Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Sherman's Got Trading Problems

It obvious that the Avs have been extremely active in the trade market in the last year or so - from the Avs finally giving up on TJ Hensick, to the Avs recent trade of John-Michael Liles to Toronto for a bag of magic beans. I figured it would be interesting to compare this past year of trades to other years since the lockout.

The Avs have made 31 trades in total since the lockout ended. This is the history of how many trades occurred in number each year:

  • 2005-06: 3 trades
  • 2006-07: 4 trades
  • 2007-08: 4 trades
  • 2008-09: 4 trades
  • 2009-10: 4 trades
  • 2010-11: 11 trades
  • 2011-12: Currently 1 trade

The first thing that is interesting is how consistent the Avs were in making trades throughout the Lacroix, Giguere and early in the Sherman-era.

The fact that Sherman made 11 trades is cause for concern in some ways - as it is far above average. Although this is not a record for a season (the 17 trades by the Oren Koules and the Tampa Bay Lightning in 2008-9 is probably a record), it raises an issue of whether Sherman is being too impatient with prospects (Cohen, Shattenkirk and Bournival spring to mind) or getting a poor return for the assets he has (such as the Liles and the Hunwick trades).

In light of this, I am curious as to if the MHH community thinks that Sherman's pro-activity in the trade market was a good move - especially in light of the impeding free-agency period.

Poll
Do you think that Sherman has made too many trades in the last year?
Yes
34 votes
No
37 votes
Give it 5 years
31 votes

102 votes | Poll has closed

MileHighHockey.com is a fan community, allowing members to post their own thoughts and opinions on the Colorado Avalanche and hockey in general. These views and thoughts may not be shared by the editors of MileHighHockey.com.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Or Maybe

He finally wants to close the book on the Giguere years.

What's the difference between a duck?

by hedge_duck on Jun 30, 2011 6:08 PM MDT reply actions  

Yeah,

I think he is just making this more into his team. Plus, more people get to go bye bye when the team sucks.

"In my experience, there's no such thing as luck" -Obi Wan Kenobi

I don't understand the purpose of the line, "I don't need to drink
to have fun." Great, no one does. But why start a fire with flint and
sticks when they've invented the lighter?

by TheRed on Jun 30, 2011 6:34 PM MDT reply actions  

It does make some sense to me that trades would be up during a rebuild phase. I mean, if you’re a solid team, you wouldn’t likely want to shake up the team too much.

by mcarson01 on Jun 30, 2011 7:41 PM MDT reply actions  

I wouldn’t call our team solid, in particular last season. Most of his trades are for people he thinks can jump out and I really don’t think the majority were that bad. Are we all of a sudden forgetting the Peter Mueller and Tomas Fleischmann trades. While they didn’t quite pan out, both of them were looking absolutely spectacular until their injuries, which you really in reality could not have 100% predicted. Of course these trades are marred by some just ok trades (Johnson + McClem for Stewart + Shatty and some picks) and some downright bad ones (see above with Liles and Bumwick) but in the end he really is as good as he is bad. Basically he’s average.

Holøs. Helping keep scores 1-Ø since 2010. ©

by AvsSqueek on Jun 30, 2011 8:25 PM MDT reply actions  

Who called them solid?

by mcarson01 on Jun 30, 2011 10:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

Let’s break down the Stewart trade…

In return we got

Johnson + McClement + Siemens

they got

Shattenkirk + Stewie + Ty Rattie

Pretty fair trade and Sherman did what he needed to do to make this team better. Addressed a big issue and had the balls to pull the trigger on a trade of this caliber. I applaud him for it, both teams came out winners in my book.

How would you like a job where, every time you make a mistake, a big red light goes on and 18,000 people boo? ~Jacques Plante

by Randy Time on Jul 1, 2011 12:21 AM MDT up reply actions  

Johnson + McClem for Stewart + Shatty and some picks

That should be Johnson + McClem + 1st round pick for Stewart + Shatty + 2nd round pick.

Americanario makes Journey reference. Tempestuous Binary listens to Don't Stop Believing. Milan Hejduk scores goal. You know what must be done. DSB Record: 1-3-0

"God I'm excited for those two to fail miserably." - SBNation writer Andrew Sharp on Josh McDaniels and Tim Tebow.

The Number Zero, aiming squarely for the groin.

by Tempestuous Binary on Jul 1, 2011 4:25 AM MDT up reply actions  

How many of the trades were out of necessity from injuries?

