Game 5 Recap: Sharks 5 - Avalanche 0
Well, you knew that was coming.
It had been a tight series through 4 games - 3 games in OT and no 2-goal leads. But the San Jose Sharks have been threatening to break out for a couple of games now, and they did so tonight. In a big way.
The first period was a microcosm of much of the series. The Sharks dominated much of the play, outshooting the Avalanche 17-2. The also had two power play opportunities, while the Avalanche had none. And, yet, Craig Anderson and the defense were able to keep the Sharks off the board, and the score was 0-0 after 20 minutes.
I don't give a rat's ass about all that Corsi crap, but there was no way the Avalanche would be able to survive forever with that sort of disparity. Eventually, the dam would have to break. That happened in the 2nd period tonight.
The Avs actually had many of the early chances in the 2nd, but couldn't bang it home. A little after the 8 minute mark, the Sharks ended up on a rush. Patrick Marleau dished to Dany Heatley on the right wing, who slid a beautiful pass to rookie Logan Couture in front of Anderson. Couture made a terrific backhand deflection past Anderson to make it 1-0. Somewhere, Ryan Wilson is still looking to pick up a man, because he had no one on the play. Neither did Stephane Yelle. It's tough to stop a Shark's rush when 2 of the 3 men back are wandering around aimlessly.
Two minutes later, TJ Galiardi was called for holding the stick and the Sharks scored on the ensuing power play when Craig Anderson fell down outside of the crease, giving the Sharks a 2-0 lead - the first 2-goal lead in the series. Anderson again stumbled on the 3rd goal when Dwight Hedimen chipped a rebound up and over a sprawling Andy to make it 3-0. Considering the Avs were outshot 29-11 through 2 periods, that effectively won the game for the Sharks. Everything after that is not really worth talking about. Cody McLeod caused some trouble, before earning a 5 minute charging penalty on Jamie McGinn. Anderson gave up another goal...as did his replacement, Peter Budaj. And the Avalanche finally put some shots on net - 17 of them. None went in. San Jose skated away with an easy 5-0 lead.
The Avalanche are in trouble. They have no offense, they are taking way too many dumb penalties and the Sharks are not getting penalties at all. A good example was the Brandon Yip cross check in front of the bench midway through the first. It's the type of play that could have easily been ignored by the refs, but the called it. It's certainly a senseless play by Yip - there's no reason to give the refs a reason to blow the whistle. But it's really frustrating to see that called when similar plays by the Sharks have not been called (hello, Matt Duchene mugging).
But you can't blame this on the refs. Regardless of the uneven refereeing, the Avalanche are losing because they can't generate any offense. They aren't getting any sort of sustained pressure which hurts them offensively (obviously), but it also hurts them defensively. The more time spent in the San Jose zone, the less you'd see the Sharks in our zone. Darcy Tucker played a good game on the 2nd line, but he's no Milan Hejduk and he's no Peter Mueller. The Avalanche desperately miss those two players. The Avalanche now are in a must-win situation on Saturday. To get that win, they are going to need to find some offense.
Derek's Take: Coach Sacco said it best during his post game press conference, "We got we deserved tonight. We didn't play well enough for 60 minutes to win this game." Truer words have never been spoken. I don't really have much to say other than echo what DDC said above, the dumb penalties are going to be the death of this team. Bad officiating or not, if this team continues to not be strong on the puck and turn it over at the blue line...well, we all know what could happen on Saturday night. I'm not ready for this season to be over yet.
Paul's Take: I didn't want to jinx the game in my preview this morning, but in watching all the video and interviews over the last 2 days, I kept hearing the Avs talk about how hard that OT loss was in game 4. It seemed like the Avs were dwelling on that loss, thinking about what could have been (a 3-1 series lead) and that is never a good sign. Tonight also seemed like the culmination of whats been lurking just barely in the shadows this whole series, and tonight the Avs weren't able to escape the attack. Our beloved Avalanche play with their hearts on their sleeves, and they will play better Saturday, but I'm just not sure how much more they have left to give. Let's hope they can find it, and it's a lot.
Mike's Take: Nothing to take away from this one. It was the game the haters had been salivating for since the seeding was locked in. If the Avs want to have any chance in Game 6 at The Can they have to move past this one and bounce back. I'd like to see fewer penalties, more cohesive offense and breakouts that don't amount to a roll of the dice. The physical play has been surprising for the Avs, but I think it has helped wear down the team a little bit. All that being said, this hasn't even closely resembled the series I expected to see and I want to see it continue. The Avs win Game 6 and the series is a coin-flip. Which is kinda fitting when you think about it.
0 recs |
253 comments
|
Comments
Well said. I thought you were a little light on the refs though.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 22, 2010 11:34 PM MDT reply actions
You know what was light? Yip’s cross-check.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
by Mike @ MHH on Apr 23, 2010 6:42 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I really hope this is the game that convinces the Avs front office that we are in desperate need of A.) More quality D, and B.) At least one more winger who loves to shoot (and I don’t think Kovy is the answer here).
Fill these needs, and we’ll be dangerous
Colorado Avalanche: PROMOTING itchy playoff beards since '10
by FiveJeffFingerDiscount on Apr 22, 2010 11:38 PM MDT reply actions
i think a better top defenseman is the biggest order of the day. we have lots of good wingers, they’re just all hurt.
I’d like to see Sharp on that top line or with Duchy AND a top pair d-man, personally.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
I am interested in your ideas
and would like to subscribe to your newsletter.
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Would you like some Shark's fin soup with that????
since Chicago will probably want a 1st+ in return for Sharp at least, I’m questioning getting both…but hell, why not?
seriously, this series has made me wonder if going with another top forward might be a good idea. our D is hanging on, it’s the goal scoring we need.
they would have one if they could just stay healthy.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 3:05 PM MDT up reply actions
Keep in mind that our D is currently fully healthy, while our forwards are pretty much crippled. 3 of our top 5 wingers are hurt, and we’re rocking a second line comprised of the KHL-bound Svatos, Darcy Mothertucker, and Duchene sans the use of his wrists.
The regular season showed that our weakness stems from the D. A team with the 6th most goals in the league will have no trouble taking care of business in the opposing end.
Honestly, I don’t think we can use Jones’ absence as an excuse. I mean, he’s been out since November! The team is well accustomed to him not being in the lineup.
Forever grateful that Joe Sakic isn't a douche bag like Brett Favre.
by Rather Dashing on Apr 23, 2010 6:17 PM MDT up reply actions
Fair enough, but it just means that our offense becomes even more lethal when he returns next year. The back end is where we’ve got to build.
I agree completely. Just wanted to give my 2 cents on the whole “missing 3 top 6 forwards” argument somewhere.
Forever grateful that Joe Sakic isn't a douche bag like Brett Favre.
by Rather Dashing on Apr 23, 2010 7:34 PM MDT up reply actions
I think the missing our top forwards argument comes into play during our discussion about this series in regards to who we are missing as opposed to who San Jose in missing. We’re accustomed to playing without Jones but that doesn’t take away from the fact that he’s a powerful force that we aren’t able to use.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 24, 2010 12:38 AM MDT up reply actions
Good recap. Pretty much sums up how I feel.
I don’t think there’s any way Mueller makes it back this series, but I have a feeling Hejduk and Jones gear up and play injured…we have no other option.
I still cannot believe that the scrum involving McGinn and Duchene resulted in a Sharks PP (and no penalty on the McGinn punches). Just unbelievable.
