Game 54: Blue Jackets 3, Avalanche 0
Congratulations to Dan LaCosta on his first NHL shutout
Photo courtesy Jamie Sabou (Getty)
Sometimes it hurts to be right. 5th stringer Daniel LaCosta did indeed become the next unknown goalie to beat the Colorado Avalanche. Not satisfied with just a garden-variety victory in his 2nd career start, LaCosta made everyone in Labrador City, Newfoundland proud by shutting out the potent Avalanche offense...*taps earpiece*...I'm sorry, I'm being told that the word I'm looking for is "impotent".
The foreshadowing was strong for this one. We know the Avs can't beat Columbus, struggle against backup goalies and, for some reason, can't win on Tuesdays. All that was remaining was for the Avs to punch their time card for 60 minutes and we could all move on to the next disappointment.
The Avalanche hung in there for a while. They were outshot 16-4 in the first period, but Peter Budaj was in the zone and Columbus' powerplay was laughingly bad (until you realize that Peter McNab could just as easily be describing the Avs' powerplay when he rips Columbus' pp apart). The boys in burgondy turned it around in the 2nd, outshooting the BJs 13-3. The results were the same, though - no goals for either team.
Just 2:29 into the 3rd period, after failed Avalanche clearing pass #4,394 on the seaoson (this one brought to you by Scott Hannan), Andrew Murray found a two inch hole between the back of Peter Budaj's knee and the goal post...just like Luke Skywalker used to do with his T-16 back home. And just like that, the Avs were done like the Death Star. The playbook was as we've seen it all year: Colorado had chances, but their opponent scored the goals. Jason Williams scored on an odd-man rush that was helped by John-Michael Liles lining up his man for a big hit and then missing widly sending him far out of the play. Freddy Modin put the finishing touches with a goal a couple of minutes later, but it didn't matter (well, I'm sure it did to him). The 1 goal deficit after Murray's goal might as well have been 100 - there was no way the Avs were going to score.
I think I know I've resigned myself to missing the playoffs, because I actually found myself rooting for LaCosta once the game was out of reach at 2-0 (yes, that's a sad, sad statement). I also found myself enjoying the game even though I knew throughout that it was not going to end well. Chris Stewart was incredible; can we get him some more minutes, please? Actually, his entire line - Stewart, Lappy and Willsie - was the Avs best line all night. And yes, that too is a sad, sad statement.
As a team, the Avs were hitting everyone that moved - Stewart, Lappy, Salei, Tucker, Willsie...even Hensick got into the hit parade. Which leads me to the following question: why now? This is the type of play we thought we'd be seeing all year, after a summer of signing nothing but "character guys". Yes, the Avalanche still lost and a missed hip check was a big factor, but it was fun to watch AND it created scoring chances. When all is said and done, I believe the team's inability to bring this sort of physicality on a regular basis - hell, I'd take an occasional basis - will be my biggest head-scratcher of the year, especially considering the coach.
- In the four games this year, the Blue Jackets have outscored the Avalanche 9-2 in the 3rd period.
- The Avalanche have lost to three different Columbus goalies this year (LaCosta, Steve Mason and Fredrik Norrena)
- LaCosta has only 2 career starts, but he has seen the Avs before. He watched from the bench as a backup in the first two Colorado - Columbus games this year.
The Avalanche are in Minnesota tonight. Raycroft will start. Gulp. The St Louis Blues lost last night and next play on Thursday.
Season. Over. - Shane Giroux, Avs Talk
The question for the Avalanche now might not be whether this team can pull off a near-miraculous late-season run to squeeze into the playoffs. Instead, can it avoid finishing in the Western Conference basement? - Rick Sadowski, Rocky Mountain News
It is unacceptable that Tyler Arnason continues to play major minutes, with one goal in his last 42 games. It is unacceptable that Darcy Tucker continues to play a regular shift while going through the motions and playing with no passion or intelligence. It is unacceptable that seemingly no changes have been made to a penalty-killing unit that stinks worse than a dead skunk in the middle of the road. - Adrian Dater, All Things Avs
It's both risky and lazy to always equate losses to a collective lack of effort — often, it's code for "lack of talent" — and it wasn't as if the Avalanche laid a 60-minute egg. But Colorado was outplayed on the road by an up-and-coming, if frequently boring, team that won all four games against the Avs this season. Plus, the Blues Jackets' "other" young goalie was more than good enough to outduel Colorado's Peter Budaj. - Terry Frei, Denver Post
"They're not a dangerous team this year," Blue Jackets defenseman Jan Hejda said. "Probably some of it is injury, but they haven't come close to beating us this season." - Aaron Potzline, Columbus Dispatch
Columbus improved to 8-22-2 against the Avalanche. The Blue Jackets have won six of seven. - AP
LaCosta was sharp all night and made a clutch stop with seconds remaining to preserve the shutout. It is reported that Mason may be ready later in the week. Hopefully he is fully recovered. With the team playing well, it is not time to rush him back. Let's err on teh side of caution. - Dave, Blogjackets
“I can’t even really explain it,” LaCosta said. “I’m having a great time. I mean, I always have a great time when I come up – I’ve got a lot of friends here, and there’s a lot to learn. But to know I can play up here right now, it’s nice. I can’t even believe what’s going on right now.” - Michael Arace, Puck-Rakers
Avalanche center Paul Stastny, who is recovering from surgery for his fractured forearm, could begin practicing with the team as early next week, but defenseman Adam Foote doesn't seem to be making much progress from his triceps injury. - Rick Sadowski, Colorado Avalanche 24/7
47 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
*slams fist on table*
That first goal SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED, DAMNIT.
