WCS Game 1: Red Wings 4, Avalanche 3

photo courtesy of Karl Gahring/Denver Post
Johan Franzen is a beast. The 6-3, 220 pound center was the key player for the Red Wings early on in last night's game 1 against the Colorado Avalanche in the Western Conference Semifinals, leading his team to a 4-3 victory. He scored the third and fourth goals (the latter of which turned out to be the game-winner) for his team and also had an assist. All this in just 16:35 of ice time.
He also inadvertently took out Wojtek Wolski when he careened into him after a first period hip check from Ruslan Salei (who was awful early in the game). Wolski's early departure, combined with the loss of Peter Forsberg to another "groin injury" and Jose Theodore to some kind of horrible stomach illness, were just too much for the Avs.
Theodore was yanked from the game early in the second period for two reasons: one, he got shelled and had no defense in front of him; two, he was sick as a dog and probably shouldn't have played at all. Live and learn.
Not that the Avs didn't try to come back. After a horrendous first period in which everybody except Paul Stastny played like they'd never seen an ice rink before, the Avs started to right the ship. Unfortunately, it was after Theodore gave up four goals (including a fluky airborne rebound that he couldn't see). But Peter Budaj came in and provided some stability to the Avs and they completely turned their game around. Budaj stopped all 20 shots he faced and the Avs scored three goals.
Unfortunately, the comeback attempt failed, and the Avs lost the game after Chris Osgood (the best goalie to ever play in the NHL) stopped a last-second shot by Ryan Smyth John-Michael Liles after Budaj had been pulled for the extra attacker. That save ensured a game 1 win for the Wings and a one-game advantage in the series.
With the losses of Wolski and Forsberg (and the playing of Cody McCormick over Jaroslav Hlinka), Coach Q resorted to an old favorite: the RPM Line of Ryan, Paul and Milan. Sure enough, it was money. All three finished with two points. Paul Stastny especially looked fantastic through most of the game, and he scored the first goal of the series early in the first period. It looks like he's shaken off what ever haunted him in the first round against Minnesota.
Andrew Brunette and Joe Sakic both had rough games, and were both defensive liabilities through much of the early going. They both finished - 2. Brunette was more flat-footed than usual, and just couldn't seem to adapt to the Wings' run-and-gun, puck possession style of play.
A lot of people would argue that simply because of geography and membership in the Original Six, the Red Wings should be in the Eastern Conference. I'd agree, but more because of their style of hockey. They don't play like a typical Western Conference team, and it just goes to show that trap-heavy grinding isn't always a successful strategy. Granted, you have to have a high level of offensive skill to pull it off, but they do, and they can.

photo courtesy of Getty Images
Now, what have we all learned from game 1? Well, it helps to have a healthy goalie and Peter Forsberg in the lineup. It also helps to watch video of your opponent before the game so their style of play doesn't completely catch you off guard in the first period. But another lesson is that even with a suddenly-depleted lineup, the Avalanche can hang with the Red Wings. After a shaky start, the Avs shifted the momentum and controlled the pace of play for the second half of the game, often scaring the Wings with close-calls and great chances (and some clangers). If the Avs are healthy, the Wings are beatable.
Also, I have to comment that both teams played extremely clean last night, and relied on their skill rather than their mouths and their fists, and it was great to see. There were some chippy moments around the net and some late hits, but overall both squads focused on scoring goals rather than tallying penalty minutes. It was a great game to watch. The Avs didn't embarrass themselves early on while behind by three goals, they just focused and cleaned up their acts. The Minnesota Wild could learn a lot from game 1 between the Avs and the Wings.
It's a tough loss, but the series just started and we know now that the Avs aren't outmatched. The only thing that can really defeat Colorado in this series is their own tendency toward injury and illness. Stay healthy, and the series could go the distance.
Stars of the Game:
- Johan Franzen (2g, 1a)
- Paul Stastny (1g, 1a)
- Henrik Zetterberg (1g, 0a)
Kittens Killed: 


0 recs |
30 comments
Comments
I missed the game
apparently, I wasn't the only one (Bruno, Sakic, Forsberg).