Proud to be Michigan's only Avs fan since 1997...
Also, how does Hannan get two roughing minors for stepping in while Murray and/or Boyle (I think it was) get nothing.
After Hannan stepped between McGinn and Duchene, Boyle grabbed a hold of Duchene and wrapped him up. Murray was also in there on Hannan before. McGinn alone should have gotten 5:00 for fighting or at the least and extra 2:00 for instigating since he was the only guy who dropped his gloves and threw any punches.
MHH: The Burgundy Army is on the March!
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Apr 22, 2010 11:53 PM MDT up reply actions
After seeing the replay for the 7th time, (I can’t believe I’m about to type this) but when Boyle wrapped up Duchene after Hannan stepped in on McGinn, Boyle gave Duchene a friendly few taps on the shoulder like “I won’t throw punches.” Props to him.
I am NOT giving him props for what I am sure some Shark fan will come on here and say was babying him, but it’s not about that. Duchene has probably played the whole series hurt and has taken a lot of hits. It’s about not having one of your primary scorers in the box for 5 minutes in a 0-4 hockey game.
Colorado Avalanche playoffs 2010: Go ahead and high stick them. It only makes them better.
the Hannan penalty was just mind-boggling. I don’t understand how it’s a 4, unless he got an extra 2 for that last little shove to the face. equally mind-boggling – McLeod got no penalty for shoving Murray into Nabokov.
Assistant *to* the Managing Editor, Mile High Hockey
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 23, 2010 12:05 AM MDT up reply actions
Dater pointed that out. McLeod should have gotten a penalty. That whole sequence was bizarre. I am amazed McGinn got off so easily.
Colorado Avalanche playoffs 2010: Go ahead and high stick them. It only makes them better.
PS. That is SO not what she said.
Colorado Avalanche playoffs 2010: Go ahead and high stick them. It only makes them better.
OK
First off i am sick of seeing the Refs grab Cody Mc every time one of the Guppies tries to take liberties at one of our young guns. He is out there to stick up for our guys let him do his job and stop getting in the way especially when you aren’t going to do anything about it. Speakeing of which if the NHL suspends Cody for his hit in the third that he got a 5 min penalty for, such BS, I am going to flipping lose my mind.
Second I am not blaming the refs for the AVs loss tonight they looked flat but playing against 7 people at even strength is pretty hard to do. We need to suck this up and take it to them in game 6 and force a game 7!! Maybe Bettman will get off his backside and instead of telling his refs hey you can’t let an 8 beat a 1 maybe he will say hey call this game fair and lets see what happens!!!
NHL Experts, NHL Experts, We don't need no stinking NHL Experts we know we're good!!! GO AVs GO
Let the Playoff Beard growth commence!!
That whole sequence of events took incompetence, boarded it on a spaceship and sent it boldly to where no incompetence has gone before.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 7:27 AM MDT up reply actions
No, I thought the reffing was on par with the acting in many episodes of Voyager.
That’s not fair, it was on par with the Scott Bakula one.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 7:38 AM MDT up reply actions
The Bakula was in an episode of Voyager? Or were you reffing Enterprise?
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
Me or Bakula.
Whose on first?
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 8:28 AM MDT up reply actions
Really pissed me off,
when they called Dutchy out at 3rd. He so clearly beat the tag! Lousy umps!
Oh wait, that was hockey? Ya think we ought have gotten some real, live, hockey refs to call that game?
Nah, it’ll be cool. Gary said so.
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Would you like some Shark's fin soup with that????
Anyone else see when Sacco was complaining to the refs about it? Duchene was standing right beside the ref and kept trying to talk to him. Galiardi had to pull him away at least three different times, he just kept going back. Thought it was kinda funny.
He finally got on the bench after the ref left and just slammed the gate shut.
great recap
i too thought you were light on the refs, but the Avs didn’t play well enough to win either.
I had already logged out of the GDT for the night, but I had to come back on to mention, again, that Mark Rycroft is totally awesome. Its so nice to have actual objective feedback on the Av’s play.
Thanks Joe...
I really wish Center Ice didn’t cut out before I get the chance to hear him post-game
Proud to be Michigan's only Avs fan since 1997...
My Center Ice does't.
Who do you have? I have Dish Network and I’m able to watch the entire Go Auto Group Postgame Show and I live in Seattle.
Mile High Hockey: A Colorado Avalanche Fan Community
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
I’m still watching it…….I have Center Ice on Dish as well.
MHH: The Burgundy Army is on the March!
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Apr 22, 2010 11:47 PM MDT up reply actions
He just broke down the entire 1:15 before the third goal, talking about puck control and lack of clearing. The D was on the ice for the full 1:15, working hard, and the forwards were so tired they changed out about 8 seconds before the goal, even tho the puck wasn’t totally cleared. We were wondering why Yelle was so far back? He was just getting off of the bench when the Sharks were crossing the blue line.
Thanks Joe...
So different from the rest of the Altitude broadcast…Love Rycroft and his straight forward approach.
MHH: The Burgundy Army is on the March!
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Apr 22, 2010 11:48 PM MDT up reply actions
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE let Deadmarsh show the team that section of game on tape. Remind deader Rycroft, your on the same “team” anyway. Might as well put the Altitude and Avs under the same ownership to good use eh?
Colorado Avalanche playoffs 2010: Go ahead and high stick them. It only makes them better.
Yeah, I saw this happen Foote and Cumiskey were out there a long time, same with O’Reilly but Yelle probably came on for him
I saw the replay, does that make me an expert?
I don’t see Rycroft lasting very long with Altitude. After watching the Versus broadcasts this year with Darren McCarty, Brian Engblom, Keith Jones and John Stevens, that channel should dump a truckload of cash in front of Rycroft to get him in studio to replace those other useless hacks. He is the only studio analyst I will go out of my way to watch.
Luck: Funny how only winning teams seem to have it.
I wanted to hear his
thoughts on the game. That’s the only reason that I’m not in bed. And he may have only been a 3rd or 4th line player in his career, but he ABSOLUTELY knows what he is talking about. If the team did half of what this team did what Rycroft talked about it, we wouldn’t be talking about losses, but wins. It sounds simple, GET THE PUCK TO THE NET!
Mile High Hockey: A Colorado Avalanche Fan Community
Defending Big D: A Dallas Stars blog on SBN: easy to use, free to join.
Can we relieve him of his job as analyst and bring him on as a coach?
'If the wings are traveling faster than the fuselage, it's probably a helicopter -- and therefore, unsafe.'
by chopchopchop on Apr 22, 2010 11:51 PM MDT up reply actions
Sacco is even questioning the officiating….not using it as an excuse, but questioning it.
I’m not blaming this loss on the officiating because the Avs really did not play well. But like I said in the GDT. The officiating has to be playing on the Avs mental game. When they are getting called for every little thing they do wrong, it has to make you a little tentative about the way you play. You start think too much and second guessing yourself.
On the other side when you can’t draw a call, it makes it hard on your forwards. They stop wanting to go into the corners or to the front of the net because when they do they are getting decked by the Sharks and fleeced by the officials.
The longer this series goes on the worse the Avs are getting. Why is that? Are the Sharks just that good? Are they making all the right adjustments? Or are the Avs starting to tire mentally because of the lopsided officiating?
MHH: The Burgundy Army is on the March!
