Enhance the Experience: Put Me In Charge
For our final sponsored post about enhancing the NHL experience, I'm envisioning a scenario where I replace Gary Bettman with someone infinitely more qualified: me. As your new NHL commissioner / benevolent overlord, I'm ready to make some changes to improve the game. Here are the 9 things I'd do to "fix" hockey.
1. No more loser point. I don't love the shootout, but even I have to admit that it's exciting to watch. But you know what? The NBA slam dunk contest is kind of exciting too (or, it was the last time I watched it, probably sometime in the ‘90s). Just because it's exciting doesn't mean you want a game decided by one. It's gone. From now on, 4-on-4 sudden-death overtime is extended from 5 minutes to 20. That's right, I said 20. If you win, 2 points. Lose? Nothing. Zilch. Zip. Not even a home version of the game. If the game is still tied after 4 periods of hockey, it's a tie. End of story.
2. Vary rink sizes. Wouldn't it be awesome to give some baseball-like character to each of the rinks? Different sized rinks would open up all sorts of different playing strategies. Smaller rinks would emphasize hitting, larger rinks would reward skill. Do you build your roster around your rink...or one that's balanced enough to play well anywhere?
3. Divisional Playoffs. There is nothing duller than the "balanced" 1-8 playoff seeding used by the NHL today. Yawn. We're bringing back divisional playoff play. 4 divisions, 4 teams from each division make the playoffs, and the first two rounds feature all-divisional play (1vs4, 2vs3 in round 1, with the winners playing each other in round 2). Why? Because the only thing more exciting than playoff hockey is playoff hockey between two rival teams. The league got rid of divisional play because sometime the 5th best team in one division was better than the 4th best team in another division. To this I say: boo hoo. If you can't finish in the top 4 in your division, you can skip the postseason.
4. Realignment. Of course, #3 won't work with 6 divisions, so we're going to have to move some teams around. This could be an opportunity to bring in the "classic" division names here (Smyth, Patrick, Wales, Norris), but I don't feel a need to bring those back. Geographical names work just fine, thanks. We'll keep the East and West Conference. In the East, will have a Northeast Division (Montreal, Boston, Toronto, Ottawa, Buffalo, Detroit, Columbus) and an Atlantic Division (Carolina, Washington, NYI, NYR, New Jersey, Pittsburgh, Philadelphia). Out West we'll have a Pacific (Vancouver, LA, SJ, Anaheim, Phoenix, Calgary, Colorado and Edmonton) and a Central Division (Minnesota, Dallas, Nashville, St Louis, Chicago, Atlanta, Tampa and Florida). For the most part, existing rivalries remain intact. A few are restored (Toronto and Detroit) and there's potential for some new ones to form (Minnesota and Chicago). Oh, and yes, there are 14 teams in the East and 16 in the West. It's okay - life will go on.
5. No Uniprons. Simple enough, yes?
6. Organizational Salary Cap. I don't love the cap, but it seems like there's a couple of things that can be done to salvage it into what it was meant to do: level the playing field. One would be to extend the cap to all of an organization's players under contract. It would be a higher cap, of course, but your players in the minors count (and you'll need to have a minimum number under contract). No more stashing a veteran in the minors just for cap relief.
7. 5 Year Maximum Contract. The mega-long contracts we're seeing in the league are not just salary cap exploits. They also limit player movement. That won't work in my NHL. No contract over five years; we want to make sure these guys get onto the open market a couple of times to jazz up free agency a bit.
8. No Gary Glitter. Don't like the song, don't like seeing mountains of music royalties going to a slug of a human being. So, his music is out. I don't care if they replace it with the Macarena or the Hokey Pokey. Glitter is a goner.
9. Shorter Season. 82 games is too much. Let's shave it down to 70 and cut 6 weeks off the marathon season to boot.
That's it. 9 "simple" things that I'd do if I was in charge. There's little chance of that happening, of course. But you never know...
25 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Way to hide this below the game recap.
I would like to see them make the salary hit for a player equal to their salary for that year. If they did that, we wouldn’t care about front-loaded contracts.
by some white guy on Nov 12, 2010 10:22 PM MST reply actions
I like that you snuck it in ;)
Winnik is a fucking Win!
by Sandie Gauthier on Nov 12, 2010 10:26 PM MST reply actions
Teee-heheheeh
Winnik is a fucking Win!
by Sandie Gauthier on Nov 12, 2010 10:33 PM MST up reply actions
My “what I would do differently” ? Make M11’s and mouthguard a requirement. And soft elbow and shoulder pads part of the equipment. I’d also scrap the enforcer rule (it causes more problems IMHO) and, finally, make every single player AHL lever and up listen to the story I posted in my concussion article.
