Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Amateur Mathematics Of Linsanity

Game 79 Recap: Sharks 1, Avalanche 0 (SO)



Can I take my I Believe In Budaj button out of the closet again? Very quietly, Peter Budaj has been playing much more like the Peter Budaj we thought we would see this year. In his last 10 starts, he's held the Avs' opponent to 2 goals or less 7 times. That's a good stretch for any goalie. It's a GREAT stretch for a goalie playing behind an AHL-calibre defense (to be fair, the newbies have played well, but these aren't future superstars back there).

Budaj and Evgeni Nabokov were both exceptional last night. Although both got a little help from the goal posts, neither allowed a goal after 65 minutes of play, and only 1 attempt was converted in the shootout. That attempt was by Joe Pavelski, giving the Sharks the win, but that's not really all that important. Each player was their team's best player by a considerable margin.

For Budaj, it was yet another solid effort squandared by his team's inability to score. I thought I'd look into Budaj's stats a little bit to see if I could illustrate that our goaltending is getting an unfair portion of the blame for this disaster of a season.

By my quick calculations, Budaj has held the opposing team to 2 goals or less 22 times, or about 42% of the time. He's allowed 3 goals (exactly) 16 times (30%) and 4 goals or more 15 times (28%). By comparison, I did the same thing for Nabokov. Nabby's splits were 36 / 9 / 15 or 60% / 15% / 25%. From this, it would seem that Budaj's percentage of "bad" games (4+) is about on par with his counterpart. Where Budaj falters is in not turning enough "average" games (3 goals) into "good" games (2 or less). I think that makes sense. Usually, it was just one soft goal that messed up an otherwise solid night for Budaj. Keeping better focus for 60 minutes is definitely an area that needs improvement.

Of course, it probably wouldn't mean much in the standings, because the Avalanche can't win if the Avalanche can't score. Budaj's record in the 2- games is 14-5-3. It's 2-13-0 in the 3-goal games and 4-11-0 in in the 4+ games. As a percentage, the Avalanche won 63% of the time that Budaj was good, 13% of the time when he was average and 27% of the time when Budaj was bad. How does Nabby compare? While Budaj's 14-5-3 record in good games seems decent, try this on for size: the Sharks are 34-0-2 in Nabby's good games. Yep, San Jose has not lost a single game in regulation where Nabokov has kept his opponent under 3 goals. The other numbers are comparable - 9-2-3 (22%) in average games and 5-8-2 (33%). If you put those winning percentages to Budaj's good / average/ bad split, the Avalanche have 9 more wins, just outside of the playoff bubble.

Budaj does need to tighten up his game. But, as I've been contending almost all year long, he has been much better than people think. Had the Avalanche scored goals like they were supposed to this year, Colorado would still be in the playoff hunt. Are there better goalies out there? Absolutely. But Budaj is getting the job done and too many people are not seeing that.

 

Lines

 

For some reason, I can't get the shift report to generate for this one. The lines were:

Tucker / Galiardi / Hejduk

McCormick / Wolski / Svatos

Hensick / Willsie / Stewart

McLeod / Guite / Lappy

Hannan / Vernace

Liles / Macias

Peltier / MacKenzie

 

I ended up falling asleep late, so I'm curious as to why Svatos was not out for OT or the shootout. Did he get injured?

 

Quick Hits

  • The Avs killed off all 5 PPs by the potent Sharks. I didn't see the later ones, but the Avs looked very effective in the first half of the game.
  • Colorado won just 39% of the draws. Wolski, Galiardi and Guite were all under 40%
  • Scott Hannan (32:33) and Johnny Hot Pocket (30:53) both set season highs for minutes

Video Highlights

Next Up

The Avs host the Dallas Stars on Thursday. Both teams have been eliminated from playoff contention.

Other Recaps

The first period was largely lifeless, with San Jose failing to get a shot until eight minutes in. The clubs combined for just five shots in the opening frame. - AP

Both teams looked as if they were playing out the string in the first period with the Avalanche generating only three shots, one more than the Sharks, who did get their offensive instincts in gear after that but couldn't beat Colorado goalie Peter Budaj. - David Pollack, San Jose Mercury News

"If you think I'm a quitter or you're insinuating that you should bail out when things aren't going well, you don't know a hockey player and you don't know me," he said. "That is almost an insulting question. Personally, when you're in a position and things aren't going well, if everyone bailed out, you'd have a lot of losers around this world. I'm going to fight through this the best I can and if I get the opportunity, try and turn this thing around the way we plan to." - Terry Frei, Denver Post

For all the Avalanche's problems this season, this much can be said with certainty: Neither Colorado's patchwork lineup nor beleaguered goaltender Peter Budaj has quit. - Terry Frei, Denver Post