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
I said this in the game thread, but even if the Avs were on the good side of a 2-1 PP advantage, I would be scratching my heads at the officiating. It really has been incompetent, and the refs have not set any kind of precedence or given any of the players an indication of what to expect. I want to partially agree with you about it affecting the way the Avs play in the game, but the refs aren’t making us flub multiple finishing chances or blow clearing attempts. I guess what I’m saying is that if we aren’t making the execution mistakes that we are, this series could be over.
'If the wings are traveling faster than the fuselage, it's probably a helicopter -- and therefore, unsafe.'
by chopchopchop on Apr 22, 2010 11:56 PM MDT up reply actions
That’s why I won’t completely blame the officials…The Avs definitely aren’t doing themselves any favors. They have missed chances, have spent too much time in their own zone, etc.
Just saying that is has to be a factor…the officials are involved too much in the game. You’d hope that like game one, the Avs could overcome it; but it’s possible it’s getting to them…it’s possible guys are looking over their shoulders too much, the discrepancy in calls could very well add to it. You need to know that if the other team takes a shot at you, you are going to get the call; well they aren’t getting them, so you start watching your back just a little bit more, you’re distracted so to speak.
MHH: The Burgundy Army is on the March!
I'm The Canary - but I'm not cute nor cuddly, and I don't sing.
by Americanario on Apr 23, 2010 12:04 AM MDT up reply actions
I don’t think it would help the Avs too much. However, when the Sharks get more chances to set up their PP, it is obvious it gives them momentum. And, a PK seems to derail them a bit. I don’t know if it’s the Avs that gain some momentum after a PP (when nothing usually happens or goes right) that’s causing a difference in the Sharks play. That’s just something I’ve noticed involving the penalties; how teams react when it gets back to even.
by Bringbackboone on Apr 23, 2010 12:04 AM MDT up reply actions
As a player, you just want consistency. If you look back on the third, Cumiskey and Duchene were both chirping at the refs after a few plays that could have been called. It is frustrating as a player when you feel like you’re getting the short end of the stick. However, you can’t blame the game on the refs. But, here’s a tip for the Avs. Any time Anderson gets hit in the head (has happened a few times), act like you’ve been decapitated, have the trainer run onto the ice, start punching their best player, and you’ll end up on a pp. Or act like you’re going to be on life support from a questionable hit, going to be called. Hey, it’s playoff hockey. Everybody dives. If you’re not, you’re not trying to win.
I was thinking about this earlier. A certain Joe Sakic was suspended for the first 2 games of the playoffs I believe in 2002 or 2003 for a knee-on-knee incident against the Red Wings in a season finale. Wasn’t intentional, just a natural reaction. Yet Joe Sakic was suspended for the playoffs. Why was Blake’s kneeing just 2 minutes and he has to do something that blatant to get called? Please correct any of my facts here, I’m sure I have something wrong.
by Bringbackboone on Apr 23, 2010 12:00 AM MDT up reply actions
I was so pissed about this game, I turned it off after Cody’s 5 min major. I have never done that if I have nothing else going on. I cannot even fathom how after the scrap where mcginn punched duchene, we ended up with the penalty, among many others I’m too pissed off to remember. I’m done for the night. Can’t think anymore about it.
No such thing as a hockey fan... only hockey fanatics!
GO AVS!!!
I'm so pissed
I just want to see blood. Shark blood, and plenty of it. If you are going to get called for everything, make it count. We obviously can’t make anything else count, might as well not send them home laughing at the Avs for being creampuffs.
"Sometimes you think they must have come out of the chimp cages at the Bronx zoo" - Gerry Cheevers, former Boston Bruins goalie, on New York hockey fans
Detroit Sucks
I am NOT giving up on this series or season yet...
But who is on the market as far as quality D men go? Because I think that is what we need. One guy to put with …. well maybe two guys that can shut down a top line and NOT make mistakes that cost us goals. Our forwards are some of the best two way forwards in the league… everyone of them. And I think that is major props to Sacco. Now we need D men who do not make bone headed plays. That being said I love RR, JML, Footer, Hobbit, and BMF… they just need to be more responsible in their own zone.
I’m not sure who is available other than Kubina and Volchenkov, and because there’s such a shortage of quality d-men free agents, I’m sure some stupid team(s) will overpay like hell to get them. personally, I’d just like to see Clark and Salei take a hike and see how Shattenkirk, Cohen, Elliott, and Gaunce fill in…those four have a ton of potential. also, if Wilson doesn’t start showing that he can do more than deliver the occasional big hit, his spot should and will be supplanted as well.
speaking of talented defensemen that we’ve drafted, have you guys noticed how well Johnny Boychuk has been playing for the B’s in their series? it’s a shame we gave up on him so early, but I guess getting Hendricks back in the deal makes up for it. thankfully, we’ve got plenty of other talent waiting in the wings. I wonder how Nigel Williams ends up for the Rangers…
Proud to be Michigan's only Avs fan since 1997...
The only thing Boychuk did for them is complain to the refs in game 1 and then get away playing dirty the rest of the series. Hell, he crushed Vanek’s knee so bad that he’s out indefinitely and no penalty was called.
I don’t want him on our roster if he’s going to be like a shark.
So what are the chances for an Avalanche vs. Sabres finals, eh?
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub. Until I get the newsletter out, anyway.
Everyone's favorite Buffalo Rumblings Anti-Tebow blowhard!
by UZ on Apr 23, 2010 5:59 AM MDT up reply actions
Gonchar.
Fuck it. He’s old and injury prone, but we’re going to need someone for a couple of years before our prospects are ready to take over. We are outmatched on D by almost every team in the West, and greatly outmatched by the top squads. Gonchar controls the puck, makes good passes, clears well and shoots on the PP, all while being much more responsible on defense than he was when he was younger.
Give him a two-year deal at $5 million per and Hamhuis a four-year deal at $3 million per, then hope to Howard that Kirk, Cohen, Gaunce and Elliot are NHL worthy within two years.
Luck: Funny how only winning teams seem to have it.
I’m liking any combo of Martin, Gonchar, or Hamhuis at this point.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
Me too. I like Hamhuis
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 11:59 AM MDT up reply actions
Devils fans (even before last night’s craptastic capitulation) were ready to let Martin walk if he wanted any more than $3 million/year. $3 million! Hell, that’s bargain territory for us, let’s do it!
by Dan Winkler on Apr 23, 2010 12:21 PM MDT up reply actions
Hated this game. Every pus-filled minute of it.
The Avs couldn’t get anything going. The Avs have been relying far too much on Andy and when he has an off night, the weaknesses in the defence are exposed.
Injuries for me are not an excuse, because we got Porter back, so we are actually in better shape than the last game and that was a close one.
I will look forward to next season because of so much talent, but because the Sharks will have huge momentum going into the next game, I will be really surprised if the Avs manage to win 2 straight games to take the series.
It's hard to be a saint in this city
I gave up on this team after the second period. The officiating is still disgustingly one-sided in this series, but the Avalanche are doing themselves no favors.
They refuse to put in anyone with even a paper-cut for fear of reinjury, they have no offensive spark, they’re not playing physical…
Basically unless I’m AT game 6 I probably won’t watch it at all.
So what are the chances for an Avalanche vs. Sabres finals, eh?
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub. Until I get the newsletter out, anyway.
Everyone's favorite Buffalo Rumblings Anti-Tebow blowhard!
