Mile High Hockey: An SB Nation Community

Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook

Wojtek Wolski Traded to Phoenix



Wojtek Wolski has been traded to the Phoenix Coyotes for forwards Peter Mueller and Kevin Porter. Wolski has been rumored to be on the blog, mostly because his projected contract numbers over the next couple of years. He's having a great season scoring-wise, but the perception - in Denver at least - is that his play hasn't quite been on par with his points.

In Peter Mueller, the Avalanche get a player who sounds a bit like...Wojtek Wolski. Mueller is a big guy but not particularly physical. He was a 1st round pick in 2006, 10 spots ahead of Chris Stewart. Mueller scored 54 points in his rookie year but he's slipped since then - 36 last year and just 17 to date this year. He has a $1.7 million cap hit this year, but those numbers include his entry-level signing bonus. Like Wolski, he is an RFA this summer, but he will make significantly less - his qualifying offer will be $850,000. There are questions about his speed and his desire, but he has talent. Obviously, the Avalanche feel Mueller will benefit from a change of scenery. He's still just 21, so that's not out of the realm of possibility.

Porter is a former 4th round pick who won the Hobey Baker award at Michigan (where he was the team captain). He's reportedly a versatile young forward, capable of playing at all 3 positions and on the PK. He would appear to fit in perfectly with the Avs' team concept - better than Mueller, even. He has spent most of this season in the AHL, where he has 40 points in 52 games with the San Antonio Rampage. His cap hit is $954,000. He, too, is an RFA this summer. His QO will be $875,000, so the Avalanche are clearing some significant cap space both this year and over the next few years with this move.

My take:

I figured Wolski was going to be on the move. I'm sorry to see him go - I've always been a big fan - but I do feel it was time to make a change. I don't know a ton about Mueller and Porter, but my initial reaction is that I would have liked to see the Avalanche get a bit better return. Wolski is the best player in this deal now and it will take a big turnaround to change that status down the road. Amazingly, the Avalanche get even younger with this deal and shed some cap space - neither of those were hugely important, though.  Mueller and Porter are both intriguing players, and this can become a solid deal for the Avs if either - or both - blossom under Joe Sacco as so many other youngsters have done.

0 recs  |  Comment 87 comments |

Story-email Email Printer Print

More from Mile High Hockey

Still Nothing.

Jul 2010 by David Driscoll-Carignan - 39 comments

Mueller or Wolski?

Jul 2010 by David Driscoll-Carignan - 140 comments

Comments

Display:

Wolski will be missed but it seems that Porter Kid is good….at least that what TSN’s Darren Pang says….and if Panger says it I believe it.

by Threepwood52 on Mar 3, 2010 10:54 AM MST reply actions  

I’m not sold on this one…. I’m just not. Time will tell

by Markopolo on Mar 3, 2010 10:55 AM MST reply actions  

+1

"Four goals in sixteen shots... I'm really tired of the...............25% rule." -John Tortorella

by esylvester6 on Mar 3, 2010 11:09 AM MST up reply actions  

Our shootouts will suck now!

by Threepwood52 on Mar 3, 2010 10:58 AM MST reply actions  

Our shootouts have sucked all year, thanks largely to Wolski.

Forever grateful that Joe Sakic isn't a douche bag like Brett Favre.

by Rather Dashing on Mar 3, 2010 11:03 AM MST up reply actions  

Not sure, but I think I read that with a lot more inherit sarcasm than you did.

Thanks Joe...

by mfured20 on Mar 3, 2010 3:49 PM MST up reply actions  

Oh…. yeah. Maybe.

Forever grateful that Joe Sakic isn't a douche bag like Brett Favre.

by Rather Dashing on Mar 3, 2010 4:09 PM MST up reply actions  

I like this deal. I’ve been hoping for about a year now that the Avs would try to make a trade for Porter and now we got him. I’m not sure about Mueller yet but I think it’s good for him to get another chance under a coach that seems to be good with youngsters. I’m not surprised to see Wokski traded because of the inconsistency and him heading into Sacco’s doghouse. Hopefully for him, the change will be good as well.

by mcarson01 on Mar 3, 2010 11:00 AM MST reply actions  

Where do you know Porter from? Whats your take on the kid?

