Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Colorado Avalanche Blogger Roundtable Day 8: Gabriel Landeskog

 

Roundtablelogofullb_medium

Three players have scored 50 points as a rookie in an Avalanche uniform: Paul Stastny (78), Matt Duchene (55) and Alex Tanguay (51). Will Gabriel Landeskog become the fourth? What sort of season do you expect from him?

First of all, I somehow borked the question as two other rookies scored 50 points with the Avs (can you guess?). But the meat of the question remains and I was pleasantly surprised that there weren't a lot of outrageous claims in the responses. I think everyone had a very level-headed response with reasonable expectations. In other words, not very blogger-like.

Stephen Crociata, Mile High Sticking and SBNation New York: Gabriel Landeskog will have experts say "I knew he was good, but this good?" I expect Landeskog to be the 4th Avs rookie to score over 50 pts.

Derek Bell, Mile High Hockey: 35 goals, 32 assists for 67 points

David from Slovakia, Eurolanche: I am really surprised by predictions and expectations from the scouts about Landeskog rookie season. He has to be smart player - everybody talks about that. But personally, I really do not know what I should think about it and what should I expect. First of all, he is European and you remember that Colorado has only a few successful European players in the 21st century. In spite of that I expect traditional 50 points from him.

Jaye Horbay, Mile High Sticking: I expect nothing less than 100 points and 2 Calder trophies. That's right, TWO. Okay, seriously though, I don't think at 18 he can be the ‘power forward' that we all project him to be, especially coming straight from the OHL. I think if you throw him with the right line mates, he's got the tools and skill for at least a good 45-60 points, depending if he gets PP time.

Star-divide

Angélique Murray, Colorado Avalanche Prospects, Mile High Hockey & Chicks Who Give A Puck: Gabriel Landeskog is described as the most NHL ready player from the 2011 NHL draft class. I believe the Avs will give him plenty of opportunities to succeed. He should be a consistent fixture on the top two lines and will receive a fair amount of time on the power play. Barring injury, misuse, or time for adjustment to the professional level, a 50 point freshman campaign is not out of the question.

Nic Zamora, Avaholics Anonymous: I expect 50 points out of Landeskog. They've been hyping him up as the most NHL ready prospect in this year's draft class so I believe that his game should be able to translate to the NHL. I don't think the 30 goal mark will be there like with Jeff Skinner in Carolina last season but I could see maybe a 25/25 type of year for him.

Mike Verminski, Put It On Ice: Absolutely. Landeskog will have more points than Duchene and Tanguay, but not as many as Stastny did. He will have a great year similar to the year Duchene had his rookie season. I think Landeskog will have a better year because he has better players to play with.

Brett Shumway, Mile High Hockey: Given top six minutes, Landeskog better score 50 points or I'll be forced to burn all my shirtless drawings of him. I'll do it!! I SWEAR!!!!!

A lot of people pegged him more in the still-respectable 40-point range.

Mike @ MHH, Mile High Hockey: No, 40 points and a couple of healthy scratches (this is Sacco we're talking about).

Austin Snow, Avs Chill Zone: No, he won't. He'll get dang close, though. I think he'll start with a bang and then taper off a bit, before coming on again down the stretch. I think the middle of the season will be spent trying to find who he has the best chemistry with.

Mike Chambers, Denver Post: Not sure. He's probably more ready than Duchene and O'Reilly were two years ago at age 18, so Landeskog has a good chance to be real good right away.

Sandie Gauthier, Mile High Hockey: No I don't think he will.  I like Landeskog. I've seen him play a few games, and I found him to be quite visible during those games.  What I saw I liked, he is a guy who isn't afraid to throw his body around, or if he is afraid he doesn't let that stop him. He also has fantastic vision. He'll do well, but I don't think he'll get the 50 point mark this year.

David Driscoll-Carignan, Mile High Hockey: If you look at the 2nd forward taken in the last few drafts (top 5 picks only), you have Taylor Seguin (22 pts), Duchene (55), JVR (35), Jonathan Toews (54) and Bobby Ryan (10 points in 23 games). Evgeni Malkin had 85, but I don't think anyone is comparing Landy to Malkin. I think 50 might be stretching it; I say 46 which could put him in Calder contention.

Several people pointed out that his production will greatly depend on who he plays with

Ryan Boulding, The Avalanche Guild: If Gabriel Landeskog stays healthy, on a productive line, and can primarily focus on what he does best, then I can see him joining the ranks of the outstanding players listed above. It is important to note that, despite being considered NHL-ready by many scouts, Landeskog has really only played two full seasons of professional hockey. Stastny had two years in the USHL and two years in the WCHA, which was easily the most dominant conference in NCAA division I hockey at the time. Duchene had one year in the OMHA and two years playing in the OHL under his belt and was considered an NHL risk when he started. Tanguay had three years in the QMJHL before making the leap into the NHL and he only had 51 points his rookie season.

The point is that it seems like players who have a longer chance to develop - Stastny - will be able to adapt more rapidly to the highest, most competitive level of their sport. While this isn't a given rule, it is worth considering. Landeskog will certainly be successful and I think he will break 50 if he remains in perfect health and develops a rapport with consistent linemates.

Cheryl Bradley, Mile High Hockey & Avalanche Breakaway: Man, this is a hard one. So much of this depends on what line Landeskog ends up and who his linemates are. Assuming that a first- or second-line left winger is not added to the roster and the rookie plays on a line with Paul Stastny and David Jones, I think he will come close to the 50 point mark though he won't actually reach it. I'm thinking 46 points perhaps. His presence on that line will be critical to the performances of Stastny and Jones. He's going to draw attention and wreak havoc in front of the net and in the corners. That style of play will certainly create opportunities for him; however, his true value will be in the space and time he creates for his linemates.

