Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Phil Mickelson Outshines Tiger Woods

Giguere On The Deadline

Shane posted this last night over at Avs Talk, but I thought I'd put it up here as well. Nothing extremely earth-shattering, but still interesting to watch.

 

 

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

i think there’s interesting stuff here — he all but admits that he wasn’t going to sell until this past terrible road trip. :O

by thedoctor on Mar 5, 2009 6:45 PM MST reply actions  

another one: “(based on these last 18 games)…there’s a lot of evaluation of the players that will be done by the coaches and management…”

this tells me he expect this coaching staff to be in place deciding for next year’s roster.

by thedoctor on Mar 5, 2009 6:50 PM MST up reply actions  

also thanks for posting, Shane and DD. i had not seen this.

by thedoctor on Mar 5, 2009 6:51 PM MST up reply actions  

No one asked him if we included all that bubble wrap in the Leoprone deal.

by Dario on Mar 5, 2009 10:40 PM MST reply actions  

I gotta believe that it went along. That’s why they included 2 minor leaguers…

2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity

by Mike @ MHH on Mar 6, 2009 7:37 AM MST up reply actions  

hay guys guess what

if the season ended today, we’d have the 4th slot for the lottery! yay?

by thedoctor on Mar 6, 2009 10:06 AM MST reply actions  

Root root root

for the lightning. If they go on a little streak we could be in the 3 spot before our next game.

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Mar 6, 2009 10:20 AM MST up reply actions  

If I understand right

as long as we are in the top (bottom) 5 we have a shot at the number 1 pick, right? That’s the point of the “lottery”?

Does it really matter which position? Does the #1 spot get more “tickets” or something?

MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Mar 6, 2009 10:40 AM MST up reply actions  

yeah, basically. these are the odds that your team will be picked in the lottery. if you are picked, you move up 4 slots and those 4 teams ahead of you down 1 slot. that’s it.

the odds of retaining your slot are pretty high. i think they’re lowest for the #1 slot at just under 50%.

by thedoctor on Mar 6, 2009 11:28 AM MST up reply actions  

Although the NBA uses a similar system and the worst team almost never picks first overall.

Never given it any thought in hockey before because we were never bad enough for it to matter.

Shit.

by eltharion_doa on Mar 6, 2009 2:10 PM MST up reply actions  

since I doubt very much that we’ll be that last place team, you should be happy!

the NBA lottery is different too — there’s a much higher chance for lower teams to move up and worse teams to get bumped.

by thedoctor on Mar 6, 2009 2:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Ok

I’m completely confused. Since the Avs have never been this bad, I have never paid much attention to the lottery or the draft. I thought the lottery was between the bottom five teams to see who gets first pick. I’m not understanding this moving up and down thing.

An ounce of confidence can carry you a mile toward winning. Oh, and Red Wings suck.

by texacogirl on Mar 6, 2009 3:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes only the top 5 have a shot at the #1 pick. For example the Avs are the 5th worst team and the Isles are the worst, but the Avs draw out in the lottery. The Avs pick #1, the Isles then move to pick 2nd, the #2 team picks 3rd, and so on.

Now out side of that I’m not sure how it works. For example: if the Avs were sitting in the 6th spot could they draw out and move up 4 spots to pick 2nd (in which case the Isles would retain the #1) or would the Avs stay with the sixth pick no matter what?

MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Mar 6, 2009 4:07 PM MST up reply actions  

No

If Avs were 6th and drew, we would get 2nd, etc. Same if we were in 8th, we draw for 4th.

by Drakenlot on Mar 6, 2009 10:06 PM MST up reply actions  

Umm

Meant to add more.

For instance, is there just one draw, or does each team get a draw? So that means the 3rd place team could go up to 1st, but as well the 6th place moves into 2nd? Or what?

by Drakenlot on Mar 6, 2009 10:08 PM MST up reply actions  

One team can only move down one spot, so I think that would preclude your scenario. I always thought the winner moved up and everyone else was reseeded accordingly, but having never been in this position before (ie caring about the last 10 spots or so) I’m not positve (oh except for being positive we will be in the top, er, bottom, ten). Positivity!

Get rid of the loser point

08-09 Avs- can we decline the penalty?

by TheRed on Mar 7, 2009 1:04 AM MST up reply actions  

Ok

So my scenario would be the 6th place gets 4th?

by Drakenlot on Mar 8, 2009 6:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

no, if you win as the 6th you’d go to 2nd. 2nd moves to 3rd, 3rd to 4th, 4th to 5th, 5th to 6th.

by thedoctor on Mar 8, 2009 10:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

But

my question was it there one draw or many?

by Drakenlot on Mar 9, 2009 5:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yep

Any team that misses the playoffs has some chance of #1 in the NBA, although the worst team can’t slip lower than 5th.

I don’t have much confidence in our front office being competant enough not to screw up a high draft pick anyway…

by eltharion_doa on Mar 7, 2009 4:08 AM MST up reply actions  

Avs were sitting in the 6th spot could they draw out and move up 4 spots to pick 2nd

That’s my understanding of it.

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Mar 6, 2009 4:19 PM MST reply actions  

Reply Fail

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Mar 6, 2009 4:19 PM MST up reply actions  

I’ve gotta say, you and your reply failures are likely the most consistent thing going for the Avalanche this year…

2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity

by Mike @ MHH on Mar 7, 2009 3:32 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
The Sunny Side of McNab and Haynes
Russia4_small
Jussi Parkkila
Owl_eyes_small
Truth

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Last Year's Team Statistics Compared to This Year
Uwhockey_small
UFAs to target-Suter and Parise
Curious_george_pic_small
Gettin' down witcha bad self. Paying homage to one of my favorite gingers.
2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
Crosby traded?
Steamavatar_small
Stastny's Value (Not what you think, and a little positive mojo about our team and where we are headed)
Hankatar_small
Proof that Sacco is a bad coach.
Fry_small
FINALLY, The Savage Has Returned, With a life altering question

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

View My Stats

Managing Editor

Milehigh-xl_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Assistant Editors

Icon_small Joe Dunman

Mike_logo_2_small Mike @ MHH

148488_10150337054485417_836355416_16934526_6679165_n_small Sandie Gauthier

Gravatar_small Cheryl Bradley

Staff Writers

Me2_small Angélique C. Murray

Godzilla_mario_small A.J. Haefele

Me_small Derek B

Roy_small Brett Shumway

Avalanche_logo_small andidee15