Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: PHOTOS: Mike Moser's Dunk Face Is Spectacular

Embracing Blogs: Why The Avalanche Will Be The Last

When the New York Islanders announced in June that they would be creating a "blog box" and provide press passes (with limitations, of course, and with definite critics) to hand-picked but still independent bloggers, the hockey blogosphere erupted in applause.  When Ted Leonsis of the Capitals recruited local hockey bloggers and sent them overseas to cover the World Championships, the hockey blogosphere raised their hands and bowed their heads in awe.  Leonsis had been giving local bloggers spots in the Capitals' press box for months before that.  Finally, teams were starting to embrace the future of online sports media!  No longer would the bloggers, those important sports media gap-fillers, be shut out from access to the teams they covered so passionately.

Well, that's not exactly true.  While the Capitals and the Islanders are great examples of teams trying to open up to the reality of online media---if only half-heartedly, in the Islanders' case---most other teams in the NHL have absolutely no interest in doing so.  At least not for a long time.

As quoted by Christy at Girl With A Puck, Ducks GM and man of questionable character* Brian Burke carefully qualified his comments about bloggers:

With a journalist, I know they’ve had some training. I know there will be a fact checker and an editor to keep them accountable. I will know what to expect from [journalists] because if they take a bribe or report false information, they’ll get fired. With bloggers, there’s no safeguard and no guarantees. That will change when one of them gets hit with a libel lawsuit, because one blogger is going to be careless with the fact and they’re going to get nailed. A lot of people will cite the first amendment and call blogging "freedom of speech," but that doesn’t mean they don’t have a responsibility to be factually correct.

Ignoring the fact that only one hockey blogger (Eklund) actually makes it his goal to be "factually incorrect," Burke's overall statement is clear in that he's not really concerned about the poor, naive bloggers getting libel suits thrown at them.  What he's worried about is that he can't control the messages they broadcast on the web.  And he doesn't really need to, because even in California his team gets decent press coverage.  Combine the recent Cup win and they're doing okay in Anaheim.

The Capitals and the Islanders, on the other hand, are media punching bags.  They get routinely bashed in their own local media outlets, and practically have to beg for coverage from local papers and TV news stations.  Their reasoning is that if you can recruit the bloggers, you can recruit some favorable attention and court the fans more directly.

Andy at the Battle Of Alberta sums it up nicely:

The only reason we are seeing teams in the U.S. move to embrace the non-MSM blogs is because they have no choice. They have no other media partners. That's not to slight the work being done by the guys and gals running those blogs. They are doing some fantastic stuff. But if they were in any of the six Canadian cities with an NHL franchise, they wouldn't be getting access to the teams. There's little incentive for the Canadian teams to provide that access when every newspaper in town wants to cover them extensively, even to the point of attempting their own, mostly tame, mostly leashed, and mostly derivative blogs. Simple, yes, but true.  

Where media coverage is weak or unfavorable, the teams are starting to embrace fan blogs, albeit slowly and with hesitation.  In cities where the teams are beloved and/or heavily courted by the local media, there is zero talk of opening the hallowed confines of the press box (or even a separate "blog box") to anyone without legitimate mainstream press credentials.

The Avalanche is no different, and is probably worse than most others.  The reason: Altitude Sports & Entertainment.  Billionaire Avalanche (and Nuggets) owner Stan Kroenke created the network to promote his Denver teams throughout Colorado and the Rocky Mountain region.  If you've ever watched an Altitude broadcast of an Avalanche game, you know they are unashamed and unabashed homers of the very worst sort.  There is absolutely no confusion of what the role of announcers Mike Haynes and Peter McNab should be.  They are salesmen for the team, plain and simple.

Combine that with the heavy coverage of the team by the Denver Post (Yo Adrian!) and the Rocky Mountain News, and you realize that the Avalanche is in no dire need for more media exposure.  Blogs, I'm sure, are a complete afterthought to team management.  I can assume this because I've never been contacted by the Avalanche organization ever, for any reason, and most of my fellow Avs bloggers can attest to this.  Outside of a general fan survey about whether or not the Pepsi Center should replay opponents' goals on the Jumbotron, there is no blogger outreach at all.

