Mile High Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
New Blog: Once A Metro covering Red Bull New York!

I find it hard to believe he was not suspended!

2 months ago Article_27214_1_tiny hockeymom 97 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

unreal, I expected (and hoped for) a suspension.

by jd21 on Dec 17, 2009 4:47 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

although, given how little ice time he gets, is a suspension all that big of a punishment? hitting his pocketbook maybe is actually more significant?

by jd21 on Dec 17, 2009 4:48 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Depends on the fine

If you’re suspended you forfeit the cash you would have made for the game(s). Usually ends up more then a fine.

by '96 Avs Bandwagon on Dec 17, 2009 4:53 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

whether or not the suspension would have been significant is beside the point. it was deserved. one bad part of this is that it sheds a bad light on the Avs as a team and organization as they will take a negative hit fromt he media and fans across the league for something they had no control over. never mind that a lot of us believe a suspension was called-for, the torches and pitchforks will be out in force.

You mean the Avs aren't going to get the top draft pick this summer???

by BeachNSnowGirl on Dec 17, 2009 4:55 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Dammit, the ONE GUY we wanted to leave and he’s not getting suspended.

Bills fan? In Colorado? It's more likely than you think.

by UZ on Dec 17, 2009 5:13 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Actually, that idiot Ruutu from Carolina just got a fine for pretty much the same thing.

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:25 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Ruutu’s was worse in my mind, and that scumbag has more of a history of scumbaggery. The fact that neither of these plays resulted in a suspension is a complete farce.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 5:33 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

If I’m not mistaken, didn’t the Avs have a run in with Jakkaso earlier this year? Wasn’t he the one who boarded Tucker?

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:34 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

That was his brother. T Ruutu is chippy and occasionally dirty, but not as outwardly a scumbag as Jarkko.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 5:35 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh yeah, that assmite.

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:36 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Assmites bite is infectious.

"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "

by Mike @ MHH on Dec 18, 2009 8:24 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s what I thought. If anything the Koci hit was a little worse just because of the head of steam he had. The Koci hit was also worse than the hit that James Neal got suspended for. I just don’t understand this nonsense.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 17, 2009 5:50 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Brotherly confusion

it was the idiot Ruutu from Ottawa.

CAR Ruutu is the (ostensible) white hat.

2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Time to grow a pair, boys!

by Hopfenkopf on Dec 17, 2009 10:25 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I have to be honest, I’ve watched the hit a bunch of times now and I don’t really think it’s all that horrible. I could certainly have understood if he’d gotten a suspension, but I’m also nowhere near as shocked as the rest of you that he wasn’t.
I do freely admit that if that’s an Avalanche player getting boarded like that, I’m calling for a lifetime ban.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 17, 2009 5:16 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

I’m not calling for a lifetime ban, but the fact that it’s not suspended is an absolute joke when taking into account the fact that a) lesser hits have gone punished and b) they talk about trying to end this sort of behavior.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, if they want to crack down on these hits, they need to dole out a lengthy suspension when there is no injury. It’s pointless to wait for a (another) player to be seriously injured to crack down. The best way is to start when there is no injury, such as this one. I have no doubt that if Green is hurt more than a cut and a black eye that Koci sits for a few games. Colon Campbell is a complete fucking (sorry for the language, but he pisses me off SO much) joke. The single best way to improve the league is to get rid of that clown and get someone who knows what the fuck (once again, sorry) he’s doing.

P.S. My anger isn’t because the Caps were involved. It’s cause Colon Campbell sucks more than a Thai Hooker.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 5:22 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I completely agree that Campbell is EXTREMELY inconsistent. I also completely agree that the NHL needs to start getting serious about hits like this.

I don’t agree that this is the incident you choose to start establishing precedent.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 17, 2009 5:25 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

But when do you start? I agree that this was far from the worst hits in recent memory. But you have to start somewhere. This was a blatant hit from behind, right in the numbers. Green’s no worse for the wear and it wasn’t too vicious but you have to give an incentive to not pull this bullshit. In my mind the best to do that is to start punishing hits like this one more severely. Enough with this 2-3 game bullshit for hits from behind and hits to the head. You have to show them that you have the balls to dole out a long suspension.

