There has been talk about if NHL should change their point structure from 2-1-0 to European 3-2-1-0. This is to encourage teams to finish the game in regular time and not to encourage to take the safe one point before competing for the second one. Current system also adds phantom points in the league, which really makes no sense.
Opposing arguments seem to revolve around tradition and possible gaps in points between teams as teams are awarded more points for wins. Lets see about how things would change in 2018-2019 season if the 3-2-1-0 system is implemented. Then we can compare the results for changes in Liiga, finnish top league, and also make a change for the standings in Liiga for the NHLs 2-1-0 point system.
Explanations for abbreviations:
RW - Regulation Wins
OW - Overtime Wins
OL - Overtime Loss
RL - Regulation Loss
P - Points
P% - Point % of the maximum possible
OT% - Percentage of games going to overtime
P/PPW - Points divided by points per win
AVG - Average
|
East |
RW |
OW |
OL |
RL |
P |
P% |
P/PPW |
West |
RW |
OW |
OL |
RL |
P |
P% |
P/PPW |
1 |
Tampa Bay |
49 |
13 |
4 |
16 |
128 |
0,78 |
64 |
Calgary |
45 |
5 |
7 |
25 |
107 |
0,65 |
54 |
2 |
Boston |
38 |
11 |
9 |
24 |
107 |
0,65 |
54 |
San Jose |
38 |
8 |
9 |
27 |
101 |
0,62 |
51 |
3 |
Toronto |
40 |
6 |
8 |
28 |
100 |
0,61 |
50 |
Vegas |
36 |
7 |
7 |
32 |
93 |
0,57 |
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
1 |
Washington |
39 |
9 |
8 |
26 |
104 |
0,63 |
52 |
Nashville |
38 |
9 |
6 |
29 |
100 |
0,61 |
50 |
2 |
NY Islanders |
37 |
11 |
7 |
27 |
103 |
0,63 |
52 |
Winnipeg |
38 |
9 |
5 |
30 |
99 |
0,60 |
50 |
3 |
Carolina |
39 |
7 |
7 |
29 |
99 |
0,60 |
50 |
St. Louis |
36 |
9 |
9 |
28 |
99 |
0,60 |
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
1 |
Pittsburgh |
37 |
7 |
12 |
26 |
100 |
0,61 |
50 |
Dallas |
36 |
7 |
7 |
32 |
93 |
0,57 |
47 |
2 |
Columbus |
37 |
10 |
4 |
31 |
98 |
0,60 |
49 |
Colorado |
33 |
5 |
14 |
30 |
90 |
0,55 |
45 |
3 |
Montreal |
37 |
7 |
8 |
30 |
96 |
0,59 |
48 |
Arizona |
30 |
9 |
8 |
35 |
86 |
0,52 |
43 |
4 |
Florida |
26 |
10 |
14 |
32 |
86 |
0,52 |
43 |
Minnesota |
33 |
4 |
9 |
36 |
83 |
0,51 |
42 |
5 |
Philadelphia |
28 |
9 |
8 |
37 |
82 |
0,50 |
41 |
Chicago |
24 |
12 |
12 |
34 |
84 |
0,51 |
42 |
6 |
NY Rangers |
23 |
9 |
14 |
36 |
78 |
0,48 |
39 |
Anaheim |
27 |
8 |
10 |
37 |
80 |
0,49 |
40 |
7 |
Buffalo |
21 |
12 |
10 |
39 |
76 |
0,46 |
38 |
Vancouver |
22 |
13 |
11 |
36 |
81 |
0,49 |
41 |
8 |
Ne w Jersey |
24 |
7 |
10 |
41 |
72 |
0,44 |
36 |
Edmonton |
24 |
11 |
9 |
38 |
79 |
0,48 |
40 |
9 |
Detroit |
20 |
12 |
10 |
40 |
74 |
0,45 |
37 |
Los Angeles |
22 |
9 |
9 |
42 |
71 |
0,43 |
36 |