Aaron Musick, HockeyBuzz: The problem with predicting production from rookie wingers is it relies a lot upon their center. Landeskog could be put on a line with Duchene or Stastny and get 55 points and then again he could be put on a line with Ryan O'Reilly and scrape by with 30. There's also the unknown if Landeskog can handle the bigger and stronger players in the NHL. He was a man among boys in the CHL but now he might be a boy against men. He's not a scorer or playmaker, he's a power forward and if he cannot handle the defensemen in the league, points will be hard to come by.

Andi D, Mile High Hockey: I actually think Landeskog can hit the 50pt mark.  The kid can flat out score.  His goals may not be pretty, but he gets them in the net.  Next year, he'll probably be playing with Stastny or Duchene, both of whom are amazing playmakers and could really benefit from having someone like Landeskog parked in front of the goalie and banging in the rebounds.  There have been some questions raised about how Landeskog's game will translate to the NHL, but from what I've seen, even if the playing field has been leveled as far as size is concerned, he still has quick hands and a knack for finding the holes in a goalie's defense.  I expect to see him as a Top 6 LW, and I expect to hear "Rebound by Landeskog - GOALLLLLL!!!!!" from Mike Haynes around 25-30 times this year. 

Geoff Rosenthal, The Avs Factor: Playing with either Stastny or Duchene? Landeskog shouldn't have a problem hitting 50 points, especially if he's as NHL ready as all the scouts have said. For once, the Avalanche have someone who is BIG and hopefully won't get injured immediately after puck drop.

There were only a couple predicting lower than 40 points, not that there's anything wrong at all with a 35-point rookie season

Adrian Dater, Denver Post: I doubt it. I'm forecasting something like a 14-24-38 season for him.

That certainly would be pretty good for a rookie, but I don't see 50 points. That said, he's got every opportunity in the world to get a top-6 job with this team this year, so I wouldn't die of shock if he ended up making it to 50.

Matt Muzia, SBN Denver: I think 35-40 points this season is optimistic for Landeskog. I have never been high on the pick, and I have concerns about his transition to the size and pace of the NHL. He'll have the advantage of playing with a top center who can create opportunities for him, but there will be plenty of growing pains.

AJ Haefele, Mile High Hockey: No. I've said a few times I think his season will be closer to that of Tyler Seguin's last year. I've started to back off that a bit simply because Landy is likely to be playing more often and with more talented guys than Seguin was on Boston's bottom 6 last season. He'll likely also be given plenty of PP time to shine but anybody expecting a big season from him I think is going to be disappointed. If we get 40 points out of him, we should be thrilled. I think a 30-35 point season is a reasonable goal.

I'm not going to do the math here, but it seems like the average of all the responses is smack dab in the mid-to-upper 40s. I think most people would be perfectly happy with that. Tomorrow, we're going to find out who else is going to have a big year for the Avalanche.

Poll
How many points do you expect Landeskog to have this season?
Less than 30
5 votes
30-39
49 votes
40-49
89 votes
50-60
113 votes
60-70
17 votes
70+
14 votes

287 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 175 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I did not laugh at AJ’s response. Please ask a different question and re-post the article.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 7:09 AM MDT reply actions  

Seriously. What’s Halfawaffles beef with Landy?

If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!

by Mike @ MHH on Sep 12, 2011 8:58 AM MDT up reply actions  

No idea. Hefelumpsandwoozles’ response really doesn’t do much for me compared to the others.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 9:03 AM MDT up reply actions  

I'm not at all sold on his ability to play in the NHL yet?

I know everyone here likes to talk about Elliott and Landy and even Hishon making the team but can we please remember something basic here: The NHL is a lot fucking harder to succeed in than junior hockey. I like Landy. I think he’ll be a good NHL player someday. I HOPE he breaks out this year and shocks the hell out of me but realistically I could very easily see him starting the first two months of the season on the third line and having a rookie season most would see as underwhelming. I think his best chances are going to come in the lack of scoring punch up front on the second PP unit. I think Landy is less talented than everyone DDC mentioned but because of opportunity he’s going to score more than a guy like Seguin (he’s not Stoa, after all) but his rookie year is gonna be a heavy dose of reality to some of the dreamers.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 9:28 AM MDT up reply actions  

But hey

I’m just bitter we didn’t draft Adam Larsson so wtf do I know.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 9:29 AM MDT up reply actions  

^5

We are of a like mind.

Some days, I feel like I’ve accidentally entered the Church of Tulowitzki on Baseball Easter.
SB Nation Denver | On Twitter | Random Music Writings

by Muzia on Sep 12, 2011 9:33 AM MDT up reply actions  

FFIW, I agree. With the type of player he is, I wouldn’t expect him to have a ton of success points-wise early on, even if he spends a good amount of time on the 2nd line. That being said, I’d much rather Landy play a solid, but low-point first season than end up like Svatos or Wolski who both had pretty stellar rookie outings.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:35 AM MDT up reply actions  

I have a hard time disagreeing with Pracey on this one. He sees something in Landeskog and I have faith in that. No one thought O’Reilly could make the team but he did.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 9:35 AM MDT up reply actions  

Again.