This punishment, to me, says that it’s ok to hit a person from behind as long as they don’t get hurt. With the kind of money these guys make, even ones like Koci, the Kunitz Special ($2,500, max. allowed under the CBA last I checked) is pocket change. They need to set an example with someone. And if one thinks that this isn’t the hit, where do you start? I think they need to start with a hit that isn’t too vicious and doesn’t end in injury to show they are serious about cracking down on these kinds of hits.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 5:31 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

How about starting with someone like... oh, I don't know

maybe Alexander Ovechkin? He has multiple hit’s from behind and his new favorite thing, the knee knocker special, has become quite the rave. This is Koci’s first incident (to my knowledge). Hardly the brass cow to make a statement with.

I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.

by Pinchy The Lobster on Dec 17, 2009 6:39 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Ignoring the fact that he hasn’t had a recent hit that was so clearly in the numbers as the Koci hit:

They missed their chance to do that. That’s why. They can’t go back and re-suspend him after the fact (I wouldn’t put it past them to do that to some player). I’m looking at what they CAN do. They can’t start a month ago since they already missed their chance. But they can start now, and should start now. They should have started years ago but they didn’t.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 8:04 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Pinchy stole a thought of mine that I forgot to make. it seems that Campbell takes into account past history when passing judegment.. Has Koci had anything like this before? Doesn’t explain how Ruttu got off, of course

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 17, 2009 8:11 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

While he doesn’t have a history of punishment beyond games, I think you have to take in game punishment history into account as well. A player like, Stastny (to choose a player that hasn’t been punished), pulling that hit is not the same as McGratten (can’t think of a serious suspension on his part) pulling that hit.

Stastny is in the league to score. That’s his role. But McGratten, while he may not have other suspensions, is in the league to do something that is already considered illegal by the virtue that it receives a penalty (fighting), and I think that needs to taken into account.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 9:56 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Two questionable knees, two questionable hits from behind. 4+ year career as a top ten hitter in the league. Not really a terrible track record. You, and the rest of the AO haters, love to latch on to these moments to paint your own picture, but the reality is AO goes about the game the exact same way as Dustin Brown, and I love both players for it. The difference? AO has infinitely more skill than Brown. Brown goes out and hits everything that moves, and that’s why people like him, and why he’ll be on Team USA. But he goes over the line sometimes, as all players that play that physically aggressive do. And I think Brown and AO should be punished when they do. But to even begin to compare either of those guys to Koci, or the blatant hit from behind Koci threw, is a joke.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 18, 2009 12:06 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t hate AO. I would gladly welcome him to the Avs any time. I wasn’t comparing the 2. Only suggesting that if the NHL is going to make a big statement for these kind of hits, Koci being gone for 10 games isn’t going to turn many heads.

I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.

by Pinchy The Lobster on Dec 18, 2009 1:19 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I find it odd that some Avalanche fans have a problem with an extremely talented forward who plays an extremely physical game that sometimes results in questionable contact with opposing players.

Mile High Hockey: Hoping for the best, expecting the worst, hating the Wings.

by Joe Dunman on Dec 18, 2009 1:32 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Well. We have never had such a thing. It’s scary. Frightening even…

I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.

by Pinchy The Lobster on Dec 18, 2009 1:44 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Really? Never? The Avalanche have never had an extremely physical forward with tons of hockey talent that has been accused of periodically playing dirty? Never?

Mile High Hockey: Hoping for the best, expecting the worst, hating the Wings.

by Joe Dunman on Dec 18, 2009 2:35 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Ever.

I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.

by Pinchy The Lobster on Dec 18, 2009 2:40 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Do you own a pair of Crocs?

Mile High Hockey: Hoping for the best, expecting the worst, hating the Wings.

by Joe Dunman on Dec 18, 2009 2:42 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Well no doy. Who woudn’t want a pair.

PS.. I kid.

PS.. I kid.And yes, I wear his Jersey to every hockey game I attend.

I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.

by Pinchy The Lobster on Dec 18, 2009 2:45 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Oh, don’t worry, I was on to your game like three comments ago.

