Game 28: Avalanche 2, Flyers 1

photo courtesy of David Zalubowski/AP
It's hard to understand this year's version of the Colorado Avalanche. One game, they look like a Junior C team, skating around lost like little kids who don't really know how to play the game. The next game, they play superbly at all ends of the ice like a truly great NHL squad. Luckily, in the 2-1 win over the Flyers last night, the Avalanche looked like the latter.
The game began in extremely boring fashion, with neither team looking especially interested in playing hockey. There was little action and few scoring chances. It wasn't until nearly fifteen minutes into the first period that the home team started to pick up the pace, and by the end they were controlling the ice and putting lots of shots on Flyers goalie Marty Biron (who for some reason I kept calling "Baron" last night in the game thread. My bad).
In the second period, the Avs kept up the pressure. Finally, after failing to score on two good power play chances, Colorado finally put the biscuit in the basket. Jaroslav Hlinka skated in fast to Biron's right and put a fantastic wrist shot top shelf before falling down and sliding into the end boards, Alex Tanguay Game 7 2001 style. Very nice.
The initial one-goal lead wouldn't hold, though, because Daniel Briere (who Mike Haynes referred to as "Danielle" at least twice) scored on a Flyers power play at 17:55, ruining Jose Theodore's chance for a shutout.
Theo's chance for the win wasn't ruined, though, because just before the end of the second period, Milan Hejduk actually scored a goal on an Avalanche power play. I know, that's messed up! The assists went to Ryan Smyth and Paul Stastny. With just three seconds left in the frame, the timing was perfect to ruin the Flyers locker room morale.
Philadelphia didn't exactly turn on the pressure in the third period, managing just seven shots (most of them in the last five minutes), all of which Theodore stopped easily. Time ran out and the Avalanche emerged triumphant against a very, very good Eastern Conference team.
The three stars of the game weren't exactly tough for Mike Haynes to choose, with Hlinka, Hejduk and Theodore getting the nods. Theo deserved every bit of the first star, considering he had 28 saves on 29 shots for a .966 save percentage. That's good stuff.
I don't want to get too excited, because the Avs have been going win-loss-win-loss all season, but it would be nice if they could string together a winning streak of some sort over the next few games. It might be tough, though, because their next four games are against St. Louis, Columbus and Nashville (twice), and the Central Division has been extremely competitive this season.
The Blues face the Avs on Sunday night at the Pepsi Center.
Stars of the Game:
- Jose Theodore (28sv, .966)
- Jaroslav Hlinka (1g, 0a)
- Milan Hejduk (1g, 0a)
0 recs |
17 comments
Comments
One note for Blues...
Theo was good last night, especially on that SH breakaway by Richards, and I imagine will probably get the start against St Louis. One thing that should go in our favor is that Legace is on the IR. Legace has always played tough against the Avs and had a couple of career SO against them. Unfortunately The Avs have had a history of making back-up goalies look like starters.
Hlinka, wow! What a shot. And Hejduk now has 99 PPGs for his career. Defense lookd much better last night, especially for that period of time in the third when they were clogging up the neutral zone and getting their sticks on everything.
by Americanario on
Dec 8, 2007 8:43 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: One note for Blues
I'm fine with Theo getting the start against St. Louis, as long as he also gets the start against Columbus next Wednesday and against Nashville after that. At this point I don't care who Q goes with, I just want him to go with one guy consistently.
If Theodore can keep playing like he did last night (even though I know he can't), then the team will be better off if he starts most of the games.
Coach Q just needs to freakin' pick one.
by Joe @ MHH on
Dec 8, 2007 9:10 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
a modest proposal
Ok, here's what I think. Since the Avs obviously won because I was in attendance last night, we start a fund allowing me to go to every game. Then they would never lose! Sounds great, right?
by Rather Dashing on
Dec 8, 2007 9:08 AM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: a modest proposal
Maybe we can convince the Avs to open a "blog box" and you can be the official representative of MHH. That way nobody has to shell out any money at all.
Feel free to call the Avs for me.
by Joe @ MHH on
Dec 8, 2007 9:11 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
ok.
Heck, that sounds good to me.
by Rather Dashing on
Dec 8, 2007 1:08 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Game 28: Avalanche 2, Flyers 1
by cupster33 on
Dec 8, 2007 12:03 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Consistancy???
I'm not sure Q even knows the meaning of the word...I mean since when has he been consistent with any aspect of this team? oh, wait, he is consistently changing things.
by Americanario on
Dec 8, 2007 12:28 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
streak
The Avs ALWAYS put together a streak. Don't worry about that guys. Ever since I started watching them they put together some kind of long good streak. I gave up hope on a streak last season; but they still delivered. There shall ALWAYS be a streak.
And I agree, play one goalie. I don't care who; just play him for a couple games straight. On a sidenote; Theodore has still not started 3 consecutive games for the Avs in his career.
I am so thankful that "the Legace" is out. That guy totally owns us.
by Mike the Avs Fan on
Dec 8, 2007 1:40 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: streak
Theo started three consecutive games three times last season, but he's never played more than three consecutive games, just for the record.
Legace is a beast this season anyway. He's been good against everybody, except injury.
by Joe @ MHH on
Dec 8, 2007 9:02 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
yes i know
I know that, just forgot to put the "more".
by Mike the Avs Fan on
Dec 9, 2007 1:52 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: yes I know
I figured that was the case.
by Joe @ MHH on
Dec 9, 2007 7:20 AM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
one more thought on the game.
It was SO hard to go to an Avs game and not see #19 on the ice. As I watched the game, I just thought to myself that the Avs were playing without their heart, and it was weird. Depressing, because eventually they'll be playing every game without him, but hopefully not for a very, very long time.
by Rather Dashing on
Dec 8, 2007 2:52 PM MST
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: missing heart
I've been to a couple games lately also and feel a huge void without both Joe and Lappy. There's no denying the feeling of the elephant in the room.
Saw Sakic today hanging around at practice (not skating)and Lappy skating a little but mostly acting as every player's own personal pep rally (all he needed was pom poms).
by Rookie14 on
Dec 8, 2007 7:25 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: missing heart
I wouldn't be surprised if Sakic takes another five to ten games off. During the early part of the season he looked old for the first time in his entire career. I think he'll probably enjoy the rest.
If the team can just keep winning without him, they'll be even better when he returns healthy in January or so.
Then again, he might come back next week. You never know.
by Joe @ MHH on
Dec 8, 2007 9:05 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
... Old?!
Tell me you didn't just say that 38 is old!
by Rookie14 on
Dec 8, 2007 9:14 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs
indeed.
didn't you see logan's run?
i second joe, if only because the team needs to learn how to play without sakic a little. i'd be surprised if he's back next year, and i can't see anyway he's back after that.
by andrew on
Dec 8, 2007 11:23 PM MST
up
reply
actions
0 recs














