Game 36 Recap: The Curse of the Corsi, Wings over Avs 4-3 in OT
It was bound to happen. The Avalanche were outplayed so often last year, and yet they kept finding ways to win. Tonight, the shoe was on the other foot in a big way. Despite dominating play, getting nearly twice as many shots on net, and creating more scoring chances, the Avs come away with an overtime loss as Chris Osgood notched his 400th win.
The Avs put pressure on immediately, and Matt Hunwick pinched in to get a shot on net that just hit the post and careened away into the corner. Between strong forechecking and repeatedly good shifts, Colorado had the Wings scrambling. Tempers started flaring a bit, and of course, Cody McLeod was in the middle of it. Then Matt Duchene started off the scoring by netting a rebound that came from some hard work by Milan Hejduk who set up Tomas Fleischmann with a shot on net.
At the 5 minute mark, TJ Galiardi took a bad, open ice penalty, putting the Wings on their first of 6 power plays for the night. Within 20 seconds, Jiri Hudler wristed one home, beating Peter Budaj glove side, to tie it up at 1. The Avs answered right back, however, as Gali took a feed from Jones and found the back of the net with a nice wrist shot. 2-1 Avs. Shortly after that, the Avs got their first chance on the power play as Darren Helm hooked Philippe Dupuis. They got some good pressure going, enough to draw another penalty. This time it was on Justin Abdelkader for tripping. Unfortunately, the Wings killed off the 5 on 3, an indication of things to come. It was the Avs turn for a penalty this time: John-Michael Liles for crosschecking. It only took 8 seconds for the Wings to tie things up off a one-timer by Johan Franzen. More McLeod fisticuffs and yet another Avs’ penalty, this time on Winnik for a (weak) hooking call. The boys in burgundy and blue did a better job on the kill and even got a breakaway chance. However, Wilson got totally mauled on his way into the slot, negating the opportunity. No call. That would be a trend for the night. I’m going to say it once and once only: the officiating was terrible. I’m not blaming the loss on the lack of calls, but I lost count of how many times the Avs were tripped up, and no call was made. Like they would all night, the "second" line of Duchene-Fleischmann-Hejduk were all over the Wings to finish the period, but the teams went into the locker rooms tied at 2.
The Avs came out in the second period dictating the pace of play and spending a lot of time in the Wings’ zone. Liles drew a tripping penalty on a bit of an embellishment, but the power play ended early due to Jones taking a horribly timed and unnecessary interference call. The teams traded some chances on the 4-on-4 as Osgood stacked the pads to stop a shot by Hunwick, and Budaj completely robbed Niklas Kronwall. Around 8 minutes into the period, Jonathon Ericsson threw Fleischmann to the ice in front of the net, earning him two minutes in the box for interference. This time, the Avs got some nice cycling going, but Osgood was up to the challenge. Paul Stastny had an open net and sure fire goal, but instead, he caught Fleishmann’s skates as Flash was inexplicably cruising between SoS and the net. Later, Ruslan Salei slashed at McLeod and got penalty number 5 for the Wings. Again, the Avs’ power play came up empty. Then, at the other end of the ice, Kevin Shattenkirk took a hard slap shot from Chris Draper straight in the face. He was down for a while and obviously in pain. Fortunately, he was able to return to the game mid-way through the third. At the end of two, the score was still tied at 2, despite the fact the Avs got 22 shots on net that period.
Less than two minutes into the third, the Avalanche went on their sixth power play of the night as Henrik Zetterberg got called for tripping. This one wasn’t any better than the previous 5, though. By this time in the game, the Red Wings looked slow and tired. Colorado continually beat them to the pucks, kept play in their zone, and outworked them at every shift. Yet, the Avs still could not convert. The few shots the Wings got on net were good ones, however, and Budaj kept the boys in it more than once. Ryan O’Byrne got called for mauling holding, and the Wings went on their 5th power play of the night. Sadly for the Avs, Detroit’s power play was much better, and they took advantage of a defensive breakdown by the Avs. Nicklas Lidstrom from Hudler and [redacted]. 3-2 Wings. With less than three minutes left, the Avs got back on the power play as Kronwall tripped Winnik. Fortunately, Duchene came up big again to tie it up: Liles with a shot from the point, Stastny with a tip in, rebound, and Dutchy beat a flopping Osgood. Budaj ensured an OT by making a last second save right at the buzzer.