RoB, Flash, EJ, Andy (sort of). The Belle trade was really for depth as were a few others. I see this year as a bit of an aberration but I think the absurd rash of injuries and possible team chemistry caused a few more.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Jun 30, 2011 8:38 PM MDT reply actions  

Another way to look at it:

What we lost:

  • #32, #47, #63, #77 and 2012 fourth round pick (#71 and #109 were washes because they were traded after we got them)
  • Two decent #3-4 defenseman on a good team that weren’t in the Av’s long term plans (Hannan and Liles), promising but small defenseman with 2 more like him still in the system (Shattenkirk), and a young defenseman with possible character issues (Cohen), and another young prospect that hasn’t cracked an NHL roster even though he’s 23 (Montgomery).
  • A .883 PPG winger with both a mean streak and the ability to turn invisible (Stewart), a center prospect out of an already log-jammed middle (Bounival), and a guy who DIDN’T score 50 points this season (Hensick)
  • A goalie that possibly had character/work ethic issues (Anderson)

What we gained:

  • #11 (Siemens – probably future core player), #49 (Pickard – possible goalie of the future), and #95 (Silas – solid defensive prospect), 2012 second round pick
  • Our cornerstone #1 blueliner (EJ), a guy that added a ton of size to our blue line and will be a #3-6 defenseman in the long run (O’Byrne), a PMD that looked somewhat maybe okay at the end of the season (Hunwick), and a veteran defenseman for LEM and injury fill in for the Avs later in the season (Belle).
  • A .995 PPG winger that may or may not be re-signed because of an unforeseeable lung concussion (Fleischmann), really solid bottom 6er who can hit and score (Winnik), a defensive and experienced bottom 6 defensive center (McClement), and the second-leading scorer on the Monster’s team (Talbot, 45pts in 77 games)
  • A warm body to stick in net and help us get #2 (Elliott, Landeskog)

Even though some of the trades might have been a bit fishy, overall, I think we did just fine this year. Sherman did the best he could when his team was falling apart (somewhat literally), and overall, he probably brought us 3 core players (EJ, Seimens, Pickard), added size to our future blueline (EJ, Siemens, O’Byrne, Silas), and got us a few other pretty decent players that helped fill in while our team was super concussed (Flash, EJ, O’Byrne, Winnik, McClement, Hunwick, Belle). It might have been extreme, but overall, not too shabby IMO. We’ll see what player we snag with the 2012 second. Maybe the trade for Liles won’t be so bad after all.

Just a Colorado girl in Montana who <3s the Avs.

by andidee15 on Jun 30, 2011 8:46 PM MDT reply actions  

not to mention...

we are all assuming this will be a late round pick, but it could be a mid round pick, maybe even an early round, or we can use it in a trade. This draft is also much deeper, only time will tell.

by ProfessorOak on Jun 30, 2011 8:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

It won’t be early unless the Leafs catch the concussion flu from JML.

Landeskog + Siemens :D

by SteveHouse on Jun 30, 2011 10:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

uhhhh its bostons pick

LANDESKOG!!!!!
How Swede it is

by Cole D Hamilton on Jul 1, 2011 12:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

I thought most of the trades were pretty good last year. getting a big tough player for a prospect that might not ever make the team is a pretty good trade. Stewart for Johnson was a good trade. We had no one that was a close number 1 or 2 guy, but we had a few top 6 guys. We had the Shats and JMAC trade that was also involved, and it is too early to say one way or another (although I really think STL are coming out of that like bandits). Hanna for Flash was a great trade for us but unlucky. Cohen for Hunwick we got an NHL’er and they got a mouthy kid who might be more problematic then value. Hunwick can also bring in some trade value, for some unknown reason.

by avalanchejef on Jun 30, 2011 9:27 PM MDT reply actions  

Ignoring the draft trades, you see

-Mules and Porter for WW. Would have been a clear win had Mules worn his anti-concussion bucket.
-Bournival for O’Byrne. Traded from strength to address a need. Good.
-Cohen for Hunwick. Unnecessary deal that brought in an unnecessary player who never fit in. Luckily all we lost was some asshole with a mythical “shot” and needing so bad to hit people he leaves the whole ice wide open.
-Hannan for Flesichmann. Both sides would have won this one if the concussions had just gone to bother Carolina or something.
-EJ, JMac, (Siemens) for CGDS/GDCS, Shatty, whoever Stl took in the second round. This was a size upgrade on the blueline, and while I’ll root for Shatty in the future he was ultimately replaceable. (Why we traded FOR and then re-signed a shittier version of him remains a mystery.) Veteran presence added and former #1 pick d-man. I miss CGDS, I do NOT miss GDCS.
-Liles for half a leftover sandwich. Gross deal dude. Gross gross gross. Lose a veteran D-man, but hey, the Leafs replaced Kaberle, so there’s that. If that 2nd rounder next year turns out to be a stud so be it, but I still think Styphen Barriot would have benefited from Liles’ presence.
-Anderson for Elliott. Dude, is that really the best you could do?