I am Jack's unbridled optimism.
I agree, but it wouldn’t have changed anything and the genesis of the goal (weak, nancy-boy clears by defensemen in the corners) is probably the only thing we have to show for Granato’s new ‘firewagon’ style this season.
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
actually, I think that goal was everything. once that puck went in, this game was over
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Feb 11, 2009 8:03 AM MST up reply actions
So we’ve reached the point where the Avs have to beat the opposition 1-0 in order to get a win? If that was management’s plan, then they are smoking some of the greatest weed ever.
A one-goal deficit on the road with the majority of the 3rd period left shouldn’t break the collective backs of a professional hockey team. Granted, the Avs haven’t looked professional, played hockey or as a team for the vast majority of the season, but you still get my point.
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
Totally Agree
The goal was not the problem, it was the team’s reaction to the goal that was the problem. One goal and they just give up?
The first two periods Budaj kept this team in the game. What did the offense do with that: nothing. I’ll call it “offensive soft goals.” How many times has this team botched up scoring opportunities because of poor offensive play? Lots. What did offensive mistakes costs the team: goals, momentum, confidence, and wins. If they have capitalized on the numerous opportunites they had last night the game could have been 2-0 going into the 3rd period. Their confidence would have been up and they would have had momentum on their side. Aren’t those mistakes just as bad as a soft goal? But nobody focuses on that because it is not so obvious, but I believe it is just as back-breaking as a soft goal.
This team wins as a team and it loses as a team. The whole team has a lot of work to do to get better.
The only good I can see coming out of this season is that they can no longer pretend that they are bad and that the team is rebuilding. It might have been worse for this team to barely make it into the playoffs, because it would masked the real problems. Maybe it will take this very bad season to get Lacroix’s attention and for him to finally take some action. Hopefully, that will be the good out of all of this.
"All our mistakes end up in the net," Tony Granato.
Hmm...
I probably waited long enough to come back to this thread (I honestly just forgot I commented at all), but I think the only “firewagon” this team needs at this point is the Radio Flyer seating my least favorite G’s in the Avs hood, Arnason, Tucker, Raycroft, and McCormick. While we’re at it, let’s get a second one rockin with Guite and Clark spending the rest of this season looking for some more company.
I am Jack's unbridled optimism.
by A.J. Haefele on Feb 12, 2009 7:11 AM MST up reply actions
+3
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Feb 11, 2009 9:29 AM MST up reply actions
Also,
The picture in the recap, for those who are interested is TEXTBOOK positioning for making a save on a point shot through a screen: Get low, get big, close the holes, stick discipline, find the puck. I know because I can only do about 2 of those 5 things consistently. Thankfully, most of the guys in my league are afraid to get hit with the puck, so NOBODY screens the goalie that consistently.
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
Just curious
and because I’m too lazy to look it up, how many shutouts did the Avs incur last season? 6 already this season in Granato’s new wide open (evidently code for clueless) system. Great. Just fricken great.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
Another theory
The Avs wholeheartedly agree with me that DDC’s midseason grades were too generous and are doing their best to open his eyes during the second half of the season.
Or another, they know they are auditioning for trades, don’t want to leave the best city in America to live, and are blowing goats on purpose.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
But I think the goats are even disappointed in the effort…
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
As they should be.
Sadly, this comment by me prompted me to post the sordid joke below. The characters in the story below are completely fictional. Any resemblance in name or any other characteristics to real people, in any domain, are unintentional.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Feb 11, 2009 2:39 PM MST up reply actions
doc's thoughts
- let’s focus on some positives first. at least they’re being consistent. losing 10 out of their last 13 our whatever is better than the lose 3 win 3 crap. at least this way we get a serious draft pick.
