Game 9 Recap: Wild 3, Avalanche 2 (SO)
You're going to get what you deserve
-Nine Inch Nails, Head Like a Hole
Sometimes, you get the NHL's stupid loser point and you consider yourself lucky. Other times, you have to be kicking yourself. Tonight, it's the latter. The Avalanche got a point for losing the the Wild in a shootout tonight and have a point in 8 of the team's 9 games this year. But they should have won the game and they should have done it in regulation. And they should have done it by a wide margin.
For the 3rd straight game, the Avalanche came out of the gates extremely flat. The Wild dominated the play in the first period, thanks in part to the FOUR powerplays the Avalanche gave them (uh, more on that in a second). It wasn't just the penalties, though. The Avalanche looked terrible. The scoresheet says they had 6 shots in the first period. Honestly, I don't know how they managed even that. But, thanks more to luck than timely penalty killing (I thought our PK looked off all night), the Wild only converted one PP opportunity in the 1st and the Avalanche were extremely fortunate to escape being just down 1-0.
All year long, though, the 2nd period has been the Avs' moneymaker - half their goals have come in the 2nd - and tonight was no exception. The Avalanche absolutely killed it in the middle frame, outshooting the Wild by an 18-4 margin. After a flaccid first period, the Avalanche had hustle and flow. They won races to loose pucks. They intercepted passes. They took pucks away from the Wild. Repeatedly. And, most importantly, they took the lead on goals by Darcy Tucker (HUGE ups to Ryan O'Reilly of the 1 career goal selflessly pointing out Tucker to the refs as the goal scorer) and Kyle Quincey (started by a steal at the blueline by Matt Duchene). It was a dominating period and even though the Avs only had a 2-1 lead, it seemed hard to envision the Wild evening the score.
But you already know how this song ends. The Avs had some issues tonight. Special teams play was one. Of bigger concern was the calvacade of stupid, stupid penalties. Boneheaded penalties. Two delay of game penalties. IN THE SAME PERIOD (Duchene, you looked like a Doogie there hitting Havlat coming off the bench like that). Closing the hand on the puck. A needless crosscheck in front of the ref. And, finally and fatally, a delay of game penalty for shooting the puck over the glass. That last one was a tough break for Wojtek Wolski as it looked like the puck went off the heel of his stick. But, when you've already taken 6 mostly needless minor penalties, you can't do that. Certainly not with 6 minutes left in the 3rd period of a 2-1 hockey game. Ugh. Of course, Minnesota converted to tie it. The Wild had nine shots at even strength all game. 9 shots in 65 minutes. Nine! Had the Avalanche managed to stay out of the box, this game isn't close.
Instead, we have to settle for the loser point. After a scoreless OT, the Avalanche couldn't get anything past Niklas Backstrom in the shootout. Craig Anderson only allowed one, but that was too much. The Wild got the win. We got what we deserved.
As Mike Chambers had reported, Wojtek Wolski indeed was dropped to the 3rd line, where he played right wing. David Jones moved to his old spot on the left side of the top line. I thought Jones played very well. Wolski played okay - not great, but not terrible. That penalty was a killer, though.
Sadly, although the Royalty Line and the MoJo lines were broken up, the Turducken Line remains. I just don't see this. Matt Duchene is having to do far too much on this line. Darcy Tucker isn't playing terrible (yes, he did score tonight), but he's not a great fit for Duchene. And I thought Marek Svatos was dreadful in this game. His awful failed clearing attempt in the 3rd and stupid crosscheck penalty could have lost the game as easily as Wolski's bad-break penalty did. At least Wolski is playing well in one zone. Svatos looked terrible everywhere on the ice.
- Jones - Stastny - Hejduk
- Tucker - Duchene - Svatos
- McLeod - O'Reilly - Wolski
- Koci - Galiardi - Hendricks
- Quincey - Hannan
- Wilson - Clark
- Cumiskey - Foote
(Speaking of Cumiskey, if he continues to hold onto the puck in front of a clear shooting lane to the net, as he did in OT tonight, I am going to have more white hair than that guy on Mad Men)
- The Avalanche are 0-11 on the powerplay without John-Michael Liles
- Ryan Wilson had two big hits on Chuck Kobasew along the boards.
- Tonight's game was the first time the Avs have outshot an opponent all year (35-26)
- David Jones shattered the glass in front of the scorer's table with Nick Shultz's body with just 4.9 seconds left in the game. Seeing the official calmly stop time on his stopwatch amid the shower of broken glass was an impressive sight. Even hockey officials are tough as nails, it seems.