Mile High Hockey: Hoping for the best, expecting the worst, hating the Wings.

by Joe Dunman on Dec 18, 2009 2:46 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

whew.. had me worried.

I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.

by Pinchy The Lobster on Dec 18, 2009 2:49 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Well said. Great perspective around here. Unfortunately for you, that probably means you’ll see me around more.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 18, 2009 3:42 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I don’t see the AO vitriol in Pinchy’s post that you seem to. He is basically saying “If you want to send a message, then send a message with a player people would actually notice being suspended, not a guy that everybody thinks isn’t even AHL-caliber.”

Pinchy’s points about track record vs first-timer are valid as well.

He made no comparison between AO’s offense that drew a suspension (or those alleged events that didn’t) and Koci’s stupidity. Don’t let your AO-auto-defense put words in somebody else’s mouth, please.

"I know everyone has their own opinion, but your opinion is wrong. "

by Mike @ MHH on Dec 18, 2009 1:56 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I didn’t say anything when Dave Driscoll-Carigan commented on AO’s knee hits, because it was measured and accurate. I don’t think I put any words in anyone’s mouth.

He has multiple hit’s from behind and his new favorite thing, the knee knocker special, has become quite the rave.

Two hits from behind in 4+ years, one of which (on Kaleta) wasn’t even a hit from behind. Two knee on knee hits in 4+ years. Doesn’t exactly seem like it’s his “new favorite thing” or “quite the rave.” Maybe Pinchy was being hyperbolic, but it’s not like I’m reading in something he didn’t say. He’s blowing AO’s track record out of proportion, and suggesting AO (the guy that was actually suspended) should be the guy that should be made an example. I though AO should have been suspended for the hit on Gleason because it was reckless, for the record. I also think the Koci hit on Green is much, much dirtier and dangerous than any hit AO has ever thrown. I stand by my reaction.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 18, 2009 3:46 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

and while I’m being all contrary and stuff, I’d also like to point out that Koci absolutely destroyed John Erskine in the subsequent fine. we’ve been complaining all year that he’s a terrible fighter, but he showed some talent there against a 6’4 defenseman with over 100 pro fights

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 17, 2009 5:24 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

you meant subsequent fight, right? or am i just confused cuz it’s been 85 degrees in my classroom all day and i’m delusional.

You mean the Avs aren't going to get the top draft pick this summer???

by BeachNSnowGirl on Dec 17, 2009 5:36 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

heh. yeah, that does read a little funny. yeah, subsequent fight.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 17, 2009 5:37 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Erskine did have his lunch handed to him, I’m just glad someone stepped up. Although Green’s lucky he was on the ice with Erskine, otherwise nobody would have responded.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 5:38 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

btw, that’s Koci’s first win this year.

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:39 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

i think it deserved a one-gamer, honestly. he had time to avoid the hit or at least change the placing of the hit (does that wording make sense?? i’m delusional right now, you know) once Green turned his back. for that, one would be reasonable.

You mean the Avs aren't going to get the top draft pick this summer???

by BeachNSnowGirl on Dec 17, 2009 5:38 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Green did turn his back though, and Koci was pretty close to him when it happened. If Green doesn’t turn around, that’s a clean hit.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 17, 2009 5:41 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I’ve been saying this more than once. Green needs to not turn his back, and if this is always called, players will always turn, just to get the call, and good checks are (big word alert) de facto out of the game

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 17, 2009 5:48 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Completely agree, I said the same thing about the AO hit on Kaleta. But I don’t think that’s what happened here.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 17, 2009 5:56 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Green’s shoulders turn, but he doesn’t really turn his lower body. He gets the puck and gets square for the pass, and then his shoulders turn a bit towards the glass as he passed it. I don’t think his shoulders turned a significant enough amount, and I definitely don’t think the slight turn was related to Koci, to take this into account really.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 5:49 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s not really turning into the hit. Green never saw it coming and Koci had like 15 feet to pull up.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 17, 2009 5:56 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

As I said in another thread, one of the two needs to go- either the instigator or goons. If your goon can’t fight the guy responsible for a cheap hit because of the instigator, and can only fight the other teams goon, it really is kinda pointless. I like fighting, and I think it does go a ways to deter cheap behavior. But only when the cheap player is held accountable, and not his teams goon.