Question for Q: McCormick > Hlinka > Richardson? Really?
Three (3) kittens killed. The Avs HAVE to do better with the man against Detroit. I'm not asking for world record percentages, but they need one a game to be in this series for the long haul, especially if they have a depleted forward core.
Any word on Wolski's injury? Wait, what am I saying? That would require two things:
- The Avs trainers correctly diagnosed the problem and aren't, in fact, x-raying his right elbow, and
- The Avs released any information about injuries that didn't immediately end up as lining for a birdcage.
by Mike @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 7:12 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: I missed the game
I'd imagine we won't know anything for certain about Wolski until just before the game on Saturday.
Maybe Dater will find out something today, but I highly doubt it.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 7:28 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Wolski
Hey, is that picture family friendly?
by Rookie14 on
Apr 25, 2008 8:34 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
sure it is
the gut hangs far enough over to cover up anything truly offensive...or are you referring to the desecration and dismemberment on display?
by pmukh on
Apr 25, 2008 8:45 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Wolski's Injury
I'm surprised Wolski is actually that big, and that his skin is pinkish.
by Drakenlot on
Apr 25, 2008 8:47 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Nude Wolski
If his man boobs aren't frightening enough, those chubby thumbs are.
by Rookie14 on
Apr 25, 2008 11:33 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Nude Wolski
For a guy with a nickname meme going, I think that picture above is pretty risky.
I'd hate to have to call him Wojtek "Chubby Thumbs" Wolski.
And personally, I think that Operation shot would be far more hilarious with Forsberg's face on it.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 11:49 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Pretty sure
Liles took the last shot that the great Osgood stopped. I think Smyths stick was lifted by the Dead Wings defender, possibly Lidstrom and it went straight to Liles who shot it.
by Savage33 on
Apr 25, 2008 7:42 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Pretty sure
You're right. I was unsure of that when I typed it, but now I remember it clearly. Liles skated in from the blue line and scooped the loose puck. I'll edit the post.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 7:56 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
lemme get something straight
judging from the game thread comments, which i scrolled through, mostly for the Angelina pics (fwiw, the GIA movie came out like 10 years ago, for whoever mentioned it as 'new'), is it legal to refer to the masked skater who must not be named after games and on non-game days?
From my side of the aisle, it was a thrill ride, from exultation to hang on to your seats terror, what with Hejduk's poster, and that last shot....Ozzie lived up to your hype in that last minute there, huh?
by pmukh on
Apr 25, 2008 8:06 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: lemme get something straight
See my response to Chris Snider below about the rules for the goalie names.
As for Osgood, let's not go off the deep end. He made a pretty routine save on Liles' shot at the end of the game. It was a dead-on shot to his chest. It would be tough for most NHL goalies to mess that up.
Osgood was fine last night, but he wasn't great. The only great goalie in the game was Peter Budaj, for what it was worth.
All that said, Chris Osgood is still the best goaltender in the entire universe.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 8:16 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: lemme get something straight
exactly
by pmukh on
Apr 25, 2008 8:43 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Osgood (the best goalie in the world)
Osgood (the best goalie in the world)
it took me a minute to figure that out. I like what you are doing there. I did notice you used the names of our Last-Line-of-Defense (LLoD) in your post. Did you break your own rules, or is that just for the game thread?
by StructuralPoke on
Apr 25, 2008 8:09 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Osgood
The goalies cannot be mentioned in the game threads during the games. Once the goalie is out of the game, out of the lineup, or the game is over, we can once again talk about them.
This isn't that complicated. While they are playing, we don't want to jinx them by commenting on their play. Saying stuff like "a great save by Theodore" will ensure that he gets scored on immediately afterwards. It's happened before.
The goalies don't have names in the game thread before or during the game. After, they have names again.