Thanks Joe...

by mfured20 on Mar 3, 2010 3:50 PM MST up reply actions  

I first noticed him when watching Hensick play for the University of Michigan. He was a superstar there and the Hobey Baker later in his career. My take is that he’s a great prospect to have, much better than getting a 2nd round draft pick. He’s already got some AHL experience and his stats have been decent. Nothing to brag about in the NHL yet but I think it would be tough in the Phoenix system right now because of their prospect depth. Hopefully he can impress Sacco and get some decent ice time soon.

by mcarson01 on Mar 3, 2010 6:35 PM MST up reply actions  

hopefully a change of scenery for mueller will help. im a little worried that its gonna end up being inconsistency for inconsistency. i dont know a whole lot about porter havent seen him since he was in college.

by Kelso22 on Mar 3, 2010 11:07 AM MST reply actions  

I really like this deal for us.

I know that a lot people are down on Mueller, but I had a chance to watch this kid play while he was playing for the Everett Silvertips and he was a solid player. I am hoping that this is going to translate over to the Avs, especially considering that we have a really young team. More for him to relate to. I am hoping that we will get to see him play Thursday against the Yotes if not tonight in Anaheim.

Mile High Hockey: A Colorado Avalanche Fan Community
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.

by Derek B on Mar 3, 2010 11:07 AM MST reply actions  

I really have no idea what to say about this trade. I’ve always liked Wolski as a person, not always as a player. It all comes down to how Mueller and Porter work out for us, obviously. Even though we saw it coming, I’m still pretty shoked that it happened.

Forever grateful that Joe Sakic isn't a douche bag like Brett Favre.

by Rather Dashing on Mar 3, 2010 11:12 AM MST reply actions  

This trade makes no sense to me. Wolski is a better player then Mueller, and he is still only 24. Porter is a center, and we do not need any more centers.

I guess getting 2 for 1, and the fact that the Avs wont have to pay Wolski after this year was a big factor.

I dont like the deal right now. I guess we just have to see how Porter and Mueller play.
“Farris Mueller you’re my hero?”

Mr. Anderson - THE ONE

by slapshotr2007 on Mar 3, 2010 11:14 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

I think fans over-think the forward positions. Centers get move to wing all the time in the NHL. I really don’t think it’s a major transition because by playing center you have to be good at accepting and giving passes with both the fore and backhand. I would agree that moving from wing to center would be more difficult but that’s not the case for us. Also, almost all talented youngsters play center in the juniors ranks. When making the move to pros, there’s a very high chance that they’ll have to play wing because there are only 4 centers per team.

by mcarson01 on Mar 3, 2010 11:19 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree. But with new young players coming in and playing different positions, it could be a little while before they are comfortable. This deal makes more sense long term to me, but I just dont see how it makes us better for this year. I guess time will tell and I hope that I am wrong.

Yip going down must have been a factor in this deal getting done.

Mr. Anderson - THE ONE

by slapshotr2007 on Mar 3, 2010 11:25 AM MST up reply actions  

Yeah, I would think it would take some time to adjust. I guess we may get to see tonight where they’ll play.

by mcarson01 on Mar 3, 2010 11:30 AM MST up reply actions  

I think that moving from center to wing is probably one of the easiest on the ice. Center’s have much more “reading and reacting” to do, especially on defense. Wings typically have a pretty clearly defined set of roles, especially defensively. For a guy who is feeling his way on to a new team, wing seems like an easier place to do it.

by Rapierwhitt on Mar 3, 2010 12:55 PM MST up reply actions  

WHY THE FUCK ARE WE TRADING FOR CENTERS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Avalanche, clearly, are down with No PP.

by Mike @ MHH on Mar 3, 2010 11:19 AM MST reply actions  

both players play all 3 positions.

by thedoctor on Mar 3, 2010 11:37 AM MST up reply actions  

per Dater, Mueller will be in the lineup tonight. Porter will be there too – not sure if he’ll play or not. He’s going to need a new number though – wore 23 in Phoenix

Mile High Hockey: stupid jokes for the intellectual crowd

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 3, 2010 11:25 AM MST reply actions  

Watching Wolski playing against may make us realize exactly how good/bad he really is. Perspective change.