Finally, a couple of home games. The Avalanche host the Carolina Hurricanes on Friday and then those pesky Red Wings on Saturday.
0 recs |
29 comments
|
Comments
yikes, didn’t see the game, but it seems like i would do alot of yelling at my tv :(
Far be it for me to question Coach Sacco, but why not try Matty D on the top line? I mean The Duke and SoS have the tools to run with him for sure.
I know it’s early, but if the Svats Machine keeps up this sub par play..what (or who) do you guys think we could get for him?
Make Me A Milkshake, Malkin! - Mike Lange
by horbayj on Oct 21, 2009 10:21 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
im not sure i’d want to make it that easy to match your top defensive guys against ALL our best offensive players.
by thedoctor on Oct 21, 2009 10:39 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
good point, spread out the offense
Make Me A Milkshake, Malkin! - Mike Lange
by horbayj on Oct 21, 2009 10:46 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Svats played good tonight, for him. The one thing that you can never question with him is effort, and right now I think it is a good thing for the team.
That being said, it is kind of tought to have 2 players (Duchene Svatos) who try to beat people one on one playing on the same line. It could eventually be a good combo with some time, but right now it doesn’t seem to be working that well.
I thought Clark had a bad game with the puck, turned it over a couple times, and was driving me crazy. And then he makes a few key plays later in the game, and you think that it makes up for the other plays. I am kind of tired of him thinking he can skate all over the place with the puck and doesn’t clear the zone.
I feel for Wolski a little bit righ now. I feel like he is a little bit further in the dog house after that late penalty and not converting on his SO try. Maybe his shaky confidence was a factor? I hope he gets the message and plays hard like he did a few shifts tonight, and hopefully takes the same for as the Wolski who played agains the wings in the payoffs a few years ago. I thought he played all out in that series. What does it take to light a fire under this guy? every coach (Q, Granato, and now Sacco) has had problems with him.
All in all, great road trip. I love how my expectations change when I see the team play well. Now we know they can do it, but can they keep it up? Hope so…
Neo played strong tonight too, kinda was crazy in the SO.
Mr. Anderson - THE ONE
by slapshotr2007 on Oct 21, 2009 10:48 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I thought Clark had a bad game with the puck, turned it over a couple times, and was driving me crazy. And then he makes a few key plays later in the game, and you think that it makes up for the other plays. I am kind of tired of him thinking he can skate all over the place with the puck and doesn’t clear the zone.
At times, he skates through his own zone like he expects people to give him a Chara or Lidstrom-like cushion. It ain’t happening. He also confuses his defensive partners. He’ll have an easy out, but he’ll hesitate, wheel back into his own zone, and then his partner has to scramble back because Clark didn’t make the simple play the other 9 guys on the ice expected.
He can be maddening to watch, and not just because of the mouthpiece.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
by Mike @ MHH on Oct 22, 2009 7:50 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I feel for Wolski a little bit righ now. I feel like he is a little bit further in the dog house after that late penalty and not converting on his SO try. Maybe his shaky confidence was a factor?
Sacco was asked about the penalty last night, and he said straight out he wasn’t mad a Wolski for the penalty. He seemed to realize Wolski was trying to make a play and perhaps put a little too much on it.
Hopefully Wolski is getting a little encouragement today…he is 0-2 in the SO so far and perhaps this time it was confidence, but the first one (Chicago?) I think he was just trying a different move.
We all have dreams. But in order to make dreams come into reality, it takes an awful lot of determination, dedication, self-discipline, and effort. - Jesse Owens -
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 22, 2009 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That was tough
In some ways, I’m upset, and in others, I consider the Avs very lucky. Brent Burns missed a wide open net at least 3 times.
I know Quincey got a garbage goal, but I thought that this was really his first bad game for the Avs. He really struggled defensively tonight.
Hannan played very well again, I thought.
Finally, here’s hoping McLeod’s eye injury is more of a scare than anything. The Avs should have gotten a power play after Quincey’s goal, as there should have been a high sticking double minor. Hope he wakes up fine tomorrow.
"You were born to be a player. You were meant to be here. This moment is yours." -- Coach Herb Brooks' pregame speech prior to the Miracle on Ice
by wtnelson on Oct 21, 2009 10:28 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
eye injury? I was watching the Wild feed and there wasn’t the slightest mention of this
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 22, 2009 5:43 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Altitude TV and radio both said he was out with an eye injury in the third period.
