The Avalanche At The Deadline - Forwards
On Wednesday, I shared my thoughts on the Avalanche at the trade deadline on. Well, they were half of my thoughts. In that article, I discussed the moveability options for the Avalanche defensemen and goalies. Today, I release part two: the forwards.
Joe Sakic ($6m, UFA): Just about every year, some yahoo postulates that the Avs should trade Sakic to Vancouver at the deadline for a heap of draft picks. It. Wont. Happen. Ever. To be honest, I'm not convinced we're going to see Super Joe on the ice again this year...but I'm also hoping to see him return in the fall.
Ryan Smyth ($6.25m, signed for 3 more years): Smyth's name is still circling about around the rumor circuit. While it's certainly plausible that Francois Giguere has explored the market, I don't the Avs want to move him. Even if they did, I'm sure the list of teams Smyth would waive his NTC for is extremely small.
Milan Hejduk ($3.9m, 1 year): Like Smyth and Sakic, Hejduk too has a NTC. That, his tenure in Denver and his favorable cap number all mean that he's not going anywhere.
Wojtek Wolski ($2.8m, 1 year): Double Dub seems seems more and more like a cornerstone player now that he's shifted over to center. He may not be untouchable, but he's only moving if he's part of a big, big deal.
Paul Stastny ($850k this year, $6.6m next year, 5 years): This one IS untouchable.
Darcy Tucker ($2.25m, 1 year): Despite his contract, I'd have to think Tucker would attract some interest from teams looking for playoff grit and, yes, leadership. The crazy thing is that I'm not convinced the Avalanche really want to move Darcy Tucker. I would love to, but I don't get to make the deals.
Marek Svatos ($2.05m, 1 year): I've said this before: I don't think Svatos has much usefulness if he's not able to crack the top two lines. He's been unable to do that so far, and doesn't appear likely to do so in the future. I've loved Svatos since that first playoff series against Dallas and there may not be anyone who would like to see Svatos succeed more than me. I just don't believe that success is going to happen in a unipron, and would like to see him moved if only to allow us to move to a different look on that tepid 3rd line. Svatos' name gets bandied about a lot in potential deals among Avalanche fans; this might just be the year that fantasy becomes reality.
Tyler Arnason ($1.67m, UFA): Take him.
Ian Laperriere ($1.15m, UFA): This one's the gut-wrencher. Word is, the Avs offered Lappy a pay cut, but he would like a raise. The truth is, Lappy has probably been underpaid since he's been on the Avs. That doesn't mean the Avalanche have an obligation to meet his demands now, but it does explain why Laperriere may be reticent to offer a home town discount. I think Giguere will make an effort to bring Lappy back, but he won't break the bank. If a deal can't be reached, Lappy will be on his way to any number of teams who need an upgrade in the heart department. And that will be one sad day indeed.
Cody McLeod ($522k, RFA): The Avs are very high on McLeod. They may get some inquiries, but I doubt he's going anywhere.
Cody McCormick ($522k, RFA): The other Cody Mac, however, is a bit more expendable. The team has a bit of a log jam on the lower lines and could use the trade deadline to thin the herd a bit. And his strong play of late should improve his trade value.
Ben Guite ($475k, UFA): If any team is looking for some depth at faceoffs and on the penalty kill, Guite would be a solid pickup. I hope he sticks around, though.
Brian Willsie ($600k, UFA): A couple of months ago, Willsie looked done, but he's played quite well lately - maybe well enough to attract the attention of another team.
TJ Hensick ($727, 1 year): Hensick has struggled to make the jump from the AHL to the NHL and is currently firmly entrenched (and rightfully so) in the Tony Granato doghouse. I know some fans are outraged that he is getting scratched instead of being sent to Lake Erie, but I don't think he has much more to prove in the AHL. ANY NHL experience - even watching from the press box - is a good thing for TJ. I still have a lot of faith in Hensick. Even if the Avalanche brass don't share my optimism, they aren't going to give up on him yet.
Chris Stewart ($590k, 1 year): In my book, Stewart is almost as close to untouchable as Stastny is at this point. He looks like he's well on his way to becoming a cornerstone player for the Avs.