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 17, 2009 5:39 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

can. worms. opened.

fwiw, i go back and forth on that one.

You mean the Avs aren't going to get the top draft pick this summer???

by BeachNSnowGirl on Dec 17, 2009 5:39 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

how would that have changed anything? The instigator rule didn’t stop Erskine from trying to dole out justice.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 17, 2009 5:39 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Not in this case…hell, for cases like this, I’m all for getting rid of the 3rd man in. I bet without the instigator…AO doesn’t try the knee on knee stuff…

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:42 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Or leaving the bench? ;)

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 17, 2009 5:43 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

sure, why not..I miss the bench clearing brwals.

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:44 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

here ya go then

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ydbATVriqA

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 17, 2009 5:49 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

No, no…

The good old days tear

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:51 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Yeah, you can tell the crowd is thoroughly disgusted, too….

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 18, 2009 2:55 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

personally, I don’t think repealing the instigator rule will have the positive effect people think it will.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Dec 17, 2009 5:43 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

you will always have idiots who take it too far.

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:45 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

It may not. But it can’t really hurt that much either, as its never called anyway.

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 17, 2009 5:45 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Say, for example, someone who is not our heavyweight does that, and erskine is not on the ice. Say, Jones hits him and nothing happens because no one is on the ice to fight. Maybe there is a hugging match between a few lightweights, but nothing that could be called “settling the score” or “deterrence”. Now, if Erskine can go out and clobber Jones next shift instead of having to fight Koci, it makes more sense to me.

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 17, 2009 5:43 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Could not agree more. The point of fighting in the NHL is to keep people honest, and the instigator completely stops that.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 17, 2009 5:57 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

and I find myself nearly in shock for not only typing this, but recing the post.

The majority of my early exposure to hockey was European, so no fighting and lots of open, fast skating, skill based hockey. Great stuff. Love it, always will.

The fighting almost always seemed to get in the way of the skating to me, though the North American game definitely has a much greater grinding aspect to it, which I’ve learned to appreciate. I like college hockey a lot because of the lack of fighting, though CHL hockey, could I watch it more easily and with more regularity, would likely temper my fervor on that point.

What has put me over the edge, especially recently is the progressively poor quality of officiating in the NHL. Look, this is a very fast game played by very big, very fast, very tough guys, so one can’t reasonably expect the officials to get it right all of the time. I’m also not in favor of turning the league into an NFL style snooze fest with 57 minutes of downtime for every 5 seconds of action. That being said, the officiating, especially this year, JUST. PLAIN. SUCKS. Like Trailer Arnason on your top line sucks.

If you’re going to ditch fighting and/or tell players “you won’t deal with this (instigator, 3rd man in, etc.), we will”, then you’ve got to show some semblance of capacity to do so, both on the ice and post factum. That is not forthcoming and there is no sign whatsoever of that changing. I’ve also come to believe that elimination of these rules (instigator, 3rd man in) will even the field and let the guys play. I’m not looking to go to a fight and have a hockey game break out, but I am sick to Goddamned death of the diving, the douchebaggery perpetrated with no regard whatsoever for the consequences (so insignificant as they might currently be) and the staged horseshit that currently passes for “fighting” in the league, that something’s gotta give.

I have less than zero faith in the capacity of the league to protect the players and the integrity of the game. If there is a fear that Highlander is gonna crush you if you fuck with Dutchy, I think that will do better than the league can or will.

2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Time to grow a pair, boys!

by Hopfenkopf on Dec 17, 2009 11:08 PM MST up reply actions   1 recs

I have less than zero faith in the capacity of the league to protect the players and the integrity of the game. If there is a fear that Highlander is gonna crush you if you fuck with Dutchy, I think that will do better than the league can or will

Well said, my friend.

Also, (and it may have already been said) the players are bigger and faster than ever, so these hits are going to cause more damage. Period. The players need to be more hesitant to make them. I’m sorry, but to a guy making millions of dollars a year, losing a few tens of thousands and having to sit out a few games won’t be as big of a deterrent as getting the SHIT beat out of him. As Jibbles said and gl av fan keeps as her sig, “You fuck with our Hejduk, and the spirit of Lappy is coming.”