And this will not change as long as Kroenke owns both the team and Altitude Sports.  What would be his incentive to change an established, profitable setup?  Remember, you never know what bloggers like me could say next.  We might say something like, "Coach Q finally got bit in the ass by playing Jose Theodore one too many times," or, "the Avalanche played horribly last night and should be ashamed of themselves."  And we just couldn't have that, could we?

*Don't forget Steve Moore.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well...

Well, that's certainly one way not to endear bloggers to the NHL, calling the GM a "man of questionable character."  It certainly wouldn't score any points with me.  Perhaps this is one reason bloggers don't get a shot.  One step forward, two steps back.

by Tapeleg on Nov 17, 2007 12:19 PM MST reply actions  

Re: Well

What would you prefer I call him?  Did you forget Steve Moore?

My calling Burke a man of questionable character has nothing to do with his opinion of bloggers, it's his love of dirty players and dirty hockey.

At any rate, I think that's why so many people seek out alternatives to the mainstream press.  They don't trust reporters because they know they're too concerned about "scoring points" and endearing themselves to the NHL.  I don't have to do that, and I wouldn't do that if granted even limited access to the Avalanche.  I'm a fan but I'm not a shill.

I think it's really interesting that you'll find more honest criticism and a resistance to the company line among fan blogs than you will the press.

by Joe Dunman on Nov 17, 2007 2:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Re: Re: Well

What would I prefer?  How about GM Brian Burke?  I would prefer there weren't cheap potshots taken for no reason.  Would a journalist make an unwarranted character assassination like this?  It has noting to do with scoring points or endearing yourself or being a shill.  It has to do with acting like you deserve credentials if you want them.  So basically, you quoted Burke, but did exactly what he is talking about.

If you want bloggers to have credentials, even limited ones, you have to give teams a compelling reason to give them to you.  They have every excuse in the world not to.  They don't need bloggers or new media right now.  They need to be shown otherwise.  

Are the Avalanche going to read what you just wrote and want to give you credentials?  Are they going to want to give you the time of day?  I would have second thoughts about having you at a Ducks game. At that point, if you are going to make them ask the credential question, you can guarantee the answer will be no.

by Tapeleg on Nov 17, 2007 3:50 PM MST up reply actions  

Wow

I'm trying to figure out exactly how I got you so riled up.  I said "questionable character," which means that someone, somewhere, has questioned his character.  His role in the Steve Moore attack, his sheltering of Todd Bertuzzi, his generally flippant and dismissive attitude towards anyone that disagrees with him...the list goes on and on.  I'm not the only person who's ever publicly said he's a shady guy.

And I didn't say that I necessarily wanted access to the Avalanche locker room anyway.  I said they've never contacted me, but I haven't contacted them, either, and have no plans to do so.  The rest of my piece was completely in the third person referring to bloggers in general.

I'm curious as to why you took such great offense to my perfectly reasonable statement based on a man's well-known professional reputation.  And at any rate, you've proven my point that people like Burke would only be interested in granting access to people that sucked up to them, just like most journalists seem to be doing these days.  

Tapeleg, I've got nothing against you at all, but it seems like you've definitely got it out for me.  Why are you so invested in this topic?  Are you on Burke's payroll?

by Joe Dunman on Nov 17, 2007 7:37 PM MST up reply actions  

OK...

I assume that last paragraph was a joke, so I will take it that way.  Just so you know, I don't have it out for you.  Enough said on that.

I think you are missing my point.  Your opinion of Brian Burke is not what I take issue with.  It truly does not matter to me.  Go back and read my first comment.  It has nothing to do with your opinion of Burke.  It has to do with access for bloggers (yes, bloggers in general), and that comments like that don't do much to help.

If you want to discuss Burke's character, go for it.  
Do a post about him, or create an entire blog about it.  My point has nothing to do with Burke as a person.  But in the context of access for bloggers, comments like that don't endear bloggers to teams.  When I was reading your post, this is what stood out to me.  

