Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Mercis, Mais Non Merci

Lacroix_medium

With the season all but over (and the draft lottey just one week from today) our attentions are naturally shifting from the steaming pile of poo dumped onto the ice a few nights a week to the folks who are responsible for said poo. This upcoming offseason is a critical one for the Colorado Avalanche and probably the biggest since the summer the new CBA was implemented (aka the disaster that started this whole mess). The Avalanche certainly need to make changes to the front office this summer. But, that doesn't go far enough. More importantly, the Avalanche need to make the right changes to the front office this summer.

The latest rumors have team president Pierre Lacroix stepping back into his old GM shoes and bringing his former client, Patrick Roy, in to coach the team. Adrian Dater doesn't specifically address the Roy part, but thinks it's about a 50/50 proposition on the former. Woodhead Paige wants both to happen (which should be enough to tell you it's a stupid idea). I think it's a bit premature to start picking our next coach, but I have no problem voicing my opinion on the idea to bring Lacroix back as GM: Thanks, but no thanks.

I probably should preface this all by saying that I'm not all that certain that Francois Giguere needs to go. I don't make the decisions, though, and I do have a feeling that both G-man (Giguere and Granato) will be gone before someone raises the Stanley Cup this summer. I also think that Lacroix will be the next GM of the Avalanche. In my opinion, it's the wrong move.

Lacroix is rightfully recognized as the GM behind the Avs' two Stanley Cups. He made bold moves - Roy, Bourque, Blake, Lemieux - to turn a talented team into a championship team. However, Lacroix did not build those teams - he just put the finishing touches on them.

When Lacroix took over from Pierre Page in May of 1994, he inherited a talent-laden team that had underperfomed the year before. The Nordiques were on the rise after a slew of terrible seasons...and high draft picks. From 1987-1993, Quebec had 8 top 10 picks (3 of those were 1st overall). Now, Lacroix did take that team and turn it into a champion, and I don't want to denegrate the job he did at all. Still, if you look at the 1995 Cup team, a lot of the key players - Sakic, Forsberg, Ricci, Simon, Kamensky, Corbet, Young, Gusarov, Klemm, Foote, Wolanin, Leschyshen - were already in place. When Lacroix came on, he made moves for Lemieux, Lefevbre, Ozolinsh, Yelle and, of course, Roy (and Mike Keane) that gave the franchise the necessary push to get over the hump. Later, he would tweak the roster further, bringing in guys like Bourque and Blake to get a second Cup.

I still contend the Colorado Avalanche are a good team in need of a good coach and some roster fine-tuning. Pierre Lacroix does not fine-tune. He makes wholesale changes. He trades Mats Sundin for Wendel Clark. He trades for Patrick Roy. He moves Owen Nolan for Ozolinsh, Dury for Morris, Morris for Gratton. He trades for Theodore. He doesn't do small. Lacroix's aggressive tactics worked (mostly) because he had a deep talent base to work from and a large payroll budget. He'll have neither if he signs on for round two. In today's NHL, splashy isn't going to cut it and PL just hasn't shown he's capable of the gentler hand that modern GMs need. In fact, it's the other way around. This franchise is still trying to recover from Lacroix's post-lockout flubs - losing Forsberg, losing Foote, the lost cap room due to the Sakic and Blake bonuses, getting swindled to take Theodore's massive contract. And, they would certainly be in better shape today had Lacroix not made the ill-advised, desperate play to move Derek Morris and Keith Ballard for Ossi Vaananen and Chris Gratton.

These days, the draft has become an increasingly important component in the way that teams build their teams. Lacroix is known for some excellent late-round picks (Svatos in the 7th, Liles in the 5th, Pahlsson 7th). Unfortunately, his first round picks have been...well, terrible. Here's the first round picks under his tenure: Denis, Ratchuk, Grimes, Tanguay, Skoula, Regehr, Parker, Kuleshov, Nedorost, Johansson and Wolski. That's a lot of misses and only a couple of hits (and 4 of those guys came from one draft).