It didn’t take long for the Avs to put the Wings on the power play again. This time it was on Boods for tripping Helm. It would prove to be the death of them as Kronwall got the overtime winner on a huge slapshot that beat Budaj outright.
Before the game, I said to myself, "This game will be decided by special teams." I couldn’t have been more right. The Wings capitalized on their power play chances; the Avs did not. Hard loss, but at least they got a point out of it..It’s time to start winning at home, though, boys.
Three Stars
Osgood - 43 saves
Kronwall - 1 GWG, 1 Asst
Duchene - 2 goals
Fleischmann-Duchene-Hejduk
Galardi-Stastny-Jones
Winnik-O'Reilly-Porter
Mauldin-Duipis-McLeod
Liles-O'Byrne
Foote-Hunwick
Shattenkirk-Wilson
- Happy Birthday to Paul Stastny! Wings scouts were in town but decided he wasn't seasoned enough for them, given that he's only 25. Congrats, Stazz!
- Galiardi played in his 100th NHL game tonight. Great job, tonight TJ. Hope you stick around for hundreds more.
- Osgood did something but I just can't remember. Must not have been important.
- Avs had not let in this many power play goals against since Nov. 8, 2009 vs. Edmonton; the Wings had not scored this many power play goals since scoring 5 against Nashville on Nov. 18, 2009.
- Reported attendance: 18,007
- Wings scored on 4 of their 6 power plays. Avs went 1 for 7.
- Osgood made 46 saves on a season high 49 shots by the Avs; 23 of those shots the Avs threw at him during the second period alone.
- Second line of Duchene-Hejduk-Fleischmann were all over the ice tonight, both defensively and offensively. It's nice to have the Duke back.
- Stastny needs Stewart. His quality of players right now just isn't cutting it shift in and shift out.
- Lots of scraps and shoving, but the dirty seemed to be kept to a minimum and not a single fight!
- I think Hunwick is finally settling in.
82 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
pretty much
It's all about the A-nderson
by Cole D Hamilton on Dec 28, 2010 12:33 AM MST up reply actions
Didn’t you get the memo, Beachie? The Wings do not commit high sticks. Also, they do not haul guys down on breakaways, nor do they interfere with people who don’t have the puck. Oh, and they only trip people like once a night. Clearly they don’t do any of those things, because they would have been called for them if they did.
What the hell was up with that? High sticks right in front of the refs don’t get called?
On the other hand, I’m proud of the boys tonight. End result notwithstanding, they skated around the beasts tonight and shoved the puck possession right back in their face.
49 shots and we can't win

On the other hand, they should win 9/10 games if they play like that all the time (aside from the special teams). I like it.
MHH: Mr. Howard, Doctor Jones will see you now.
Greetings everyone!
Long time reader, first time poster. Agree that Hunwick seems to be much more comfortable lately. I was not happy with that trade when it first happened, but Sherm and Sacco have proven their briliance to me often enough that I now believe..
Loved the energy tonight, Avs deserved to win that game, but Osgood never ceases to piss me off! Glad to have Duke back, he was a big part of the game in the early stages. Duchene just keeps getting more dominant with every game it seems, and the kid is only 19! Unbelievable!!! Can’t wait to see our top two lines in action once CGDS gets back – correct me if I’m wrong, but he was injured before Flash joined us, correct??
Welcome :)
Glad to see you posting!
Winnik is a fucking Win!
by Sandie Gauthier on Dec 28, 2010 8:47 AM MST up reply actions
We can talk missed trips if you also want to talk about dives.
Is it youth that makes them skate like newborn giraffes or do they all just have inner-ear problems that make them fall down easier than professional hockey players should?
I’ll give you the missed high-sticking call on Eaves though. I think the refs felt bad for the Wings on that one.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 28, 2010 6:09 AM MST reply actions
The falling down part comes from spending too much time on the ice with Darcy Tucker. There were plenty of missed calls that went both ways. The refs were missing enough of the obvious crap that it became a joke. I won’t blame the refs for the loss though. I’ll blame our atrocious PK and PP units for that.
Colin Campbell doesn't have the balls to eject Semin.
See, Throatwarbler. Lots of time.