You mean the Avs aren't going to get the top draft pick this summer???

by BeachNSnowGirl on Dec 18, 2009 4:56 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Just a thought…
I wonder if the fact that Koci received the 5:00 penalty for boarding factored into the “no suspension” ruling? It seems that hits that are penalized in the game receive less time in suspension, or none at all.
I have nothing to back that up, but it might be something to look at.

The 2009-10 Avalanche: Have the wheels fallen off?

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Dec 17, 2009 5:53 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

I’d like to think they don’t considering the Campbell has never included that in the criteria for whether or not a hit is suspended. But I’d be foolish to try and find any consistency or logic in the things that are done by that man.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 5:55 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Campbell actually did use that criteria in the playoffs last year when he didn’t suspend Camalleri (IIRC) but did suspend Carcillo for the same thing.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 17, 2009 5:59 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I stand corrected. But I would still be foolish to try and find consistency and logic in his rulings.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 6:02 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

That’s what I’m thinking…because it’s a 5’er there was wiggle room, if he got a game for boarding, that would mean it was a head hit.

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 5:56 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Is Colin protecting the refs? He didn’t see it as a hit to the head so I can’t see it that way? I wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if that was something that came up in whatever boardroom this meeting was held in.

"I think the relentless negative coverage in The Washington Post is a real difference from previous years," Redskins general counsel David Donovan said. "But in terms of the way our actual fans are behaving, we don't see any difference."

by Sct112 on Dec 18, 2009 8:25 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m just left wondering whether he would have got a suspension (and how long of one) if the Caps said Green was questionable for the next couple games as opposed to having him take part in practice today.

by '96 Avs Bandwagon on Dec 17, 2009 6:09 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Don’t think it would have made a difference.

Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.

by InfamousM on Dec 17, 2009 6:10 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

If it weren’t known that the worst thing that happened to Green was a cut and a black eye I’m pretty sure a suspension would have been handed out considering how important injuries are to them.

Then again, I was pretty sure he’d be suspended anyway, so I guess that shows what I know about what’s running through Campbell’s head.

Now drink with me deeply of the bourbon, scotch, and rye until such time as we are fighting drunk.

by Steckel Me Elmo on Dec 17, 2009 6:14 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

what’s running through Campbell’s head.

I didn’t know you could run in a vacuum?

The 2009-10 Avalanche: Have the wheels fallen off?

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Dec 17, 2009 7:03 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I’m beginning to like this Koci guy.

I am so clever that sometimes I don't understand a single word of what I am saying.

by Pinchy The Lobster on Dec 17, 2009 6:18 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Definitely worth a suspension.

Having said that, a lot of defensemen really need to learn to brace themselves for hits when they’re facing the boards behind the net. If you watch a guy like Willie Mitchell, you’ll see him get hit from behind constantly but since he’s always ready to take a hit, he always just gets harmlessly hit into the boards.

Hits from behind aren’t inherently dangerous; they’re only dangerous when the player is a couple feet from the boards and isn’t ready to take a hit. Yes, the forechecker needs to take responsibility and not run guys when they’re in vulnerable positions along the boards, but hockey is a rough game. If you’re near the boards and not braced to take a hit, you are going to get rocked, whether it’s from behind or not.

These are NHL defensemen we’re talking about, not kids who haven’t yet learned how to take a hit; they know how to protect themselves when they’re near the boards.

by ExiledAmongYou on Dec 17, 2009 8:50 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

This is probably expecting too much from guys that are moving so fast, but the purpose of the hit should be considered when assessing these “dirty” plays. Is the hitter trying to play the puck or is he just trying to knock out an opposing player? Examples to illustrate my point:

1. Both teams are deep in the Avalanche zone. Green has the puck along the boards behind Anderson, but Hannan and Foote are low and close enough to scoop it up if Green loses control. Koci skates in and hits Green hard, with the intention of knocking the puck loose so his D can clear it.