It is a bummer though. He’ll be an 80+ points guy within the next 4 seasons (if only for one season).

by Paul's Coffey on Mar 3, 2010 11:29 AM MST reply actions  

what's the over under

on WW’s goals for the next 20 games? Current rate would be five or six.

09

by wflan on Mar 3, 2010 11:34 AM MST up reply actions  

Puck Daddy:
12:45 p.m. EST: The Coyotes trade Peter Mueller(notes) and Kevin Porter(notes) for Wojtek Wolski(notes) of the Avalanche, a.k.a. a bust and a Hobey Baker curse for a floater. Analysis at the top of the clock. That this is the biggest trade of the day is equal doses of encouraging and depressing.

09

by wflan on Mar 3, 2010 11:35 AM MST reply actions  

Hate this trade. Wolski might be inconsistent but Mueller has 4 fucking goals in 53 games. Kevin Porter might me a hard working 3rd line type of player but we have a fucking gajillion players like that. We need point producers. I cannot understand this trade. If we didn’t want to pay Wolski 3mil next season we could have at least gotten some draft picks in return over the summer. God damn it!

by Dustin Burfiend on Mar 3, 2010 11:35 AM MST reply actions  

i think the main thought is that Wolski will get 4m+ in arbitration.

by thedoctor on Mar 3, 2010 11:37 AM MST up reply actions  

Yeah, the rehire money is a compelling reason.

I’m not saying I like the idea of trading for a new Marek Svatos under any condition but Wolski has had what, three years of displeasure under three difference coaches.

by Cheesus on Mar 3, 2010 11:42 AM MST up reply actions  

I would have rather taken the chance of it going to arbitration and the Avs walking away with nothing quite honestly. At least then we wouldn’t be trading a player who might well go on a tear to a team will be very dangerous in the stretch run and playoffs for an AHL player and a bust. Maybe Mueller will turn out to be awesome but I doubt out. Here’s hoping I get to eat some crow.

by Dustin Burfiend on Mar 3, 2010 11:43 AM MST up reply actions  

I HOPE

this means we’re positioning to strengthen our roster and poach some talent when offer sheets start being in vogue

I did like DoubleDub but his play has been, perhaps, the best under Sacco and we’ve been annoyed with him here. There are a lot of things that motivate people and I wouldn’t be shocked to see WW crest thirty goals this year after a playoff series is through.

09

by wflan on Mar 3, 2010 11:47 AM MST up reply actions  

I don’t think they traded with the hopes that Mueller and Porter would simply be 3rd-line hard-working role players. Both of these guys have proven that they can rack up points in the lower leagues and the Avs believe they’ll be good under our system. Porter hasn’t really had a major chance to prove himself yet in the Majors so we shouldn’t shut the door on that yet. Mueller has but he’s been inconsistent like Wolski. However, I do think that Mueller has the potential to be at least as good as Wolski, if not better. The big difference I’ve seen between the two is that Wolski has had 5 years to prove himself and hasn’t been able to do much yet. Mueller has only been in it for 3 years and hasn’t done much either under a Phoenix system. Is the Phoenix system bad for young kids? They sure do have a lot of young talent that doesn’t live up to their potential.

by mcarson01 on Mar 3, 2010 11:59 AM MST up reply actions  

I was kinda hoping we’d keep Wolski and let him get signed to an offer sheet! Ha ha ha!