They refuse to put in anyone with even a paper-cut for fear of reinjury, they have no offensive spark, they’re not playing physical…
I disagree. They’re an 8-seed (playing a 1-seed) who reached and made it to the playoffs in Year 1 of the rebuild. You don’t jeopardize the long-term viability of two or three of your core players (moving forward) to try to eek out a first round win. I’m going to trust the Avs trainers, players and coaches. If any one of those three think that a player isn’t ready, then he isn’t ready. My desire as a fan to see certain players is trumped pretty easily by the fact that the organization has the players health and the long-term nature of the team to think about.
The offensive spark issue is real, but with Sacco playing strength against strength (SoS’s guys against Jumbo Joe and Co.), they’re essentially canceling each other out. Duchene is playing with third liners against Pavelski’s line and it’s resulted in two OT W’s for the Sharks. O’Reilly is doing OK, but he spends 47 minutes a night on the PK.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
actually 46:27.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 10:26 AM MDT up reply actions
You know Mike,
full of hyperbole.
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Would you like some Shark's fin soup with that????
I’m all about the facts myself.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 10:36 AM MDT up reply actions
and I would never write anyting just to get a laugh.
P.S.
Big Meat.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 10:36 AM MDT up reply actions
Has to be stated
First off i am sick of seeing the Refs grab Cody Mc every time one of the Guppies tries to take liberties at one of our young guns. He is out there to stick up for our guys let him do his job and stop getting in the way especially when you aren’t going to do anything about it. Speakeing of which if the NHL suspends Cody for his hit in the third that he got a 5 min penalty for, such BS, I am going to flipping lose my mind.
Second I am not blaming the refs for the AVs loss tonight they looked flat but playing against 7 people at even strength is pretty hard to do. We need to suck this up and take it to them in game 6 and force a game 7!! Maybe Bettman will get off his backside and instead of telling his refs hey you can’t let an 8 beat a 1 maybe he will say hey call this game fair and lets see what happens!!!
NHL Experts, NHL Experts, We don't need no stinking NHL Experts we know we're good!!! GO AVs GO
Let the Playoff Beard growth commence!!
The Officiating has not been one sided......
Com’mon guys, the ref’s have been letting so much go in this series (and all the series). Yip’s call for instance, he cross-checked the opponent three times, what do you expect a ref to do. The avs have been throwing so many picks I have lost count. In defense of Anderson, he is playing one hell of a series, but he cannot be expected to do what he has been doing for four games now, it is statistically impossible for him to succeed. A good majority of the Sharks shots have been incredible with a good chunk of which can be considered scoring chances, and the amount is simply one sided. The Avs Defense is going to need to kick it up a notch on Saturday, but honestly I think they are done. The Sharks have been battering the defense for all the games and I think it has caught up with them. With little offense, the Avs are finished. But who knows, this is why we watch hockey, especially playoff hockey…..anything can happen.
So
You are saying that when a top forward is getting hit by a guy and not hitting back #1 the ref should grab a guy to keep him from helping his teammate and #2 give more penalties to the guy who plays peacemaker then the guy who is instigating and also punching with no gloves on??
NHL Experts, NHL Experts, We don't need no stinking NHL Experts we know we're good!!! GO AVs GO
Let the Playoff Beard growth commence!!
The reffing hasn’t been one sided, it’s been atrocious. The Yip call was fine.. except when you put it in context of what hasn’t been called all series. Had they called the series that way it would have been fine. But you said it yourself
“the ref’s have been letting so much go in this series”So they call that!?! Seriously?. And if you don’t think the sharks have thrown just as many picks, you are deluding yourself. All teams throw playoff picks.
The reffing has been abhorrent, both ways. But it’s been more abhorrent towards the Avs, and it’s not even close. We could go back and forth all trading missed calls, there’s plenty to go around both ways.
But the sharks haven’t picked up those borderline penalties this series that the Avs have. The Yip “crosscheck”, the Foote interference in OT in game 2. The Hannan double-minor for roughing last night. The 5 minute charging on McLeod.
Those are all calls that can be made, they are all penalties. But the same level of penalty just isn’t being called on the other side. The Avs have the least amount of powerplays for any playoff team this postseason, by a pretty substantial amount. I expect there to be a discrepancy in calls because the Sharks have really dominated play, but this has been a very physical series, more so than anything in the east for sure. For the Avs to have fewer PPs than any team, when playing a team that was 6th in penalties taken in the regular season, means our complaints aren’t all just sour grapes.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 8:53 AM MDT up reply actions
For the Avs to have fewer PPs than any team, when playing a team that was 6th in penalties taken in the regular season
This is my point exactly. I mean lets see here Blakes hit to the head on TJ – No Call
Dutchy getting punched in the face – 2 minutes for roughing
It has been bad those are just two examples I would be here all day if i listed everything. It just makes one wonder where the integrity of these refs. Bettman has done his usual and not stepped in so personally if they want the old NHL back then we need to give the Guppies a taste of what AVs pride is and show them why we had such a heated rivalry with the Dead Wings for so long.
NHL Experts, NHL Experts, We don't need no stinking NHL Experts we know we're good!!! GO AVs GO
Let the Playoff Beard growth commence!!
I thought they were eighth...
The Sharks are doing all they can to keep up the discrepancy. Thorton has been diving/acting to an absurd level. You couldn’t see if Stat’s stick even touched him & if it did, there was no rebound from the collision on the head or stick. And he hit the deck like someone yelled gun in a convenience store. And this last game, the holding the stick penalty was so absurdly hammed up. Just two examples. Lots are going into the absurd discrepancy, but a LOT of it comes down to the refs.
09
I think they said in the game that there is no way Galiardi has enough strength to rip Thornton’s stick out of his hands
I saw the replay, does that make me an expert?
The ref's are going to call this every time
Doesn’t matter if the stick touched the face or not, or if Thornton embellished. If the ref see’s a high stick and a head snap back, it will be called.
and yet they’ve missed all 4 or 5 high sticks that the sharks have done to the avs, including the ones that drew blood and caused stitches.
so no, no they’re not
maybe an internet pipe froze and burst
mwuahaha
whatever
galiardi still had most of his lip attached, it’s not like the stitches were doing anything a tiny bit of remaining intact skin wasn’t already taking care of.
09
Yeah, it wasn’t like TJ was dying or anything…so, of course…NO TOE TAG, NO PENALTY.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
by InfamousM on Apr 23, 2010 9:39 AM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Hahaha seriously.
And it only took out one tooth (I think) so obviously it wasn’t that bad!
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 24, 2010 12:39 AM MDT up reply actions
Bullshit. If he embellished IT’S DIVING. It’s in the rule book. I’ve got now beef calling the high-stick, but call the dive. There have been plenty of it from the guys in teal all series and the refs don’t have the testicular fortitude to call it against the #1 team.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
I must have seen a different game.
Look, when any team is spending 75-80% of the time in the offensive zone, the other team is going to take more penalties, that is just how it is. Yesterday, the Avs were having a rough time containing the sharks…yes even the first line this time. Saturday may be a different game, I doubt it but maybe.
I expect there to be a discrepancy. The Sharks have dominated the Avs in the last 4 games. They should get more PPs than the Avs, but this has become absurd. 21-10 in PPS for the series until the refs threw the Avs some bones late in the game.
It’s been a very physical series, and only 10PPs. that’s not a normal discrepancy that’s a whole new level of incompetency.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 9:31 AM MDT up reply actions
I'm confused about this
NHL.com has it at 19-26, BUT I heard the 21-10 from two or three different MSM sources. Even with the handful of minors the Sharks had last night, it’s not even close to syncing up.