2. The puck is deep in the Capitals’ zone, and only a couple of Avalanche players are on the forecheck. Green has the puck behind Theodore, with no other Avalanche players around him. If he loses the puck, it will be scooped up by another Capitals defenseman or his goalie. Koci skates in and hits Green hard, with no intention to steal the puck and try to score on his own.

The two situations are drastically different. The second scenario is actually what happened, and clearly indicates that Koci was making no effort to play the puck at all. His sole intention was to cream Green from behind and take him out of the game. His actions would have been excusable (but still boarding) had scenario one been the case, in my opinion.

I think the league messed up here. A one game suspension would have been appropriate.

Mile High Hockey: Hoping for the best, expecting the worst, hating the Wings.

by Joe Dunman on Dec 18, 2009 8:29 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Agree

context is important.

The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Dec 18, 2009 10:21 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

The issue isn’t whether or not he’s trying to play the puck, in my opinion. Forecheckers constantly hit defenders behind the net without trying to play the puck; that’s the whole idea of forechecking. If you can’t play the puck, finish your check anyways and hope the defender thinks a bit about the hit that’s coming instead of playing the puck. How often do we complain about Wolski not finishing his checks on the forecheck?

I’ll say it again: defensemen need to protect themselves when they’re near the boards. If you turn, assume you’re going to get hit and brace yourself. If you do that, it doesn’t matter if you get hit from behind; you’re not going to get hurt (barring elbows to the head, etc.).

by ExiledAmongYou on Dec 18, 2009 2:08 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

It’s not just the act of checking I’m talking about. It’s one thing to hit a guy to knock him off the puck. It’s another thing entirely to ram his ass into the boards from behind when it serves no other immediate purpose but to hurt him.

Mile High Hockey: Hoping for the best, expecting the worst, hating the Wings.

by Joe Dunman on Dec 18, 2009 2:37 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

If you do that, it doesn’t matter if you get hit from behind; you’re not going to get hurt (barring elbows to the head, etc.).

That’s not true at all. Paul Kariya can brace himself all day long, but a hit from behind by a guy as big as Koci is going to do some damage. Another good example: Chris Pronger hitting Stevie Sullivan. Just because a player sees it coming and braces himself doesn’t eliminate the inherently dangerous nature of a direct hit into the boards from behind.

Mile High Hockey: Hoping for the best, expecting the worst, hating the Wings.

by Joe Dunman on Dec 18, 2009 2:40 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

And while I’m at it, there’s a reason fighting sports have weight classes. BJ Penn may be unbeatable against other dudes who weigh 155, but put him in a ring with Fedor and see how long he lasts.

Mile High Hockey: Hoping for the best, expecting the worst, hating the Wings.

by Joe Dunman on Dec 18, 2009 2:48 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Please. The logical end to this argument is that all NHL lines must be of comparable weight and size so no one gets hurt.

I realize you are rebutting the hurt factor, but Exiled Among You is right on both how the game is played and what you need to do to protect yourself. Otherwise, They need to make checking illegal. Screw that.

Forecheckers constantly hit defenders behind the net without trying to play the puck; that’s the whole idea of forechecking

This

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 18, 2009 6:02 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

That still doesn’t excuse continuing to accelerate and target a guy when you see “52” from 15-20 feet away. Green never saw Koci coming and didn’t turn into the hit. This is a classic hit from behind. By your logic, what hits from behind would be punishable.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 18, 2009 3:48 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Let me make myself clear:

I am not defending Koci, nor am I saying that no hits from behind should be punishable. They definitely should be, and Koci should for sure have been suspended.

All I’m saying is that hits from behind are only especially dangerous (by which I mean more dangerous than an equivalent hit from the front) when the player getting hit is not standing up straight, is a foot or two from the boards, and isn’t braced to take a hit.

Yes, Kariya would be sore after getting hit by Koci, but if Kariya’s standing up straight and is braced to take the hit, his whole body will get driven into the boards and take the brunt of the force. In that case, the hit is no more dangerous than if Koci hits Kariya in the chest into the boards (which, I might add, can still be an illegal hit if there’s charging, an elbow, etc.). Where players get into the most trouble getting hit from behind is when their head takes the brunt of the force because it gets driven into the boards before the rest of the body.