I like Landy. I think he’ll be a productive player in the NHL for a long time. I made the comparison to Jamie Langenbrunner like 6 months ago. I’m sticking with that comparison. A guy everyone wants on their team and the kind of player every Cup champion needs. I’m happy to have him. Landy was the best fit for the the team’s current construction and there’s no arguing that. I can’t wait to see what he brings to the ice this year because I hopehopehopehope it’s greatness. I just don’t think it will be. I have no idea where the O’Reilly comparison comes from.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 9:41 AM MDT up reply actions  

It came from my head. It wasn’t meant as an apple for apple comparison. More that some players can adjust to the NHL game quickly and I hope landy does.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 9:43 AM MDT up reply actions  

Much like Radar, I don’t think Landy’s success should be judged solely on his point totals at the end of the year. The kid can have a really successful season and only end up with 35 pts, imho.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:46 AM MDT up reply actions  

I'd be happy with 35 :D

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 9:53 AM MDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:53 AM MDT up reply actions  

O’Reilly is a pretty special case, a young guy that makes the club and excels as a defensive forward and PK specialist. There’s pretty much no one else that we can compare him to, especially not Landy.

I hope that Landy makes an impact as a top 6 forward, at least as an upgrade over the scrubs that Stastny was forced to play with last season. Points aren’t as important to me from him this season. Just show me you belong in the league.

Some days, I feel like I’ve accidentally entered the Church of Tulowitzki on Baseball Easter.
SB Nation Denver | On Twitter | Random Music Writings

by Muzia on Sep 12, 2011 9:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

I’ll tell you what I said about Landeskog when we drafted him. He doesn’t scream otherwordly talent…but he has that “it” factor written on him. He looks like the type of player that doesn’t suddenly stop scoring because its the post season, in fact he excels in it. His two way play (and O’Reilly to an extent) are key to this teams future post season visits. (and if Stastny and Duchene’s lines are scoring…).

But checking wingers/centers are ones that realy make/break a team in the playoffs. (Goalies/defensemen too, but it’s usually one of these guys that comes to life in the playoffs)

Paul Stastny did, what Paul Stastny does. Score big goals.

by amit916 on Sep 12, 2011 2:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

O’Reilly making the team was a good decision no doubt. Landy making the team this year likely is too. But if the Avs were a clear playoff team this year Landy wouldn’t make the cut (nor would’ve Radar).

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:42 AM MDT up reply actions  

This. Landeskog, like O’Reilly, will see action because he’s stepping into an area of weakness for this team. One more top 6 forward on the team, and Kitchner might have held on to his rights this year.

"It's all about the $"
Lawn defender since... crap, I can't remember.

by Busted Twigg on Sep 12, 2011 10:03 AM MDT up reply actions  

If the Avs were a clear playoff team they would likely have drafted neither player.

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 11:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

Pretty much agree with all of this.

There are going to be times when he’ll be lost out there and Sacco will want to sit him, and I’m worried about the lack of forward depth. I wonder, though, if moving up O’Reilly to the top 6 is a more viable option after his offensive breakthrough late last season. Move McClement up to the 3rd line and just roll three. I’d rather see that than Porter or Winnik or Yip in the top 6.

This would be a great spot for The Artist Formerly Known as Galardicus (Galiardicus?), but I’ve got a few reservations about him…

by Dan Winkler on Sep 12, 2011 5:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

You do? Since when?!?

It's all about the O'

by SteveHouse on Sep 12, 2011 5:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

Let's keep it in perspective.

The O’Reilly ‘offensive breakthrough’ last season was 4 points in 12 games, which puts him on pace for…a 27 point season.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 6:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

I prefer to look at his 5 points in 6 games during that stretch.

by Dan Winkler on Sep 13, 2011 12:14 AM MDT up reply actions  

DDC, everyone needs a good bork now and again

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 7:18 AM MDT reply actions  

the combo of bonk and pork?

Check out my girlfriends business at www.AllyBStudio.com
As grandma always says, Fuck the Red Wings, indeed.

by David Danger on Sep 12, 2011 7:25 AM MDT up reply actions  

Spelling issue. It’s B-O-U-R-Q-U-E.

"It's all about the $"
Lawn defender since... crap, I can't remember.

by Busted Twigg on Sep 12, 2011 10:04 AM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t think I’m going out on a limb to say that Lando’s points will be a reflection of how the team does in general.

Good team showing this year, and he’ll net 50+ points, but if the team tanks hard, he might not make it. At 18, I doubt he’s the type of player who can rise above the play of the team all by his lonesome.

Check out my girlfriends business at www.AllyBStudio.com
As grandma always says, Fuck the Red Wings, indeed.

by David Danger on Sep 12, 2011 7:25 AM MDT reply actions  

As long as he is as “NHL ready” as advertised, and actually uses his size (unlike Wolski, Stoa) to his advantage. I see a high 40’s point total

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 7:37 AM MDT reply actions  

The games I’ve seen, he does use his body, he took and gave checks with ease. He also didn’t seem afraid to be a bit “rougher”. That doesn’t mean that he’ll do it at the NHL level though.

It's all about the A-

by Sandie Gauthier on Sep 12, 2011 8:06 AM MDT up reply actions  

Exactly.

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 8:08 AM MDT up reply actions  

I expect Landeskog to finish with somewhere between 28-60 points, and that’s about as narrow a range as I’m willing to give without tagging “blind guess” next to it.

Good points were raised all-around in the round-table (with the notable exception of DDC’s “borking”. Also your answer is: Wolski and Svatos). Overall team performance and line-mates will matter a ton. As Mike pointed out, this is Sacco we’re talking about. Landy could be on the 3rd line for half the season, easy.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 8:21 AM MDT reply actions  

If Landy’s on the 3rd line, this team is going places.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 8:30 AM MDT up reply actions  

hell in a handbasket?