09
Assumption
You guys are basing your logic on the assumption that PP are supposed to be even, or close to it I guess. The Sharks have been offensively dominant in all the games, it would make sense that the PP is a 2:1, that is when most teams take them. What am I not getting here?
2:1 would be expected?!
look at the chart below. The difference between the Blackhawks and the famous for gritty/dirty/fighting Flyers is one fighting major. That’s for the entire season as an average, and is accurate within 18 seconds. Expecting double is absurd.
And ‘offensively dominant in all the games’ neglects the significant stretches of time the Avs were in control in the SJ zone.
09
No. That this has been a physical enough series, that more than 10 PPs should be called. Look this series has been a lot nastier than BOS-BUF, PHI-NJ or OTT-PIT. yet even the teams being dominated in those series have gotten a more PPs
they shouldn’t be even at all. The sharks deserve more, but this has been absurd. The PPs for this series should probably be about 25-33 or so, in favor of the sharks. The refs aren’t calling a lot, but they are calling even less against the Sharks.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 9:54 AM MDT up reply actions
I'll give in.....
cause I admire your damn goalie so much :] . I didn’t see what a lot of people were talking about here….the mis-calls/discrepancy/etc (I am a Sharks fan so I am biased). If it happened, I hope those refs are called on it and not seen in the series again. Lets hope for a better game all around on Saturday.
I had no issue with the fact there was a penalty on McLeod, but a major for that? McGinn wasn’t hurt…that’s just a simple 2 minute minor.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
After the most frustrating loss of perhaps the entire season...
Its time to show some fan appreciation for our 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche!
Here’s to T.J. Galiardi, who put his face and body on the line from Game 1! Not afraid to back down from the thuggery of Blake and Boyle!
Here’s to Ryan O’Reilly, the 19 year old penalty-killing, puck-clearing, shot-blocking rookie who nobody thought would even make the roster this year!
Here’s to Craig Anderson, the coming out season for a goalie who turned heads all season and MVP of our young team!
Here’s to the coaching staff and first-year NHL coach Joe Sacco, who turned this team from the bottom of the West to a playoff-caliber team in a single year!
You get the idea… this is a team of unsung heroes and first-year Avalanche players believing they can win hockey games! They have paved a road for success in the years to come, and We The Fans get to watch this young exciting team grow as the new era of Avalanche hockey has begun!
And you better believe they aren’t giving up yet, because I’m sure every one of those players can’t wait to get on the ice and fight to the whistle blows and there’s no hockey left to be played!
by HansoBonanzo on Apr 23, 2010 9:09 AM MDT up reply actions
WoooooHoooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I agree.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Until they regress next year…
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
Until they regress next year…
And there’s the rub, good sir. I took a stab at it months ago, here it goes again. Guys who I think will regress next year (in terms of points and/or TOI):
Anderson
Stewart
Wilson
Yip
Quincey
Cumiskey
Hendricks
Doesn’t mean we’re going to suck or be terrible. It doesn’t account for new guys or unexpecteds stepping up, just think that this year we got career “type” years from a lot of guys.
by Dan Winkler on Apr 23, 2010 12:27 PM MDT up reply actions
I agree that I think Stewart will regress, but I don’t think we got a career year out of him. I think in a couple of seasons will be when Stewart’s at the top of the game. Next season though, I do think he’ll drop down just a little.
I love how mouthy Sharks fans are…
HEY, DIPSHITS, HOW ABOUT GOING TO THE STANLEY CUP FINALS FIRST.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
What are you talking about
I am the only one who has posted anything pro-sharks and half of that was in praise of Anderson.
Go back to the game thread.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
do we need to do this?
Assistant *to* the Managing Editor, Mile High Hockey
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 23, 2010 9:30 AM MDT up reply actions
Just merely stating a fact…
if they don’t like it, oh well.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
and the other half was whining about us whining. thanks for bringing something awesome to the community!
I want to whine about them whining about us whining about…. oh fuck it.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 10:47 AM MDT up reply actions
Penalties

Basically, the Avs average 6 penalties a game, the Sharks 7. In the playoffs, the sharks are at 3.5 and the Avs still around 6 (7.6 vs 12.2 pim/g)
09
It has been amazing how clean the Sharks have played. /sarcasm
FU Rob Blake, and I mean that in the most gentlemanly way possible
by Bob in Boulder on Apr 23, 2010 9:31 AM MDT up reply actions
Agree with all that has been said. We deserved to lose and deserved to lose big. What we saw was “what happens in game 3 if our goaltender isn’t super human?” And Andy was far, far, far from super human last night as well. Looked extremely out of whack all night for some reason.
The officiating, as it has been most of the series was brutally one-sided in favor of the Sharks. How Hannan gets an extra minor instead of McGinn is an unbelievable mystery. That said, a few god-awful calls voided in this one wouldn’t have made one bit of difference.
FU Rob Blake, and I mean that in the most gentlemanly way possible
LOL
Assistant *to* the Managing Editor, Mile High Hockey
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 23, 2010 10:01 AM MDT up reply actions
no fair
My blood pressure is high enough this morning.
FU Rob Blake, and I mean that in the most gentlemanly way possible
by Bob in Boulder on Apr 23, 2010 10:07 AM MDT up reply actions
This was just a game where the Babylanche showed up..and the real NHL’ers stayed in Denver. They were just dead from the get go. Maybe it was a hangover from the loss of game 4, maybe they pouted because they’re getting hosed by the refs, who knows, and who really cares?
The point is, that will hopefully be a wake up call that you have to step your game up in the playoffs.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
I agree
Quincey’s ’tard penalty in the first minute of the game set the tone for that game.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
Not to cross the streams or anything
But I blame the horrible game on the fact that none of the Avalanche wanted to see Tebow drafted in the first round. How can anyone from Colorado be expected to perform well after hearing that news?
Luck: Funny how only winning teams seem to have it.
Good god is hoodie junior ever an idiot.
FU Rob Blake, and I mean that in the most gentlemanly way possible
by Bob in Boulder on Apr 23, 2010 9:41 AM MDT up reply actions 3 recs
Just hearing about it took them out of their game.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 10:29 AM MDT up reply actions
I'm done with the officiating, disgusted by the team
I told myself I wasn’t gonna comment after McGinn threw punches and he and Boyle had their gloves off and Duchene turned away and we ended up a man down. Worst bullshit I’ve seen since Devorski bottled the McCarty assault on Lemieux in ’97.
But then, after the refs gave Cody Mac a 5 minute major in the 3rd, I just laughed and said fuck it. Nothing else to say about the inept officiating, except that I honestly don’t think it can get any worse or more one-sided than it has been.
So in the 3rd, here’s what I expected to see – at the very least, someone challenge McGinn, straight up. If he didn’t respond, then I expected to see someone take off their gloves and start flailing away on him. If not him, then challenge Setoguchi, whoever’s their equivalent of Duchene, i.e. a skill guy who won’t fight. Then, if no Shark wanted to oblige, I expected to see some hard, high hits by the Avs – during the course of play or after the whistle, doesn’t matter to me. I expected SOME response that said, “Look, we’re not going to get pushed around by you. We understand you guys are the top seed, you’re a very talented team, great players and, on the whole, we’re not going to be able to keep up with you. But the one thing we can do, since it’s all about will, is hit you so fucking hard that you’ll remember us, and it’ll make you hurt.”
I didn’t fucking see any of that. Cody Mac sort of tried, but even after his major he was back on the ice at the end of the game but didn’t do anything.