I’m not sad to see him go. Wolski has no heart. Mueller is faster and…a right handed shot. I think he’ll blossom on a line with Stastny or Duchene.

www.returnoftheghostbusters.com

by BraxtanFILM on Mar 3, 2010 11:42 AM MST reply actions  

hope you are right

Mr. Anderson - THE ONE

by slapshotr2007 on Mar 3, 2010 11:43 AM MST up reply actions  

is Mueller really faster? I’ve heard questions about his skating

by thedoctor on Mar 3, 2010 11:43 AM MST up reply actions  

like “how is his skating, do you know?” ?

09

by wflan on Mar 3, 2010 11:45 AM MST up reply actions  

He looks fast. And he looks like he tries. I’ve never been a fan of Wolski…except maybe last year during shootouts.

The funny thing is, I think Wolski will be worse under Dave Tippet. That guy is a defensive coach. Wolski is anything but defensive.

www.returnoftheghostbusters.com

by BraxtanFILM on Mar 3, 2010 11:58 AM MST up reply actions  

Wolski is was one of the Avs better defensive forwards

The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Mar 3, 2010 12:00 PM MST up reply actions  

agree

when he’s trying, he’s perfectly capable in his own end. Also, defensively.

09

by wflan on Mar 3, 2010 12:23 PM MST up reply actions  

I see what you did there.

by creamy on Mar 3, 2010 2:15 PM MST up reply actions  

Wolski is very good defensively. Good on the pk too.

by Dario on Mar 3, 2010 2:28 PM MST up reply actions  

Wolski has NO heart

I agree completely, and think that is the primary reason Sacco wanted to see him go. I don’t know how many times I watched Wolski pull up to avoid contact. It wasn’t the plays he made that were the problem. It was all of the ones that were a stride away that he simply wouldn’t that put him in Sacco’s doghouse. I do believe that Sacco briefly beat some heart into him and Wolski played his best hockey ever for awhile, but couldn’t/wouldn’t sustain it. Hence the lengthy slump which is, most likely, more a return to reality than a pause in the midst of a meteoric rise.

Since we all praised Sacco for not being Granato-like and rewarding underachievers with pt, can’t we agree that it is consistent with his philosophy to ship him out? One guy that doesn’t bring it every night can be rapidly contagious.

by Rapierwhitt on Mar 3, 2010 1:05 PM MST up reply actions  

Thing about mueller's stats

this year has been the only real regression if you look at shooting percentage vs goals. First season was 22g and ~.1 SOG% Similar next year, but with fewer shots on goal and fewer goals…

09

by wflan on Mar 3, 2010 11:57 AM MST reply actions  

points scored in 2010 (20 games)

Wolski: 9
Mueller: 7

Mile High Hockey: stupid jokes for the intellectual crowd

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 3, 2010 11:58 AM MST reply actions   1 recs

Mueller: playing on the 4th line.
Wolski: Playing with Stastny and Duchene.

by thedoctor on Mar 3, 2010 12:01 PM MST up reply actions  

I’m sure the TOI is greatly different as well. Not to mention the PP time.

by mcarson01 on Mar 3, 2010 12:03 PM MST up reply actions  

Average TOI (Entire Season to Date)

Mueller – 12:55
Wolski – 18:57

I hate the Red Wings.

by wtnelson on Mar 3, 2010 3:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Interesting. Five minutes is a pretty large difference. Hopefully he’ll get a chance to earn more time here.

by mcarson01 on Mar 3, 2010 6:36 PM MST up reply actions  

Would’ve rather kept Wolski for this season then flip him for a second rounder at the deadline. As bad as Wolski has been, he’s useful once in a blue moon. Mueller is useless 24/7.

by NEB on Mar 3, 2010 12:03 PM MST up reply actions  

DDC’s point about 2010 stats has merit but trying to argue that Mueller’s stats have to do with his TOI? TOI derives from play. The reason he is on the 4th line is because he is struggling offensively, not he is struggling offensively because he is on the 4th line.

by Dustin Burfiend on Mar 3, 2010 1:38 PM MST up reply actions  

this chicken came well before this egg, i assure you

by thedoctor on Mar 3, 2010 1:42 PM MST up reply actions  

The chicken is in the pot, over.

