Final Grade: Darcy Tucker
| GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | PIM | ESG | PPG | SHG | GTG | GWG | SOG | |
| 1st Half | 30 | 5 | 4 | 9 | -5 | 41 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 43 |
| 2nd Half | 33 | 3 | 4 | 7 | -8 | 26 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 51 |
| Total | 63 | 8 | 8 | 16 | -13 | 67 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 94 |
|
|
|
|
Final Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midseason Grade: D
Final Grade: D+
Joined Team: Signed as a free agent on July 1st, 2008.
MHH Nicknames: ShamWow, The Douch Who Stole Christmas [Ed note: really?]
Lines:
- 4th (26)
- 3rd (22)
- 2nd (11)
- 1st (4)
Positions:
- LW (42)
- RW (21)
Linemates:
LW:
- McLeod (8)
- Wolski (6)
- Stewart (4)
- McCormick (2)
- Laperriere (1)
C:
- Guite (19)
- Arnason (13)
- Sakic (6)
- Hensick (5)
- Willsie (5)
- Gliardi (4)
- McCormick (3)
- Wolski (3)
- Dupuis (3)
- Laperriere (2)
RW:
- Laperriere (10)
- Svatos (7)
- McCormick (6)
- Stewart (6)
- Hejduk (4)
- Willsie (4)
- Dupuis (2)
- Jones (2)
- Hensick (1)
Ice Time:*
- TOT 14:06 (9th)
- EV 12:24 (7th)
- PK :06 (12th)
- PP 1:36 (7th)
*Rank is based on total minutes, not average per game.
Best Month: November (3 goals in 10 games)
Career Highlights: Tuckers 16 points and 67 penalty minutes were both career lows.
Report: He was destined for failure.
Darcy Tucker would have had to have had a big season to overcome all the naysayers (myself included) who criticized his signing this summer. If I could beat the dead horse one more time, the Avalanche already had a significant amount of grit on the roster. If anything, they needed some speed. Tucker is not fast. Had the Avalanche signed Tucker to a reasonable deal - say, $800k - it might have raised some eyebrows, but wouldn't have invoked a great deal of ire.
Instead, Tucker was given $2.25 million per year - double the contract of Ian Laperriere. Seriously. This for a player in sharp decline (his PPG over the last three seasons: .77, .46, .25) and one who was bought out by the Toronto Maple Leafs. To be sure, the gross overpayment for Tucker's services are a huge part of why his season was such a failure and why his grade is so low.
Really, though, it's not like he was all that good at any price. He did do some hitting (4th in hits, just 1 less than Lappy), but that was about it. Actually, his small stature and slow foot speed meant that he either missed a lot of checks or just bounced off the guy and fell to the ice. And Tucker being Tucker, he'd often take that opportunity to lay "stunned" on the ice for a few minutes, just in case the ref wanted to call a penalty or something. It never worked.
Other than the hitting, there was little to rave about. He didn't play a lick of defense and the 6-time 20-goal scorer botched more developing scoring chances than I cared to count. Tucker has a rep as a feisty agitator, but he generally appeared to be disinclined to partake in any of the rough stuff. He had just 3 fights, and one of those was with Patrice Brisebois! Sadly, it was not uncommon to see Tucker look the other way when someone was starting something with one of his teammate, such as the time Chris Stewart had to push Tucker out of the way to come to the defense of one of his teammates.
I did think that Tucker played better late in the year - one of the few guys who actually picked up his game at the tail end of the season from hell. Overall, though, this was a dud.
Fun Fact: Tucker was actually quite good against NW teams - 8pts in 19 divisional games vs 8pts in 44 non-divisional games.
The Darcy Tucker Drinking Game: Drink when Darcy Tucker falls down when trying to make a hit. Drunk potential: Moderate
What I Said Last Year: "I don't like Darcy Tucker."
2008 Salary (and Cap Number): $2.2M ($2.25)
2009-2010 Status: Tucker is under contract for one more season at a $2.25 million cap hit. A buyout would save about $1.5 million next year but would cost $750,000 the following year.
Outlook for 2009: I don't have any desire to watch Tucker in a unipron next year. I just don't think he has anything left in the tank (mentally and physically). He was a shell of his former self, and I doubt another year of wear and tear is going to make him better.
I think a buyout of Tucker's contract is plausible (if I was in charge, that's what I'd do). The Avalanche could save cap room by waiving him and sending him to the AHL, but with the team's financial situation being what it is, that's probably less likely. Unfortunately, the final option - just ride out the final year of the deal - is the most likely option. At least Tyler Arnason won't be around so the pair can create 2/3 of the worst line ever. We hope...
Next Up: Brian Willsie
0 recs |
28 comments
|
Comments
Understatement of the year
Shamwow’s final grade
by Tommelot on May 11, 2009 8:45 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Im kinda bummed that Sham-Poo didnt catch on as a nickname, i found it even more accurate.
i suppose the grade is ok. i mean, the guy did try, he just made horrible decisions. he made a couple of good plays. I suppose that if F is really really bad, not trying, complete lack of motivation, etc, then this D is about accurate. would have liked to see a minus on it tho.