Two guys get a pass – Duchene and O’Reilly, because they’re both young kids. Every fucking other member of the Avs should feel embarrassed for any lack of response in the 3rd. You know what? I’m pretty sure that if Matt Hendricks had gone off, instigated a fight, took a run at a guy, crossed the line or whatever, that we could replace his 8 minutes of ice time in Game 6 if he got suspended. Same with Cody. Cumiskey looked lost, Porter does zero for me, and Chris Stewart…oh, Chris Stewart. The one guy on this team who can actually hurt someone in a fight…and he did nothing. Barely saw him on the ice in the 3rd, and something’s gotta be going on with him, because he’s not close to the same player he was most of the season. Every player on the roster who’s not 19 and not a goalie should be ashamed of themselves today.
I’ve got one and only one comment to the Sharks fans on here, I’m not engaging any of them the rest of this series: Where the fuck were you after the losses, you spinless, front-running pukes?
by Dan Winkler on Apr 23, 2010 9:45 AM MDT reply actions 5 recs
Dan, no coffee for you my friend.....
Dude, it is just a game, one game, let it go, it is not worth being pissed off the whole day, and tomorrow is a new day, new game. Put yourself in in a Sharks fan shoe’s, we have been saying WTH do the sharks need to do to get a goal against this rookie goalie for all the previous games. Like you said the Avs did not show up to play last night. On a positive note, this goalie you guys have might be the next Roy…he is that good. You get a decent defensive core in front of him and it will be next to impossible to score against. The Avs future will be very bright with him there.
Has Dan been over to FtF?
I know I haven’t been. Win or lose. Pissed or not pissed. I think Dan has a valid point.
FU Rob Blake, and I mean that in the most gentlemanly way possible
by Bob in Boulder on Apr 23, 2010 9:55 AM MDT up reply actions
I loved all of this up until that last sentence. there’s no need.
Assistant *to* the Managing Editor, Mile High Hockey
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 23, 2010 9:53 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Doesn’t change the fact that it was unnecessary. We pride ourselves on being level-headed with our administration of this community. Don’t force our hands because you want to stoop to the level of trolls from other teams.
It’s my one and only rule people: DON’T FEED THE TROLLS.
I’ve got no problem with being emotional, I’ve got huge issues with personal attacks. Everybody dial it down a notch.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
by Mike @ MHH on Apr 23, 2010 12:09 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Well said Dan
The lack of a physical response, in a game obviously lost, was disturbing to say the least. And the only time I noticed Stewie last night was when he was half-assedly turning the puck over. The Sharks douchery has gone unchecked for way too long. Even if we lose Saturday night, I hope we can at least send them to their next series having paid a physical price for being such fucking douchebags.
FU Rob Blake, and I mean that in the most gentlemanly way possible
by Bob in Boulder on Apr 23, 2010 9:54 AM MDT up reply actions
Thanks to that lack of response, I’m offically convinced Joe Sacco shouldn’t be a head coach in the NHL. He has no damn spine, he won’t retaliate for anything. We have already seen his TOTAL incompetence with his Wheel of D. If he doesn’t put Koci in for game 6 to at least send an early message to the Sharks that we’re not going to take their bullshit anymore, what little faith I have in Sacco as the coach will be gone.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
I'm not even close to being ready to go there
I still like Sacco. A ton. He has done an amazing job this season with an amazingly young team with many injuries along the way (fuck you Rob Blake). And a D that, lets face it, overachieved somehow early in the year.
FU Rob Blake, and I mean that in the most gentlemanly way possible
by Bob in Boulder on Apr 23, 2010 10:04 AM MDT up reply actions
Since the Olympic break, I have been questioning Sacco’s competence and sometimes sanity almost on a nightly basis…
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
And a D that, lets face it, was bailed out by Andy all year
.
Fixed…
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 10:07 AM MDT up reply actions
Don’t get me started on Anderson…Sacco rode him like he was a horse in the Preakness…there were SEVERAL times he should have taken a night off, and we end up losing huge because he was exhausted.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
It hasn’t hurt him. Anderson’s been great this series
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 10:09 AM MDT up reply actions
I was meaning in the season…Sacco’s unwillingness to play Budaj at least once in a while probably cost us 6 – 10 points.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
Not sure I agree
Maybe three to five after the Olympics, which would have resulted in more rest for Andy sure, but he was riding the horse that brought him to the dance, so to speak. I didn’t expect anything less.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
as much as i would have loved to see him send someone out there to kick some ass i don’t want to see us going the crawford route, and you all know what i mean by that
maybe an internet pipe froze and burst
mwuahaha
No one has to go that far, but it would have been nice if someone would have stepped up for Dutchy.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
I agree about wanting to see a more physical game
The way I saw it, the Avs were still going to get a bunch of penalties, so why not make them count? Throw some bodies, drop some gloves, send the message that there was no fear. Bigger does not mean they could be pushed around. It is not okay to go after our star player AGAIN. You can’t wack our goalie in the head and think it’s going unnoticed. And also send a message to the refs. We know what you’re doing and we don’t fucking care anymore. We can’t get on your watch list any more than we already are, so fuck you.
On another note, could someone tell me if the interference call on Quincey was legit or not. It looked to me (but i was at a bar and couldn’t tell for sure) that he (the sharks dude) could have easily gone around Quince and that Quince wasn’t even playing the guy but playing the puck…
This is our team: underrated, filled with amazingly talented kids and veteran leaders, both young and old, who are buying into the vision of a hard working, fast moving, never-say-die game. They are the 2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche.
I thought it was a bullshit call, but Quincey didn’t argue it. McNab seemed in disbelief by it.
by Dan Winkler on Apr 23, 2010 10:19 AM MDT up reply actions
In a night so full of bullshit that all the ads were from fertilizer companies,
that may well have been the most egregiously made the fuck up call of all.
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Would you like some Shark's fin soup with that????
from my seat
…in Vancouver, it looked like Quincey was used as a nice, springy diving board, though they did clip off the beginning of the replay.
Think of it like basketball-if you aren’t moving and get run into, it’s not so much your fault. Not the most direct likeness, but that’s the feeling I got from it live & in the replay.
09
Couldn’t agree more Beachie.
And yeah, my fiance was screaming at the TV that Quincey got a penalty for some Shark trying to jump over him or something.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 24, 2010 12:44 AM MDT up reply actions
I'm right there with you Dan.
One guy that I might, kind of, sort of give a pass to is Galiardicus.
That being said, I can’t express my frustration at seeing him continually move the puck through the neutral zone, gain the offensive zone and then be rubbed out on the boads by the 3 or 4 Sharks in the defensive zone with neither Stastny or Stewart even in the picture, maybe not even in the building. WTF?
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Would you like some Shark's fin soup with that????
It’s pretty obvious that SoS’s line has been tasked with shutting down Jumbo Joe above all else. That will only negatively effect their offensive production. It’s just another version of Sacco’s tendency to take his foot of the gas with a lead. The only way we can hang with the Sharks is with the speed and the quick-strike offense. When we slowed down to try and contain the Sharks first and play our game second, it took away the one thing we had going for us.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
I want to see Footer
Angry and beating the shit out of people like when Ballard hurt Andy in the Florida game. Footer was on him in a second and furious. Thats what we need more of in this series from the Avs, and who better for it to start with than the guy wearing the C
by Skijumper on Apr 23, 2010 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions 2 recs
Rec'd,
I agree, with just about everything, I was just too pissed to type anything more than “I want blood”
"Sometimes you think they must have come out of the chimp cages at the Bronx zoo" - Gerry Cheevers, former Boston Bruins goalie, on New York hockey fans
Detroit Sucks
Rec’d
I agree with absolutely everything.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 24, 2010 12:45 AM MDT up reply actions
Game 6 start times
Starting times have been assigned to two of the
remaining games in the 2010 NHL Stanley Cup Playoff Conference Quarter-Finals. The
starting times of games previously listed as "to be determined" are as follows:
Game #6 Series E (Sat., Apr. 24 – San Jose at Colorado) — 8:00p local/10:00p eastern.