Joe "We Don't Have a Plan" Ellis, Denver Broncos COO, 2008-2010: 20-27 record; 3 head coaches; no true GM; cancels Champ Bailey's contract extension when negotiations are 80% complete; admits that Josh McDaniels will end up being a successful head coach in the NFL, admits that he is in the top of the league in game-planning, and admits that the organisation needed to do more to help him, but fires him anyway. It all starts up top.
"God I'm excited for those two to fail miserably." - SBNation writer Andrew Sharp on Josh McDaniels and Tim Tebow.
by Tempestuous Binary on Dec 28, 2010 6:16 AM MST up reply actions
Huh?
Did I miss something, or were you not referring to me?
I know my name is spelled "Luxury Yacht" but it's actually pronounced Throatwarbler Mangrove.
Member of the PFJ and the Spanish Inquisition.
No one expects the Spanish Inquisition!!
by Luxury Yacht on Dec 28, 2010 11:06 AM MST up reply actions
I do not pronouce it "Throatwarbler Mangrove", Throatwarbler Mangrove?
Joe "We Don't Have a Plan" Ellis, Denver Broncos COO, 2008-2010: 20-27 record; 3 head coaches; no true GM; cancels Champ Bailey's contract extension when negotiations are 80% complete; admits that Josh McDaniels will end up being a successful head coach in the NFL, admits that he is in the top of the league in game-planning, and admits that the organisation needed to do more to help him, but fires him anyway. It all starts up top.
"God I'm excited for those two to fail miserably." - SBNation writer Andrew Sharp on Josh McDaniels and Tim Tebow.
by Tempestuous Binary on Dec 28, 2010 12:18 PM MST up reply actions
Funny, cuz I saw a ton of Wings players fall to the ice, too. Of course, it quite frequently happend when that damned blue line was acting up again. Skating is hard.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 7:07 AM MST up reply actions
That was all the picks that the Avs players were running.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 28, 2010 7:09 AM MST up reply actions
Please.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 7:11 AM MST up reply actions
Both teams were doing it
I know you said that you won’t blame the refs for the loss, but Avs players were flopping around just as much as the Wing players were. There were calls missed for both teams, but the Avs had 7 PPs to the Wings’ 6, including an extended 5-on-3. We could sit here all day and point out situations where both teams got away with something, but then we’d be here all day.
Look, I’m absolutely positive the Avs got away with stuff, too. That’s what happens when there’s bad officiating. And I’m really never the one who in all seriousness says the Avs were victim to a bunch of uncalled penalties, but if there is a player tripped on nearly every shift, I can’t ignore it. The Avs still got their chances and still blew it which is why I’m not claiming the refs won that game for the Wings.
I recorded the game; I will go home and count up every time a player goes down to the ice to see what caused it. I feel this strongly about this game. Again, I’m not the tin foil hat girl. This game just seemed out of control to me. Perhaps I’m wrong. I’ll know when I review the tape. And then I’ll be an expert.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 7:40 AM MST up reply actions
Good luck
Are you going to do that for both teams? Because the way the players were flopping out there, it may take you some time. I think that the players understood the refs were calling a lot, and they took whatever opportunities they could to draw penalties.
I’m also not of the “refs-screwed-us-because-they-hate-us” mind (unlike a lot of Wing fans), and it was our PP that won the game, because even-strength the Wings had no answer for the Avs speed or puck possession. I consider the Wings fortunate to have won that game, and it was all Osgood after the first period; without him, I think the Avs win pretty easily.
it wasourtheir PP that won the game
fixed.
And yeah, I’m going to go through the whole game and watch for ice face plants on both teams. DVRs are awsome; put it on first FF and when someone goes down, take a quick look at the whos and whys. Shouldn’t take more than an hour or so.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 8:16 AM MST up reply actions
While I would agree that the refs were calling a lot, they were wildly inconsistant in what they were calling. I know there were a couple of plays where I cringed and then thought “how did they get away with that one?” Direct checks from behind by the avs, and I saw that Holmstrom (a douche) was bleeding from the head once. Yet they call a ticky tack call on budaj in overtime? and some of the holding calls were BS, put a stick on someone and they might not even fall….
Hopefully they (the refs) get graded down and miss out on a big fat post season paycheck.
Avs lost this game because they went 1-7 on the PP, redwings wouldn’t have been in it if the avs could have killed some penalties.