I am the most humble blogger of all time

by David Driscoll-Carignan on Sep 12, 2011 9:07 AM MDT up reply actions  

the pugilist Pacific

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:11 AM MDT up reply actions  

Quebec.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 9:16 AM MDT up reply actions  

St. John’s? Wait…that’s the AHL

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 9:23 AM MDT up reply actions  

The Ramparts. Then Roy will be forced to accept the head coaching job for our team.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:25 AM MDT up reply actions  

GOALIE FIGHTS!!!!!!!!!!

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 9:26 AM MDT up reply actions  

And criminal investigations

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 9:45 AM MDT up reply actions  

winning

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:47 AM MDT up reply actions  

*Remparts.

It's all about the A-

by Sandie Gauthier on Sep 12, 2011 9:51 AM MDT up reply actions  

We speak english around here Miss.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:54 AM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah Sandie, take that french-canadian “i” out of your last name.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 9:56 AM MDT up reply actions  

Freakin commie.

How would you like a job where, every time you make a mistake, a big red light goes on and 18,000 people boo? ~Jacques Plante

by Randy Time on Sep 12, 2011 10:22 AM MDT up reply actions  

Hang on Randy. The Vici-French were fascists, not commies. The other side were.. um.. british subsidiaries. Much like Canada! Quebec, however, gains its roots from pre-revolution Imperial France. So, point in fact, she would be um.. fuck it.. “commie” works.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 10:30 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

sigh you are one of those that pronounce French names weirdly, aren’t you?

It's all about the A-

by Sandie Gauthier on Sep 12, 2011 10:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

Ha, no. I’m actually one of those that tries to pronounce things correctly in french, but ends up butchering them with my american accent instead.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 10:23 AM MDT up reply actions  

Chewy!

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 10:31 AM MDT up reply actions  

Talk about butchering a name. Whoever chose Helafawaffle as a last name shit the proverbial bed.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 10:33 AM MDT up reply actions  

It was you morons, not me.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 10:37 AM MDT up reply actions  

Actually it was me when I graded you. The same day you made your name all proper and blogger like so I changed the Final Grade.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 10:40 AM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I remember.

I just didn’t wanna go pointing fingers in specific directions.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 10:43 AM MDT up reply actions  

I accept your finger pointing. Wait a minute, that came out wrong.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 10:51 AM MDT up reply actions  

Now it's an MHH thread.

A little rudeness and disrespect can elevate a meaningless interaction to a battle of wills and add drama to an otherwise dull day.

Mile High Hockey : Where B- is different than C+

by A.J. Haefele on Sep 12, 2011 10:51 AM MDT up reply actions  

Shit.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 10:54 AM MDT up reply actions  

I’m trying to read two MHH-type threads at once. Bouncing from this one to the Motown one…my eyes are crossing

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 11:45 AM MDT up reply actions  

Your eyes should be crossed just from entering the Motown one…..

Datsyuk may have done it first, but he learned it from Peter Forsberg.

Thanks for everything Foppa!
Footer: We'll miss seeing you clear the riff raff off your lawn.

by Americanario on Sep 12, 2011 5:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

“Sandy Goth Ear”

It's all about the O'

by SteveHouse on Sep 12, 2011 11:27 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

No no,

Sawn Dee Goth Err

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 11:29 AM MDT up reply actions  

I always pronounced it “gaw their”

How would you like a job where, every time you make a mistake, a big red light goes on and 18,000 people boo? ~Jacques Plante

by Randy Time on Sep 12, 2011 11:29 AM MDT up reply actions  

Go where?

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 11:29 AM MDT up reply actions  

Sandy “Go there” apparently comes from a long line of sexual innuendo expertise

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 11:31 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Usually I would stand up for our dear Sandie’s honor here, but you more or less have a get-out-of-jail-free card in the “calling someone else a whore” department i suppose.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 12:49 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sandie has no honor.

She does, however, have honour by the shitton.

2011-2012 Lokomotiv Yaroslavl: Vyechnaya Pamyat!
2011-2012 Colorado Avalanche: The possibility exists that this may not suck.

by Hopfenkopf on Sep 12, 2011 1:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

What the fuck is honour?

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 3:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

It’s French/Canadian for honor

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 3:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

Ha, I know. Thank you though.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 3:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

Queen’s English. Daniel Webster thought all the extra "u"s were stupid. He yanked them from “favourite,” “colour” and several other words too.

"It's all about the $"
Lawn defender since... crap, I can't remember.

by Busted Twigg on Sep 12, 2011 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

No more sarcasm for me today.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 3:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sarcasm, eh. Didn’t even register. Need to get the meter checked again.

"It's all about the $"
Lawn defender since... crap, I can't remember.

by Busted Twigg on Sep 12, 2011 7:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Those French. They have a different word for everything.

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 4:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

tout

2011-2012 Lokomotiv Yaroslavl: Vyechnaya Pamyat!
2011-2012 Colorado Avalanche: The possibility exists that this may not suck.

by Hopfenkopf on Sep 12, 2011 4:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

Also, “I gave my cat a bath the other day…they love it. He sat there, he enjoyed it, it was fun for me. The fur would stick to my tongue, but other than that…”
— That’s also Steve Martin

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 7:05 PM MDT up reply actions  

You pronounced Brodeur with like 8 w’s. I’m sure I’m not the only one here who’d’ve been confused by that.

by some white guy on Sep 12, 2011 5:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

ok, i may not remember exactly how you pronounced it. i do remember having absolutely no idea who you were talking about when you first said his name though.

by some white guy on Sep 12, 2011 6:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

though as someone who consistantly mispronounces his teams (former) back-up goalies name, i suppose i’m not in a position to talk

by some white guy on Sep 12, 2011 6:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

I’ve seen pics of his upper body and guy’s got some beefcake going on. That should serve him well to endure the rigors of a long season. So I’ve heard he’s physical, but will he fight? Can we expect a dozen fights perhaps?