Game #6 Series G (Sun., Apr. 25 – Vancouver at Los Angeles) — 6:00p local/9:00p eastern.
Assistant *to* the Managing Editor, Mile High Hockey
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Apr 23, 2010 10:09 AM MDT reply actions
positivity!!
yeah im pretty much in denial about what happened. im gonna keep it that way. great recap as always!!
i fully believe we can bounce back and win the next one as long as our boys step it up and actually try.
we did so well against the sharks with the trap, maybe we could implement that again?
maybe an internet pipe froze and burst
mwuahaha
We have been. They’ve adjusted too. They’re dumping cross-ice and sending two guys deep and one guy high. They know we can’t break the puck out to save our lives so they have no problem aggressively forechecking. Consequently, we’re holding back the breakouts to support on D and the Sharks easily get the puck by overpowering our blueline corps and setting up their offense.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
and we haven’t figured out how to negate this… why?
sigh.. well, i still think/hope we can come back and win the next game!
maybe an internet pipe froze and burst
mwuahaha
The sharks have taken this team lightly before, I wonder if they are going to in game 6. I Think the avs will win the next game 2-1. I’m looking forward to game 7.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 10:34 AM MDT reply actions
I don't think so this time
Avs are going to get longshanked!
if the avs get back their second line, I’ll take my chances. Just like in previous series against osgood, I keep telling myself, if they can get a couple more shots on goal, this guy isn’t that good—adding tallent to the line up will get the avs closer to that.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 10:46 AM MDT up reply actions
I see your longshank...

AND RAISE YOU A HIGHLANDER!!!

2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Would you like some Shark's fin soup with that????
by Hopfenkopf on Apr 23, 2010 1:45 PM MDT up reply actions 3 recs
More in the tank
With elimination on the line, you would expect Hejduk to be back and Jones to be doing everything shy of bribing Sacco to get in the lineup.
We can’t afford to have Tucker on the second line again. I don’t care how “good” people thought he played, he’s not a threat to score and he’s not good at creating scoring chances.
I applaud the effort of guys like Hendricks and Durno and Tucker, but we need to get some talent back on the ice before we spend all of game 6 in our zone as well.
Luck: Funny how only winning teams seem to have it.
Did you ever see ‘team america?’ I don’t think that would be going too far.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 10:37 AM MDT up reply actions
We can’t afford to have Tucker on the second line again. I don’t care how "good" people thought he played, he’s not a threat to score and he’s not good at creating scoring chances.
This is not at all fair.
Tucker was easily one of SJS top 5 players last night!
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Would you like some Shark's fin soup with that????
from FtF
After the score became a bit lopsided, Cody McLeod started to get a little chippy. After he somehow avoided an obvious cross-checking call onDouglas Murray, the charging penalty he committed on Jamie McGinn was blatant and dangerous. McLeod received a major penalty, and in my opinion, should have gotten a game misconduct. If the referees saw the cross check, I think that would have been the case. People have claimed that the officiating has been uneven. We’ll all have our biases, and I have probably overlooked a few calls that could have gone in the Av’s favor. That’ s fine, and everyone is entitled to their opionion. But McLeod was out to injure, and I’m not cool with that.
and they’re complaining about us whining about officiating and attempts to injure. A penalized hit (one that wasn’t even that bad compared to many from the Sharks) and they’re up in arms? unreal. the bias and lack of perspective is shocking.
Oh and McGinn just unloading on the first person he sees is cool with them…
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
As shocking as some of the stuff we’ve been spouting all series? I think not. Change the name in that quote from McLeod to say Boyle and cross-check to slew-footing and you have almost a carbon copy of the verbage over here.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
I Agree Mike, but
…seriously fuck Boyle
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 12:17 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I agree with your agreement. I wish Boyle would get seriously fucked too. Hopefully by one of Tiger’s skanks with chlamydiae.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
Personally
I would like a guy like Boyle or Clowe on the AVs but being as they are not I HATE THEM!!!!!
NHL Experts, NHL Experts, We don't need no stinking NHL Experts we know we're good!!! GO AVs GO
Let the Playoff Beard growth commence!!
Looking at a few of these FA’s…one or two of these guys could make a good difference next year.
"It comes from motivation within" - Matt Hendricks
Mile High Mayhem just another ho-hum Avs blog.
BURGUNDY ARMY...BLEEDING BURGUNDY UNTIL I DIE!!!
Mission 16W (2010 version): 2 down, 14 to go!
COLORADO AVALANCHE HOCKEY: KEEP DOUBTING US, WE LIKE TO PROVE YOU WRONG!!!!!
Last year's finals
Are a good example of a team getting destroyed on the road in game 5, but able to come back to win games 6 and 7.
Malkin’s playing for us on Saturday, right?
Luck: Funny how only winning teams seem to have it.
I think game 5 was simply the culmination of the Sharks finally getting some confidence and momentum, and belief in themselves. The biggest successes the Avs have had in the series were preying upon SJ’s mental weakness about fear of choking, Anderson’s phenomenal play, and Galiardicus.
After the game 4 OT winner, the Sharks started to believe in themselves. Their second line carried the offense and has taken the pressure off the top line – which is starting to allow them to play their game finally. Their mental weakness is gone.
The Avs have to put that fear of collapse back into the Sharks players, or they’re chances are not very sexy.
The officiating has been well covered in these comments, but I HATE that the refs started making calls in the third to “even it up a bit”. I’m sorry, but a 30 second PP, or that ridiculous 5 second PP we had, those aren’t powerplays. It’s just a slap in the face, insult to injury – literally. And I agree that the Avs should have stood up for themselves once the game was out of reach, because now it’s too late. You do it in game 6 and you’re back in the box and the Sharks are scoring PP goals. The Sharks have won every game they have scored a PP goal in. They have lost every game they have not scored on the PP.
But, all in all, the Avs have faired better in this series than I expected, and I’m stoked for next year.
by Paul's Coffey on Apr 23, 2010 11:53 AM MDT reply actions 1 recs
So you’re saying it’s the PK’s fault.
Just kidding.
If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!
Obviously the culprit is Matt Sokolowski, the Avs trainer, who unwisely replaced the gatorade in the Avs water bottles with Arby’s sauce, thus explaining both the Avs’ lethargic play, and the “great sauce blight of 2010” that you experienced yourself.
by Paul's Coffey on Apr 23, 2010 12:37 PM MDT up reply actions
Here's what's wrong, in a nutshell, courtesy ESPN
2. Speaking of the Philadelphia Flyers, anyone looking for an illustration of how the seventh seed handled the Devils with such ease need look no further than the swollen, bloody face of forward Ian Laperriere. The gritty forward blocked a Paul Martin slap shot with his face with the Flyers leading 3-0. Reports out of New Jersey indicate he needed between 60-70 stitches, yet he told reporters after the game he expects to be ready for whomever the Flyers play in the second round. Already missing top forwards Simon Gagne and Jeff Carter, both of whom are out with foot injuries after they blocked shots, the Flyers didn’t miss a beat. And with players like Laperriere putting it all on the line, Philly cannot be taken lightly regardless of who it plays.