I am NOT saying players should be able to hit from behind whomever they want, whenever they want. I’m just saying that hockey is a very fast and rough game and there’s always a chance that someone is going to run you into the boards if you’re near them. Given that, players need to protect themselves when they’re near the boards, particularly defensemen when they’re behind the net. That will cut down on injuries, given the nature of the sport, more than anything else.

Hits from behind should still be severely punished, and the instigator still needs to go so the players can police themselves. But that doesn’t mean players can’t do anything to protect themselves from getting hurt. That’s all I’m saying.

by ExiledAmongYou on Dec 18, 2009 4:24 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I agree with most of that, and I think watching how well the players protect themselves supports your point. I would just point out that it’s important that guys see the hit coming so that they know to brace themselves, and from what angle they are going to be hit. Sure, you could be hit at any time, but it’s not normal to get railed from behind by a guy that you don’t know is coming. I’ve gotten some heat for saying players need to protect themselves better (most recently on the Kaleta hit and then the Jared Ross hit that Kaleta threw a day or two later). When you know the hit is coming you can’t just turn to exacerbate it or draw a call. That’s dumb and dangerous. But when Tucker got smoked from behind by Ruutu I thought it was a bad hit and should be suspended, and I feel the same now (not saying you disagree, just providing reference points for where I draw lines).

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 18, 2009 5:33 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Green never saw Koci coming and didn’t turn into the hit

Yes he did.

When you know the hit is coming you can’t just turn to exacerbate it or draw a call

This is where a lot of players are going imo

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 18, 2009 6:05 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I know that’s where the players are going and I hate it.

You’re completely wrong on the first point, but whatever. We are seeing different things so this won’t ever get resolved.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 18, 2009 6:50 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8hR5UQltaM

just before the 1:05 mark, he looks back and sees Koci coming. I don’t have his eyeballs, so I can’t guarantee what he did or didn’t see. But it sure looked to me like he was aware a guy was coming. FTR, I agree a call should have been made on the play. I just don’t see it as bad as some other folks have. Even if Green didn’t see it and not turned into the boards, a charging penalty was still more than justified. In fact, no matter where Green was, it was a charge. But, as you say, whatever, I suppose different people can always see the same video and interpret different things.

I’m glad you see my point about the layers milking the system for calls.

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 19, 2009 1:38 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Ummm.

Players, not layers, there in the last line.

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 19, 2009 1:39 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

But...

Aren’t most players layers?
Beachie? can you help us out on this!!

"You mess with our Hejduk and the Spirit of Lappy is coming!"-Jibbles
MHH- The Haiku capital of AvsNation.

by gl avfan on Dec 19, 2009 6:59 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

+1

Sandie

"That’s the way we’ll win championships"- The Baron

by sandiegee on Dec 20, 2009 1:01 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

You know after watching it again, I’m not so sure it should have been a penalty.
- OK, Koci did come in from a long way out and hit Green, however the puck was there and barely left Green’s stick before the hit.
- Green did glance back before corralling the puck and maybe he saw Koci, maybe he didn’t, it was a pretty quick glance and he may not have gotten his head back far enough to see Koci.
- Someone pointed out before that Green’s playing of the puck is what turns him, until the follow through on his clearing attempt, his shoulder is facing the boards not his face.
- At full speed it happens pretty fast and I thought it was a penalty. After seeing it slowed down I’m not so sure. I definitely don’t think Koci went in to hurt Green, and I’m not sure he did anything wrong. But at full speed it was a different look and I’m not blaming the officials for making the call, or the Caps for standing up for their player. After seeing this replayed, I think it’s obvious why there was no suspension.

The 2009-10 Avalanche: Have the wheels fallen off?

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Dec 19, 2009 10:10 AM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Green does take a little look, but considering how far away Koci was at the time and the angles involved I’m not positive it was a clear view or that he realized what was coming. You may be right though. I wish one of the Caps beat writers would do their job and ask Green that question. Seems simple and the kind of thing fans would want to know.