You're right, who is going to want to have a blogger around who is going to have the gloves off all the time?  Who is going to give privileges in that context?  That doesn't mean sucking up to the man.  But if a blogger is unwanted around the team, they will no longer be around the team.  

If you go back and read my comments again, and replace the word "you" with "bloggers", maybe it will seem like less of a personal attack on you.  It wasn't, it isn't.  

by Tapeleg on Nov 17, 2007 9:53 PM MST up reply actions  

Re: OK

I don't take anything personally, anyway, so there's no problem there.  We cool.

One thing in your last comment stood out to me:

You're right, who is going to want to have a blogger around who is going to have the gloves off all the time?  Who is going to give privileges in that context?  That doesn't mean sucking up to the man.  But if a blogger is unwanted around the team, they will no longer be around the team.  

The same goes for journalists, and that's why they hold back and ask meaningless questions and step on eggshells around the teams they cover, so they don't lose access.  The teams would treat any overly critical voice the same way.

But I think the "gloves off" approach is the appeal and strength of blogs, and I think teams will have to eventually embrace them because bloggers command such large and growing audiences.  Teams will want to open up to bloggers, even if they can't always count on a positive message, with the goal of taming them with the bribes of team access and free tickets.  They'll think, it works for reporters, why not for blogs?

Bloggers who want access to teams shouldn't tone down their criticism and/or honesty, though.  The teams, I think, will eventually embrace them anyway, regardless of the nasty things they might say.  The teams will have no choice if they want to reach the largest number of fans possible.  

by Joe Dunman on Nov 18, 2007 5:53 AM MST up reply actions  

Who said...

No one has to tone down their honesty or criticism,  But showing a bit of restraint can be advantageous. Teams are already embracing blogs.  They don't have to embrace individual bloggers.  Someone else will come along to pick up the pieces, whether you think of them as shills or suck ups or whatever.

But in the context of bloggers getting access, making a negative comment about someone isn't going to get people very far in the door.  Since bloggers getting in the door is the topic of discussion, that is where I come from.

Of course, my question is this.  If someone other than Brian Burke had made the comment, would it have changed your perspective on what he said?

by Tapeleg on Nov 18, 2007 4:26 PM MST up reply actions  

Nope

No way.  I added the critical comment about his character because he's Brian Burke, but his statement would mean the same no matter who said it.  He is no different than most GMs and team presidents in that they want to keep a tight reign on who gets close to the players.  His comment could have been said by Francois Giguere and it would have meant the exact same thing.

by Joe Dunman on Nov 18, 2007 6:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Agree with Joe

Burke is a man of questionable character. The Steve Moore fiasco, and the fact that he builds teams that have the most questionable characters on his teams (May, Bertuzzi, Pronger).

Call-in radio shows used to be though of in the same way as blogs, just some yokel with a mic that stirs the pot and isn't a "real" journalist. Then after call-in radio didn't go away everyone began to realize how important it was, because it gave a place for fans to call in and vocalize their frustrations.

Blogs are going through the same growing pains. (I hate talk radio by the way, but there is a parallel there). As blogs gain more influence they will see attention from team management.

In fact in the next two years I expect Altitude/Avalanche to put out the "Official blog of the Avalanche" because they see how popular this blogging thing has become. He'll link to Dater and the RMN and get exclusive access to the players and ask hard hitting questions like "What kind of son is he?" to Avs players' fathers.

In creating this blog, and trying to control the message, it will really legitimize what we do. Even a corporate shill blog will be a recognition that people are turning to blogs for their information and intelligent honest opinions of the game.  

by Jibblescribbits on Nov 17, 2007 3:56 PM MST up reply actions  

Re: Agree with Joe

I definitely think you're right about the "Official Blog," and I'm surprised more teams haven't gone that way anyway.  The Post and Dater created their own fake blog months ago, and I've got no doubt that the teams themselves will soon follow suit.