- Stewart had a great game. He flew around the ice hitting people, making chances, and even had a great defensive play in hustling back to turn a 2 on 1 into a 2 on 2. Bye Svatos, bring us back a good goalie.
- On the other hand, Stewart missed a wide open net at 1 – 0 that would have tied the game. he’s hardly alone in that, but ouch.
- Hejduk and Smyth were flat invisible. I say this because when they suck, the whole team has nothing. They’re allowed to have bad nights, but no one is there to pick up the slack on this team. /sigh
- What do you think Hensick’s game should be? Clearly this isn’t it — last night was a microcosm of everything bad he’s been doing — he gets pushed around along the boards and going for loose pucks, he can’t go to the net or he’ll get pushed off the puck, and when he DOES have room, his shot is pretty weak and he telegraphs his passes. He’s also non-existent defensively. I know this is massively premature, but is he a bust? His game just isn’t translating in a way that even shows potential.
Hensick
Has flat out sucked most of the season. Again, he had a few bright moments when teamed with Svatos and Stewart …. why hasn’t Granato gone back to that?
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Feb 11, 2009 9:44 AM MST up reply actions
Clark
We all know I don’t think Clark is very good. But I thought last night was his best game of the season. His one-on-one defending against Rick Nash at one point in the game was excellent. Hopefully scouts saw this and we can unload him.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Feb 11, 2009 10:12 AM MST up reply actions
I actually didn’t think he played particularly good last night. that’s what i expect from him defensively, but he’s still not producing much offensively. I am glad to see a Clark-hater acknowledge his defensive play though. all it seems I ever hear about is when he screws up — and as Leopold, Hannan, and Liles have shown us the last 2 games that happens all the time and is just part of being a defenseman.
Well
I don’t think he usually plays all that well defensively most nights, he’s supposed to contribute on offense. But last night he was pretty solid in his own zone.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Feb 11, 2009 10:55 AM MST up reply actions
Hejduk
Also missed a wide open net. Part of the invisibility thing. (actually he didn’t miss the net per se, he just shot at the teeny fraction of it covered by LaCosta)
Get rid of the loser point
This team can't score on an empty net
and you actually expect them to try to shoot to the part of the net the goalie isn’t covering. Now, that’s asking A LOT of this offense.
Avs. They. Can't. Score.
Old joke
I don’t like being negative all of the time. Therefore, I just need to quit discussing this team right now. They flat out suck, period. The term “heartless” is even coming to mind. Play one period out of 3, get down by a goal and give up, crap, how gutless can you get? So, here’s an old joke.
Three guys, Joe, DDC and Mike, all go out drinking one night to excess. They decide to get together the next morning for coffee to share horror stories from the night before. The first guy, Joe, says “Man, I was so drunk last night that when I got home I just blew chunks all over the place.” The second guy, DDC, says, “That’s nothing. I never made it home. I wrapped my car around a tree and slept in a park.” The third guy, Mike, says, “I have you both beat. I somehow made it home but managed to accidently set my place on fire.”
Joe just looked at DDC and Mike sort of puzzled. “I don’t think you guys understand. Chunks is my dog.”
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
that is just…
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Feb 11, 2009 2:14 PM MST up reply actions
I see a slander suit winging it’s way to Boulder as we speak…
Colorado Avalanche: Gellin' and Propellin'!!!
From Joe or from Chunks?
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Feb 11, 2009 2:34 PM MST up reply actions
Watch them 3, 2, 1 — I posted them backwards.
by StructuralPoke on Feb 12, 2009 8:41 AM MST up reply actions
I think this quote hurts more than any others this season.
“They’re not a dangerous team this year,” Blue Jackets defenseman Jan Hejda said. “Probably some of it is injury, but they haven’t come close to beating us this season.” – Aaron Potzline,
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
About as close as anyone is ever going to come to saying “Man, that team sucks.” And from a BJ names Jan? Wow. The little guy is kicking sand in the fallen giant’s face. Thanks FG! Thanks Granato!
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Feb 11, 2009 10:23 AM MST up reply actions
yeah, my eyes got extra wide when I saw that quote. A definite keeper.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Feb 11, 2009 10:34 AM MST up reply actions
If I was the coach
that quote would already be printed out, blown up and posted in the locker room.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
Now and then we had the hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be PIRATES.
-Mark Twain-
by Americanario on Feb 11, 2009 10:47 AM MST up reply actions
Are you assuming that our coach can read?
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Feb 11, 2009 10:55 AM MST up reply actions
Quote
I saw that quote and my jaw dropped. For the bland as vanilla world of hockey quotes this is particularly stinging.
I believe in Peter Budaj
by Jibblescribbits on Feb 11, 2009 10:56 AM MST up reply actions

by 



