"Put stick on ice, put puck in net"

by HeyPeterman on Sep 12, 2011 8:36 AM MDT via mobile reply actions  

A dozen fights?? I don’t think so. That’s a lot of fights if you think that Mcleod had 14 last year.

It's all about the A-

by Sandie Gauthier on Sep 12, 2011 8:43 AM MDT up reply actions  

I would imagine he’ll have 1 or 2 early on to make his presence with the team and/league known.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 8:51 AM MDT up reply actions  

And break his hands? He better not. WE HAZ NO WINGERZ DUDEZ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If we don't get our sauce, we ain't watching the game!

by Mike @ MHH on Sep 12, 2011 9:00 AM MDT up reply actions  

Whatevs. He’ll just bang a few other players’ wives and get traded for a defenseman that we really need. I already saw the rumors of it on a blog or something somewhere at some time.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 9:02 AM MDT up reply actions  

Wives, girlfriends, he’s banging everyone up in here

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 9:04 AM MDT up reply actions  

Banging in the crease is the life of the power forward.

"It's all about the $"
Lawn defender since... crap, I can't remember.

by Busted Twigg on Sep 12, 2011 10:08 AM MDT up reply actions  

Oh, don’t you go there. Or Gauthier. Or however we’re saying it now.

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 11:37 AM MDT up reply actions  

Why is it if you do a google image search for “Gabriel Landeskog”, you get that dumb picture of Tyler Arnason? I lol’ed.

No soup for you!

by creamy on Sep 12, 2011 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

Have you ever seen them in the same room?

4th biggest pessimist of MHH.
"There's always next season." -- Jimmy Howard on not winning the Calder Trophy.

by Dixomatic on Sep 12, 2011 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Holy Cow, you’re right! I just looked and there that picture was. Of course Bob Barker was on the next line down, too, but disturbing nonetheless.

by Go Avs and Mavs on Sep 12, 2011 6:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Any update on the group tickets for opening night? The dead-line for pre-ordering tickets (not through the posted link here at MHH) is tomorrow.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 9:14 AM MDT reply actions  

I posted about it last week. A lot of news sent it into archive list fairly quickly.

Brothers, I am Galimov.

by Cheryl Bradley on Sep 12, 2011 12:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thanks. I’m just a little confused about the difference between pre-ordering and the group tickets your post was about. I seem to remember someone saying the blocks were already zoned out for sale, so the group is guaranteed tickets despite having to wait until Monday to purchase? Letting an opening-night ticket sale deadline pass by just gives me the gitters even if it’s for a good reason I guess.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 12:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yup, same here.

Forever grateful that Joe Sakic isn't a raging dick hole like Brett Favre.

by Rather Dashing on Sep 12, 2011 12:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

I want specific tickets to the game, and I emailed Jake this morning asking if I could specify what I wanted thru the MHH ticket special. I havent heard back yet, but will call before the 17th and find out.

Thanks, Joe... Thanks, Peter.... Thanks, Adam....

by mfured20 on Sep 12, 2011 1:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

If you pre-order, you cannot pick your seats. If you use the MHH link, you can. I cannot imagine there is any possible way the Pepsi Center will sell out in two days. However, if you are concerned you will not get seats through the MHH link and are okay with not being able to pick your seats, do the pre-order by all means. MHH doesn’t get anything from the link. I just thought it would be a nice gesture. The link is actually a courtesy Jake is doing for me and MHH. We were supposed to buy group tickets but things just didn’t work out as I would have had to put up the cash and be reimbursed. Sorry, but I (1) don’t have that kind of money and (2) will never do that again because I’ve been burned too many times.

Brothers, I am Galimov.

by Cheryl Bradley on Sep 12, 2011 7:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thanks to you & Jake & GL and others who put together the chance for us all to be near each other at the game. If, by some Act of Howard, we don’t get tix, I know the MHH watch party will be beyond epic.

2011-2012 Lokomotiv Yaroslavl: Vyechnaya Pamyat!
2011-2012 Colorado Avalanche: The possibility exists that this may not suck.

by Hopfenkopf on Sep 12, 2011 9:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Thanks but I don’t deserve any credit for this,
I asked about it and Cheryl did all the communicating with Jake. She really put all the leg work into it.

August is done, Bring on the hockey!
R.I.P. Wade, Rusty and Scratch
MHH - Home of the troll-ku

by gl avfan on Sep 14, 2011 6:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

And yes, the Watch party would be EPIC!!
We’ll all be watching from the Can though, ;)
I expect the pre and post parties to be over the top good times.

August is done, Bring on the hockey!
R.I.P. Wade, Rusty and Scratch
MHH - Home of the troll-ku

by gl avfan on Sep 14, 2011 6:40 PM MDT up reply actions  

I'm with A.J. completely on this one.

I expect a sub 40 point season from him. I want him to succeed don’t get me wrong. I really do want the kid to blow our minds and break out in his rookie year and to continue to rise. Realistically though, I just want him to have a solid enough year and prove he belongs in this league by working hard no matter his point total.

How would you like a job where, every time you make a mistake, a big red light goes on and 18,000 people boo? ~Jacques Plante

by Randy Time on Sep 12, 2011 9:57 AM MDT reply actions   1 recs

I think 35 is realistic. In a normal draft, he’s not a 2nd overall talent. If he gets on the top 2 lines, he’ll get plenty of opportunities, but I think he’s going to find that the tactics that worked in Junior will just bounce off experienced NHL defensemen. It will be a year of learning.

