Meet Your 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche
I talked a little about next year's cap around the deadline, and Adrian Dater has a good article about on his blog today as well. Although I don't think there's any firm numbers out there, it's expected that the salary cap will be dropping in the coming years, and some teams could be in some real cap trouble coming up. If the cap drops too sharply, you might end up seeing some really good players skating in the AHL if it gets to the point that an NHL club can't fit his contract into the cap.
The Avs' situation isn't that dire, although as Dater points out, the team doesn't have a ton of cap flexibilty this summer. According to NHL Numbers, the Avalanche already have $43.4 million committed to 13 players next year. Comparing them to other teams, that ranks them 11th. More importantly, the Avs average salary commitment is $3.4 million per player (that's the last column) and that is the 4th highest in the league.
| Phi | 54.3 | 19 | 2.9 |
| Ott | 49.2 | 19 | 2.6 |
| Det | 47.3 | 15 | 3.2 |
| SJ | 46.7 | 13 | 3.6 |
| Buf | 46.5 | 15 | 3.1 |
| Pit | 46.3 | 13 | 3.6 |
| Car | 46.2 | 16 | 2.9 |
| Was | 45.9 | 14 | 3.3 |
| Stl | 44.3 | 18 | 2.5 |
| Edm | 43.8 | 17 | 2.6 |
| Col | 43.7 | 13 | 3.4 |
| Min | 43.1 | 16 | 2.7 |
| LA | 42.6 | 20 | 2.1 |
| Bos | 42.5 | 14 | 3.0 |
| Cal | 42.5 | 15 | 2.8 |
| Tor | 41.9 | 17 | 2.5 |
| CBJ | 41.7 | 18 | 2.3 |
| NJ | 40.4 | 14 | 2.9 |
| NYR | 40.1 | 9 | 4.5 |
| Dal | 39.4 | 16 | 2.5 |
| Fla | 38.0 | 13 | 2.9 |
| TB | 37.7 | 13 | 2.9 |
| Chi | 36.2 | 11 | 3.3 |
| Ana | 35.8 | 11 | 3.3 |
| Pho | 35.1 | 14 | 2.5 |
| Nas | 32.9 | 13 | 2.5 |
| Van | 31.2 | 11 | 2.8 |
| NYI | 30.8 | 16 | 1.9 |
| Atl | 28.5 | 10 | 2.9 |
| Mon | 23.3 | 11 | 2.1 |
However, that's a little decieving because it doesn't include RFAs. The Avalanche have 4 key players that should sign for close to the minimum QO (shown below). Peter Budaj is also an RFA, but I would think he would command something higher than the $840k qualifier. For now, I'm setting him aside.
- David Jones ($605k)
- Cody McLeod ($574k)
- Cody McCormick ($574k)
- Kyle Cumiskey ($522k)
While I suppose there's a chance someone throws some money at McLeod this summer, in all likelihood those 4 will be back with us at something close to those numbers. That gives the Avs 17 players signed for $46 million, at a much more reasonable average of $2.4 million [EDIT: thanks JS]. Depending on the cap number, the Avs will have some money this summer - but not much. Key UFAs would be Joe Sakic, Ian Laperriere and Ben Guite. Budaj would need to be signed as well. Taking just some rough guesses (and assuming Super Joe is returning...which I am):
- Sakic, $4m
- Lappy, $1.5m
- Budaj, $1.4m
- Guite, $600
That puts you at about $53.5 million for 20 players - likely right up to the cap max, if not over. If Sakic decides not to come back, the team might have a little spending money, but not enough to target a top line player. And can you imagine the PR hit the team would take if Sakic wanted to come back but the Avs couldn't afford him? Yikes.
In terms of buyouts, the Avalanche really only have two viable candidates. Darcy Tucker would be an obvious choice. Buying out Tucker's remaing year would save the Avalanche $1.5 million next year, and would cost $750,000 against the cap in 2010-2011. Another option could be Brett Clark. Buying out Clark's $3.5 million would save $2.33 million next year, but would be $1.1 million in dead weight the following season. The savings next year (and addition by subtraction on the ice) would be nice, but 2010-2011 is the season everyone is projecting the cap to collapse, so it may not be wise to have any dead money on the books that year.
The bottom line is that, for better or worse, the Avalanche of next season are probably going to look a lot like the Avalanche of this season. We've been talking about a need to shake things up on the ice this summer, but there just may not be enough financial flexibility to do so.
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
yeah, i agree — the Avs are committed to essentially this roster for the foreseeable future. and I think McLeod will at least file for arbitration and will get a larger raise.
I don’t think Joe will return. The body is simply not willing.
I’m not sure I see why Budaj would get a raise. Is there a big market for sub .900 sv. pct. goalies that have never been able to hold down a starting slot?
This team also has far, far too many RWs. I think you’ll see Svatos dangled for a goalie in the offseason. If no one bites, then you could even see him moved for picks and prospects.
We’ve never seen the Avs do a buyout before. I wish they’d buy out Tucker, but I just don’t see it.
Math
I am not getting your math:
43.7 + .605 + .574*2 + .522 = $46.0M , not $47.4
…
$46M + 4 + 1.5 + 1.4 + .6 = $53.5M
…
Also I don’t think Budaj will receive much more than the qualifying offer. I estimate ~$1/season and $1.4 would be a huge reach after he had a disastrous season, and the free agent market this season will be very tight. GMs aren’t going to be throwing that much money around, and especially not at guys coming off of poor season who would cost draft picks for the future.