The Avs may (or may not) suck now, but they've still won a Cup more recently than 75% of the NHL.
by Joe Dunman on Oct 22, 2009 6:01 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Seems he left the arena and went to the hospital, but was cleared to return home with the team. His vision wasn’t affected?
We all have dreams. But in order to make dreams come into reality, it takes an awful lot of determination, dedication, self-discipline, and effort. - Jesse Owens -
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 22, 2009 1:19 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
PK looked pretty bad tonight
a better PP puts 3 or 4 on us.
Clark had some solid moments and some wtf turnovers too, on the PK especially.
The Wilson – Clark pairing looks pretty good though at ES. Am I the only one not wanting Wilson to go down when the other people are back?
Hope McLeod is ok.
Can we officially get Galiardi off the 4th? He looked great on all of his shifts on the higher lines…again.
Wolski spent some time on Duchene’s wing, I thought it worked pretty well. Better than Tucker!
by thedoctor on Oct 21, 2009 10:43 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Wilson
I thought he had some great plays tonight. One of his hits was definitely a “holy crap!” moment for me.
by Rather Dashing on Oct 21, 2009 11:34 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Galiardi has value on a lower line because he’s great defensively. He’s been a very effective shut down player so far. I say keep him on the 3rd or 4th and let him do what he’s good at. The bonus is that he’s good for some points, too.
The Avs may (or may not) suck now, but they've still won a Cup more recently than 75% of the NHL.
by Joe Dunman on Oct 22, 2009 6:02 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i agree he’s good down there, but the top lines aren’t exactly tearing things up. his skills are needed in many areas.
Lets at least play him on the 3rd. Shifting him with Koci and Hendricks at ES is a total waste. That’s all I’m saying.
by thedoctor on Oct 22, 2009 9:10 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think the Wolski on Duchene’s wing was more of a delayed change. But it happened a couple of times and it did look good. Not sure how I feel about Jones on the 1st line, he looked a little lost at times.
But I wouldn’t be opposed to seeing:
Duke-SoS-Jones
Wolski-Duchene-Svatos
Galiardi-O’Reilly-Tucker/?
We all have dreams. But in order to make dreams come into reality, it takes an awful lot of determination, dedication, self-discipline, and effort. - Jesse Owens -
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 22, 2009 1:22 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I could get behind that…
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
by Mike @ MHH on Oct 22, 2009 4:56 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
That’s what I told her.
(The alternative to “that’s what she said.”)
The Avs may (or may not) suck now, but they've still won a Cup more recently than 75% of the NHL.
by Joe Dunman on Oct 22, 2009 5:58 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
i could get behind you getting behind that.
The 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche: too naive to think they can lose.
"To all the cynics, I'm sorry for you, ... I'm sorry you can't believe in miracles."
-Lance Armstrong
by BeachNSnowGirl on Oct 22, 2009 9:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Nice hat tip to the anniversary of Pretty Hate Machine btw…
by Ben from Portland on Oct 21, 2009 11:48 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
i’d love to see a line of Jones – Duchene – Hejduk just to see what happens
by Uziel on Oct 21, 2009 11:56 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
At the end of the day, while most of us are upset with the way the Avs lost this one. They ended a really tough road trip, 4-1-2 (10 of a possible 14 points)…for a team that wasn’t supposed to win 4 games all year, I’ll take it!
by chiavsfan on Oct 22, 2009 2:33 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I’m with you. I’m extremely impressed by the team so far, and hope they can keep up the same kind of success.
If you were to extend the 10-for-14 streak out over the whole season, that would give the Avs a final point total of about 117 points. I’ll take it!
The Avs may (or may not) suck now, but they've still won a Cup more recently than 75% of the NHL.
by Joe Dunman on Oct 22, 2009 6:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
The road trip was a very good trip. The game last night wasn’t a “bad” game, but when you have a 2-1 lead you’d like to see your team come out with 2pts.
Still last season the team would have allowed another Minny goal in the final minute and they would have gotten 0pts.
All in all it was still good, but we all know it could have been a little bit better.
We all have dreams. But in order to make dreams come into reality, it takes an awful lot of determination, dedication, self-discipline, and effort. - Jesse Owens -
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Oct 22, 2009 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
My thoughts on the game
The first poster on this or any other website who lays that loss on Anderson because of ‘rebound control’ on the first goal gets a swift kick to the junk and Le Banhammer de Truthe.
