playing prior to last night.
i have to say, it’s nice to have a hard time deciding who to bench rather than deciding who should play…another difference from last year.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: Anything is possible.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 13, 2009 3:59 PM MDT up reply actions
Not that he's played bad
I just don’t know who else they’d scratch.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Oct 13, 2009 4:19 PM MDT up reply actions
I could see hensick and koci, with the hope that Stewart gets the message
Craig Anderson - Mr. Anderson - THE MATRIX !!!
by slapshotr2007 on Oct 13, 2009 2:02 PM MDT up reply actions
So you hate the sun
Well I’m sorry. Next time I create the univers I’ll make sure you participate, Just in case.
The Savage has spoken. Let it be done
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
The following is posted in complete and utter deference to the Lord High Creator of all Things etc, pp.
Well I’m sorry. Next time I create the universe I’ll make sure you participate, Just in case I, in my magnificent omniscience forget how to spell and suchlike…
With all due respect and so forth and so on…
Hopf
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - "Hey Brother, can you spare a Left Winger?"
It is not he who spelled incorrectly, it us who do not have the vision to see his perfection….
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 14, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions
Much like The Canary said, when you’re the King Of The World and creater of everything you don’t need to know how to spell or use grammer. I leave that crap for my minions.
The Savage has spoken. Let it be done
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
Much like The Canary said, when you’re the King Of The World and creater of everything you don’t need to know how to spell or usegrammergrammar. I leave that crap for my minions.
this minion has done her job for the day.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: too naive to think they can lose.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 15, 2009 3:00 PM MDT up reply actions
someone else can handle that creater business. i’m going to lunch.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: too naive to think they can lose.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 15, 2009 3:00 PM MDT up reply actions

by 





















