With The 3rd Pick, The Colorado Avalanche Select...
No big surprise here. In the SBN Mock Draft, the Islanders selected John Tavares with the first overall pick and Tampa Bay selected Victor Hedman at #2. In my opinion, taking Matt Duchene at #3 was a no-brainer. He projects to be a speedy, playmaking two-way center and the Avalanche desperately need an infusion of top 6 talent. I'm not sure if he steps in right away or spends another season in the OHL, but he'll be in Denver before too long, hopefully forming a devastating 1-2 punch with Paul Stastny up the middle for many, many years to come. In fact, here's John-Eric Iannicello wrote about Duchene - I actually just typed "Stastny" there by mistake - in yesterday's Hockey's Future Avalanche Draft Preview:
With the third overall selection, the Avalanche are in a prime position to be drafting a future great in Matt Duchene. Duchene displays great skill on the ice and great character off it. With dynamic speed and strong two-way ability, Duchene is able to play in all key situations and is a threat every time he steps onto the ice. He has a great set of offensive skills both in scoring and playmaking. He has strong balance which makes him hard to knock off the puck. He’s the ideal pick at the third selection and, should he develop, will be a great one-two punch with Stastny.
I find it kind of interesting how MHH readers have changed their opinions as we've gotten closer to the draft. Yesterday, I asked who you would pick, regardless of who you thought would be available. The results (as of this writing):
- Duchene - 59%
- Tavares - 22%
- Hedman - 18%
That's quite a change from the poll we ran right before the lottery:
- Tavares - 47%
- Duchene - 23%
- Hedman - 19%
- Kane - 4%
- MPS - 3%
- Cowen - 0%
Curiously, Hedman has stayed pretty much at the same spot, but Duchene and Tavares have flip-flopped almost completely. Is that because of the reports that Duchene's stock is rising slightly while Tavares' has slipped a bit? Or, are we selling ourselves on Duchene because we know that's who we'll end up with? I suspect it's probably more of the latter than the former, but I don't really know.
If you're into the mock draft thing, I did a little write-up for Cycle Like The Sedins for their mock draft (links for the other selections are on the right). Believe it or not, I still had some snark left in the tank after that, so I contributed to another mock draft preview for View From My Seats. That one won't be up until tomorrow.
0 recs |
18 comments
|
Comments
I don’t understand why Kane has dropped so much. Does anybody know? From looking at his stats compared to Duchene’s, he seems like more of a solid pick because his goal scoring is much more balanced with assists. I’ve never been a great fan of the term “play maker”, it’s too hard to tell if they are just surrounded by talent or are they really making the plays. Hensick was supposed to be a “great playmaker”. We need somebody that can bury the puck with or without a top 2 line mate. With that said, I would slightly prefer Tavarez and Kane over Duchene. If Tavarez is not available at 3, I would like to see us trade down 1-2 spots and pick Kane. Maybe we could get another 3rd or 4th round from it.
by mcarson01 on Jun 16, 2009 8:16 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
taking Matt Duchene at #3 was a no-brainer
Uh oh.
MHH: Shagging Dater one contributor at a time.
by Bob in Boulder on Jun 16, 2009 9:40 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I can’t speak for the other people, but I’ve become more aware of the prospects since the first poll. Tavares and Hedman were the only ones I really knew before, now I’ve read up on and watched highlights of Duchene and I’ve also been a little put off by Tavares’ attitude in the interviews I’ve watched as well. I’m sure I’m aligning my wants with reality some as well.
So yeah, I’m one of the guys that switched.
by thedoctor on Jun 16, 2009 9:45 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
As am I. Even though i may be rationalizing a bit, Duchene feels like a better fit for us. Really what it ended up being was that I looked at the top three stud draft picks and figured out that I would love to have any one of them. At this point I prefer Duchene or Hedman, but Tavares is no small prize, even if he turns out to be an arrogant bastard.
Sippin' PBR on a Colorado game day...
by mfured20 on Jun 16, 2009 10:02 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Duchene fits because he grew up an Avs fan. Hensick won’t fit because he grew up a Wings fan. That’s really all there is to it.
Go Avs! Let's get some goals!
by Joe Dunman on Jun 16, 2009 10:05 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I started out wanting Hedman because I thought our defense needed some serious help. Hedman seems to be a beast and is probably going to be one in the NHL very soon and could be a big asset on our blue line. But maybe, just maybe our current defense can be fixed with a “system”. The same could be said for our anemic offense, that a “system” can fix it but maybe our current “depth” isn’t as deep as we may have thought (by the result of recent call ups) and adding the caliber of player like a Tavares or Duchene would really help in the long run. I, like thedoctor, have become a little more aware of the available prospects and have some what been turned off by what I have seen and heard about Tavares’ attitude. While at the same time, I have liked what I have seen from Duchene. I still like Hedman and I would take which ever of the three that is available when are turn arrives.
But I also admit that the fact Duchene is an Avs fan, and is most likely our “consolation” prize in the Ti4T sweepstakes has probably swayed me somewhat as well.
MHH: Like the Avs organization, we’ve now officially lost our minds.
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Jun 16, 2009 10:25 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
Are you trying to make reply-failing a common thing so no ones picks on you anymore?
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on Jun 16, 2009 1:09 PM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think it’s a subconcious habit he has no control over by now. Kinda like me blocker punching doors and throwing stuff after a goal.
The Savage has spoken. Let it be done
"Two roads diverged in a wood, and I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference"
R. Frost
by Savage33 on Jun 17, 2009 2:28 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
This wasn't a reply fail.
Everyone was giving their reasons for they flip-flopped separately.
by Jibblescribbits on Jun 17, 2009 7:44 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
You’ve got to think that even though Tavares may have more raw talent, Duchene appears to have a better work ethic at times which could bridge the gap between them results-wise (even though the questions about Tavares work ethic are probably blown out of proportion)
by HugoAgogo on Jun 16, 2009 7:00 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
So you didn't channel PL
And trade the pick away for a bucket of pucks?
2008-2009 Avalanche: It's like watching a car crash.
by Drakenlot on Jun 16, 2009 9:50 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs
yeah, my biggest fear.
Hyphens cause writers more trouble than any other form of punctuation, except perhaps commas.
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Jun 17, 2009 6:29 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Keep up the good work, David. Looks like you’re providing some wall-to-wall draft coverage.
When I'm not battling in California:
http://www.cyclelikesedins.com
by jamestobrien on Jun 17, 2009 1:39 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
He’s just practicing for another high draft pick next year. He’s preemptively lazy.
2008-2009 Colorado Avalanche: Dry Humping Mediocrity
by Mike @ MHH on Jun 17, 2009 8:15 AM MDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yes, but he he remained focused…. at no time did he say, “With the 1st pick in the 2010 Draft, the Colorado Avalanche select Taylor Hall…” He should be commended!! :-)
Cheers,
Matt
www.viewfrommyseats.com
by Cheap Seats on Jun 17, 2009 10:00 AM MDT reply actions 0 recs
I still like Hedman
If he’s available. After that, Duchene and perhaps Kane. I dunno, something just feels fishy and Tavares.
by eltharion_doa on Jun 18, 2009 9:08 PM MDT reply actions 0 recs

by 