Winnik is a fucking Win!
by Sandie Gauthier on Nov 12, 2010 10:36 PM MST reply actions
Agree on all counts but one:
I’d make everybody from CHL / NCAA / Jr. Bs on up listen. The C(entral)HL & IHL are especially frightening in that regard.
2010-2011 Colorado Avalanche: pretty good at hockey since they can't get into the bars yet.
Even better!
Winnik is a fucking Win!
by Sandie Gauthier on Nov 12, 2010 11:52 PM MST up reply actions
ANd I disagree about the shorter seasons. Those would make me Sad Panda.
Winnik is a fucking Win!
by Sandie Gauthier on Nov 12, 2010 10:37 PM MST reply actions
You would ;)
Winnik is a fucking Win!
by Sandie Gauthier on Nov 12, 2010 10:43 PM MST up reply actions
kiss ass
Bitch, give me your lunch money.
by Cheryl Bradley on Nov 17, 2010 9:17 AM MST up reply actions
I liked the “5 minutes of 4 on 4 followed by 5 minutes of 3 on 3.” I don’t care if they turn it into a video game. I LIKE VIDEO GAMES.
http://chrisgoddamnstewart.com
Ugh, I don’t like that OT rule. I like the 20 minute OT but I want 5 on 5. Winner gets 2, loser gets 0.
Holøs - Norwegian for "Bench Kyle".
Though Dustin's wrong on one count.
The loser should get a box of Rice A Roni and a jar of Turtle Wax.
2010-2011 Colorado Avalanche: pretty good at hockey since they can't get into the bars yet.
And whenever the Red Wings lose they get coupons to Old Country Buffet.
Holøs - Norwegian for "Bench Kyle".
Nah,
extra visit from Meals on Wheels or their local diocese’s elderly shut in visitation program.
2010-2011 Colorado Avalanche: pretty good at hockey since they can't get into the bars yet.
it’s how I roll
I am the most humble blogger of all time
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Nov 13, 2010 6:16 AM MST up reply actions
He just wants his beloved wings back in the East so he doesn’t have to stay up all night to watch them.
The Avs defense is "air tight"....so tight it's gasping for air and turning purple.
by Americanario on Nov 13, 2010 8:47 AM MST up reply actions
1. Make games worth 3 points. 20 minute 4v4 OT and still have a shootout. Allow 4v2 if 2 penalties taken. Reg/OT win worth 3, shootout win worth 2, shootout loss worth 1, Reg/OT loss worth 0.
2. Maybe standardize on current NHL and Olympic sizes. Makes NCAA games interesting now.
3. No. I like the current playoff format.
4. No. Maybe if they relocate one or two of the southern teams, but nothing so drastic. Separating Detroit from Chicago and St. Louis (and Colorado) kills too many current rivalries just to restore one ancient one.
5. Replace uniprons with a “cranberry” (like blueberry, but burgundy and add stripes at the bottom). Make the away jerseys simple white with burgundy and blue stripes and the diagonal “COLORADO”.
6. Yes – current cap has more [loop]holes than Grahame’s net.
7. Yes – Contracts longer than 5 years just encourage managerial stupidity.
8. Meh – Song OK, tradition is gold, not convinced Glitter gets any royalties.
9. No – 82 is a nice number. HoF arguments are stupid enough now without devolving into “per-game” everything.
10. Home whites.
Detroit is peopled entirely by slovenly ill-informed troglodytes, excepting of course the few Avalanche fans who are victims of unfortunate circumstance.
I was a pretty big fan of the scoring system employed by the Olympics. Similar to what Busted Twigg posted just above me,
Regulation win: 3
Overtime win: 2
Overtime loss: 1
Regulation loss: 0
Every game is worth the same amount of points and you get rewarded for taking care of business in regulation. I hate the shootout though. Deciding who wins in a team sport by individual skills competition doesn’t sit right with me. But at the same time I don’t like the idea of infinite overtime during the regular season, when teams have unequal rest…
It's all about the Ø
Major yes to zero points for a loss. I just don’t understand a point for losing. Let’s face it, a team that is 21-14-7 is a .500 team that should have 42 points, not 51. 2 points win, 1 point each for a tie (after 20 minutes of 5 on 5), ZERO POINTS FOR A LOSS. Period.
If my name was Kyle, I would suck at this. More.

by 


















