Final Grade: Brett Clark
| GP | G | A | PTS | +/- | PIM | ESG | PPG | SHG | GTG | GWG | SOG | |
| 1st Half | 41 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 54 |
| 2nd Half | 35 | 0 | 5 | 5 | -19 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 43 |
| Totals | 76 | 2 | 10 | 12 | -16 | 32 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 97 |
|
|
|
|
Final Grade |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 Grade |
2007 Grade |
Midseason Grade: C+
Final Grade: C-
Joined Team: January 24, 2002 (in trade with Atlanta for Frederic Cassivi)
MHH Nicknames (thanks Mike!): The Mouthpiece
Linemates:
- Hannan (24)
- Liles (20)
- Foote (16)
- Salei (12)
- Leopold (2)
- Tjarnqvist (1)
- Vernace (1)
Ice Time:*
- TOT 22:19 (2nd)
- EV 16:52 (2nd)
- PK 3:05 (2nd)
- PP 2:21 (2nd)
*Rank is based on total minutes, not average per game.
Best Month:
Career Highlights: Clark's goals (2), assists (10), points (12) were his lowest in 4 years. His -16 +/- was the worst of his career. In better news, his penalty minutes have declined every year since his first full season in Colorado (56, 50, 33 and 32).
Report: I was outspoken in favor of Clark's $3.5 million extension back in August of 2007. Hell, I was so much in favor of it that I wrote about it. Twice. Since then, I've soured on Clark considerably as the level of his play has plummeted. I gave him an A- two years ago. Last year: a B. For the midseason grade in January, I gave him a C+. Now he's a C-.
I never considered Clark to be a terrific defender. I love his ability to block shots and like his versatility to be used in all sorts of situations. But his best asset was his offensive pop; the ability to throw up 30-35 points while providing adequate defense made him a solid - if unspectacular - top 4 guy. Unfortunately, his offensive spark has fizzled considerably. The 39 points Clark put up two years ago is a distant memory. Clark had just 12 this year. That's simply not enough to overcome the defensive liabilities.
It's frustrating to see how all the Avalanche defensemen seem to have offensive restraints in place by the coaching staff, but I'm not sure we can blame all of Clark's issues there. Clark averaged over 2 minutes a game on the powerplay, 2nd most (behind Liles) among defensemen. And over all those minutes (179 on the season), Clark managed to score...2 points. Yikes. In 76 games, Clark had one more PP point than Ray Macias had in 6.
Clark wasn't a great defenseman to begin with, and he's been sliding there too. He is getting beat to the outside with an alarming increase in regularity, and I don't imagine he's going to get any faster. I also have to reluctantly point out that Clark's intensity level declined sharply as the team finished out the year. He certainly wasn't the only guy to mail it in towards the end, but I think he might have been the biggest offender; he simply looked dreadful in his final few games. Frankly, that worries me as much as it surprises me. If he's not giving it his all out there, he's more than an overpaid player - he becomes a liability.
Fun Fact: Clark has played for the Maine Black Bears, Orland Solar Bears and the Hershey Bears. I'm sure that is interesting to me alone.
The Brett Clark Drinking Game: Drink whenever Clark's mouth guard is not in his mouth. Drunk potential: Comatose.
What I Said Last Year: "Clark has averaged 35 points a season in his 3-and-a-cup-of-coffee seasons with the Avs and I'd expect his numbers to be similar to that next year. It's possible that Clark could break into the 40s if Tony Granato implements a more up-tempo game."
2008 Salary (and Cap Number): $3.5M ($3.5M)
2009-2010 Status: Clark has one more year on his contract. A buyout would save $2.33 million next year but would count $1.2 million in 2010-2011.
Outlook for 2009: No matter how you slice it, that was Clark's worst season in an Avalanche uniform. Unfortunately, there wasn't much to indicate that this was a temporary dip in performance - Clark's play seems to be in steady decline. Clark was rumored to be on the trading block during much of the first half of the season, but those rumors quieted as the trade deadline approached; I don't believe Clark is tradeable at this point. The Avs are faced with either buying him out or bringing him back for his final year with the hope that he can rebound. While I'd love to see him turn it around, I don't think we can expect it.
$3.5 million didn't seem like a lot to pay a decent defender who could score 35 points a year. It is a TON to pay a below-average defender. How the new GM handles the Clark is likely one of the keys to this offseason.
Next Up: Wojtek Wolski
36 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Beat to the outside, beat to the inside…half of his blocked shots were a direct cause of one of his turnovers. I was a big Clark backer as well, but this season he has gone to a point where I don’t think he can come back anymore. IF, IF and IF he is back next year, Granato (or hopefully some new coach) needs to realize that he is no longer, or never was a top pairing defender. If he is on the top 2 pairings, the same defensive woes will continue.