Fuck you, Francois Giguere.
Luck: Funny how only winning teams seem to have it.
here’s another article and video
I knew my “Lappy forever” tattoo was a good idea.
by Paul's Coffey on Apr 23, 2010 12:15 PM MDT up reply actions
I'm so happy,
that we’re getting our playoff leadership from Darcy “oh my, I’ve just fallen down, yet again” Tucker and not that guy!
2009-2010 Colorado Avalanche - Would you like some Shark's fin soup with that????
by Hopfenkopf on Apr 23, 2010 1:51 PM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
what we need
Andy should overhear some trash talk and go batshit in a hotel lobby & vow a shutout for the rest of the series. And then deliver to within 0.5 GPG
09
Well
Unfortunatly Andy doesn’t have two Stanley Cup rings to plug his ears with YET!!!!
NHL Experts, NHL Experts, We don't need no stinking NHL Experts we know we're good!!! GO AVs GO
Let the Playoff Beard growth commence!!
nonono
that’s the defense for creepy makeup wearing* publicity whores
*JR probably does this, right?
09
“Everything after that is not really worth talking about.”
fear the fin had something to say….
“People have claimed that the officiating has been uneven. We’ll all have our biases, and I have probably overlooked a few calls that could have gone in the Av’s favor. That’ s fine, and everyone is entitled to their opionion. But McLeod was out to injure, and I’m not cool with that. "
But McLeod was out to injure, and I’m not cool with that.
He/she/it mustn’t be cool with Slewfooting Dan Boyle, then. Wonder how whoever wrote that reconciles his love of Boyle with his dislike of people who try to injure other players, considering that slewfooting is probably the most dangerous play in hockey.
by Dan Winkler on Apr 23, 2010 12:52 PM MDT up reply actions
I didn’t see McLeod’s hit (yesterday was a really terrible day for me and so I couldn’t do more than the first and half of the second period) but I cannot believe they would have the balls to say that they aren’t cool with people being out to injure. These same people that cheer for Boyle and Blake, and many other guys who have been taking deliberate runs at Avs players during this series. The hypocrisy boggles my mind.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 23, 2010 2:53 PM MDT up reply actions
like adam foote’s toe penalty this series or blakes kneeing penalty? i dont know about slewfooting??? havn’t seen that play from Boyle.
dosn’t change the fact that its bull shit and dangerous to take runs at the other team. If Mcleod started game one playing like that it would be one thing but its bull shit try to try to spark your team by taking runs at team.
Taking runs at people huh
Do we really need to go there?? How about Punching a guy who doesn’t want to fight you?? Then when someone your size steps in you don’t want any??
NHL Experts, NHL Experts, We don't need no stinking NHL Experts we know we're good!!! GO AVs GO
Let the Playoff Beard growth commence!!
im unsure what your talking about? ryan clowe seemed to call out the whole avs bench after a avs player took a run at murray / nabby. i forget did anyone fight clowe?
Hahaha you mean when that fatass Murray fell onto Nabby himself? Yeah, that was about a thousand times worse than the Sharks players taking out Anderson’s legs in the first.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 23, 2010 2:55 PM MDT up reply actions
so you didnt see the “hit” but you know he fell on nabby all by himself?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ijISwhvkyg
go watch… DUUUIIIRRRRRRRRRTTTYY. Avs bench rocks!
Yep.
That was a penalty. NO question. BTW-I hope you did notice McGinn’s stick up around McLeod’s neck (perhaps accidentally).
And do you seriously believe that McGinn was showing any class at all by dropping the gloves and going after Duchene?
I would also challenge you to consider that the dive into Anderson’s knee (not sure by whom/don’t have a clip) was uncalled, at least equally dirty, and had more potential to deliberately (?) injure.
Mcleod’s cheap hit was actually pretty run-of-the-mill scrum stuff. Plus, I am pretty certain the refs more than sufficiently penalized McLeod for his antics.
Wow, way to take two completely unrelated statements and try to lump them into something you feel you can make an insult out of.
Obviously you are too stupid to realize that the incident I wrote about above (Murrays fat ass falling onto Nabby) is not the same as whatever McLeod did in the third period.
It’s not our fault Murray could eat Wellwood for dinner and still be hungry. At least Nabby was given a whistle so he could relish in his pain instead of having to brush it off and get right back up like Anderson has to do. All. The. Fucking. Time.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 24, 2010 12:55 AM MDT up reply actions
I wanna know why....
The Sharks don’t have an ice crew that looks like this, do the Avs??
no. The Avs ice crew is all guys, save one blond girl who’s ok looking, but nothing like that
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 1:45 PM MDT up reply actions
Well we can’t have icegirls now! Andy would never be able to concentrate!
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 23, 2010 2:58 PM MDT up reply actions
Seriously
For all the frustration this series has caused me, It sure as fuck beats not watching the Avs in the playoffs.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Apr 23, 2010 1:55 PM MDT reply actions
this spring = 1000x better than last spring and our Ti4D campaign.
Steve Moore’s last act as a hockey player was beating Matt Cooke’s ass, which makes him a great great person.
by An Unmitigated Disaster on Apr 23, 2010 3:06 PM MDT up reply actions
Andy Concern.
A little concerned the Anderson’s less than superhuman play (a rarity) may have had some cause. After he got taken out at the knee and laid fllat on his back, his concentration seemed downright poor, he started bobbling those pucks, sitting deeper in his crease, and flailing more than he has all series.
Couple that with the awkward trips (bad ice?. . . . maybe.) and I’m a little worried that he may have sustained a slight injury that was at least in his head.
Perhaps too little data, but I wondered if others saw the correlation between that specific incident and a sudden emergence of unAndiness.
Anderson has to put up with a lot of shit. Getting his legs taken out combined with whoever decided to launch themselves into the net at full force (I couldn’t believe they were reviewing that as a possible goal, I seriously was about to call Toronto myself) must have hurt him at least a little.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 24, 2010 12:57 AM MDT up reply actions
I rec this and concur with Hannan that McGinn is an asshat.
FU Rob Blake, and I mean that in the most gentlemanly way possible
by Bob in Boulder on Apr 23, 2010 4:32 PM MDT up reply actions
Turn it green!
"Sometimes you think they must have come out of the chimp cages at the Bronx zoo" - Gerry Cheevers, former Boston Bruins goalie, on New York hockey fans
Detroit Sucks
No, I was trying to emphasize my Rec’iness to the above photo, but, hey, if it starts a new meme, I’m all for it. You can only expertly punch so many sandwiches.
"Sometimes you think they must have come out of the chimp cages at the Bronx zoo" - Gerry Cheevers, former Boston Bruins goalie, on New York hockey fans
Detroit Sucks
I don’t know why but I’m not sure I’ve ever noticed your sig. I love it very, very much.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 24, 2010 12:59 AM MDT up reply actions
Thanks. Me too ;)
"Sometimes you think they must have come out of the chimp cages at the Bronx zoo" - Gerry Cheevers, former Boston Bruins goalie, on New York hockey fans
Detroit Sucks
I never thought I’d meet someone more obnoxious than a Red Wings fan IRL until a Rangers fan tried to get in a fight with me.
by xskatebakerrx on Apr 24, 2010 1:08 AM MDT up reply actions

by 




