I'm really liking Michael Vernace. Sure, he's had some stumbles along the way, but he looks very calm and collected out there. Late in the third, he fell on his back in front of Budaj but he got up quickly and immediately raced over to pick up a man in front. He didn't look for the puck, he looked for an open man. Hell yeah. - Shane Giroux, Avs Talk

Lacroix, the Avalanche's president and alternate governor, will not speak to the media about future plans regarding his general manager, Francois Giguere, or coach, Tony Granato. Again, that's no surprise with the secretive French-Canadian, but his silence is a bit more deafening than usual this time. The quieter he gets, the more people are going to speculate he might replace Giguere with himself. - Adrian Dater, Denver Post


Comment 50 comments  |  15 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Can you rec a post?

Cause this entire post deserves to turn green

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Apr 8, 2009 9:39 AM MDT reply actions  

I agree

Very interesting work on the comparison of the goalies.

MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Apr 8, 2009 9:42 AM MDT up reply actions  

Yes you can

Between the small ad and the block showing other SBN stuff, is the email, print, flag and rec buttons.

2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.

by Drakenlot on Apr 8, 2009 9:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

We’re up to 4 recs now, but no greeny-ness yet. I’m kinda bummed.

2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity

by Mike @ MHH on Apr 8, 2009 9:55 AM MDT up reply actions  

9 recs

and no green post yet.

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Apr 8, 2009 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

thanks for the recs. I don’t think it does anything with front page stuff. It think it will make the sidebar stuff (fanposts and fanshots) green…or maybe it just separates those into a recommended section.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 8, 2009 2:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

to answer your questions, DD

Svatos did get hurt. He went awkwardly into the boards right near the end of the 3rd. The announcers didn’t notice, but I turned to my wife and said, “there goes trading Svatos at the draft…”

Great stuff on Budaj too — he has indeed played very well with the pressure off. But that’s a bit conerning to me — his 2 stretches of dominant play have both come with the pressure off? hmmmm…

Also, I still really like Vernace and Galiardi. You should give them more recognition. KIDDING. Seriously though, another strong game from them both, though Vernace needs to stop falling over. I especially loved the sequence where Galiardi busted his ass the entire length of the ice with seemingly no chance of catching up to a SJ odd man rush, and when they dilly-dallied right at the end of the rush to get an open net, he intercepted a pass that was probably a GA if he hadn’t. This kid needs to make the team next year for sure.

And a game after I reamed him hard in the comments, Hensick had perhaps his best game of the year. He was always around the puck, and made some slick passes and shots that were scoring chances.

by thedoctor on Apr 8, 2009 9:58 AM MDT reply actions  

oh and about Svatos — he did skate off under his own power, just very slowly.

by thedoctor on Apr 8, 2009 10:00 AM MDT up reply actions  

I saw that

and thought “just what we need, another injury”, but then he got up…

MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Apr 8, 2009 11:03 AM MDT up reply actions  

Boods

Pressure may have been the biggest reason for his better games, but you can’t ignore the fact that the D has been much better lately than all season.

Remember, Clark isn’t on the ice.

2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.

by Drakenlot on Apr 8, 2009 12:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

Remember, Clark isn’t on the ice

I was totally thinking of that last night. Even when Vernace fell on his butt in front of the net, he had the sense to get up and go after a man, not stumble around trying to play goalie and then preventing Budaj from making the save (which he did). Now, that’s thinking on your feet (or on your ass, I guess)

Avs. Sticking it to the Red Wings

by hockeymom on Apr 8, 2009 12:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

I hate to say this

been the D has shown improvements every time Foote has been out. I can’t prove that, it just seems to be the case IMHO.

MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Apr 8, 2009 3:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree 100%

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 8, 2009 3:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Oh crap

I can’t say that I disagree, but do you guys really want the horde of angry BJ fans (how could anyone be an angry BJ fan, btw, when you think about it) that pop into Dater’s blog before and after every Av/BJ game to infest this blog with a bunch of “I told you so?”

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 8, 2009 3:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hey

I thought the Foote trade was ill-advised when they made it. I reconsidered when we saw the effect he had at the end of last season, but he hasn’t done diddly this year. No sane person would argue with that, regardless of team affiliation.

2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity

by Mike @ MHH on Apr 8, 2009 3:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

If it had been a second rounder,

I’d still be ok with it. the first rounder was sheer lunacy.