10 |
Ottawa |
23 |
6 |
6 |
47 |
64 |
0,39 |
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
East |
RW |
OW |
OL |
RL |
P |
P% |
OT% |
P/PPW |
West |
RW |
OW |
OL |
RL |
P |
P% |
OT% |
P/PPW |
1 |
Tampa Bay |
49 |
13 |
4 |
16 |
177 |
0,72 |
0,207 |
59 |
Calgary |
45 |
5 |
7 |
25 |
152 |
0,62 |
0,146 |
51 |
2 |
Boston |
38 |
11 |
9 |
24 |
145 |
0,59 |
0,244 |
48 |
San Jose |
38 |
8 |
9 |
27 |
139 |
0,57 |
0,207 |
46 |
3 |
Toronto |
40 |
6 |
8 |
28 |
140 |
0,57 |
0,171 |
47 |
Vegas |
36 |
7 |
7 |
32 |
129 |
0,52 |
0,171 |
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|||
1 |
Washington |
39 |
9 |
8 |
26 |
143 |
0,58 |
0,207 |
48 |
Nashville |
38 |
9 |
6 |
29 |
138 |
0,56 |
0,183 |
46 |
2 |
NY Islanders |
37 |
11 |
7 |
27 |
140 |
0,57 |
0,220 |
47 |
Winnipeg |
38 |
9 |
5 |
30 |
137 |
0,56 |
0,171 |
46 |
3 |
Pittsburgh |
37 |
7 |
12 |
26 |
137 |
0,56 |
0,232 |
46 |
St. Louis |
36 |
9 |
9 |
28 |
135 |
0,55 |
0,220 |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
|||
1 |
Carolina |
39 |
7 |
7 |
29 |
138 |
0,56 |
0,171 |
46 |
Dallas |
36 |
7 |
7 |
32 |
129 |
0,52 |
0,171 |
43 |
2 |
Columbus |
37 |
10 |
4 |
31 |
135 |
0,55 |
0,171 |
45 |
Colorado |
33 |
5 |
14 |
30 |
123 |
0,50 |
0,232 |
41 |
3 |
Montreal |
37 |
7 |
8 |
30 |
133 |
0,54 |
0,183 |
44 |
Arizona |
30 |
9 |
8 |
35 |
116 |
0,47 |
0,207 |
39 |
4 |
Florida |
26 |
10 |
14 |
32 |
112 |
0,46 |
0,293 |
37 |
Chicago |
24 |
12 |
12 |
34 |
108 |
0,44 |
0,293 |
36 |
5 |
Philadelphia |
28 |
9 |
8 |
37 |
110 |
0,45 |
0,207 |
37 |
Minnesota |
33 |
4 |
9 |
36 |
116 |
0,47 |
0,159 |
39 |
6 |
NY Rangers |
23 |
9 |
14 |
36 |
101 |
0,41 |
0,280 |
34 |
vancouver |
22 |
13 |
11 |
36 |
103 |
0,42 |
0,293 |
34 |
7 |
Buffalo |
21 |
12 |
10 |
39 |
97 |
0,39 |
0,268 |
32 |
Anaheim |
27 |
8 |
10 |
37 |
107 |
0,43 |
0,220 |
36 |
8 |
Detroit |
20 |
12 |
10 |
40 |
94 |
0,38 |
0,268 |
31 |
Edmonton |
24 |
11 |
9 |
38 |
103 |
0,42 |
0,244 |
34 |
9 |
Ne w Jersey |
24 |
7 |
10 |
41 |
96 |
0,39 |
0,207 |
32 |
Los Angeles |
22 |
9 |
9 |
42 |
93 |
0,38 |
0,220 |
31 |
10 |
Ottawa |
23 |
6 |
6 |
47 |
87 |
0,35 |
0,146 |
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AVG |
32 |
9,1 |
9 |
32 |
124 |
0,5 |
0,22 |
41 |
|
32 |
8,3 |
9 |
33 |
122 |
0,5 |
0,21 |
41 |
|
Liiga |
RW |
OW |
OL |
RL |
P |
P% |
OT% |
1 |
Kärpät |
41 |
6 |
2 |
11 |
137 |
0,761 |
0,133 |
2 |
Tappara |
32 |
3 |
6 |
19 |
108 |
0,600 |
0,150 |
3 |
Pelicans |
30 |
3 |
8 |
19 |
104 |
0,578 |
0,183 |
4 |
TPS |
29 |
5 |
6 |
20 |
103 |
0,572 |
0,183 |
5 |
HPK |
25 |
8 |
8 |
19 |
99 |
0,550 |
0,267 |
6 |
HIFK |
24 |
8 |
10 |
18 |
98 |
0,544 |
0,300 |
7 |
Lukko |
26 |
5 |
8 |
21 |
96 |
0,533 |
0,217 |