Each of my replies is a work of art, each more brilliant than the last.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Dec 28, 2010 10:05 AM MST up reply actions
Holmstrom (a douche) was bleeding from the head once
The puck took a weird bounce and hit him, that’s all. Can’t blame the refs there.
"Who?" -Joe Sacco’s post-game answer to how Todd Bertuzzi looks as a player these days.
by StiflersMom on Dec 28, 2010 10:08 AM MST up reply actions
I was there and only saw the after-effect. My theme remains the same, they let some stuff slide they shouldn’t have called some really bs stuff.
Each of my replies is a work of art, each more brilliant than the last.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Dec 28, 2010 10:13 AM MST up reply actions
Agreed. And the offside calls were laughable. Way offside? No problem, keep playing. A foot onside? Nope. Hear my whistle roar.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 10:18 AM MST up reply actions
Not to mention that a certain goalie decided to move the goal just because his team was struggling. In what way is accidentally shooting the puck over the glass worse than this?
"Who?" -Joe Sacco’s post-game answer to how Todd Bertuzzi looks as a player these days.
Oh yeah, forgot about that.
“veteran move”
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 28, 2010 7:15 AM MST up reply actions
I have no idea why the FSN guys called that a veteran move. If Avery annoys the hell of a goalie or star player, he’s a prick and doesn’t respect the rules of the game (a spinorama at center ice has the same effect, btw). If Ribeiro or any other player dives or embellishes to give his team a PP chance, he’s a cheater and Don Cherry is gonna call him diving soccer Eurotrash. But if a goalie moves the goal just for fun, it’s a smart veteran move.
"Who?" -Joe Sacco’s post-game answer to how Todd Bertuzzi looks as a player these days.
To be fair, the FSN guys in Detroit are hired by and work for the Red Wings, not for Fox Sports. They’re not paid to be objective.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 28, 2010 7:30 AM MST up reply actions
In the same vein, our announcers are hired by the Avs and broadcast on a channel owned an operated by the Avs owner. So yea, our’s are exactly unbiased either…
Thanks Joe...
Did the Altitude announcers give Osgood the tongue-in-cheek credit for knocking his own net off? I didn’t know that.
Yeah, I’d probably be mad at the Fox Sports Detroit guys if they didn’t show the correct level of anger about the refs letting the opposition goaltender get away with that.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 28, 2010 9:47 AM MST up reply actions
Actually I don’t know if they gave him credit for it, I was listening on the radio. I was just saying that we have a similar situation here when it comes to our announcers.
Thanks Joe...
Ah, ok
I say it every chance I get, but I prefer local homers to national “objective” guys, even if that means I have to listen to the opposition’s homers.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 28, 2010 10:05 AM MST up reply actions
IIRC, they didn’t say anything other than it was knocked off its moorings (sp?). They were busy rambling about something inconsequential at the time…as usual.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 10:11 AM MST up reply actions
Bettman-Webster’s Dictionary definition of ’objective" announcers:
ob·jec·tive: Plug Caps and Pens often and always.
by Brett Shumway on Dec 28, 2010 11:03 AM MST up reply actions
I know our PK blows, but I really cant put a finger on anyone who was atrocious. The Damn Dead Wings kept putting wicked shots on goals. Franzen Goal was just sick (Bastard always scores on us. Hudlers goal might have been boods fault for being out of position. Lidstrum and Kornwhole were just wicked shots. Can some one please tell me I am wrong
That first goal was soft and Boods should have had it. But I’m in agreement that the team played incredibly well, even Budaj. I think the loss is due – and I shudder to say this – to Osgood standing on his head last night, playing the role of a HoF goalie. Now if he had that kind of performance all the time, hew would be a HoFer.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 7:09 AM MST up reply actions
The Avs don’t pick their shots well. They do a lot of shooting into chests. Osgood made some great saves, especially in the second, but the Avs should have capitalized on at least 3 or 4 of those. Still, when a goalie is going strong, little can be done
"The only people we hate more than the Romans is the fucking Judean People's Front" (and the Red Wings of course)
Boods, high glove side again
It's all about the A-nderson
by Cole D Hamilton on Dec 28, 2010 10:59 AM MST up reply actions
I might be the only one but I loved Foote’s play especially in the 2nd period.
"Who?" -Joe Sacco’s post-game answer to how Todd Bertuzzi looks as a player these days.