Cook it.

BOOOOM

Never trust the lunch lady.

by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Mar 3, 2010 1:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Most younger players end up having low TOI because of inexperience. Mueller def falls into this category. Wolski has much more experience than him would would explain the difference between them. However, Sacco has shown that he’ll put younger players into the mix if they prove their worth, so, if he likes him, we could see the TOI between Wolski and Mueller even out along with the stats.

by mcarson01 on Mar 3, 2010 2:49 PM MST up reply actions  

These are excellent points.

www.returnoftheghostbusters.com

by BraxtanFILM on Mar 3, 2010 12:06 PM MST up reply actions  

Just to be clear...

…this wasn’t so much a money issue as it was a worth issue, right? As in, Sherman could have afforded to keep Wolski, no matter what he got in arbitration, if he had really wanted to, right? There’s cap space to sign him without crippling the rest of the team – this isn’t a Calgary situation from last year.

Just want to get everyone’s opinion on this as we continue to evaluate this deal. Seems very clear to me that Sherman has a certain value in mind for Wolski, and that he felt Wolski would get more from an arbitrator than he wanted to pay, not than what he could afford to pay.

So…if you look at the chance that Colorado could have lost Wolski this summer and gotten nothing in return (by refusing to pay what he would have been given in arbitration, a la the Rangers and Zherdev), then this deal was a HUGE win for Colorado. Two assets in return instead of none, super job by Sherman.

by Dan Winkler on Mar 3, 2010 12:14 PM MST reply actions   1 recs

I believe that is exactly what this is, yes.

Mile High Hockey: stupid jokes for the intellectual crowd

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 3, 2010 12:15 PM MST up reply actions  

By the way, Dave, I know AD’s your boy, but your take on this situation, both last week and yesterday, blew his out of the water. His blog post gave some half-assed stuff comparing Wolski to Jeff George, and didn’t mention his RFA status and the implications. Yours got to the heart of the real issue, which is how much Colorado would have to pay for Wolski after this season.

AD has talked about thriving on the competition from Sakowski, and how he sometimes misses that. He should keep an eye over here, I think it’ll get his competitive juices flowing.

by Dan Winkler on Mar 3, 2010 12:21 PM MST up reply actions  

thanks Dan!

Mile High Hockey: stupid jokes for the intellectual crowd

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Mar 3, 2010 12:29 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes

Except the Avs likely wouldn’t have gotten nothing. Wolski still would have value at the draft and they could have even accepted arbitration and then traded him in the summer, next season etc.

The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Mar 3, 2010 12:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Def agree -

This is exactly why Liles has been riding the bench on and off all season… He’s playing to under his worth.

Thanks Joe...

by mfured20 on Mar 3, 2010 4:15 PM MST up reply actions  

We really traded LW. Wow.

by Ilkinio on Mar 3, 2010 12:23 PM MST reply actions  

My dog's name is Wojtek!

Argh! Not sold on this one, second highest scorer on the team with a plus 15 for what exactly? Change of scenery? Possible ‘potential’? IDK

by cfh0225 on Mar 3, 2010 12:57 PM MST reply actions  

TSN's got a video

up on their TradeCentre page: http://www.tsn.ca/tradecentre/

look at the right column

by StructuralPoke on Mar 3, 2010 12:59 PM MST reply actions  

he’s in Anaheim with the team

09

by wflan on Mar 3, 2010 1:02 PM MST up reply actions  

Ha

Wolski said he brings a “consistent effort” night in and night out. That is a damn lie.

I hate the Red Wings.

by wtnelson on Mar 3, 2010 3:55 PM MST up reply actions  

NO IT'S NOT!!!!