I hope this makes sense. It does to me, at least.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 8:14 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Foppa, Woolie
Just heard Q say that both Forsberg and Wolski are "very questionable" for Saturday's game. Damn it.
by Rookie14 on
Apr 25, 2008 8:33 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Could mean
anything from they're dead to they have a bruise on they're baby toe.
by Drakenlot on
Apr 25, 2008 8:51 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Foppa, Woolie
Keep in mind that this is the Avalanche we are talking about, and it's the playoffs, which means his comment could have been a giant fake-out.
I hope.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 8:51 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Foppa, Woolie
True, true. It was funny because Q discussed a certain goalie not taking any chances) being pulled, Forsberg and Wolski for all of 60 seconds, yet the "Sports Guys" were able to expand that into about an hour of speculation.
Earlier this A.M. when our buddy was expounding on the our goalie pull last night, he said something to the effect of 'if you don't think this is an issue, you should check out some of the blogs'. The other guy said, "But I know you've called them chucklehead and I thought I wasn't suppose to believe anything they said?" Clough said, "Well you shouldn't believe what they say..." blah blah Ha!
Apparently Clough is now a closet blog lurker.
by Rookie14 on
Apr 25, 2008 11:30 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Foppa, Woolie
You can't disagree with something you don't read, and I think it's pretty clear that Sandy reads 'em all the time.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 11:48 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Have we really made it an issue.
I think the only issue was "If he wasn't healthy enough to play, why was he in net". We don't have a goalie issue, when Theo is healthy he's the starter for the rest of the season. He just wasn't healthy last night.
by Jibblescribbits on
Apr 25, 2008 11:54 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: Have we really made it an issue
You know, come to think of it, I wonder what blog(s) he was referring to. To my knowledge there aren't any others than mine, Drafty's, yours and Shane's that do frequent updates on playoff developments, and none of us made it a big deal. Theo was sick, he probably shouldn't have played. If he's better on Saturday, he should play.
I don't think there's much of a controversy there.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 11:58 AM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
I Am Proud of My Avs
I really didn't expect anything different from what we saw in the first period. The boys had too much time off in between games and came out flat footed. The turn around in the second and third was everything I was hoping for. We scored some pretty goals and SoS really lived up to his nickname - read "save our skins". Of course I was absolutely delighted to see Budaji back in net and he showed no signs of rust. He had a solid game.
I believe the only reason we lost that game was because of Q's wacky coaching decisions. Why the hell did Theo start in net when he was sick as a dog? That was a stupid move. Even more stupid was playing McCormick instead of Hlinks in Forsberg's absence. Had Budaj started it would have been a completely different game.
However, I am proud of the Avs. They showed up in the game proving they could beat the Wings, depleted line up or not. What more can you ask for?
Well, maybe a coaching change but, WE.
by texacogirl on
Apr 25, 2008 11:53 AM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs
Re: I Am Proud of My Avs
I agree except for playing Hlinka over McCormick. I think Cody McLeod should have been the one sitting. I've always liked McCormick more than McLeod, and I think the latter's defensive mistakes early in the game were as much to blame for the loss as Theodore's illness.
by Joe @ MHH on
Apr 25, 2008 12:00 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Hating on Q
As much as I enjoy partaking in that activity:
I believe the only reason we lost that game was because of Q's wacky coaching decisions. Why the hell did Theo start in net when he was sick as a dog?
That one's on the training staff. They need to tell Q whether Theo can play or not.
by Jibblescribbits on
Apr 25, 2008 12:28 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
RE: Q
What? Like Q doesn't have eyes and could not see that Theo was sick? I'll agree the training staff botched the call as well but I'm ranting on Q and enjoying it. :)
by texacogirl on
Apr 25, 2008 12:43 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Good Point
You're line-up sounds much better. Sit McCleod, play Hlinks and McCormick - I like it.
by texacogirl on
Apr 25, 2008 12:44 PM MDT
up
reply
actions
0 recs
Injuries
Wolski out indefinately. Forsberg questionable. Theo likely for game two.
http://www.denverpost.com/avalanche/...
That sucks. Wolski was kickin ass.
by InYoFace on
Apr 25, 2008 2:47 PM MDT
reply
actions
0 recs