There's another reason that I'm against Lacroix, Part Deux. I'll let Dater put it in his words:

Lacroix has not and, according to Avs VP of media relations Jean Martineau, will not speak with the media in the near future. There is nobody more secretive and tight-lipped with the media than Pierre Lacroix.

Um, yeah. Memo to the Avalanche: we're trying to bring teams into the 21st century. We need less of this childish loose-lips-sink-sinks approach, not more. Obviously, Lacroix is not a changed man. The Avalanche already lag behind just about every NHL team in the communication department and Lacroix would be a big step in the wrong direction.

So, thanks, but no thanks. If Giguere does go, I'd prefer to go in a completely new direction. This franchise had a great run under Pierre Lacroix, but it's time for a new approach. Personally, I'd like to see the team get really radical and go outside of the organization entirely (crazy, I know). Everything about the franchise seems stale and tired right now and that's reflected in the team's dismal attendance numbers.  Installing another inside man - be it Lacroix or someone else from within the organization - is going to extend the message to the fans that the team is perfectly happy with the status quo. I can assure you: the fans are not.

Comment 20 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

As always, very interesting take. I’d prefer PL over FG, but am not sure it would be the right direction either, mostly for the reasons you stated. Also remember, PL is the one with the huge man crush on Granato and the one who inexplicably handed over the keys to him the first time around. And I wouldn’t be at all surprised if he didn’t dictate his re-promotion this past offseason.

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 7, 2009 12:23 PM MDT reply actions  

I specifically omitted any reference to Giguere’s hiring of Granato for this very reason. I absolutely believe that was Lacroix’s hire. And Giguere will take the fall for it.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 7, 2009 12:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

indeed, I agree we have at least another year of Granato if PL steps back in as GM.

by thedoctor on Apr 7, 2009 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

indeed, I agree we have at least another year of Granato suck if PL steps back in as GM

Fixed

Get rid of the loser point

08-09 Avs- can we decline the penalty?

by TheRed on Apr 7, 2009 1:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

Isn't

Granato a synonym for suck?

2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.

by Drakenlot on Apr 7, 2009 4:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

Only if

“Tony” in in front of the “Granato”
I believe there is another “Granato” who doe not suck. Of course we haven’t seen that one coach….

MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Apr 7, 2009 7:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

I believe there is another "Granato" who doe not suck

Keeping mouth shut…keeping mouth shut…..

Get rid of the loser point

08-09 Avs- can we decline the penalty?

by TheRed on Apr 8, 2009 1:08 AM MDT up reply actions  

TheRed narrowly avoids the BanHammer….

2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity

by Mike @ MHH on Apr 8, 2009 8:13 AM MDT up reply actions  

nice post

if Pierre Lacroix can “tone it down” some, I’ve no problem believing he can be successful in the new NHL. while the run of poor picks is worrying, I tend to think the draft picks aren’t the GM’s direct call either — they’re the scouting department’s. You yourself have noted our good record on drafting since the team came to Denver, and I’m very happy with our current scouting regime (well, except for their goaltending picks).

Bottom line, while I agree FG might not even need to be fired, I’m not exactly sure PL stepping back in will be bad if it occurs. The worst effect will probably be the lack of change in coaching.

by thedoctor on Apr 7, 2009 1:23 PM MDT reply actions  

I 100% support the idea of tossing out the existing Avs front office and filling it with some new blood from outside the organization. Unfortunately, I think there is a very low chance of this happening.

I’m no Jack Welch, but I’ve got a few years of corporate management experience under my belt, and I can tell you that letting go a whole management team and replacing people in high positions with outsiders is a sure way to crush the spirit of any office. Even though it might be for the best—-hell, even critical—-of the company, it’s still potentially toxic.