Foote played one of his best games of the season, he was good everywhere
It's all about the A-nderson
by Cole D Hamilton on Dec 28, 2010 11:00 AM MST up reply actions
I only saw the third so I can't comment on the first two periods...
but Foote was almost entirely to blame for Lidstrom’s PP goal in the third. He took himself out of position to take a shot at Bertuzzi (admirable, yes, but not on the PK) which led to Lidstrom being wide open in the slot.
by ExiledAmongYou on Dec 28, 2010 1:15 PM MST up reply actions
I blame Peter McNab
When he said “Chris Osgood could win his 400 games this game against the Avalanche,” I looked at my husband and said, “well, he just jinxed the Avs, because Osgood is now going to stand on his head. It will be a one goal game and the Avs will be on the losing side of it.”
Oh, and the Avs slaughter of the Power Play Kittens didn’t help much either.
It was an exciting game to watch. If they are going to lose, I want them going down fighting.
2010-2011 Colorado Avalanche: Defying Corsi
Off Topic
Sorry – completely off topic. I just noticed (slow, I know) that the Avs are doing the Alumni night thing again and I’e already missed 2 posters. Any chance you grabbed any extras? If so, any chance you’d be willing to part with them =)? Hope your holiday and hockey seasons are going well.
I have an extra one for Sylvain Lefebvre (we are not attending as many games this year). We will be at the January 2nd game. I can give it to you then if you are going to be there.
2010-2011 Colorado Avalanche: Defying Corsi
That’s awesome that you have an extra one; thanks for being willing to give it another good home! Unfortunately, I won’t be able to make the 1/2 game, but do you have any other games on the horizon? I’d be happy to do whatever works best for you. Thanks again =)!
On this theme,
is anybody else holding out the vain hope that we can finally rid ourselves of McNab and plug somebody into the “color analyst” slot who isn’t intent on fellating the opposition and droning on about shit nobody cares about at the expense of the actual game? I realize that Peter and Julie Ballgame Browman are a pair to beat a full house, but goddamn it!
2010-2011 Colorado Avalanche: pretty good at hockey since they can't get into the bars yet.
Don’t hold your breath, dear.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 10:12 AM MST up reply actions
There is a lot to build on from this game, and a lot to work on. Reading Sacco’s comments in the Post this AM tells me he sees what the team needs to do going forward and he’ll work on it.
That said- did anyone else not miss Brandon Yip last night?
PS- Thank Howard that Shattenkirk is OK!!!!!!!!!!
Jonas Holøs- Putting the Ø in defense since 2010!
Miss Yip? You mean he was gone? Hmm, I guess I didn’t notice.
The Avs defense is "air tight"....so tight it's gasping for air and turning purple.
by Americanario on Dec 28, 2010 9:18 AM MST up reply actions 1 recs
I did miss Yip. I thought his presence around the net would have been nice. And it’s not like his poor penalties would have been out of the ordinary for the team last night.
"Oh, that's Brock. He's my dad's bodyguard. One time I saw him kill a guy with a sock full of party snaps!"
i didnt, who would you replace with yip? everyone played better than yip has of late, (especially Mcleod) so I didnt miss him at all
It's all about the A-nderson
by Cole D Hamilton on Dec 28, 2010 11:01 AM MST up reply actions
I like how well Sacco analyzes the team. He got the PP where it needed to be (last night notwithstanding) and now knows he needs to address the abysmal PK. If they can get that to a respectable level, this is going to be a serious playoff team.
BANG! BANG! BANGITY BANG!!
Avalanche Breakaway: a blog of hockey goodness
by Cheryl Bradley on Dec 28, 2010 10:14 AM MST up reply actions
Frustrating night at the can
Nothing worse than watching your team skate so well even strength, then give away opportunities on the PP and not capitalize on their own chances. I’m thinking that if another trade is coming, it will be for a PK specialist.
Lively bunch of Wings fans in attendance. Only once did I seriously consider throwing one over the third-level balcony, and that was when a total douchebag made a comment after Shattenkirk took that puck to the face. I think even the other Wings fans were embarrassed by that guy, though.
"Oh, that's Brock. He's my dad's bodyguard. One time I saw him kill a guy with a sock full of party snaps!"
I think even the other Wings fans were embarrassed by that guy, though.
I hope they were. I would have been. I was actually a bit mad at Draper for driving a slapshot into traffic like that. It’s not like there’s any rule against it, but it’s kind of something that’s just not done anymore.