I would add in another $600k for Willsie as well. (this is $54M for 21 players)
I could see the Avs buying out Clark if they are unable to move him or Salei in the summer, but both Tucker and Clark come off the books at the end of next season, so at the very least they’ll be deadline deals next season.
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 11, 2009 11:29 AM MDT reply actions
I am not getting your math:
thanks, fixed (I was using actual salary, not cap numbers when I was adding everything up)
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 11, 2009 12:15 PM MDT up reply actions
we will be a better team...
because hedman or tavares will be playing. they will instantly become top 5 player on the team.
I still think we end up 3rd or 4th. One of these days the team will get it back together, and NYI, TBL, and PHX are all worse teams on paper.
I’ve gotta say though, Atlanta could be close to breaking out of their purgatory. The games I’ve seen look very promising — Bogosian is awesome, Kovalchuk is who he is, Little is good, Lehtonen is a great goalie…a good UFA signing and another top 5 pick in this coming draft probably sets them up with a good core for years.
Lehtonen
Is probably gone.. I think they’re going with Pavlecec (and if they’re not we should trade for him)
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 11, 2009 12:55 PM MDT up reply actions
Even if we don't go after Lehtonen
The office will get some goalie. Whether that be a star goalie or someone to groom, I cannot foresee management enduring another year of Budaj.
The team may look a lot like this year, but it will be better. Even having Stastny and a potential Sakic healthy is already a better team. Negativity can only go so far.
agree
But I’m not sure who they would go after if they are unable to shed some salary.
Take my estimate of $54M for 21 players.. that leaves just $2M to sign 4 more players, and goalies are notoriously the most expensive of the bunch. Now take a look at a list of UFA goalies. Can any of the goalies that the Avs would be able to afford be considered better than Budaj, or Raycroft for that matter?
I wouldn’t mind the Avs taking a look at Nittymaki, but even at $1.3M/ season it would probably be out of the Avs price range.
One reason I see ATL as a possible trading partner is that I think they are going to struggle to make the Salary floor next season. If they trade Lehtonen away (which I think they will do) they will need to pick up a contract or two. Both Salei or Clark would be a good fit with their team, as they desperately could use a defenseman.
Bottom line is that the Avs have to dump a contract this offseason. I think it can be done, but it will be difficult.
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 11, 2009 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions
Atlanta has a huge need at RW. Svatos + our high 2nd is a very attractive package to ATL, imo. Hell, we can toss in Budaj as a backup for Pavelec. I oughta pop that on HF boards, see what the ATL people have to say.
I oughta pop that on HF boards, see how Eklund rates this
Fixed!
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 11, 2009 2:34 PM MDT up reply actions
The Stastny contract
This is why I feel Stastny will be overpaid. He should have received a 3 year deal at 4M per, or something similar. The contracts they’re handing out these days are ridiculous, and it’s going to cost the Avs.
Top goaltender? Can’t afford that!
I don't believe in Peter Budaj.
lightbulb over head
TRADE STASTNY!
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 11, 2009 2:30 PM MDT up reply actions
I know this is probably going to get me flamed, but lets say that Sakic doesn’t come back. Who takes the “C”? Smyth? Foote? Staz?
I hear those names tossed around a lot – but the lone guy that I’d want the “C” on is Lappy. I hope, nay, pray, that we can resign him and keep him around till he ends his career here.
stastny
I think stats would get it, with Foote, Smyth and Lappy as Alternates.
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 11, 2009 2:54 PM MDT up reply actions
Smyth would get my vote
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 11, 2009 2:54 PM MDT up reply actions
Smyth gets mine too
But Lappy would be a great choice too.
I don’t know about Staz for the C though, definitively he deserves the A.
I vote for Smyth as well!
His next couple years on the team as the captain just lets SoS develop a little more.
But Lappy would be a good choice too. Does that come with a raise?
by From the Point on Mar 11, 2009 4:11 PM MDT up reply actions
I'm not sure SoS is ready to wear the C
Smyth or Lappy would be my choices
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Mar 11, 2009 6:15 PM MDT up reply actions
Clarification
I think Stats will get the Captaincy… but I wouldn’t choose him yet.
I too would probably give it to Smyth.
by Jibblescribbits on Mar 11, 2009 3:11 PM MDT up reply actions
I see no reason in waiting, give the C to Stastny if Joe retires.
When it comes to cap numbers, I find this site to be more reliable then NHL Numbers:
One thing to consider is incoming prospects. Assuming the Avs draft in the top five, it’s highly likely that player will be in an Avs uniform this fall. Also Ryan Stoa will get a good look in camp, though I suspect he’ll start the year with the Monsters. I don’t expect Shattenkirk to be signed until 2010. With the Avs having five defensemen signed through next season, it doesn’t make sense bringing him on board now.
One more thing is signing undrafted prospects. The Avs signed Cedric Lalonde-McNicoll recently and are rumored to be one of the teams interested in signing DU’s Tyler Bozak. Bozak I believe can play in the NHL as early as next season. Bozak is a gifted offensively player, but is also excellent defensively, and great in the face-off circle.
Colorado Avalanche Prospects (www.avsprospects.blogspot.com)
by Angélique C. Murray on Mar 11, 2009 4:52 PM MDT reply actions
The Avs signed Cedric Lalonde-McNicoll
hyphens represent!
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 11, 2009 5:01 PM MDT reply actions

by 



