For substantial portions of this season, I believe it to have been consistently half-assed.

Perhaps even quarter-assed.

2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - On the upside, there's only 20 more (regular season) games of Darcy Tucker left!

by Hopfenkopf on Mar 3, 2010 4:33 PM MST up reply actions  

true, consistently inconsistent as it were

maybe an internet pipe froze and burst

by Uziel on Mar 3, 2010 4:34 PM MST up reply actions  

I like this trade

If anything it opens up some cap space to retain Stewart, Yip and Quincey.

by pikeyrubbish on Mar 3, 2010 1:14 PM MST reply actions  

the parallels between this trade

and the Smyth trade are startling. Both were about future money, and took back young cheap players in exchange for surer things. Both also left me feeling like we should have gotten more.

But, the Quincey trade has worked out great for us. I hope this one does as well, and I’m willing to trust Sherman a bit on it. And thank god we didn’t overpay Wolski.

by thedoctor on Mar 3, 2010 1:36 PM MST reply actions  

+ 1.

That’s definitely what I was thinking about this trade.

The thing that sucks is we did trade Wolski when his trade value is the highest (so far in his career) and we got a high value prospect and guy who could be an enigma or could be just going through a rocky patch where his value is low (if the latter it could be a very good trade, but doubtful).

The most worrying thing about Mueller is he has been playing against the weakest competition of all forwards this year (last year he was middle of the pack). I do hope he hasn’t fell off the cliff and I wish we’d got a 2nd rounder for him as well, as unrealistic as that is.

by HugoAgogo on Mar 3, 2010 2:07 PM MST up reply actions  

Porter

I have probably seen Porter play more than anyone here being a huge Michigan fan and having a connection to dvds of all of Michigan’s hockey games. He had an amazing senior (after Hensick left) year being the Captain and leading UM to one of it’s best seasons in school history (and one of the most heartbreaking ones losing to the golden domers in the Frozen 4). He plays all 3 positions. He isn’t the fastest or biggest guy, but he is smart with the puck, not afraid of contact and works very hard. I personally think he will fit in great with this young bunch of guys!

Our criminal institutions are full of little creeps like you who do wrong things... and many of them were driven to these crimes by a horrible force called MUSIC!

by Pinchy The Lobster on Mar 3, 2010 1:42 PM MST reply actions  

He’s the one variable I’m going to wait on for this. I don’t like the trade from a short-term point of view, but He might make it tolerable long term.

The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time

by Jibblescribbits on Mar 3, 2010 1:44 PM MST up reply actions  

I hope he gets a good shot at making the team. If he can bring back some of that 07-08 magic, we will be happy!

Our criminal institutions are full of little creeps like you who do wrong things... and many of them were driven to these crimes by a horrible force called MUSIC!

by Pinchy The Lobster on Mar 3, 2010 1:58 PM MST up reply actions  

That was an amazing frozen four game. Heard Sunday’s game was pretty good too. :D

Never trust the lunch lady.

by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Mar 3, 2010 1:51 PM MST up reply actions  

Haha.. this year has been frustrating so far.

Haha.. this year has been frustrating so far.PS: It was Saturday ;)

Our criminal institutions are full of little creeps like you who do wrong things... and many of them were driven to these crimes by a horrible force called MUSIC!

by Pinchy The Lobster on Mar 3, 2010 1:57 PM MST up reply actions  

I just looked at his hockey futures profile and he looks like he could be the sort of player we want. In 2005-2006 and 2006-2007 he led his team in game winning goals, in 2007-2008 he was 2nd in playoff and regular season scoring. Sounds like he steps up when that situation arises.

Sounds like he has the sort of intangibles we want.