I also think you have to draw a distinction between a player moving the puck and the follow-through turning them and the players that turn to shield the puck from the forechecker. You have to let players move the puck. You can’t just say “well you passed the puck and were vulnerable so it’s your fault.” I think that argument is more applicable when you just turn and put your own face into the glass to try to keep your body between the puck and the forechecker. If the league makes that a per se penalty you will see that behavior a lot more, and consequently see many more injuries.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 19, 2009 2:24 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Good points. I’m also not sure how well Green saw him, and it’s more of a “glance” than “seeing him”. I think you’re right that only Green knows for sure what made him turn away.

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 19, 2009 5:09 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Don Cherry agrees with you, for whatever that’s worth. He also said Koci took it easy on Green. I love that guy.

In an ideal world all ten fingers would be on my left hand so my right hand could just be a fist for punching.

by Fehr and Balanced on Dec 19, 2009 6:19 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

I love Don Cherry, but took it easy on him? Not so much

Get rid of the loser point

09-10 Avs- YMMV

by TheRed on Dec 20, 2009 3:55 PM MST up reply actions   0 recs

Koci, who averages 3 minutes 7 seconds of ice time per game

Really?! I thought is average time was more like 2 minutes.

It wasn’t a good hit.
Erskine did the right thing.
The NHL should either enforce their own rules on the ice or get rid of the instigator penalty.

I should never be taken seriously.... Seriously!

by AvDog on Dec 18, 2009 12:36 AM MST reply actions   0 recs

Great news

The league probably evaluated the hit in the context of his history as a guy who’s not a dirty player and hasn’t made a habit of hits like that, and decided the fine was enough.

And congrats to Dave (in advance) for setting a career high in single-season NHL games played. His next game played will be his 34th this season, breaking his mark of 33 set last year. Seems like a hard worker, a guy who’s trying to improve all the time. He’s been a good fit with this overachieving team.

by Dan Winkler on Dec 18, 2009 5:48 PM MST reply actions   0 recs

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.
Start posting about the Avalanche »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Fiesta_bowl_small
Where does Versus go from here?
Fiesta_bowl_small
Long time fan, first time blog
Small
New Digs for Svatos?
Jml_edge_small
Scott Burnside @ ESPN on Salei, Andy
Smurfetteavs_small
Current Player Nicknames- until Glossary is changed.
Smurfetteavs_small
Versus/ Direct TV/ Comcast.
Jml_edge_small
UPDATED: Ovechkin to get TWO games suspension
Scrunchi1_small
MHH Madness March 1st pictures
Jml_edge_small
I really have to stop reading Dater's blog
Jml_edge_small
Another awesome commercial from the Bruins

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Promotion


Add to Technorati Favorites Sports Blogs - Blog Top Sites
Sports Blogs Blogroll.net
Top Blogs Sports blogs
Blog Directory
BlogRankers.com Sport Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

 


View Stats

Listed on the ArmchairGM Sports Blog Index


 

View blog authority

 

SBNation.com Recent Stories

Boston Bruins' Johnny Boychuk (55) shoots the puck past Carolina Hurricanes goalie Manny Legace (34) for a goal during the second period of an NHL hockey game in Raleigh, N.C., Tuesday, March 16, 2010. (AP Photo/Karl B DeBlaker)

Bergeron Injury Overshadows Bruins 5-2 Win Over Carolina

Edmonton Oilers second round pick Anton Lander, from Sweden, speaks to reporters at the 2009 NHL entry draft  in Montreal Saturday, June 27, 2009. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press, Ryan Remiorz) link

An Interview With Oilers Prospect Anton Lander

Washington Capitals' Alex Ovechkin (8), from Russia, shakes hands with Pittsburgh Penguins' Sidney Crosby (87) following Game 7 of an NHL hockey second-round playoff series, Wednesday, May 13, 2009, in Washington. The Penguins won 6-2. (AP Photo/Bruce Bennett, Pool) link

A Statistical Look At The NHL's MVP Race

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editors

Icon_small Joe Dunman

New_profile_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Staff Writers

Profilepic2_small Mike @ MHH

Boone_small Angélique C. Murray

Photo_10_small Derek B

Black_mage_small Dustin Burfiend

Clash_casette_small Paul's Coffey