That wraps up the forwards. Tucker, Svatos, Laperriere, Willsie, McCormick, Arnason and Guite seem to be the names that would make the most sense to deal, although I'd say only Svatos and Lappy are going to warrant a return worth talking about. With the deadline arriving next Wednesday, we won't have to wait long to see just how far off on this I am.
0 recs |
13 comments
|
Comments
The team has a bit of a log jam on the lower lines
You really should write for Altitude.
by Jibblescribbits on Feb 27, 2009 8:26 AM MST reply actions
I don’t think we’ll ever see Super Joe on the ice again. Period. Which is sad. Granato’s love of Tucker should be part of his dismissal. Along with his failure to utilize Svatos correctly, and inability to scratch Arny for most of the season.
If the Avs go into full-blown rebuilding mode, which I think they should (for the love of Roy starting with a new GM and coach), I wouldn’t be opposed to trading Smyth for a very significant return (top goalie prospect plus a few first rounders would be nice). The young guys I would build around would be Stats, Stewart and Jones. I’d keep the Duke and Lappy around, for sure. I also wouldn’t be opposed to dealing the Baron, but again only for a significant return. I’d also like to see what Svatos could do with a competent NHL coach.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
+1
Also:
I’d also like to see what Svatos could do with a competent NHL coach.
Svatos could be my favorite Avalanche player right now and the sad state of the Avs actually has me wishing he would get traded to a good, playoff-bound team. He’d probably score goal after GWG playing for a decent coach and with better linemates; meanwhile the Avs management and coaching staff will be sitting around saying, “Doh!”
With Svats gone, I would then just feel sorry for Hejduk and Wolski for being stuck where they are and for Sakic and Foote for having to end their careers with the Avs being so bad. If Laperriere gets traded I hope he wins the Stanley Cup with his new team.
If Laperriere gets traded I hope he wins the Stanley Cup with his new team.
POSITIVELY!!!!
Avs. Sticking it to the Red Wings
Unless it is the Wings, of course. In which case I’d hope he beats up his teammates and gets out of town.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Feb 27, 2009 11:17 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I would have no problem if Joe comes back next fall, but I think he needs to look at taking less money. He’s could still be a benefit to the team, but I’m not sure he’s any where the 6mil range.
I would keep Hejduk, Stastny, Wolski, Lappy, McLeod and Stewart.
Smyth, Guite, Hensick, Svatos and Willsie are guys that could stay, but if we can get something of value out of them, than so be it.
Tucker, Arnason just need to be gone. A bag of pucks would be enough just as long as we get rid of them.
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
Economy
I just read through a pretty somber account of sports franchise operations. With the economy the way it is looking like it’s going to be, I would doubt anyone becomes an overpaid free agent this summer.
It dawned on me that this may be the reason the Avs are playing a bit of hardball with Lappy. Sure Kroenke isn’t in danger of going broke, but franchises are going to be a lot more careful of what they spend this summer.
Hossa and Gaborik, to name a few, are going to look like fools for turning down money and going into this offseason as free agents. Both wanted about $9M/season and It wouldn’t be completely shocking to see Gaborik make $5M. I bet Hossa gets $6M.
by Jibblescribbits on Feb 27, 2009 11:47 AM MST up reply actions
I see the point of higher tier players having to take a pay cut. But Lappy asking for a raise is immaterial to the overall budget. An additional 900,00K let’s say, to bring him to 1.8M over a couple years versus the 56M cap… completely and totally immaterial. We’re talking 1% of the payroll at max in salary difference. Compare that to what Lappy brings to the team… Kronke lol. Frickin lol. The man is worth billions. Lappy’s salary is merely a blip on the radar.
An ounce of confidence can carry you a mile toward winning. Oh, and Red Wings suck.
Agree
I agree that paying Lappy is the right move, but I was just pointing out that teams may start being extra frugal regarding contracts this spring/summer.
by Jibblescribbits on Feb 28, 2009 9:06 AM MST up reply actions

by 


