Also, I wonder whether there could have been character issues with Wolski and the rest of the locker room that accelerated his departure (in addition to the upcoming arbitration dilemma and the like)?

by HugoAgogo on Mar 3, 2010 3:19 PM MST up reply actions  

So do we gloss Mueller as Ferris now, is this even a debate?

by Dario on Mar 3, 2010 2:32 PM MST reply actions  

And if he doesn't light the lamp soon

Do we start calling out “Mueller …. Mueller ….. Mueller” with our best Ben Stein imitation?

And with the 32nd pick in the 2009 NHL draft, the Red Wings select: Someone other than Ryan O'Reilly. LOL@Detoilet.

by Bob in Boulder on Mar 3, 2010 2:37 PM MST up reply actions  

Ferris Mueller’s day off. The possibilities are endless.

by Dario on Mar 3, 2010 2:38 PM MST up reply actions  

Hopeful that doesn’t get used too much in regards to his play…

by HugoAgogo on Mar 3, 2010 2:44 PM MST up reply actions  

SON OF A BITCH.

In my mind, this was fucking dumb.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

by SlamDunkTheFunk on Mar 3, 2010 3:16 PM MST reply actions  

Oh please go on Bubs, tell us how you really feel.

Actually I really am curious as to why you don’t like it. I love reading everyones criticisms of trades like this.

Thanks Joe...

by mfured20 on Mar 3, 2010 4:24 PM MST up reply actions  

Sad to see Wolski go ...

…welcome Mueller and Porter though. Hopefully they can contribute and get better under Sacco.

Denver Stiffs.com: Defending the sovereignty of Nuggets Nation.

by Nate Timmons on Mar 3, 2010 3:32 PM MST reply actions  

I gotta be honest...

I’m nit unhappy with this deal. Look, I think you’d be hard pressed to find many people who thought Wolski’s ceiling was all that much higher than what we got this year. I’m not willing to pay $4 mil plus for that. It’s possible that he might have signed a great offer sheet and given us a couple draft picks, but it’s hard to count on that.

We got tangible assets here. I’ve spent some time in Phoenix the past few years and watched quite a few Coyotes games. Mueller had a great rookie season. I know he’s been struggling, but give Sacco a chance. Porter hasn’t played many NHL games, but if this new Avs’ management has showed anything, it’s the ability to adequately evaluate young talent. I am more than willing to give management and Sacco the opportunity to work with these guys. If you take the Tippett Shackles off of Mueller and put him on Duchene’s wing, I won’t bet against some good production.

What I am upset about are some of the moves we DIDN’T make. I know it’s not always possible, but if we could have moved a defensemen or two and gotten back a second or third round pick, I would have been elated. Even if we were endangering our playoff chances, I still want us to be collecting picks and prospects. I want us to maintain a building attitude for this year and maybe even next, so I wish we could have come down with an extra pick or two.

by The Extra Attacker on Mar 3, 2010 3:57 PM MST reply actions  

I agree completely.

Especially with your point about the moves not made.

That is the primary failure of Dwight, PL, Biller, et al. The failure to trade Svatos (I don’t care if Yip is hurt, Svats has proven nothing this year – or last – save for the fact that he is NOT the answer. Not here at least.), Clark or Tucker for something, anything, really is just stupifying. I don’t care if we’re talking about a 7th rounder for Tucker (several of those trades occurred today). We’re talking addition by subtraction.

I applaud the fact that Salei was not traded and understand why Liles wasn’t traded (the market for $4.5M cap hits was not particularly large), but damn!!

2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - On the upside, there's only 20 more (regular season) games of Darcy Tucker left!

by Hopfenkopf on Mar 3, 2010 4:42 PM MST up reply actions  

Mueller vs Svatos.

Both had great rookie years [Svats 50pts, Ferris 54]. Both had significant injuries that held them back [Svats shoulder and ACL, Ferris concussion]. Both are trying to recover from those injuries and their effects on the game. They even had similar production on their Junior teams.

On the plus side, Mueller was the 8th overall pick, Svatos the 227th. Gotta believe the scouts saw SOMETHING good in the kid.