8 |
Ilves |
23 |
8 |
6 |
23 |
91 |
0,506 |
0,233 |
9 |
Saipa |
21 |
10 |
5 |
24 |
88 |
0,489 |
0,250 |
10 |
JYP |
7 |
12 |
7 |
24 |
52 |
0,289 |
0,317 |
11 |
Sport |
17 |
11 |
8 |
24 |
81 |
0,450 |
0,317 |
12 |
Kalpa |
18 |
7 |
8 |
27 |
76 |
0,422 |
0,250 |
13 |
Kookoo |
18 |
6 |
7 |
29 |
73 |
0,406 |
0,217 |
14 |
Jukurit |
13 |
8 |
12 |
27 |
67 |
0,372 |
0,333 |
15 |
Ässät |
9 |
7 |
6 |
38 |
47 |
0,261 |
0,217 |
AVG |
22 |
7,1 |
7 |
23 |
88 |
0,49 |
0,24 |
|
Liiga |
RW |
OW |
OL |
RL |
P |
P% |
1 |
Kärpät |
41 |
6 |
2 |
11 |
96 |
0,800 |
2 |
Tappara |
32 |
3 |
6 |
19 |
76 |
0,633 |
3 |
Pelicans |
30 |
3 |
8 |
19 |
74 |
0,617 |
4 |
TPS |
29 |
5 |
6 |
20 |
74 |
0,617 |
5 |
HPK |
25 |
8 |
8 |
19 |
74 |
0,617 |
6 |
HIFK |
24 |
8 |
10 |
18 |
74 |
0,617 |
7 |
Lukko |
26 |
5 |
8 |
21 |
70 |
0,583 |
8 |
Ilves |
23 |
8 |
6 |
23 |
68 |
0,567 |
9 |
Saipa |
21 |
10 |
5 |
24 |
67 |
0,558 |
10 |
Sport |
17 |
11 |
8 |
24 |
64 |
0,533 |
11 |
Kalpa |
18 |
7 |
8 |
27 |
58 |
0,483 |
12 |
Kookoo |
18 |
6 |
7 |
29 |
55 |
0,458 |
13 |
Jukurit |
13 |
8 |
12 |
27 |
54 |
0,450 |
14 |
JYP |
7 |
12 |
7 |
24 |
45 |
0,375 |
15 |
Ässät |
9 |
7 |
6 |
38 |
38 |
0,317 |
By looking at the standings above, it can be stated that there will be no significant change in standings or the gaps between the teams. I added even the P/PPW number there so it is clearly visible how many regulation wins is is the points equal to and how many wins therefore does it take to close the gap to the team above and to make the playoffs.
Other thing I was curious to check if there is a significant difference between the two leagues due to the incentive to push for the regulation wins. And there is not. Both stats taken from the 2018-2019 season and NHL has average OT% of 22% and Liiga 24%. I had even wished that there would be a visible reduction in the percentages, but there are more variables in this, like the different style of play in the league. Liiga tends to have more conservative in its style.
As a conclusion I wish to say that I think that the 3-2-1-0 would really be liked in the NHL community as it rewards teams for pushing for the regulation win, making the final minutes of the game even more intense. This system would also help poorly performing teams surge in the standings if they are able to turn it around and win games and in regulation. NHL must wish that no teams are really out of the playoff picture before christmas and this system would add a slight burst of hope in the eyes of the teams and their fans who starts the season with a struggle.
Thanks for reading! please share your thoughts, ideas and opinions in the comments.
-AvsFinland