The Avs no doubt have some serious talent in their front office. FG is a fine accountant, no doubt. And he’s probably got some very smart guys working under him, guys that are working their way up the ladder in the hopes of someday being the next Avalanche GM (or Marketing Director, or VP of Hockey Operations, etc.). You toss out their bosses and replace them with outsiders, not giving them the chance for a promotion they may have earned, and you might just poison the whole environment.

Now, those are just doom and gloom management concerns coming from me, and they certainly haven’t stopped a lot of companies and sports teams from making the changes necessary to start winning again. BUT, the fact that sweeping changes like that are often so traumatic to an organization is the major reason why I think PL (and Stan Kroenke above him) will be very reluctant to make them.

If we’ve seen anything, it’s that the Avs are desperately loyal to insiders and guys who’ve worked their way up. That’s honorable, and definitely in short supply in today’s corporate world, but it can also be a serious fault.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe Dunman on Apr 7, 2009 1:23 PM MDT reply actions  

Outside the organization…surely you jest!

by chiavsfan on Apr 7, 2009 3:30 PM MDT reply actions  

He doesn't jest

and please quit calling him Shirley.

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 7, 2009 3:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

DAMN YOU for stealing my chance at an Airplane comeback

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 7, 2009 3:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sorry

Looks like I picked a bad week to quit sniffing glue.

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 7, 2009 3:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

No offense, but the line is “picked the WRONG week.”

I’m an Airplane! fanatic.

Go Avs! Let's get some goals!

by Joe Dunman on Apr 7, 2009 6:16 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think Billington would be a good GM. He seems ready and I think he has been a big part of the recent drafts that feel more promising with Shattenkirk, Cohen, and possibly Stoa if his injured season was just a fluke (and not a sign of another injury prone player).

The coach however should come from the outside. Somebody that can teach defense. I’m not asking for the trap, just something that seriously reduces the high percentage shots that we have seen so much this season.

by InYoFace on Apr 7, 2009 4:49 PM MDT reply actions  

Thanks David!

David, I’ve been a long-time hockey fan (grew up in MN) and Avs fan, and recently discovered your blog. I hope (but highly doubt) that the Avs brass read your (and others) blogs. I agree that the Avs need to make wholesale changes in the managment and coaching staff, and bring in fresh perspective from outside the organization.

Keep up the good work!

by PulldaGoalie on Apr 7, 2009 4:51 PM MDT reply actions  

thanks and welcome to MHH!

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 7, 2009 5:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

Maybe Lacroix has learned...

…how to GM under a salary cap?

I’d be happy if we toss FG and TG this summer. Even if “Bonus Math Master” PL is back in the saddle. Although ideally, the Avs will go outside the organization and get someone who is both skilled and qualified—not just a friend of someone inside the organization.

I don't believe in Peter Budaj.

by BraxtanFILM on Apr 7, 2009 5:16 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Russia4_small
Jussi Parkkila
Owl_eyes_small
Truth

Recent FanPosts

2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
Crosby traded?
Steamavatar_small
Stastny's Value (Not what you think, and a little positive mojo about our team and where we are headed)
Hankatar_small
Proof that Sacco is a bad coach.
Fry_small
FINALLY, The Savage Has Returned, With a life altering question
Andy_small
avs weekend...
Forsberg-retires_1__small
Hockey Pranks and other funny things
Av_glasses_small
An Opinion As To Why The Waiving Of Yip Is Extremely Important
Images_small
Peter Mueller Has Inspired Me

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

View My Stats

Managing Editor

Milehigh-xl_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Assistant Editors

Icon_small Joe Dunman

Mike_logo_2_small Mike @ MHH

148488_10150337054485417_836355416_16934526_6679165_n_small Sandie Gauthier

Gravatar_small Cheryl Bradley

Staff Writers

Me2_small Angélique C. Murray

Godzilla_mario_small A.J. Haefele

Me_small Derek B

Roy_small Brett Shumway

Avalanche_logo_small andidee15