Thanks Joe...

by mfured20 on Mar 3, 2010 4:34 PM MST reply actions  

i’ve been hoping for a long time to trade svats for mueller actually, and us giving wolski did come as a surprise to me.
but, with everything said and done, i’m happy that mueller’s here if he can find his game with the uber centers that we have.
I guess we wait and see, and good luck to the Baron!

maybe an internet pipe froze and burst

by Uziel on Mar 3, 2010 4:36 PM MST up reply actions  

I thought Mueller would have been a very interesting pick up back in December when he was first placed in Tippett’s doghouse. At that time, the Coyotes nearly dealt him to the Canucks for Shane O’Brien and nearly to the Rangers for Brandon Dubinsky and an AHL defenseman. I think they got a little bit more in this deal. But, the interest has definitely been there from other teams in the league. Hopefully there is something left in this kid and he clicks with Duchene or Stastny or Stewart.

by Bringbackboone on Mar 3, 2010 6:07 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.
Start posting about the Avalanche »

Join SB Nation and dive into communities focused on all your favorite teams.

Connect_with_facebook

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Denver_spurs_small
Drunk Posting Guidelines

Recent FanPosts

Bladesofsteel_small
What a great deal!
Photo_9_small
Are the Avs gearing up for something big?
Photo_9_small
NHL10 Updated Ratings/Roster
Small
Are the Avs being too conservative with money?
001926_small
The Official Dr. Jones Newsletter
Img_0213_small
Stewart (of the Chris kind) and Wayne Simmonds interview on THN
2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
You are not welcome in the Pepsi Centre
Manbearstewart_small
Los Angeles vs Colorado
Nhl-and-food-network_small
Paying the price to compete for the Cup - Now with a Poll!

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Promotion


Add to Technorati Favorites Sports Blogs - Blog Top Sites
Sports Blogs Blogroll.net
Top Blogs Sports blogs
Blog Directory
BlogRankers.com Sport Blogs - Blog Catalog Blog Directory

 


View Stats

Listed on the ArmchairGM Sports Blog Index


 

View blog authority

 

SBNation.com Recent Stories

NEWARK NJ - JULY 20:  Ilya Kovalchuk of the New Jersey Devils poses for photographs following the media opportunity announcing his contract renewal at the Prudential Center on July 20 2010 in Newark New Jersey.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images) +9 updates

With Arbitrator And Hearing Date Set, Is Kovalchuk Contract Mess Set To End?

In this photo taken on Monday, July 19, 2010, Atlanta Thrashers forward Andrew Ladd, formerly of the Stanley Cup champion Chicago Blackhawks, spends his day with the Stanley Cup atop Crown Mountain, British Columbia., north of Vancouver. Ladd, a two-time Stanley Cup champion, was flown by helicopter to the top of Crown Mountain to watch the sunrise. (AP Photo/The Canadian Press,  Mark L. Johnson) +55 updates

NHL Free Agency: Andrew Ladd Avoids Arbitration, Signs With Thrashers

FILE - In this May 7, 2009, file photo, Milan Michalek, front left, of the Czech Republic attacks Swedish goalie Jonas Gustavsson, right, during a quarterfinal at the Ice Hockey World Championship in Bern, Switzerland. Sweden's Carl Gunnarsson is seen behind on left. The Toronto Maple Leafs landed Gustavsson with a one-year contract on Tuesday, July 7, 2009. The 24-year-old netminder, nicknamed "The Monster," was also heavily pursued by Dallas, San Jose and Colorado. (AP Photo/Anja Niedringhaus, File) link

Euro Hockey For Dummies: A Primer On How European Hockey Leagues Work

More from SBNation.com >


Managing Editors

Icon_small Joe Dunman

New_profile_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Staff Writers

Profilepic2_small Mike @ MHH

Boone_small Angélique C. Murray

Photo_10_small Derek B

Black_mage_small Dustin Burfiend

Young_guns_poster_copy_small Paul's Coffey