Get rid of the loser point

08-09 Avs- can we decline the penalty?

by TheRed on Apr 8, 2009 6:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

I still blame Budaj

since this is at least in part a stat-driven post, I’ll offer this from TSN
BUDAJ IS HOT : 1-0-1, 0.48, .980 IN LAST 2 GPI

We’re slipping (gaining?) against the lightning, who only have 2 games left and if Boods keeps showing up like this against the better teams, I have no idea how we’re going to lose enough down the stretch for a 2nd pick…

Seriously though, I wonder what catalyzed him getting so on his game all the sudden–if TG sticks to his habits, he’ll put Raycroft in for Dallas and the Budaj will be off form for the following game. Woo!

I just want Drury back... I recognize the Drury->Morris->Statsny chain, and I stick with the statement.

by wflan on Apr 8, 2009 10:04 AM MDT reply actions  

Raycroft the rest of the year!

Seriously, Budaj is pissing me off. We’re trying to get a good tank job in here, and he’s screwing it up royally down the stretch.

Joking aside, the Avalanche have wasted too much time hoping for Budaj to be a starter. He’s not a starter—but he’s a good backup. I wouldn’t mind keeping him on the roster in that role IF the Avs can find a good starter. After this disaster of a season though, I wouldn’t be surprised if Budaj and Raycroft both join the casualty list that will also likely include the coach and possibly the GM.

I don't believe in Peter Budaj.

by BraxtanFILM on Apr 8, 2009 12:31 PM MDT reply actions  

Great Post!

and if you decide not to come out of the closet with the “I believe in Budaj” button, not worries: I have you covered.

I think last night was a perfect example of how impossible it is for a goalie to play behind this team. Even with a shutout against one of the best goalies in the league and the Western Conference leaders, Budaj still couldn’t get a win because the team just can’t score. Pretty ridiculous.

With respect to the pressure, I think the pressure of any goalie to try and prove his Number #1 standing as an Avalanche goalie is hard enough, with the media and fan scrutiny and the Legend of Patrick Roy always in the forefront. Combine that with doing it behind the Worst.Avs.Team.Ever, and you have a recipe for disaster.

In terms on Budaj’s career, I feel like this year was just like the Chutes and Ladders game I play with my son. Boods was at that final couple of rows going for the win when he landed on that one crappy square that sends you right back down to the bottom rung. I don’t agree a lot with Dater, but I have to agree that I certainly hope he finds success in the NHL.

Thanks for spending the time doing the comparision to Nabby. Now, that type of comparision with Mr. Three-or-Four would be pretty funny!

Avs. Sticking it to the Red Wings

by hockeymom on Apr 8, 2009 12:53 PM MDT reply actions  

Oh yeah
Budaj still couldn’t get a win because the team just can’t score.

Raycroft would have won that game, because the team would have played better in front of him.

/Muppet

(see how ridiculous this sounded in Late November/Early December)

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Apr 8, 2009 1:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not only that

But with Raycroft’s amazing puck handling and offensive skills, he would have scored the lone goal. Damn that Budaj.

Avs. Sticking it to the Red Wings

by hockeymom on Apr 8, 2009 1:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

Taking it a little far

I don’t think he would have scored a goal… except when Granato used him over Wolski in the shootout

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Apr 8, 2009 1:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

Taking it not far enough

He wouldn’t have scored one goal, he would’ve gotten a hat-trick. Plus the first assist on said three goals.

He would’ve also let them have a shootout afterwards simply for the fun of it, and would go and score another three goals.

He’d get First, Second, Third Star, and even a special consideration just for being some totally awesome.

2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.

by Drakenlot on Apr 8, 2009 1:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Okay

so now you’re the one with the bong!

Avs. Sticking it to the Red Wings

by hockeymom on Apr 8, 2009 1:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

A consideration

I didn’t get to catch last night’s game, but I’m curious if the Avs D was up to their usual shot blocking ways, or they actually let Budaj do his job.

When I watch this team, I just feel like all the screening we do prevents the goalies (Budaj and Raycroft) from seeing the shots properly and getting into the correct position. I’m a Budaj believer, I just don’t feel like our defensive strategy allows him to play his best.

by FiveJeffFingerDiscount on Apr 8, 2009 1:26 PM MDT reply actions  

First of all

Great handle. If your significant other ever decides to star commenting she should be ThreeSakicFingerdiscount.

But I think you are onto something. I’m not sure it doesn’t allow Budaj to play his best, even though with his very strict technique-based approach it may play to his weaknesses more. I think it really deflates Avs goalies stats since the blockers are going to be stopping, on the majority, the shots that goalies are likely to save.

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Apr 8, 2009 1:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think it really deflates Avs goalies stats since the blockers are going to be stopping, on the majority, the shots that goalies are likely to save.

I wonder if this is why Brodeur gets pissed when his D blocks shot and doesn’t want them doing it; I mean not that he has an ego or would want his stats inflated or anything . . .

