Erik Johnson Packs His Bags: A statistical breakdown of the trade
Normally I only cover Oilers stuff, but this Erik Johnson/McClement vs. Stewart/Shattenkirk trade is not only a blockbuster, but one that seems to be fairly unbalanced after I dive into the numbers below.
over 1 year ago
mindmasher
8 comments
0 recs |
Comments
That’s all interesting and stuff, but numbers are never the whole story.
Jonas Holøs- Putting the Ø in defense since 2010!
I agree 100%. EJ has all the tools to be elite, he simply hasn’t been playing elite. Will that continue? No one knows, but both general managers have put a wager: one on EJ never reaching his ceiling, the other on at least an improvement from this years play.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
First, there is no “old adage” about the team getting the best player wins the deal. I’ve heard that twice in regards to this trade, but I’d never heard it before that.
The problem with this analysis, just like sabermetrics in baseball, is that they look at the players in a vacuum. Statistical analyses are great, but not for everything. They completely ignore team needs. The Avs have more offensive dmen than you could for in a trash barrel, including more in the pipeline. At least one of them was expendable, and the team has needed a guy of Johnson’s ilk for a long time. If he’s a standard on the blueline for several years, then it was a good trade, even if he isn’t a full blown superstar.
Anyway, this trade was more Stewart for Johnson, a 2nd for McClement, and a 1st for Shattenkirk.
I'm just like everyone else, only way better.
by wtnelson on Feb 20, 2011 11:20 AM MST via mobile reply actions
I think the adage has been around since the Gretzky trade at least, and I know I’ve heard it repeated dozens of times by sports analysts on hockey shows for years and years.
In terms of your comments, I think it is a bet being made by both sides.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
Interesting analysis
Though I don’t totally agree with your conclusion. Basically you stated
Overall: Stewart > McClement (which is true, though it’s not that black and white)
Defense: Johnson > Shattenkirk
Offense: Shattenkirk > Johnson
With just those three categories, yeah, Blues win the deal. But the 1st the Avs acquire is > than the 2nd they gave away, so that kinda evens things out. Also take into account that Johnson has a much much higher ceiling than Shattenkirk.
Another point is that the Avs acquired size, which they needed, a potential #1 d-man, which they needed, and improved defensively both on the blueline and in the forward core, which they needed to do. Also, helped their re-build with an additional 1st.
All that said, just looking at the numbers I think this is a pretty good analysis. I’ve never paid much attention to the different stat models, but you explain it well.
Thanks, I only offer my unbiased opinion, so I’m glad you got some value out of it.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
thanks for the stats
but we have to remember that Shatty played with a high powered offense for awhile there so the scoring will be up right there. One would think if EJ was in that situation he too would see an increase. Luckily STL has some nice talent upfront and could be a high powered offense next year while Colorado continues to shift pieces and develop so Shatty will be in a better situation to produce again.
As for Stewart… I can’t say it was Stewie and a 2nd for McC and a 1st but even if it was that potential mid round pick (11-15?) would be higher than where Stewart was picked so talent can be had. Unfortunately Stewart is a rare breed and hard to find but his offense could be replaced. Then that leaves McC for a 2nd. This is all with rose colored glasses on
2010-11 Colorado Avalanche: The Asskickers of the Amazing