The Minny announcers were commenting that the Wild were successful on the first PP because the Avs weren’t being aggressive. The following PK’s the Avs were forcing the play by the Wild PP unit and it resulted in zero scores, until the last one. Watching that last PK (the one the Wild tied the game on), the announcers’ earlier statements proved true. The four guys stood still in a box and let the Wild pass all around until they got the winning combo of quick passes and position to beat Anderson. They might have well been pylons. Koivu got to the net because SoS was standing above him. Not skating, standing. And Foote has his back to the slot. Two mistakes = PP goal.
I counted at least two highsticks that weren’t called on the Wild, but with the meh PP the Avs rolled last night, I’m not sure it would have mattered.
Wilson had his hit setting dialed into Kobasew all night. The lick in the first period was pretty sweet.
The Baron’s delay-of-game penalty was a backbreaker. Call it a bad break, but he had plenty of time and space to settle that puck. There was nobody within 12 feet of him or even coasting in his direction. Maybe a case of trying to do too much as it looked like he intended to spring Duchene on the bench side of the ice.
Cumiskey has got to shoot the puck when he’s got a clear lane like the one he had in OT. Just gotta.
Paging Paul Stastny. Stastny to the white courtesy phone. Hi Paul. I know you had a little juggling going on with your line tonight, and while I appreciate your faceoff wins (9!), you’ve gotta be more of a factor in games like this. You and Hejduk have gotta finish a scosh more. You guys spend so much time with the puck and are so difficult to contain in the offensive zone, but it seems like you’ve been making one pass too many the last handful of games. You and the Duke just need to relax. Let the game come to you. Lead by example. Insert cliche here. I know you’re tired and that this has been THE definition of a grueling road trip, but my fantasy team NEEDS you to produce. You’re all I got at center until Vinny down in Tampa decides that he wants to play hockey and not just skate around with a stick in his hand. Thanks.
"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "
by Mike @ MHH on Oct 22, 2009 8:07 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Cumiskey has got to shoot the puck when he’s got a clear lane like the one he had in OT. Just gotta.
oh the words that spewed from my mouth when this happened.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 22, 2009 8:37 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Paging Paul Stastny. Stastny to the white courtesy phone.
No, the white phone.
Airplane! references aside, Stastny has done this before. He’ll have two or three games with multiple points and amazing plays, then hit a rut for a week or two. These scoring droughts are a trademark of his career so far. He’s gotten out of them before and will do it again, but he’s got to do it soon or this momentum will fade. He’s the centerpiece of the offense, rookies aside. Time to step up.
The Avs may (or may not) suck now, but they've still won a Cup more recently than 75% of the NHL.
by Joe Dunman on Oct 22, 2009 8:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
just for kicks:
Stastny before the big contract: 164GP 55G 109A 164P +25 1.00 PPG
Stastny since the big contract: 38GP 9G 18A 27P -4 .71 PPG
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Oct 22, 2009 9:00 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Frustrating game
5-on-5, the Wild don’t even sniff the net. And I’m not one to rant about officiating, and I’m not arguing most of the calls agains the Avs, but when one team is dominating 5-on-5, and the other is clutching, grabbing, tripping, hooking, and otherwise interfering to try to keep up, how in the hell does the dominant team only draw 2 power plays? Some serious home cooking going on.
Can’t blame that for the loss, however. If Wolski just settles down and makes a simpler play out of the zone the game probably ends 2-1 or 3-1 Avs in regulation. Frustrating to lose a point and give that suck ass team 2.
Hey Peter McNab, I'm starting to see sunshine and rainbows here.
by Bob in Boulder on Oct 22, 2009 9:42 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Learning process
that is how I look at this year. Look at it this way, the Washington Capitals took 8 minor penalties in one game, 6 in one period, and lost to the Flyers 6-5 in overtime. It is going to happen, so let it happen early in the season so they learn by it.
This team is doing far better than I thought they would. I anticipated a season of inconsistent play and mistakes, so actually this game was more of what I thought I would be seeing every game. The new kids are smart and sponges; they will figure it out quick enough. The bad contracts will soon be gone. And for those players who aren’t quite playing to their potentional, they may finds themselves wearing a different jersey by the end of this season.
Colorado Avalanche: Please excuse the mess while we are under construction.
by hockeymom on Oct 22, 2009 9:54 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 






