Avs. Sticking it to the Red Wings

by hockeymom on Apr 8, 2009 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

I remember when Belfour first got to Dallas he had to change the mindset of his defensemen. They were used to blocking shots, but he preferred having a clear line of site to the shot. I definitely think there’s something to be said about this. The Avs do block a lot of shots, but they end up partially deflecting a lot of them in addition to screening their goalie. Hannan, IMO, is really, really bad at this (VS even showed a replay of him doing this, although they were praising him). Clark does a better job getting down to the ice and out of the way of the goalie.

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 8, 2009 2:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

clear line of sight, even

Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 8, 2009 2:13 PM MDT up reply actions  

Speaking as a goalie, I HATE when my D blocks shots when standing. I have a rule on my team where if you aren’t within a foot of the puck when it’s released, you shouldn’t be trying to get a stick/leg/foot on it to block it. Line up on the shooter (not the puck) and let me see the shot. Goal-scorers look to get the D-man between them and the goalie for this reason, so he provides a screen while they rifle a shot through his legs. Watch any Caps game. Ovie does it two or three times a period.

2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity

by Mike @ MHH on Apr 8, 2009 3:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

LOL

Let Budaj do his job…ROFL

I don't believe in Peter Budaj.

by BraxtanFILM on Apr 8, 2009 7:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

And now for something completely different:

LOBSTER KNIFEFIGHT!

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Apr 8, 2009 1:33 PM MDT reply actions  

Did you

yet into Raycroft’s bong again!!

Avs. Sticking it to the Red Wings

by hockeymom on Apr 8, 2009 1:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

You need to ask?

2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.

by Drakenlot on Apr 8, 2009 1:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

Just waiting for the crab to scuttle in...

“Dumb lobsters, bringing knives to a gunfight..”

BLAM!
BLAM!
BLAM!
BLAM!

by Hopfenkopf on Apr 8, 2009 1:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

“That’s the Chicago way!!”

2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity

by Mike @ MHH on Apr 8, 2009 3:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

This is really sick if you think about it.

Humanity? Bleh.

I don't believe in Peter Budaj.

by BraxtanFILM on Apr 8, 2009 7:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

Can I take my I Believe In Budaj button out of the closet again?


Yes, please :) Great post DD.

An ounce of confidence can carry you a mile toward winning. Oh, and Red Wings suck.

by texacogirl on Apr 8, 2009 5:24 PM MDT reply actions  

Blockquote fail.

An ounce of confidence can carry you a mile toward winning. Oh, and Red Wings suck.

by texacogirl on Apr 8, 2009 5:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t even know how to do what you just did.
Jibble been giving you lessons?

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 8, 2009 5:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Cool, I did it.

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 8, 2009 5:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hey

I’ve never done that

The 2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Slumpbusters

by Jibblescribbits on Apr 8, 2009 5:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sorry

But somehow it has just become fun to blame any type of posting failure on you. If I don’t get my mail at home, I’m blaming it on you.

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 8, 2009 6:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

How
far
can
you

take

this
thing?

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 8, 2009 5:49 PM MDT reply actions  

I’ll stop now before the “wtf is he doing?” ban hammer comes down.

MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.

by Bob in Boulder on Apr 8, 2009 5:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

That’s effin hilarious. Now I don’t feel like such a dumb ass. Thanks, BiB.

An ounce of confidence can carry you a mile toward winning. Oh, and Red Wings suck.

by texacogirl on Apr 8, 2009 7:10 PM MDT up reply actions  

haha, i havent ever used blockquotes… now i want to play with it!

awaiting the draft...

by mfured20 on Apr 8, 2009 8:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

That’s what she said!

MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.

I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.

by Americanario on Apr 8, 2009 10:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
The Sunny Side of McNab and Haynes
Russia4_small
Jussi Parkkila
Owl_eyes_small
Truth

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Last Year's Team Statistics Compared to This Year
Uwhockey_small
UFAs to target-Suter and Parise
Curious_george_pic_small
Gettin' down witcha bad self. Paying homage to one of my favorite gingers.
2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
Crosby traded?
Steamavatar_small
Stastny's Value (Not what you think, and a little positive mojo about our team and where we are headed)
Hankatar_small
Proof that Sacco is a bad coach.
Fry_small
FINALLY, The Savage Has Returned, With a life altering question

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

View My Stats

Managing Editor

Milehigh-xl_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Assistant Editors

Icon_small Joe Dunman

Mike_logo_2_small Mike @ MHH

148488_10150337054485417_836355416_16934526_6679165_n_small Sandie Gauthier

Gravatar_small Cheryl Bradley

Staff Writers

Me2_small Angélique C. Murray

Godzilla_mario_small A.J. Haefele

Me_small Derek B

Roy_small Brett Shumway

Avalanche_logo_small andidee15