But then again, that would take a common sense approach, something Avalanche coaches don’t seem to have
by chiavsfan on May 4, 2009 6:44 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I too was a Clark guy, and I thought he started the year pretty well, but he really went into the shitter as the year went on. I also liked his extension, though it was a little high, but now it’s a disaster. Clark and Tucker lost FG his job, I’m pretty sure.
Good grade DD, and here’s hoping Clark rebounds or gets traded next year.
His play
has sharply declined since his injury last season. I wonder if the injury has much to do with it?
Hopefully he has hit bottom and will be better next season….
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on May 4, 2009 11:02 AM MDT up reply actions
I would estimate
at least one-third to one-half of the goals against this year have been a direct result of his mistakes. Big disappointment.
Colorado Avalanche: Please excuse the mess while we are under construction.
by hockeymom on May 4, 2009 8:09 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I had a huge debate about this with some of the hf guys — even this year, Clark didn’t do that poorly compared to the rest of the team. In fact, at the start of the year, no one was holding opponents to less GA/60. looking now:
http://www.behindthenet.ca/2008/basic_5_on_5.php?sort=17&mingp=&mintoi=5&team=COL&pos=D
he’s right in the middle of the pack. What inspires Clark hate, imo, is his propensity towards glaring errors. When he screws up, boy does he ever.
His PK and PP numbers, btw, are awful, I think his worst ever:
http://www.behindthenet.ca/2008/5_on_4.php?sort=22&mingp=10&mintoi=0.5&team=COL&pos=D
http://www.behindthenet.ca/2008/4_on_5.php?sort=23&mingp=10&mintoi=0.5&team=COL&pos=D
and that’s a major sign of his reduced effectiveness. he’s gotta pick that up if he wants to stay in the NHL.
What inspires Clark hate, imo, is his propensity towards glaring errors. When he screws up, boy does he ever.
That, and the contract.
by Jibblescribbits on May 4, 2009 9:42 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I can't stand Brett Clark
I do not hate Theo. I do not hate Tucker. I do not hate Arny. Even Brad May, he only made me feel disgust. The ONLY other Avalanche player I have ever hated is Nolan Pratt.
When I support a sports team, I believe in cheering for every member of that team, superstars and role players alike. I don’t rag on a slumping player, except to joke around. But I hate Brett Clark for his complete uselessness. Just like Nolan Pratt. I thought Clark always sucked and was miraculously hit with a little luck 2 months before his contact extension. What a fucking joke.
Off Topic: for Joe (if he still reads this blog)
My new baseball team is far superior to your baseball team, and will prove it over the course of the next 2 days.
Are you kidding?
The Giants just barely squeezed by the Rockies yesterday and that was WITH getting every break conceivable. Good luck with that.
If you don't eat your meat, you can't have any pudding! HOW can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?!
by A.J. Haefele on May 4, 2009 10:24 AM MDT up reply actions
No offense Jibbles, but I hope the Cubs beat the crap out of the Giants starting tonight. THey need to get back on track
Well
Giants 5th starter (Sanchez) is in tonight… which also means the Cubbies get Lincecum tomorrow.
by Jibblescribbits on May 4, 2009 1:39 PM MDT up reply actions
LOL. You could not have picked a better pic.
by c0nquistad0rian on May 4, 2009 10:27 AM MDT reply actions
Programming Note
I’ve been doing these daily, but I don’t think I’ll have Wolski’s up tomorrow. Wednesday is more likely. In the interim, go out and get some sun, or something.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on May 4, 2009 12:13 PM MDT reply actions
Does that mean I have to put pants on?
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
pants are NEVER required here
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on May 4, 2009 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions
Fun Photo Fact
The lady (or gentleman) in the picture is trying to tell Clark to put his mouthpiece back in.
(I hope to bring the snark for every photo, FYI)
I think Lile's grade should be a little lower
-Jibblescribbits
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on May 4, 2009 2:16 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
Not me
I can spell Liles’ name correctly.
(And i don’t get the joke either)
by Jibblescribbits on May 4, 2009 2:31 PM MDT up reply actions
Dammit
That error was unintentional. Posting on the wrong thread was the joke. Albeit, a stretch. What we learn from DDC’s grades so far? He really, really, really does not give Fs.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on May 4, 2009 2:41 PM MDT up reply actions
BANG
That’s a post-to-post replay fail…. You sure BiB’d that one. (Starting a meme here)
by Jibblescribbits on May 4, 2009 2:46 PM MDT up reply actions
I got the joke and loved it.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on May 4, 2009 3:00 PM MDT up reply actions
So there
inyoface, Jib!
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on May 4, 2009 3:05 PM MDT up reply actions
I think you’re being generous with the 4 there…
2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity
My guess would be one mouthpiece a shift. I wonder how many shifts he took this season….I am so NOT looking that up.
2,250
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on May 5, 2009 6:50 AM MDT up reply actions

by 

