I'm not sure, though, that it will "legitimize" what we do, since the popularity of blogs among fans is already so large and increasing so quickly that we don't have to rely on traditional media outlets and the teams themselves for validation.  We already have it because we have growing audiences and advertisers who pay us for space---all we lack is press passes, which many of us don't really want, anyway.  

by Joe Dunman on Nov 17, 2007 7:43 PM MST up reply actions  

Unquestionable character

Whether Burke has questionable character or not is besides the point.  The fact that a MSM journalist has to self censor or qualify every remark is the exact reason that blogs or the new media are getting more and more popular.  I know for a fact that our Denver journalists could get away with the questionable character comment, except that they would simply absolve themselves of any journalistic integrity accusations by simply saying, "what some have called...".  On the other hand, as a blogger (I use that reference to myself in the loosest possible way) I'd just rather say Burke is a complete asshole.  Bloggers can do this, Mile High Hockey chose a more family friendly approach.  You can say all you like about it but the later approach is what you hear in the stands, in Lodo and at the bar with the Avalanche players at Chops.  Not coincidently, it's also an opinion that many readers appreciate.

I don't want a press pass so I can pretend I'm not an Avalanche fan and get free tickets to games.  If I want to interview Brad Richardson, I'm sure I could call Jean Martineau and arrange interviews during off days etc... However, as a blogger I'm not going to ask the guys if they think it's great playing with Sakic.  I'm going to ask hard questions about particular plays or how they can improve their play.  I'll bring up face off percentages, double-shifting Sakic on the point for power plays and other things I think are relevant.  I might also throw in a question at the end like, "What's more intimidating, Quinvelle's mustache or Parkers?"  Why?  Because I'm not a trained journalist obviously.  I think it would funny, It would amuse me and perhaps my readership.  What makes bloggers unpalatable to some other journalists and communication departments with pro sports is the same thing that makes them popular.  We are fans and have actual opinions.

by Dario on Nov 18, 2007 9:26 AM MST reply actions  

Preach it, brother

...and the teams will embrace us eventually.  They'll have to.  Bloggers are both consumers of the products and free promotion, even if it is critical and hard-hitting.

I may call Coach Q a fool for relying so heavily on Jose Theodore, and I may think Super Joe is being worn down by too much time on the power play, but I still love the Avalanche.

More than anything else, I want them to be the best team they can be, and the best team in the NHL---every single year.

by Joe Dunman on Nov 18, 2007 10:10 AM MST up reply actions  

I wrote...

I wrote a whole long response to this, but I think it's time to just put a post up on my blog about the subject.  I don't mean that I will be calling people out or even mentioning this discussion, just that I have enough of my own opinions on the "blogger with credentials" matter.  It's something that I think of quite a bit anyways, and taking it out of the context of this whole discussion may actually be beneficial.

by Tapeleg on Nov 18, 2007 4:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Re: I wrote

I look forward to reading it.  I'm interested in as many perspectives as possible on this subject.

by Joe Dunman on Nov 18, 2007 6:32 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

For original fans of the Quebec Nordiques, transplanted fans of the Colorado Rockies, day one fans of the Avalanche and bandwagon fans just looking for a place to root.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Russia4_small
Jussi Parkkila
Owl_eyes_small
Truth

Recent FanPosts

Images_small
Last Year's Team Statistics Compared to This Year
Uwhockey_small
UFAs to target-Suter and Parise
Curious_george_pic_small
Gettin' down witcha bad self. Paying homage to one of my favorite gingers.
2309379311_5dd939250e_o_small
Crosby traded?
Steamavatar_small
Stastny's Value (Not what you think, and a little positive mojo about our team and where we are headed)
Hankatar_small
Proof that Sacco is a bad coach.
Fry_small
FINALLY, The Savage Has Returned, With a life altering question
Andy_small
avs weekend...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

View My Stats

Managing Editor

Milehigh-xl_small David Driscoll-Carignan

Assistant Editors

Icon_small Joe Dunman

Mike_logo_2_small Mike @ MHH

148488_10150337054485417_836355416_16934526_6679165_n_small Sandie Gauthier

Gravatar_small Cheryl Bradley

Staff Writers

Me2_small Angélique C. Murray

Godzilla_mario_small A.J. Haefele

Me_small Derek B

Roy_small Brett Shumway

Avalanche_logo_small andidee15