Unless I’m missing something, this is basically a wash IMO. Runs the gamot from “win” to “errbody win” to “wtf, hosed.”

Landeskog + Siemens :D

by SteveHouse on Jun 30, 2011 10:13 PM MDT reply actions  

Porter for WW is a clear win regardless of Mueller

LANDESKOG!!!!!
How Swede it is

by Cole D Hamilton on Jul 1, 2011 12:50 AM MDT up reply actions  

All in all, I am fine with the trades that Sherm has done. Sure, a couple of them are mysterious, but I give the brass the benefit of the doubt. Once the decision was made, they got what they could for JML.

Oh well. Lets see how this starts to shape up next year.

Thanks, Joe... Thanks, Peter.... Thanks, Adam....

by mfured20 on Jun 30, 2011 11:53 PM MDT reply actions  

Exactly. He’s yet to lead us down the wrong path.

How would you like a job where, every time you make a mistake, a big red light goes on and 18,000 people boo? ~Jacques Plante

by Randy Time on Jul 1, 2011 12:16 AM MDT up reply actions  

I agree, I think that Sherm has overall done a good job, but I certainly didn’t think it when some of these deals were announced (Andy > Elliot, Stewart<EJ, etc).

Given time, these deals have fallen into perspective and I have to think that they worked out in the end. Only injuries to Mueller & Flash stopped us saying “that trade was a flat-out win.”

Although, Porter and WW alone was a worthy win for us, as time has proved.

Adam Foote - Warrior

by Nemesis44UK on Jul 1, 2011 4:38 AM MDT up reply actions  

I dont mind the Anderson Trade. I have my doubts we could get anything better for Anderson. He proved the whole season with the Avs that he was a one-year wonder. He got sent home from a road trip for personal reasons. He acted like a true zero and had contention. When he goes to Ottawa he got his vigor back and turned things around. So, I say good ridence, we got a guy who carried his team to the playoffs and lost on a gamble. It sucks, but Anderson did nothing to better the situation.

by avalanchejef on Jul 1, 2011 7:07 AM MDT up reply actions  

Fucking prophetic.

"I’m predicting 50pts in the NHL for Hensick next season. Anyone want to put $20 on it?" - DetAvs, Jun 18, 2010 3:45 AM EDT

by Hardshell_Taco_del_Lowayne on Jul 1, 2011 1:10 PM MDT reply actions  

zing

Sports don't build character, they reveal it

by Cotts on Jul 1, 2011 1:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sherman is like the kid in the playground always getting his lunch money stolen, then volunteering information about the treats hidden in his backpack when the bullies weren’t even planning to ask him what was inside.

by NomadJackson on Jul 1, 2011 6:20 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Oak_bigger_small
Favorite non-Avs players
Oak_bigger_small
Bracket Challenge, half way there...
Russia4_small
Landeskog on Varly at Worlds
Steamavatar_small
Relish in the decline of the RedWheel
Steamavatar_small
Lets play fill the hole
Russia4_small
WC: Russia vs Norway
Small
MORE of My Investigative Report
Russia4_small
Varly answers fan questions at Worlds
2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
Why the CBA argument is a red herring
Oak_bigger_small
MHH Bracket Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

View My Stats

Managing Editor

Milehigh-xl_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Assistant Editors

Icon_small Joe Dunman

Mike_logo_2_small Mike @ MHH

148488_10150337054485417_836355416_16934526_6679165_n_small Sandie Gauthier

Gravatar_small Cheryl Bradley

Staff Writers

Me2_small Angélique C. Murray

Godzilla_mario_small A.J. Haefele

Me_small Derek B

Me_and_fopps_small Cole D Hamilton

I3_r_3___t_small Brett Shumway

Wilson_small Randy Time

Zaphod_small SteveHouse

Avalanche_logo_small andidee15

Jtizz_small Sean Harsha