"It's all about the $"
Lawn defender since... crap, I can't remember.

by Busted Twigg on Sep 12, 2011 10:10 AM MDT up reply actions  

Suck up.

Brothers, I am Galimov.

by Cheryl Bradley on Sep 12, 2011 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

I agree, between 10-15 goals (I don’t expect him out there on the PP which will cut into his production) and the same in assists.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

How would you structure the two PP lines?

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 2:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

Duchene, Stastny and Hedjuk up front and Johnson and Mueller on points on the 1st.
O’Reilly, Jones and Whoever is hottest of the rest of the team (TJ or Landeskog most likely) and Quincey and double shift Johnson.

The 2nd team PP gets so much less ice than the 1st I don’t see him getting too much production (5 goals tops).

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 3:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

The 2nd PP will get Hunwick, Elliott, or Barrie; depending on who makes the team.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 3:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think Hunwick with be the 7th Dman and Elliot or Barrie in the AHL unless they got a ton better over the offseason (which can happen, but I wouldn’t hold my breath). So every 8th game when Hunwick gets in he’ll be on the PP…well until two to 4 defense ahead of him on the depth chart get hurt and are out for the year.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 3:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

But what you don’t have on that first PP is someone to stand in front of the goalie. Is it worth it to split up the two centers (if, that is, Landeskog proves good at that sort of thing)? Then, try to work the 2nd unit in more?

It might be worth trying at least.

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 4:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

I always think you should put your 5 best players out there. It’s possible that Landeskog is already one of them, but he’ll have to prove it. Stastny and Landeskog are the exact same size, the avs don’t really have someone with a huge ass they can anchor out in front of the net, Jones is the biggest, but it’s not really his game.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 6:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well, I have a big ass. Maybe I should try out.

But fair point. It’s going to be an interesting season, for sure.

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 7:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

I expect a 40-50 season. He’s not the scorer that Duchene is…we can’t expect those big numbers…however if he has Stastny/Duchene feeding him, anything is possible. But I’m going to keep it on the realistic and hopeful side as I expect him to be a strong forward on both ends of the ice as he adjusts in his first year.

Paul Stastny did, what Paul Stastny does. Score big goals.

by amit916 on Sep 12, 2011 10:41 AM MDT reply actions  

Predicting points for any player is a real tricky (ie impossible) task.

I like Landy’s make-up a lot, especially for this team. As far as points are concerned, it’s really up to his linemates because I think Landy is going to get most of his scoring opportunities by getting to the net for rebounds. Rebounds aren’t up to him and it takes a lot of his control away. Puck possession isn’t a strong suit for any rookie so he’s going to rely on his linemates to create scoring chances.

If anything is almost certain with this player, it’s that he’s got an agressive hockey mentality. Unlike Wolski or Stoa, he’s not going to shy from contact or play on the outside. When I think of the makeup of the top six and I look at their bigger players, they aren’t really getting ugly work done. Even a guy like Stewart got his production on the rush (like Jones and Mueller). The best rebound forward the Avs have is Hejduk and that’s via his savy at the net and not his build.

All said and done Landeskog could have anywhere from 35-50 points or more. Outside of rare talents, rookies can’t carry the puck and control their scoring chances for the most part. That includes RNH and Hubaderp.

I'll keep this brief.

by Dario on Sep 12, 2011 11:03 AM MDT reply actions  

If Landy nets more than 50 pts, it’s b/c he’s playing on Matty’s wing and Duchene is having a blowout year.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 11:06 AM MDT up reply actions  

As much as Duchene meshed with Ferris and Duke, I wouldn’t mind seeing Landy on his wing, having someone actually drive the net may coerce Duchene to shoot even more.

by ProfessorOak on Sep 12, 2011 11:07 AM MDT up reply actions  

Everyone talks about him using his body, alright, he threw his weight around in the Juniors. Great. The NHL is a whole different animal… NHL.com has him listed at 6-1 and 204 lbs. That really isn’t that big, and this is what I don’t understand. He can use his body, but up against bigger, older and more experience defensemen of the NHL, do you really see him being successful at that size? Even if he tacked on say 6 lbs this off season. 6-1 210 is solid, don’t get me wrong. It’s not small like Hishon, but he’s not that typical or standard power forward frame.
That being said, I expect him to play LIKE a power forward, still go to the dirty areas, and still get those ugly goals and I’m gonna go with 20 and 20.

by ProfessorOak on Sep 12, 2011 11:04 AM MDT reply actions  

I think the last part of your analysis is what people are talking about. He’s got the mentality to use his body and size. It’s like the difference between Penner versus say a Dustin Brown or Benden Morrow.

I'll keep this brief.

by Dario on Sep 12, 2011 11:08 AM MDT up reply actions  

Alright. And it’s not bad if you are short but stocky… if he somehow reaches like 220, not sure if that’s possible, but if he can, he wouldn’t be that easy to move because he would be just so compact.

by ProfessorOak on Sep 12, 2011 11:09 AM MDT up reply actions  

Well Byfuglien reached 800 during the offseason so nothing is impossible.

How would you like a job where, every time you make a mistake, a big red light goes on and 18,000 people boo? ~Jacques Plante

by Randy Time on Sep 12, 2011 11:15 AM MDT up reply actions  

That seems low…on Byfuglien anyway. The man boobs alone gotta be 600

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 11:46 AM MDT up reply actions  

The Jets now have more species of whale than most ocean-based ecosystems.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 11:49 AM MDT up reply actions  

He’s just big boned, not sure why we’re picking on the poor guy.