I was glad to see that Shattenkirk was ok.
by J.J. from Kansas on Dec 28, 2010 9:25 AM MST up reply actions
One of my favorite commentary lines of the year, I don’t even remember who said it, but he told a story about a guy he played with who once got hit in the chest with a teammate’s slap shot, so he turned around and fired the puck right back at the shooter’s head.
Shattencup
STILL pissed about the game...
Guess I am not easily pleased. Avs played a really good game. They played THEIR game, for most of it, and did it really well. Lots of shots on net, and quality chances. And the Wings still won.
It all comes down to special teams. Its an especially soft spot for me. Any time you have a 5-on-3 for more than 30 seconds you should get a goal. If you can’t, you are utterly terrible. The best PK in the world should have a hard time defending a well-built 5-on-3. The Wings PK is good, no denying it, but you HAVE to score in that type of situation.
Avs PP: 1 of 7. Wings PP: 4 of 6.
I dont know what has to be done here, but that is pretty goddam unacceptable. Whatever the problem is, it needs to be fixed before this team can legitimately have a chance to go anywhere. Granted that it was one game, and our PP numbers have been good all year, but thats only half the problem. I watched us on the PP, and we scrambled around, trying to get the puck into the zone, and trying to do ‘nifty’ things with it. The Wings PP just sort of coasted it in, and were set up and cycling before we even realized what had happened. Blah. Pisses me the fuck off.
Thanks Joe...
And for the love of Howard, can we get a faceoff win during a penalty kill? That part was just brutal.
"Oh, that's Brock. He's my dad's bodyguard. One time I saw him kill a guy with a sock full of party snaps!"
Avs sat back way too much on the PP instead of challenging the rw’s. That is an easy fix and what concerns me is that they did not make that a mid-game adjustment.
Jonas Holøs- Putting the Ø in defense since 2010!
by niwotsblessing on Dec 28, 2010 10:42 AM MST up reply actions
Same for the PK. Give me more challenging and attacking on both the PP and PK. You can’t leave lidstrom alone on the point to and work his evil Swedish black magic.
by Brett Shumway on Dec 28, 2010 11:09 AM MST up reply actions
Hey we're surviving
while Stewart is out and that’s all we asked for when he went down right? I mean even Dater said the Avs should have won last night and if they play like that all the time they’re going to win. The Duchene line was unreal and get Stew back with Stastny and Jones and we’re in business…..except for that whole PK thing…..
"NI-YIY-YICE PANTS!"
I wouldnt mind them not fixing the PK, if they would stop taking undisciplined penalties. I wonder if that would be an easier fix. Or just keep up their mantra of scoring more than the other team, no matter what the score. I wouldn’t mind that either. But something has to change along the line.
Thanks Joe...
Going 2-6 on your PK isn’t going to win you a lot of games. Wings shouldn’t even have been in this game if the avs could pull off even an average night on the PK
Each of my replies is a work of art, each more brilliant than the last.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Dec 28, 2010 10:08 AM MST reply actions
Before the game, I said to myself, “Though the Avs will play well and Duchene will score two goals, the Red Wings will score four power play goals and win the game 4-3 in overtime.”
I couldn’t have been more right.
http://chrisgoddamnstewart.com
Start a betting website.
Each of my replies is a work of art, each more brilliant than the last.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Dec 28, 2010 3:15 PM MST up reply actions
I H8 Detroit
And their hockey team, and their fans, and everything in their god forsaken shithole of a town. Fuck each and every one of them. And Happy Holidays!
My fantasy hockey team sucks. But at least I'm not a Red Wing sellout.
by Bob in Boulder on Dec 28, 2010 11:05 AM MST reply actions
Reasons we lost this game
1. Our PK.
2. Failing to score on the 5-on-3.
3. Our PK.
4. Career backup/mediocre starter Chris Osgood deciding to simulate an NHL goaltender after Gali’s weak goal.
5. Our PK.
My fantasy hockey team sucks. But at least I'm not a Red Wing sellout.
by Bob in Boulder on Dec 28, 2010 11:21 AM MST reply actions
The avs PK was the only reason detroit was even in the game.
Each of my replies is a work of art, each more brilliant than the last.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Dec 28, 2010 3:15 PM MST up reply actions




