Sippin' PBR on a Colorado game day...
by mfured20 on May 11, 2009 8:54 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
well, he did throw the body around enough to give some value to the team. Now, if he wasn’t providing offense or defense and absolutely refused to initiate contact of any sort, THEN he’d get an F.
/foreshadowing
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on May 11, 2009 8:56 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think he had 2 GWG in a row during a time when the Avs were down early in the season…I think they ran off a couple of promising wins after that, then we all know what happened from there
by chiavsfan on May 11, 2009 9:01 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
close. he had his 1 GWG on 11/8 (Nash) and his 1 GTG 2 games later against Edmonton.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on May 11, 2009 9:08 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arn"f"son?
Get rid of the loser point
08-09 Avs- can we decline the penalty?
by TheRed on May 11, 2009 9:14 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
SPOILER ALERT
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on May 11, 2009 11:04 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Its not spoiling if everyone knows who it is….
Get rid of the loser point
08-09 Avs- can we decline the penalty?
by TheRed on May 11, 2009 5:42 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Caption
The referee and Darcy Tucker prepare for their on-ice rendition of “Tell me how to get to Sesame Street”
by Jibblescribbits on May 11, 2009 9:08 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
The real test
As to whether or not DDC ever hands out an F will come somewhere around number 39.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on May 11, 2009 10:28 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Somehow, I think that one will be saved from the lowest grade because he’ll have aced the drinking game bonus question.
One down, three to go
by FiveJeffFingerDiscount on May 11, 2009 11:21 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
can we take it to a vote? i vote F+. his play was at least 2 grade levels below the players getting C grades.
by Pookie on May 11, 2009 12:17 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
D- is the highest I could possibly give him
by Tommelot on May 11, 2009 4:29 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
So in numbers
He barely passes? Sounds about right to me.
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on May 11, 2009 5:10 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
2008-2009 Avalanche: Aah, the Memories!
I remember the first time we noticed Arny and Sham Wow playing together on the same line. The initial horror and distress (as expressed during the GDT by MHH members) was somewhat mitigated by hopes that the toxic effects of either player’s bad play were only polluting one line, not two. Then there was confusion — we couldn’t decide if it was a horrible decision by Granato or genius. And lastly, we felt pity for the player who was forced to play on that line with Sham Wow and Arny; most often it seemed to be Svatos. I stayed up nights worrying about what Svats had done to Granato to deserve such cruel and unusual punishment.
by Pookie on May 11, 2009 12:14 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I remember the first time we noticed Arny and Sham Wow playing together on the same line.
To everyone’s surprise they had been playing together for 3 weeks previously… but it was the first time i noticed.
by Jibblescribbits on May 11, 2009 12:24 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not surprising
I forgot Arny was on the team until about the 81st game.
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on May 11, 2009 5:12 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Playing with Sham/Arny
Is definitely a form of horrible torture, worse than anything thought up before.
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on May 11, 2009 5:13 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You following me camera guy?
No, no he’s not Tucker. No one is following you. You’re never in the play so why waste a camera on you?
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on May 11, 2009 5:15 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I admit, the “Douche who Stole Christmas” was all mine and only used once, but I liked it, so I included it in the list of nicknames for DDC.
2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity
by Mike @ MHH on May 11, 2009 2:40 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I feel terrible
I was one who said Tucker being lined with Sakic could help Tucker turn his career around and post high stats.
I must’ve stolen Razor’s pot that day.
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on May 11, 2009 5:17 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Keep that up and well have to change your nickname to Drunkalot :P
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on May 11, 2009 5:37 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
What do you know
That IS my nickname. I am Newfie afterall.
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on May 11, 2009 5:41 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Tucker being lined with Sakic could help Tucker turn his career around
And that explains why Sakic was lost for the season. Maybe he found out TG was gonna match him with Tucker and faked the back issues just to get out of it, or maybe the whole thing was a curse to kill the AVS and increase the chances for the TIFJT to be successful? We may never know for sure, but its a good bet that Tucker is the bad apple in the bunch and should be chased out of LoDo with hockey sticks, brooms and anything else found laying around. I dont say buy the guy out, just send him to Lake Erie so we dont have to pay him the whole 2.25M. if he becomes cancerous in Cleveland trade him for a bag of pucks to anyone who will take him.
I’d like to go on the record now and say that Arnason definitely deserves an F- If there were a lower letter grade i’d nominate it to represent that clown. Come to think about it, the schools here use S and U as grades too. S = Satisfactory, U = Unsatisfactory
That being the case I formally give Arnason a U-
by FIRE_FG_the_moron on May 13, 2009 12:18 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 
