I love it
2 Wing fans disagreeing about a potential deal for Shea Weber in the comments section of a post about the Avalanche.

Winging It In Motown
by Amerinadian on Sep 12, 2011 9:51 AM PDT up reply 1 recs

by Randy Time on Sep 12, 2011 12:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

Cause he ate Wellwood over the summer

Datsyuk may have done it first, but he learned it from Peter Forsberg.

Thanks for everything Foppa!
Footer: We'll miss seeing you clear the riff raff off your lawn.

by Americanario on Sep 12, 2011 5:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

Wellwood and….

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 6:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Wellwood turned out to contain 1/8th of the galaxy’s dark matter.

It's all about the O'

by SteveHouse on Sep 12, 2011 6:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

For a scout who’s been hitting home runs, it seems odd that he would choose a Brendan Morrow type player with the number 2 pick, unless that was the best available I guess.

I think his ceiling is higher.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 11:10 AM MDT up reply actions  

I can’t speak for the scouting staff but I think they got burned with guys like Wolski and Stoa. They don’t want to take a chance on getting that kind of compete level again, especially with a higher pick. I also believe they think Landeskog’s intangibles play a bigger role in helping the team win sooner (in Duchene’s early prime years) than a guy like Huberdeau who may not be able to contribute for several years. But, then again maybe the scouts see him as a Shannahan type of guy that can chip in 35-45 goals eventually.

I'll keep this brief.

by Dario on Sep 12, 2011 11:19 AM MDT up reply actions  

And that’s the thing. Pracey really hasn’t missed with much of anyone (not sure if he was around to pick stoa, heh) But in Pracey we trust…

by ProfessorOak on Sep 12, 2011 11:19 AM MDT up reply actions  

He was around but Hampson was the head scout. Pracey was an amature scout but not the decision maker. He was named head scout prior to Duchene’s draft in 2008.

I'll keep this brief.

by Dario on Sep 12, 2011 11:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

gotcha, in that case, he really hasn’t missed when he was supposed to hit, and got a few gems as well in the second and later rounds.

by ProfessorOak on Sep 12, 2011 11:21 AM MDT up reply actions  

Not that I expect Lando to be this good

but the current standard for power forwards in the NHL is Jarome Iginla (at least in terms of lasting success). How big is Iginla? 6’1, 207. It’s not about raw size; it’s about mentality and strength. I have no idea what Lando is going to become, but his size isn’t going to be something that holds him back. He’s big enough to play whatever type of game he wants, assuming he puts in the time in the gym.

by ExiledAmongYou on Sep 12, 2011 8:47 PM MDT up reply actions  

Let's all note

Cheryl is publicly mocking Siemens on twitter for being underage.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 11:27 AM MDT reply actions  

Must be hanging around with TJ again

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 11:49 AM MDT up reply actions  

He asked what to do in Denver…a place that has a bar for every three businesses downtown. How could I not??

Brothers, I am Galimov.

by Cheryl Bradley on Sep 12, 2011 12:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

I will be disappointed if Landy doesnt break 40 points. If we took a guy who wasnt ready to make a bigger impact in the NHL, I would rather see a Laarson. I dont think he will score less then 40 points, We cant afford a top 6 to score less then 40,

by avalanchejef on Sep 12, 2011 12:11 PM MDT reply actions  

Lofty expectations of an 18 year old will net you a bit of disappointment. As long as he plays hard and proves his worth via work ethic, I’m perfectly fine with a 35 point season.

I love it
2 Wing fans disagreeing about a potential deal for Shea Weber in the comments section of a post about the Avalanche.

Winging It In Motown
by Amerinadian on Sep 12, 2011 9:51 AM PDT up reply 1 recs

by Randy Time on Sep 12, 2011 12:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

I tend to agree. We should all be more than happy if he ends up with 35-39 points.

No soup for you!

by creamy on Sep 12, 2011 1:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

I know that is lofty expectation, but he is the 2nd overall pick, and he is planned to be in the top 6. He will be given the opportunity. If he plays on the third line then expectations will be a bit different, but I hope/expectation is to get a guy who can make an impact on the score sheet with a second overall. 40 is not unrealistic. Eberle and Hall both had over 40. There were 10 rookies who had over 40 points including our/was our own Shattenkirk.

by avalanchejef on Sep 12, 2011 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

You don’t rack up the points until you’re on the PP for over 2-3 minutes a game, he won’t break the top 3 forwards on the team, so it’s going to be hard for him to really put up #’s.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 3:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Skinner, Couture and Grabner all had more then 40 points outside the PP. Bickell had 37 with 3 PP. I hope we got more then a Bickell.

by avalanchejef on Sep 12, 2011 5:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

Teemu Selane has the rookie point record at 132. I predict landeskog to not break this record. Yeah, that’s right I’m putting my ass on the line on this one.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 1:25 PM MDT reply actions  

I hope eat makes you eat your words

by avalanchejef on Sep 12, 2011 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Paul Stastny has the rookie record for points in consecutive games at 20 games. I am not predicting Landeskog to break that one.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 1:29 PM MDT reply actions  

I’ll make a prediction. Peter Budaj will shutout the Avs when they play against Montreal.

I love it
2 Wing fans disagreeing about a potential deal for Shea Weber in the comments section of a post about the Avalanche.

Winging It In Motown
by Amerinadian on Sep 12, 2011 9:51 AM PDT up reply 1 recs

by Randy Time on Sep 12, 2011 1:52 PM MDT reply actions  

That one will come true. When do the avs play florida this year? I’m predicting another shutout there.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

Who’s that two minor league affiliate? Oh yeah the Allen Americans. They will get shut out whenever they play Brian Elliot.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 1:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

Either Stewart or Shattenkirk, or both, will have at least one multi-goal game against the Avs.

I need a drink, please.

by MalachiConstant on Sep 12, 2011 1:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

Stewart’s a given. Liles get’s at least two goals.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 2:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

Liles trips Jones. Jones out for the season.

Paul Stastny did, what Paul Stastny does. Score big goals.

by amit916 on Sep 12, 2011 2:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

I hate you.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Liles doesn’t have to trip Jones…Jones does a good job hurting himself

Stabilize your rear deflectors, watch for enemy fighters.

by chiavsfan on Sep 12, 2011 2:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Is Jones one of the blogger questions or can we talk about him?

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 2:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

My bad. What I meant to say was:

Jones trips over the blueline and gets injured…oh wait that already happened.

Paul Stastny did, what Paul Stastny does. Score big goals.

by amit916 on Sep 12, 2011 2:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

Can we have a new thread for "Most moronic comments on Puck Daddy"?

This dude wins.

Jesus Died. LOL!
there are seriously like 10 teams that are actually worth having in the league. people don’t even realize teams like st. louis, buffalo, NJ, dallas, anaheim, etc. constantly lose big money because they’ve been around a while and aren’t considered “expansion” teams anymore. i believe pittsburgh and washington have lost money in recent years even with their stars. this league is quite literally a ponzi scheme.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 2:25 PM MDT reply actions  

I hope that post goes on to where he actually defends that statement, but I assume that he’ll be coy and wait for someone to say, “What the f—- do you mean by that?”

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 2:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

this league is quite literally a ponzi scheme.

Who knew that Rick Perry liked hockey?

2011-2012 Lokomotiv Yaroslavl: Vyechnaya Pamyat!
2011-2012 Colorado Avalanche: The possibility exists that this may not suck.

by Hopfenkopf on Sep 12, 2011 3:15 PM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Even Social Security is insulted by that comment.

I'll keep this brief.

by Dario on Sep 12, 2011 3:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t know why, but I giggled like a school girl when I read this.

by Hobbes Hiltz on Sep 12, 2011 7:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

What an idiot. We all know the league is really a shell game.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

The whole league is being propped up by the Illuminati, in cooperation with the reverse vampires, to create a market for false teeth and zambonis.

4th biggest pessimist of MHH.
"There's always next season." -- Jimmy Howard on not winning the Calder Trophy.

by Dixomatic on Sep 12, 2011 3:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Wow.

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 3:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

that makes sense.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 3:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

I thought the zombies liked the zambonis?

by Andy_ on Sep 12, 2011 4:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

It’s actually a long con. We, the fans of the other 29 teams, are just screwing with red wing fans.

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 3:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

So then by association, are we all really just trying to screw with Amway? It seems kinda ironic that one ponzi scheme would try to screw another one.

by Hobbes Hiltz on Sep 12, 2011 7:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Getting back on topic....

I honestly think that over his first few years, we will see a greater disproportion of assist to goals then most will expect. I know he likes to crash the net and I fully expect that be the source of most of his goals, but he is a great passer. I see alot of first (and mainly second) assist coming from him grinding along the boards behind the net and getting that outlet pass to the D on the point (yeah i know right, like our D would actually be there…and SHOOT). Although when we play the Bruins (all of what one time), I’d have him watch that Thomas clip about a half dozen times.

by Hobbes Hiltz on Sep 12, 2011 8:01 PM MDT reply actions  

looking back, using “grinding” was probably not the best word I could have picked on MHH.

by Hobbes Hiltz on Sep 12, 2011 8:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

You lost me at “disproportion”

Mile High Hockey - No Tanks.

by CrankyPete on Sep 12, 2011 9:56 PM MDT via iPhone app up reply actions  

Wait, so were there two other rookies that scored over 50 or not?

A man who stole my whisky used the defense that no one could resist a bottle of Scotch. I had no choice but to testify on his behalf.

by c6hor8 on Sep 12, 2011 9:35 PM MDT reply actions  

selanne and joe juneau?

Chip, I'm gonna come at you like a spider monkey!

by An Unmitigated Disaster on Sep 12, 2011 9:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

Svatos and Wolski. Both, I think, right at 50.

by Andy_ on Sep 13, 2011 10:26 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Oak_bigger_small
Favorite non-Avs players
Oak_bigger_small
Bracket Challenge, half way there...
Russia4_small
Landeskog on Varly at Worlds
Steamavatar_small
Relish in the decline of the RedWheel
Steamavatar_small
Lets play fill the hole
Russia4_small
WC: Russia vs Norway
Small
MORE of My Investigative Report
Russia4_small
Varly answers fan questions at Worlds
2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
Why the CBA argument is a red herring
Oak_bigger_small
MHH Bracket Challenge

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

View My Stats

Managing Editor

Milehigh-xl_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Assistant Editors

Icon_small Joe Dunman

Mike_logo_2_small Mike @ MHH

148488_10150337054485417_836355416_16934526_6679165_n_small Sandie Gauthier

Gravatar_small Cheryl Bradley

Staff Writers

Me2_small Angélique C. Murray

Godzilla_mario_small A.J. Haefele

Me_small Derek B

Me_and_fopps_small Cole D Hamilton

I3_r_3___t_small Brett Shumway

Wilson_small Randy Time

Zaphod_small SteveHouse

Avalanche_logo_small andidee15

Jtizz_small Sean Harsha